data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bbfc2/bbfc2df2ce07541cdd8614a7a618a7a5df06813f" alt="05到16年考研英語一真題_第1頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11adc/11adc9fa42e0af4885bb2fa6134760869bf240dc" alt="05到16年考研英語一真題_第2頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62563/62563d63c1301346acf13f11e0b86bc1527737dc" alt="05到16年考研英語一真題_第3頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2129/c2129e932c4ec67b95cfe3ce6085fd22aeecfe8e" alt="05到16年考研英語一真題_第4頁"
版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
2016Text1France,whichpridesitselfastheglobalinnovatoroffashion,hasdecideditsfashionindustryhaslostanabsoluterighttodefinephysicalbeautyforwomen.Itslawmakersgavepreliminaryapprovallastweektoalawthatwouldmakeitacrimetoemployultra-thinmodelsonrunaways.Theparliamentalsoagreedtobanwebsitesthatuinciteexcessivethinness”bypromotingextremedieting.Suchmeasureshaveacoupleofupliftingmotives.Theysuggestbeautyshouldnotbedefinedbylooksthatendupimpingingonhealth.That*sastart.Andthebanonultra-thinmodelsseemstogobeyondprotectingmodelsfromstarvingthemselvestodeath-assomehavedone.Ittellsthefashionindustrythatitmusttakeresponsibilityforthesignalitsendswomen,especiallyteenagegirls,aboutthesocialtape-measuretheymustusetodeterminetheirindividualworth.Thebans,iffullyenforced,wouldsuggesttowomen(andmanymen)thattheyshouldnotletothersbearbitersoftheirbeauty.Andperhapsfaintly,theyhintthatpeopleshouldlooktointangiblequalitieslikecharacterandintellectratherthandietingtheirwaytosizezeroorwasp-waistphysiques.TheFrenchmeasures,however,relytoomuchonseverepunishmenttochangeaculturethatstillregardsbeautyasskin-deep-andbone-showing.Underthelaw,usingafashionmodelthatdoesnotmeetagovernment-definedindexofbodymasscouldresultina$85,000fineandsixmonthsinprison.Thefashionindustryknowsithasaninherentprobleminfocusingonmaterialadornmentandidealizedbodytypes.InDenmark,theUnitedStates,andafewothercountries,itistryingtosetvoluntarystandardsformodelsandfashionimagesthatrelymoreonpeerpressurefbrenforcement.IncontrasttoFrance*sactions,Denmark*sfashionindustryagreedlastmonthonrulesandsanctionsregardingtheage,health,andothercharacteristicsofmodels.ThenewlyrevisedDanishFashionEthicalCharterclearlystates:"Weareawareofandtakeresponsibilityfbrtheimpactthefashionindustryhasonbodyideals,especiallyonyoungpeople.”Thecharter*smaintoolofenforcementistodenyaccessfbrdesignersandmodelingagenciestoCopenhagenFashionWeek(CFW),whichisrunbytheDanishFashionInstitute.Butingeneralitreliesonaname-and-shamemethodofcompliance.Relyingonethicalpersuasionratherthanlawtoaddressthemisuseofbodyidealsmaybethebeststep.Evenbetterwouldbetohelpelevatenotionsofbeautybeyondthematerialstandardsofaparticularindustry.Accordingtothefirstparagraph,whatwouldhappeninFrance?[A]Newrunwayswouldbeconstructed.[B|Physicalbeautywouldberedefined.[C]Websitesaboutdietingwouldthrive.[D]Thefashionindustrywoulddecline.Thephrase"impingingon”(Line2,Para.2)isclosestinmeaningto[A]heighteningthevalueof.[B]indicatingthestateof.[C]losingfaithin.[D]doingharmto.Whichofthefollowingistrueofthefashionindustry?[A]NewstandardsarebeingsetinDenmark.[B]TheFrenchmeasureshavealreadyfailed.[C]Modelsarenolongerunderpeerpressure.[D]Itsinherentproblemsaregettingworse.AdesignerismostlikelytoberejectedbyCFWfor[A]pursuingperfectphysicalconditions.