GRE寫作開頭結(jié)尾各段落實(shí)用模板句式VIP

1、第12頁(yè) 共12頁(yè)GRE寫作開頭結(jié)尾各段落實(shí)用模板句式GRE寫作開頭結(jié)尾各段落實(shí)用模板句式素材分享新GRE考試經(jīng)典寫作模板匯總：開頭In the argument, the (主題對(duì)象) remends that(對(duì)結(jié)論做闡述，根本上可以抄原文，用另外一種方式表達(dá)即可). To support this remendation the argumentpoint out that (說明文章用了什么論據(jù)去證明觀點(diǎn)了，同上抄襲即可) however This argument is logicallyflawed in several critical respects (說明這篇文章邏輯上是有

2、缺陷的).新GRE考試經(jīng)典寫作模板匯總：攻擊論據(jù)1. 調(diào)查結(jié)果沒有證據(jù)申明To begin with, the argument depends on the assumption that(闡述說出了一個(gè)沒有根據(jù)的申明，并說出文中的原因) rather than for some other reasons. Yet it isentirely possible that (說明這種猜想可能的原因) or some other factor. Without ruling outall other reasons why (重述這個(gè)申明)(說出反方向的結(jié)論).2. 提到了樣本，但是數(shù)據(jù)不具有

3、代表性(數(shù)據(jù)不夠)Firstly, the author provides no evidence that the survey is statisticallyreliable. Perhaps the surveys sle is not sufficient in size orrepresentative of the quality of (說明對(duì)象的數(shù)量和質(zhì)量不夠) For that matter, this survey isnot strong enough to establish causation between (在這里列出原因和結(jié)果，做比擬) However, th

4、eother reasons of the survey which (表達(dá)其他原因下的情況). As a result, without theevidence that the survey is statistically reliable the author cannot justifiablydraw any conclusion by relying on this survey.3. 猜想，但是沒有證據(jù)Thirdly, the argument assumes that (闡述文中的猜想) However, the letter providesno evidence to s

5、ubstantiate this assumption. In fact, the letter suggests thatthis might be the case. By admitting that , the letter implies that說明影響他們happy的因素還有其他的方面，不光是研究中所列舉。新GRE考試經(jīng)典寫作模板匯總：攻擊論證過程1. 時(shí)間上的錯(cuò)誤類比To begin with,(陳述某個(gè)數(shù)據(jù)) may not a reliable date of that rate would benow(和如今相比擬是不可信的). Perhaps the (反例), For

6、 that matter, perhaps(說出反例的情況下會(huì)導(dǎo)致何種結(jié)果). In short, without ruling out other possible reasons for(假設(shè)說出針對(duì)反例應(yīng)該怎么做)the memos author cannot convince me on the basis of(說出應(yīng)該有的結(jié)論)2.錯(cuò)誤的因果關(guān)系3. 兩個(gè)事實(shí)錯(cuò)誤的類比Even if(讓步，即使某個(gè)條件成立) the argument unfairly assumes that(說明錯(cuò)誤的類比的情況). Itis entirely possible that the (比擬對(duì)象)

7、own different situations. Perhaps(詳細(xì)說出反例) Without accounting for such differences between the two places isunreliable.4. 錯(cuò)誤的推論Even if (讓步，即使某個(gè)條件成立)the argument relied on the future assumption that(說出要讓步的是事實(shí)). Yet the only evidence the argument offer to substantiate thisassumption (說出文中的根據(jù)). Perhaps

8、(說出有可能出現(xiàn)的其他情況導(dǎo)致這個(gè)事實(shí))if so, (說出不一樣的結(jié)果，與上面事實(shí)相矛盾).Or(其他的情況) In short, without more information about(對(duì)上面的可能情況總結(jié)) wereestablished it is impossible to assess (回到上面的結(jié)論).新GRE考試經(jīng)典寫作模板匯總：結(jié)論的攻擊1. 說明結(jié)論不完美，可以有其他的方法Finally, the argument fails to consider (有更好的方法實(shí)現(xiàn)目的). Perhaps by(方法一), orby (方法二), (對(duì)目的進(jìn)展展望) In sh

9、ort, without weighing the suggestion againstalternatives, it is unconvincing that (說明提供的方案不好).2. 贏利Finally, even if the families support to build the new seafood restaurant,the restaurant would not necessarily be profitable as a result. Profitability isa function of both revenue and expense. Thus, i

10、t is quite possible that therestaurants costs of obtaining high-quality and healthy seafood or of newpromoting restaurant might render it unprofitable despite its popularity.Without weighing revenue against expenses the arguments conclusion is prematureat best.新GRE考試經(jīng)典寫作模板匯總：結(jié)尾段In sum, the argument

11、seems logical, but is based on nothing more than purespeculation and perhaps wishful thinking, yet lack of some warrantedinvestigation. To strength it, the author needs to evaluate all possiblealternatives and provide detail and prehensive evidence before jumping to theconclusion that (文中的結(jié)論)GRE作文范文

