國際商法練習題

5/5選擇題1．ADRreferstothefollowingbut（D）A.ConciliationB.GoodofficesC.MediationD.Litigation2．AccordingtotheArbitrationLawinChina,thepartymayapplyforsetasideCIETACawardintheIntermediatePeople’sCourt.(B)A.WheretherespondenthasplaceofbusinessB.WhereCIETACislocated.C.Wheretherespondenthasproperty.D.Wheretherespondentcorporationisincorporated3．AccordingtotheChineseArbitrationLaw,thechairmanarbitratorshouldbedecidedby.(A)A.thepartiescommonchoice.B.thearbitratorsappointedbytheparties.C.NeitherAandBD.BothAandB.4．UnderNewYorkConvention,thenationalcourtmayrefusetoenforceforeignawardbasedonthefollowingconditionsexcept.(D)A.Oneofthepartiestothearbitrationagreementhassomeincapacity.B.Thepartywasnotgivenproperopportunitytopresenthiscase.C.Thearbitraltribunalawardedmattersbeyondthescopeofthesubmissiontoarbitration.D.Thefactsfoundbythearbitraltribunalwerewrong5.ThedoctrineofCompetence-Competencereferstothat.(B)A.Thenationalcourtmayruleonthevalidityofthearbitrationagreement.B.Thearbitrationtribunalmayruleonitsownjurisdiction.C.BothAandB.D.NeitherAandB.6.Thearbitrablemattersininternationalarbitrationisgovernedbythe.(D)A.NewYorkConvention.B.ModelLawontheInternationalCommercialArbitration.C.ArbitrationRules.D.Nationallaw.7.WhenonepartyseeksenforcementunderNewYorkConvention,thecourtmayrefusetoenforcetheawardnotcapableofsettlementbyarbitrationbythelawofthecountry.(A)A.wheretheawardismade.B.wheretheenforcementissought.C.BothAandB.D.NeitherAandB.8.TheChineseArbitrationLawbegantoimplementintheyear.(B)A.1994B.1995C.1990D.1996判斷題1．TheFAS(portofshipment)tradetermrequiresasellertodelivergoodstoanamedportalongsideavesseltobedesignatedbythebuyerandinamannercustomarytotheparticularport.（T）2．Atransactionisan“internationalsale”governedbytheUnitedNationsConventiononContractsfortheInternationalSaleofGoods(CISG)onlyifthestatesinwhichthebuyerandsellerhavetheirplacesofbusinessarecontractingpartiestotheconvention.（F）3．ContractsgovernedbytheUnitedNationsConventiononContractsfortheInternationalSaleofGoods(CISG)havetobeinwritingtobeenforceable.（F）4．Anirrevocableletterofcreditisacreditonwhichasecondbankhasaddeditsendorsement,indicatingthatit,too,willmakepaymentagainstthespecifieddocuments.（F）5．AccordingtotheUnitedNationsConventiononContractsfortheInternationalSaleofGoods(CISG),acontractisnotformeduntiltheoffereeacceptstheofferor'soffer.（T）6．ThedomesticarbitrationcommissionsinChinahavenoauthoritytodealwithcasesinvolvingforeignelements.（F）7．Thepartiestoanarbitrationagreementmaychooseanyone,inwhomitbelieves,asarbitratorinChina.（F）8．ThearbitrationagreementisinvalidifthepartiesfailedtoreachagreementontheparticulararbitrationcommissioninaccordancewiththeArbitrationLawinChina.（F）9．ADRcouldnotbeusedinthearbitrationandlitigationprocedureinChina.（F）10．Atransactionisan“internationalsale”governedbytheUnitedNationsConventiononContractsfortheInternationalSaleofGoods(CISG)onlyifthebuyerandsellerhavetheirplacesofbusinessindifferentstates.（T）11．Asubsidyisafinancialcontributionmadebyagovernmentorotherpublicbodythatconfersabenefitonanenterprise,groupofenterprises,oranindustry.（）12．Almostalldomesticlawsallowthepartiestoasalescontracttodefinethemeaningofthetradeterms(suchasFCA,CIF,etc.)thattheyuseintheircontract.（F）13．ContractsgovernedbytheUnitedNationsConventiononContractsfortheInternationalSaleofGoods(CISG)havetobeinwritingtobeenforceable.