[B]caringtoomuchaboutmodels'character.[C]showinglittleconcernforhealthfactors.[D]settingahighagethresholdformodels.Whichofthefollowingmaybethebesttitleofthetext?[A]AChallengetotheFashionIndustry'sBodyIdeals[B]ADilemmafortheStarvingModelsinFrance[C]JustAnotherRoundofStruggleforBeauty[D]TheGreatThreatstotheFashionIndustryText2Forthefirsttimeinhistorymorepeopleliveintownsthaninthecountry.InBritainthishashadacuriousresult.WhilepollsshowBritonsrate“thecountryside"alongsidetheroyalfamily,ShakespeareandtheNationalHealthService(NHS)aswhatmakesthemproudestoftheircountry,thishaslimitedpoliticalsupport.AcenturyagoOctaviaHilllaunchedtheNationalTrustnottorescuestylishhousesbuttosave"thebeautyofnaturalplacesforeveryoneforever."Itwasspecificallytoprovidecitydwellerswithspacesfbrleisurewheretheycouldexperience"arefreshingair."Hill'spressureslaterledtothecreationofnationalparksandgreenbelts.Theydon'tmakecountrysideanymore,andeveryyearconcreteconsumesmoreofit.Itneedsconstantguardianship.Atthenextelectionnoneofthebigpartiesseemlikelytoendorsethissentiment.TheConservatives'planningreformexplicitlygivesruraldevelopmentpriorityoverconservation,evenauthorizing"off-plan"buildingwherelocalpeoplemightobject.Theconceptofsustainabledevelopmenthasbeendefinedasprofitable.Labourlikewisewantstodiscontinuelocalplanningwherecouncilsopposedevelopment.TheLiberalDemocratsaresilent.OnlyUkip,sensingitschance,hassidedwiththosepleadingfbramoreconsideredapproachtousinggreenland.ItsCampaigntoProtectRuralEnglandstruckterrorintomanylocalConservativeparties.Thesensibleplacetobuildnewhouses,factoriesandofficesiswherepeopleare,incitiesandtownswhereinfrastructureisinplace.TheLondonagentsStirlingAckroydrecentlyidentifiedenoughsitesfbrhalfamillionhousesintheLondonareaalone,withnointrusionongreenbelt.WhatistrueofLondoniseventrueroftheprovinces.Theideathat"housingcrisis"equals"concretedmeadows"ispurelobbytalk.Theissueisnottheneedformorehousesbut,asalways,wheretoputthem.Underlobbypressure,GeorgeOsbornefavoursruralnew-buildagainsturbanrenovationandrenewal.Hefavoursout-of-townshoppingsitesagainsthighstreets.Thisisnotafreemarketbutabiasedone.Ruraltownsandvillageshavegrownandwillalwaysgrow.Theydosobestwherebuildingstickstotheiredgesandrespectstheircharacter.Wedonotruinurbanconservationareas.Whyruinruralones?Developmentshouldbeplanned,notletrip.AftertheNetherlands,BritainisEurope'smostcrowdedcountry.Halfacenturyoftownandcountryplanninghasenabledittoretainanenviableruralcoherence,whilestillpermittinglow-densityurbanliving.Thereisnodoubtofthealternative一thecorruptedlandscapesofsouthernPortugal,SpainorIreland.Avoidingthisratherthanpromotingitshouldunitetheleftandrightofthepoliticalspectrum.Britain'spublicsentimentaboutthecountryside[A]didn,tstarttilltheShakespeareanage.[B]hasbroughtmuchbenefittotheNHS.[C]isfullybackedbytheroyalfamily.[D]isnotwellreflectedinpolitics.AccordingtoParagraph2,theachievementsoftheNationalTrustarenowbeing[A]graduallydestroyed.[B|effectivelyreinforced.[C]largelyovershadowed.[D(properlyprotected.WhichofthefollowingcanbeinferredfromParagraph3?[A]Labourisunderattackforopposingdevelopment.[B]TheConservativesmayabandon“off-plan“building.[C]TheLiberalDemocratsarelosingpoliticalinfluence.