綜合護(hù)理干預(yù)對(duì)慢性精神分裂癥患者康復(fù)和生活質(zhì)量的影響

1、本word文檔 可編輯 可修改綜合護(hù)理干預(yù)對(duì)慢性精神分裂癥患者康復(fù)和生活質(zhì)量的影響 摘要 目的 探討綜合護(hù)理干預(yù)對(duì)慢性精神分裂癥患者康復(fù)和生活質(zhì)量的影響 方法 選擇2014年6月2015年5月入住我院的慢性精神分裂癥患者100例作為觀察對(duì)象,根據(jù)護(hù)理方法不同隨機(jī)分為對(duì)照組和綜合干預(yù)組,對(duì)照組行常規(guī)對(duì)癥護(hù)理,綜合干預(yù)組實(shí)施包括心理護(hù)理康復(fù)訓(xùn)練家庭及社會(huì)支持等綜合護(hù)理,兩組均觀察3個(gè)月,比較兩組患者入院時(shí)出院時(shí) IPROS 中的工療情況生活能力社交能力講究衛(wèi)生能力?P心和興趣各項(xiàng)評(píng)分及GQOLI-74 中的物質(zhì)生活軀體功能心理功能和社會(huì)功能各項(xiàng)評(píng)分情況 結(jié)果 干預(yù)后,結(jié)果顯示,綜合干預(yù)組與對(duì)照組患

2、者出院時(shí)的IPROS 中的工療情況生活能力社交能力講究衛(wèi)生能力關(guān)心和興趣各項(xiàng)評(píng)分分別較入院時(shí)顯著降低,且綜合干預(yù)組IPROS中的工療情況生活能力社交能力講究衛(wèi)生能力關(guān)心和興趣各項(xiàng)評(píng)分均顯著低于對(duì)照組(P 中圖分類號(hào) R473.74;R749.3 文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼 B 文章編號(hào) 1673-9701(2016)34-0138-04 Effect of comprehensive nursing intervention on rehabilitation and quality of life in patients with chronic schizophrenia WU Liyuan LIU We

3、nguang ZHANG Jinliang WANG Ying ZHANG Sujuan Department of Psychiatry, Zhejiang Province Wenzhou Kangning Hospital, Wenzhou 325000, China Abstract Objective To explore the effect of comprehensive nursing intervention on the rehabilitation and quality of life of patients with chronic schizophrenia. M

4、ethods 100 patients with chronic schizophrenia in our hospital from June 2014 to May 2015 were enrolled and were randomly divided into control group and comprehensive intervention group according to different nursing methods, the patients in the control group received routine nursing care,and the co

5、mprehensive nursing group was given comprehensive nursing including psychological nursing, rehabilitation training,family and social support. The two groups were observed for 3 months. Then the scores of the health status, living ability, social competence, hygiene, care and interest in IPROS and th

6、e scores of physical activity, physical function, mental function and social function in GQOLI-74 were compared between two groups on admission and discharge. Results The results showed that the scores of treatment, living ability, social ability, capacity of paying attention to health, care and interest in IPROS of the comprehensive treatment group and the control group patients at discharge were significantly lower