（F）14．Apromissorynoteisathreepartyinstrumentwhosepartiesarethe“drawer,”the“drawee”andthe“payee”.()15．AccordingtotheUnitedNationsConventiononContractsfortheInternationalSaleofGoods(CISG),acontractisnotformeduntiltheoffereeacceptstheofferor’soffer.（）16．TheWorldTradeOrganizationisanewsupranationalorganizationwiththepowertousurpsovereigntyfromitsmemberstates.（）17．ADRcouldbeusedinthearbitrationandlitigationprocedureinChina.（）18．Atransactionisan“internationalsale”governedbytheUnitedNationsConventiononContractsfortheInternationalSaleofGoods(CISG)onlyifthebuyerandsellerhavetheirplacesofbusinessindifferentstates.（）19．Thepartiestoanarbitrationagreementmaychooseanyone,inwhomitbelieves,asarbitratorinChina.（）20．ThearbitrationagreementisinvalidifthepartiesfailedtoreachagreementontheparticulararbitrationcommissioninaccordancewiththeArbitrationLawinChina.（）定義對應題1.freightforwarder2.billoflading3.forumselectionclause4.tariffsA.AfirmthatmakesorassistsinthemakingofshippingarrangementsB．AprovisioninacontractdesignatingaparticularcourtortribunaltoresolveanydisputethatmayariseconcerningthecontractC．Ainstrumentissuedbyawarehousemanorcarriertoashipperthatservesasareceiptforgoodsshipped,asevidenceofthecontractofcarriage,andasadocumentoftitleforthegoods.D．Governmentalchargesimposedongoodsatthetimetheyareimportedintoastate.1.withdrawal2.billoflading3.offer4.tariffsA.Cancellationbytheoffereeofanacceptance.B．Aproposalbyonepersontoanotherindicatinganintentiontoenterintoacontractunderspecifiedterms.C．Ainstrumentissuedbyawarehousemanorcarriertoashipperthatservesasareceiptforgoodsshipped,asevidenceofthecontractofcarriage,andasadocumentoftitleforthegoods.D．Governmentalchargesimposedongoodsatthetimetheyareimportedintoastate.法律術語解釋merchantlawindividualproprietorshipanticipatorybreacharbitraltribunalbusinesslawlimitedpartnershipfundamentalbreacharbitration問題解答whatisthedeferencebetweenone-mancompanyandindividualproprietorshipinchina?whatistheconstitutionsofproductliabilityinAmerican?whatisthedeferencebetweenlimitedcompanyandlimitedpartnshipinchina?Whatisreasontorefusetorecognizeforeignarbitralawards?250案例分析題1.OnJanuary1,SellersentalettertoBuyerofferingtoselltoBuyer5,000widgetsfor$25apiece.Theletteralsostated:“ThisofferisbindingandirrevocableuntilFebruary1.”O(jiān)nJanuary5,priortoBuyer’sreceiptoftheletter,SellercalledBuyeronthetelephoneandleftthefollowingmessageontheansweringmachineatBuyer’splaceofbusiness:“IgnoremyletterofJanuary1.Ihavedecidedtowithdrawtheoffercontainedinit.”O(jiān)nJanuary7,afterlisteningtoheransweringmachineandreadingtheletterthatarrivedthatsameday,BuyersentSellerthefollowingtelegram:“IacceptyourofferofJanuary1.”IsthereacontractunderCISG?Why?2.SellerinSanFranciscoagreedtoshipgoodstoBuyerinLondonunderaCIFSanFranciscocontract.Afterthegoodswereloadedaboardtheship,butbeforeitdepartedfromSanFrancisco,SellertenderedthedocumentsrequiredbythecontracttoBuyerandaskedtobepaid.Buyerrefused,assertingthatithadarighttoinspectthegoodsupontheirarrivalinLondon,andthatitdidnothavetopayuntilitdidsoandwassatisfiedthatthegoodswereincompliancewiththecontract.Sellersuesforimmediatepayment.WillSellerwin?why?3.Sellercontractedtodeliver1,000barrelsofoiltoBuyerfor$14,000.Whentheoilarrived,975barrelscompliedfullywiththecontractdescription.Twenty-fivewerecontaminatedandunacceptable.Oilincomparablebarre