[D]Ukipmaygainfromitssupportforruralconservation.TheauthorholdsthatGeorgeOsborne'spreference[A]highlightshisfirmstandagainstlobbypressure.[B]showshisdisregardforthecharacterofruralareas.[C]stressesthenecessityofeasingthehousingcrisis.[D|revealsastrongprejudiceagainsturbanareas.Inthelastparagraph,theauthorshowshisappreciationof[A]thesizeofpopulationinBritain.[B]thepoliticallifeintoday'sBritain.[C]theenviableurbanlifestyleinBritain.[D]thetown-and-countryplanninginBritain.Text3"Thereisoneandonlyonesocialresponsibilityofbusiness,nwroteMiltonFriedman,aNobelprize-winningeconomist"Thatis,touseitsresourcesandengageinactivitiesdesignedtoincreaseitsprofits."ButevenifyouacceptFiedman'spremiseandregardcorporatesocialresponsibility(CSR)policiesasawasteofshareholdersmoney,thingsmaynotbeabsolutelyclear-cut.NewresearchsuggeststhatCSRmaycreatemonetaryvalueforcompanies-atleastwhentheyareprosecutedforcorruption.ThelargestfirmsisAmericaandBritaintogetherspendmorethan$15billionayearonCSR,accordingtoanestimatebyEPG,aconsultingfirm,Thiscouldaddvaluetotheirbusinessesinthreeways.First,consumersmaytakeCSRspendingasa"signal"thatacompany'sproductsareofhighquality.Second,customersmaybewillingtobuyacompany'sproductsasanindirectwaytodonatetothegoodcausesishelps.Andthird,throughamorediffuse"haloeffect,"wherebyitsgooddeedsearnitgreaterconsiderationfromconsumersandothers.PreviousstudiesonCSRhavehadtroubledifferentiatingtheseeffectsbecauseconsumerscanbeaffectedbyallthree.ArecentstudyattemptstoseparatethembylookingatbriberyprosecutionsunderAmerica'sForeignCorruptPracticesAct(FCPA).Itarguesthatsinceprosecutorsdonotconsumeacompany*sproductsaspartoftheirinvestigations,theycouldbeinfluencedonlybythehaloeffect.Thestudyfoundthat,amongprosecutedfirms,thosewiththemostcomprehensiveCSRprogrammestendedtogetmorelenientpenalties.Theiranalysisruledoutthepossibilitythatitwasfirms'politicalinfluence,ratherthantheirCSRstand,thataccountedfortheleniency:Companiesthatcontributedmoretopoliticalcampaignsdidnotreceivelowerfines.Inall,thestudyconcludesthatwhereasprosecutorsshouldonlyevaluateacasebasedonitsmerits,theydoseentoinfluencedbyacompany*srecordinCSR.*'Weestimatethateithereliminatingasubstantiallabour-rightsconcern,suchaschildlabour,orincreasingcorporategivingbyabout20%resultsinfinesthatgenerallyare40%lowerthanthetypicalpunishmentforbribingforeignofficials,"saysoneresearcher.ResearchersadmitthattheirstudydoesnotanswerthequestionofhowmuchbusinessesoughttospendonCSR.Nordoesitrevealhowmuchcompaniesarebankingonthehaloeffect,ratherthantheotherpossiblebenefits,whentheydecidetheirdo-goodingpolicies.Butatleasthavedemonstratedthatwhencompaniesgetintotroublewiththelaw,evidenceofgoodcharactercanwinthemalesscostlypunishment.TheauthorviewsMiltonFriedman'sstatementaboutCSRwithtoleranceskepticismuncertainty[D]approvalAccordingtoParagraph2,CSRhelpsacompany[Alwinningtrustfromconsumers.[B|guardingitagainstmalpractices.[C]protectingitfrombeingdefamed.[D|raisingthequalityofitsproducts.33.Theexpression"morelenient"(Line2,Para.4)isclosestinmeaningto[Almoreeffective.lesscontroversial.lesssevere.morelasting.34.Whenprosecutorsevaluateacase,acompany'sCSRrecord[Aesacrossasreliableevidence.[C]increasesthechanceofbeingpenalized.[D|constitutespartoftheinvestigation.WhichofthefollowingistrueofCSR,accordingtothelastparagraph?