12、：事物不會(huì)一成不變Much of the information that people assume isfactualactually turns out tobe inaccurate. Thus，any piece of information referred to as afactshould bemistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future.GRE作文范文參考：Should we be doubtful to all the information at hands because the rightness

13、of which is uncertain? The speaker claims so，I concede that people often mitvarious fallacies in the course of cognizing things，however I fundamentally takeexception of the arguers assertion to mistrust every fact we might encounter.And I will substantially discuss my views thereinafter.To begin wit

14、h，the speaker seems to implicate that a fact would be provenfalse in the future under numerous circumstance. Nevertheless I prefer to arguerthat facts never change. No matter how did the Medieval Church and Inquisitionpersecute Bruno，the fact never changes that the earth is far from being thecenter

15、of the universe as the religious sovereigns had assumed or hopedfor，while just a minor particle in it. Equally，no matter how Edison had tried toincite the public fear and distrust to the alternative current electricity，thefact never changes that Teals electrical system is vastly superior to hisdirec

16、t current electrical one，and would be accepted and applied in largerrange.However，what do change are the humans objective interpretations to facts.One pelling argument to this point is that，due to the limitation of humansknowledge and prehensive capability，they tend to make insufficient or evenfalse

17、 understanding to the certain fact. An apt illustration is the changes ofcognition to disease. While at the ancient time，our progenitors believed the aman being a patient for the reason that he had conduct crimes or offendedsome ghosts or spirits，the contemporary people have well know that the varie

18、s ofpathogens are the basic causes to our diseases，and the defects of our immunesystem and so forth are also the factors as well. Another argument for thechange of prehension to fact is that different people always observe andinterpret from different perspectives. Though the Relativity theory is not

19、 wellpliable with the Quantum mechanism，no one call the greatness of both Einsteinand Bohr，because their theories are based on distinct views，the former from themacrocosm and the later from the microcosm.Notwithstanding the foregoing reasons for that human tend to make fallaciesduring the cause of p

20、rehending and cognizing facts，these reasons should neverbe the excuses to doubt every conclusion we might draw from facts. Based oncertain rational inference and proper knowledge fundament，the conclusions wemake might well be justifiable，if not pletely right，to certain degree. Whatwe need to do is t

21、o promote the enterprise of pursuing the better answer and tryto use the result we have get to application，instead of wasting our time toundue doubt and suspicion. Though the medical scientists have not fullyunderstood the mechanism of how the does the implanted organ interact with thewounded body，t

22、hey are not refrain from using the implanting skill to savepatients，of course the precondition or which is that this technology is muchwell established than the fundamental theory.To sum up，while I advocate the speakers opinion that it is inevitable forhuman to prehend facts inaccurately，for the rea

23、son of the limitation of theabilities，I essentially disagree with his assertion that facts will continuallyalter themselves，as well as his remendation to discredit any piece of fact.In the final analysis，I would arguer once more that facts never change andalthough the misunderstanding to them is ine

24、vitable，we should not deferourselves from the pursuit to fully prehending them.GRE作文范文：如何防止偏激Most people often look for similarities, even between very differentthings, and even when it it is unhelpful or harmful to do so. Instead, a thingshould be considered on its own terms: we should avoid the te

25、ndency to pareit to something else.GRE作文范文參考：In the age of accelerating changes, the eagerness to understand things inan effective and equally efficient way is more than ever. Although all kinds ofplex techniques, skills and equipments helpful for understanding and studyingthe objects are easily acc

26、essible to people, the basic strategies stay the sameas before: one is starting from similarities and the other from distinction.From my personal point of view, only by using the two in proper proportion andorder can one achieve his/her goal to understand a thing.may not be able to find the similari

27、ties, or even such an effort seems tobe meaningless. Yet, they are both part of a house, something that must be takeninto consideration when decorating or refurnishing the house. Such a parisonwould be helpful for us to realize that “buy” and “sell” are two basic operationwe can have upon window eve

28、n though we have no idea what window is made of, howit is produced or what its function is.Whats more, looking for similarities notonly refer to the object itself, but the relationship with others. Similarrelationships helps people understand things in groups or pairs using thestrategy: analogy. Ana

29、logy is especially useful when the charactertistics of arelationship rather than the objects themselves are the focus of understandingand when similar relationships are known and objects unknown. For exle, iftold that the relationship between window and ASVE is similar to that betweenbook and read,

30、one can safely guess that ASVE is the operation people can takeon window although ASVE stays an unknown action.Definitely, mere similarity usually exclude the distinctive characteristicsof a thing. We need to investigate its own terms for deeper understanding.Within the rough outline sketched by similarity, a more detailed andwell-articulated picture can be drawn by grasping own terms of a thing. Stilltake window as an exle. From careful observation, we know that it istransparent, it consists of different chemical materials, it performs thefunction