[AlItsnegativeeffectsonbusinessesareoftenoverlooked.[B]Thenecessaryamountofcompanies*spendingonitisunknown.Companies*financialcapacityforithasbeenoverestimated.Ithasbroughtmuchbenefittothebankingindustry.Text4TherewilleventuallycomeadaywhenTheNewYorkTimescasestopublishstoriesonnewsprint.Exactlywhenthatdaywillbeisamatterofdebate.uSometimeinthefuture"thepaper*spublishersaidbackin2010.Nostalgiaforinkonpaperandtherustleofpagesaside,there*splentyofincentivetoditchprint.Theinfrastructurerequiredtomakeaphysicalnewspapers-printingpresses.deliverytruck?isn'tjustexpensive;it'sexcessiveatatimewhenonline-onlycompetitiondon'thavethesamesetfinancialconstraints.Readersaremigratingawayfromprintaway,Andalthoughprintadsalesstilldwarftheironlineandmobilecounterpartsrevenuefromprintisstilldeclining.Overheadmaybehighandcirculationlowe,butrushingtoeliminateitsprinteditorwouldbeamistake,saysBuzzFeedCEOJonahPeretti.PerettisaystheTimesshouldn*twastetimegettingoftheprintbusiness,onlyiftheygoaboutdoingittherightaway"Figuringoutawaytoacceleratethattransitionwouldmakesenseforthem"hesaid,"butifyoudiscontinueit,you*regoingtohaveyourmostloyalcustomersreallyupsetwithyou."Sometimesthat'sworthmakingachangeanyway".PerettigivesexampleofNetflixdiscontinuingitsDVD-mailingservicetofocusonstreaming."Itwasseenasablunder."hesaid.Themoveturnedouttobeforesighted.AndifPerettiwereinchargeatthetimes?"1wouldn'tpickyeartoendprint."hesaid."Iwouldraiseandmakeitintomoreofalegacyproduct.MThemostloyalcostumerwouldstillgeltheproducttheyfavor,theideagoes,andthey'dfeelliketheywerehelpingsustainthequalityofsomethingtheybelievein."Soifyou'reoverpayingforprint,youcouldfeellikeyouwerehelping,"perettisaid."Thenincreaseitatrateeachyearandessentiallytrytogenerateadditionalrevenue."Inotherwords,ifyou'regoingtoprintproduct,makeitforthepeoplewhoarealreadyobsessedwithit.WhichmaybewhattheTimesisdoingalready.Gettingtheprinteditionsevendaysaweekcostsnearly$500ayear-morethantwiceasmuchasadigital-onlysubscription."It'sareallyhardthingtodoandit'satremendousluxurythatBuzzFeeddoesn'thavealegacybusiness,"Perettiremarked."Butwe'regoingtohavequestionslikethatwherewehavethingswe'redoingthatdon'tmakesensewhenthemarket.Changeandtheworldchanges.Inthosesituations,it'sbettertobemoreaggressivethanlessaggressive.'*.TheNewYorkTimesisconsideringendingitsprinteditionpartlydue[A]thehighcostofoperation.[B]thepressureformitsinvestors.[C]thecomplaintsformitsreaders[D]theincreasingonlineadasles..Perettisuggeststhat,infaceofthepresentsituation,theTimesshould[A]seeknewsourcesofreadership.[B]endtheprinteditionforgoog.[C]aimforefficitentmanagement.[D|makestrategicadiustments.ItcaninferredformParagraphs5and6thataulegacyproductM[A]helpsrestorethegloryofformertimes.[B]ismeantforthemostloyalcustomers.[C]willhavethecostofprintingreduced.[D]expandsthepopularityofthepaper.Perettibelievesthat,inachangingworld,[A]legacybusinessesarebecomingoutdated[B|cautiousnessfacilitatesproblem-solving.[C]aggressivenessbettermeetschallenges.[Dtraditionalluxuriescanstayunaffected..Whichofthefollowingwouldbethebesttitleofthetext?[A]ShifttoOnlineNewspapersAllatOnce[B]CherishtheNewspapersStillinYourHand[C]MakeYourPrintNewspaperaLuxuryGood[D]KeepYourNewspapersForeverinFashion2015SectionIIReadingComprehensionPartADirections:Readthefollowingfourtexts.AnswerthequestionsbeloweachtextbychoosingA,B,CorD.MarkyouranswersonANSWERSHEET.(40points)Text1KingJuanCarlosofSpainonceinsisted“kingsdon'tabdicate,theydareintheirsleepJButembarrassingscandalsandthepopularityoftherepublicanleftintherecentEuro-electionshaveforcedhimtoeathiswordsandstanddown.So,doestheSpanishcrisissuggestthatmonarchyisseeingitslastdays?DoesthatmeanthewritingisonthewallforallEuropeanroyals,withtheirmagnificentuniformsandmajesticlifestyle?TheSpanishcaseprovidesargumentsbothforandagainstmonarchy.Whenpublicopinionisparticularlypolarised,asitwasfollowingtheendoftheFrancoregime,monarchscanriseabove"mere^politicsand"embody^aspiritofnationalunity.Itisthisapparenttranscendenceofpoliticsthatexplainsmonarehs'continuingpopularitypolarized.Andalso,theMiddleEastexcepted,Europeisthemostmonarch-infestedregionintheworld,with10kingdoms(notcountingVaticanCityandAndorra).ButunliketheirabsolutistcounterpartsintheGulfandAsia,mostroyalfamilieshavesurvivedbecausetheyallowvoterstoavoidthedifficultsearchforanon-controversialbutrespectedpublicfigure.Evenso,kingsandqueensundoubtedlyhaveadownside.Symbolicofnationalunityastheyclaimtobe,theirveryhistory—andsometimesthewaytheybehavetoday-embodiesoutdatedandindefensibleprivilegesandinequalities.AtatimewhenThomasPikettyandothereconomistsarewarningofrisinginequalityandtheincreasingpowerofinheritedwealth,itisbizarrethatwealthyaristocraticfamiliesshouldstillbethesymbolicheartofmodemdemocraticstates.Themostsuccessfulmonarchiesstrivetoabandonorhidetheiroldaristocraticways.Princesandprincesseshaveday-jobsandridebicycles,nothorses(orhelicopters).Evenso,thesearewealthyfamilieswhopartywiththeinternational1%,andmediaintrusivenessmakesitincreasinglydifficulttomaintaintherightimage.WhileEurope'smonarchieswillnodoubtbesmartenoughtosurviveforsometimetocome,itistheBritishroyalswhohavemosttofearfromtheSpanishexample.ItisonlytheQueenwhohaspreservedthemonarchy'sreputationwithherratherordinary(ifwell-heeled)grannystyle.ThedangerwillcomewithCharles,whohasbothanexpensivetasteoflifestyleandaprettyhierarchicalviewoftheworld.Hehasfailedtounderstandthatmonarchieshavelargelysurvivedbecausetheyprovideaservice一asnon-controversialandnon-politicalheadsofstate.CharlesoughttoknowthatasEnglishhistoryshows,itiskings,notrepublicans,whoarethemonarchy'sworstenemies.AccordingtothefirsttwoParagraphs,KingJuanCarlosofSpain[A]usedturnenjoyhighpublicsupport[B|wasunpopularamongEuropeanroyals[C]casedhisrelationshipwithhisrivals[DJendedhisreigninembarrassmentMonarchsarekeptasheadsofstateinEuropemostly[A]owingtotheirundoubtedandrespectablestatus[BJtoachieveabalancebetweentraditionandreality[C]togivevotermorepublicfigurestolookupto[D]duetotheireverlastingpoliticalembodimentWhichofthefollowingisshowntobeodd,accordingtoParagraph4?Aristocrats'excessiverelianceoninheritedwealthTheroleofthenobilityinmodemdemocraciesThesimplelifestyleofthearistocraticfamilies[D]Thenobility'sadherencetotheirprivilegesTheBritishroyals“havemosttofeaf'becauseCharlestakesaroughlineonpoliticalissuesfailstochangehislifestyleasadvisedtakesrepublicansashispotentialalliesfailstoadapthimselftohisfutureroleWhichofthefollowingisthebesttitleofthetext?[A|Carlos,GloryandDisgraceCombinedCharles,AnxioustoSucceedtotheThroneCarlos,aLessonforAllEuropeanMonarchs[D]Charles,SlowtoReacttotheComingThreatsTEXT2JusthowmuchdoestheConstitutionprotectyourdigitaldata?TheSupremeCpurtwillnowconsiderwhetherpolicecansearchthecontentsofamobilephonewithoutawarrantifthephoneisonoraroundapersonduringanarrest.Californiahasaskedthejusticestorefrainfromasweepingruling,particularlyonethatupsetstheoldassumptionsthatauthoritiesmaysearchthroughthepossessionsofsuspectsatthetimeoftheirarrest.Itishard,thestateargues,forjudgestoassesstheimplicationsofnewandrapidlychangingtechnologies.ThecourtwouldberecklesslymodestifitfollowedCalifornia'sadvice.Enoughoftheimplicationsarediscernable,evenobvious,sothatthejusticecanandshouldprovideupdatedguidelinestopolice,lawyersanddefendants.TheyshouldstartbydiscardingCalifornia'slameargumentthatexploringthecontentsofasmartphone-avaststorehouseofdigitalinformationissimilartosay,goingthroughasuspect'spurse.Thecourthasruledthatpolicedon'tviolatetheFourthAmendmentwhentheygothroughthewalletorporcketbook,ofanarresteewithoutawarrant.Butexploringone'ssmartphoneismorelikeenteringhisorherhome.Asmartphonemaycontainanarrestee'sreadinghistory,financialhistory,medicalhistoryandcomprehensiverecordsofrecentcorrespondence.Thedevelopmentof“cloudcomputing.''meanwhile,hasmadethatexplorationsomuchtheeasier.ButthejusticesshouldnotswallowCalifornia'sargumentwhole.New,disruptivetechnologysometimesdemandsnovelapplicationsoftheConstitution'sprotections.OrinKerr,alawprofessor,comparestheexplosionandaccessibilityofdigitalinformationinthe21stcenturywiththeestablishmentofautomobileuseasadigitalnecessityoflifeinthe20th:Thejusticeshadtospecifynovelrulesforthenewpersonaldomainofthepassengercarthen;theymustsortouthowtheFourthAmendmentappliestodigitalinformationnow.TheSupremecourt,willworkoutwhether,duringanarrest,itislegitimatetosearchfbrsuspects'mobilephoneswithoutawarrant.checksuspects'phonecontentswithoutbeingauthorized.preventsuspectsfromdeletingtheirphonecontents.[DJprohibitsuspectsfromusingtheirmobilephones.Theauthor'sattitudetowardCalifornia'sargumentisoneoftolerance.indifference.disapproval.cautiousness.Theauthorbelievesthatexploringone'sphonecontentiscomparabletogettingintoone'sresidence.handingone'shistoricalrecords.scanningone'scorrespondences.goingthroughone'swallet.InParagraph5and6,theauthorshowshisconcernthat[AJprinciplesarehardtobeclearlyexpressed.(B|thecourtisgivingpolicelessroomforaction.phonesareusedtostoresensitiveinformation.citizens'privacyisnoteffectiveprotected.OrinKerr'scomparisonisquotedtoindicatethat(A)theConstitutionshouldbeimplementedflexibly.(B)NewtechnologyrequiresreinterpretationoftheConstitution.(C)Califomia'sargumentviolatesprinciplesoftheConstitution.(D)PrinciplesoftheConstitutionshouldneverbealtered.Text3ThejournalScienceisaddinganextraroundofstatisticalcheckstoitspeer-reviewprocess,editor-in-chiefMarciaMcNuttannouncedtoday.Thepolicyfollowssimilareffortsfromotherjournals,afterwidespreadconcernthatbasicmistakesindataanalysisarecontributingtotheirreproducibilityofmanypublishedresearchfindings.“Readersmusthaveconfidenceintheconclusionspublishedinourjournal,''writesMcNuttinaneditorial.WorkingwiththeAmericanStatisticalAssociation,thejournalhasappointedsevenexpertstoastatisticsboardofreviewingeditors(SBoRE).Manuwillbeflaggedupforadditionalscrutinybythejournal'sinternaleditors,orbyitsexistingBoardofReviewingEditorsorbyoutsidepeerreviewers.TheSBoREpanelwillthenfindexternalstatisticianstoreviewthesemanus.Askedwhetheranyparticularpapershadimpelledthechange,McNuttsaid:"Thecreationofthe"statisticsboard'wasmotivatedbyconcernsbroadlywiththeapplicationofstatisticsanddataanalysisinscientificresearchandispartofScience'soveralldrivetoincreasereproducibilityintheresearchwepublish.''GiovanniParmigiani,abiostatisticianattheHarvardSchoolofPublicHealth,amemberoftheSBoREgroup,saysheexpectstheboardto"playprimarilyanadvisoryrole.''Heagreedtojoinbecausehe"foundtheforesightbehindtheestablishmentoftheSBoREtobenovel,uniqueandlikelytohavealastingimpact.ThisimpactwillnotonlybethroughthepublicationsinScienceitself,buthopefullythroughalargergroupofpublishingplacesthatmaywanttomodeltheirapproachafterScience.''ItcanbelearnedfromParagraphIthat[A]Scienceintendstosimplifyitspeer-reviewprocess.[B]joumalsarestrengtheningtheirstatisticalchecks.[C]fewjournalsareblamedformistakesindataanalysis.[D]lackofdataanalysisiscommoninresearchprojects.Thephrase"flaggedup''(Para.2)istheclosestinmeaningto[A]found.[B]revised.[C]marked[D]storedGiovanniParmigianibelievesthattheestablishmentoftheSBoREmay[A]poseathreattoallitspeers[BImeetwithstrongopposition[C]increaseScience'scirculation.[DJsetanexampleforotherjournalsDavidVauxholdsthatwhatScienceisdoingnowaddstoresearchers'worklosd.diminishestheroleofreviewers.hasroomforfurtherimprovement.istofailintheforeseeablefuture.Whichofthefollowingisthebesttitleofthetext?ScienceJoinsPushtoScreenStatisticsinPapersProfessionalStatisticiansDeserveMoreRespectDataAnalysisFindsItsWayontoEditors'DesksStatisticiansAreComingBackwithScienceText4Twoyearsago,RupertMurdoch'sdaughter,Elisabeth,spokeofthe“unsettlingdearthofintegrityacrosssomanyofourinstitutions"Integrityhadcollapsed,sheargued,becauseofacollectiveacceptancethattheonly"sortingmechanism"insocietyshouldbeprofitandthemarket.But"it'sus,humanbeings,wethepeoplewhocreatethesocietywewant,notprofitDrivingherpointhome,shecontinued:"It'sincreasinglyapparentthattheabsenceofpurpose,ofamorallanguagewithingovernment,mediaorbusinesscouldbecomeoneofthemostdangerousfoalsforcapitalismandfreedom."ThissameabsenceofmoralpurposewaswoundingcompaniessuchasNewsInternational,shieldthought,makingitmorelikelythatitwouldloseitswayasithadwithwidespreadillegaltelephonehacking.Asthehackingtrialconcludes-findingguiltyones-editoroftheNewsoftheWorld,AndyCoulson,forconspiringtohackphones,andfindinghispredecessor,RebekahBrooks,innocentofthesamecharge-thewinderissueofdearthofintegritystillstandstill,Journalistsareknowntohavehackedthephonesofupto5,500people.Thisishackingonanindustrialscale,aswasacknowledgedbyGlennMulcaire,themanhiredbytheNewsoftheWorldin2001tobethepointpersonforphonehacking.Othersawaittrial.Thislongstorystillunfolds.Inmanyrespects,thedearthofmoralpurposeframesnotonlythefactofsuchw
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 關(guān)于水電安裝合同范本
- 出國保姆合同范本
- 拌合站加工合同范本
- 萬科景觀合同范本
- 北京市裝飾合同范例
- 冷庫玉米加工合同范本
- 合作送外賣合同范例
- 公司結(jié)算合同范本
- 地基注漿加固合同范本
- 光伏發(fā)電代理合同范本
- 寺廟線上運(yùn)營策劃方案
- 《Unit2Myfavoriteseason》教學(xué)設(shè)計課件
- 七年級上冊生物期末測試卷(含答案)
- 路基分層-表格-
- 離婚協(xié)議書電子版下載
- 中醫(yī)藥膳學(xué)124張課件
- 汽車法規(guī)第一章
- Kappa測試數(shù)據(jù)分析報告
- 視知覺原理課件
- 建筑工程計量與計價高職PPT完整全套教學(xué)課件
- 網(wǎng)店運(yùn)營PPT完整全套教學(xué)課件
評論
0/150
提交評論