包-lte庫(kù)移動(dòng)通信論壇

TECHNOLOGIES

CO.,.Security

Level:LTE

Radio

NetworkPlanning

Introduction移動(dòng)通信

通信人才網(wǎng)

PDF

createdwithpdfFactory

Pro

trialversion

AgendaLTE

RNP

Dimensioning1LTE

RNP

Overview2LTE

Co-location

Solution3LTE

DeploymentStrategy4移動(dòng)通信

Page

2TECHNOLOGIES

CO.,.通信人才網(wǎng)

PDF

createdwithpdfFactory

Pro

trialversion

移動(dòng)通信

LTE

Radio

Network

Planning

Main

StepsDetailed

PlanningInputs:

Coverage,

Capacity

&Service

RequirementOutputs:

eNodeB

coverageradius

and

site

numbersbased

on

capacity

calculationInputs:

Calculated

coverage

radius,

digitalmap

and

subscriber

distribution

informationOutputs:

Preliminary

eNodeB

numbersInputs:

CoverageOutputs:

Actual

siandsite

survey

resultocation

and

engineering

parametersDimensioningPreplanningPage

3TECHNOLOGIES

CO.,.通信人才網(wǎng)

PDF

createdwithpdfFactory

Pro

trialversion

The

operator

provides:Naming

conventionsExisting

sites

informationPreparationNetwork

DeploymentDetailed

PlanningCoverage

area

(Dense

urban,

Urban,

Suburban

)Quality

objective

(QoS

criteria)Capacity

requirement

(Subscriber,

traffic

model)Link

budget

parameters

(Penetration

loss,

Propagation

model)Agreementachieved

bythe

operatorandLink

budgetCapacity

dimensioningSite

numbers/configurationCell

radius

inea

orphologyNetwork

development

solutiondeliverThe

output

ofdimensioning

isimportant

criteria

toassess

RNP

solutionBackground

Interference

Test

(optional)Propagation

model

tuning

(optional)Site

survey/candidate

site

searchNeighbor

cell

configurationCell

parameters

configurationAlgorithm

configurationNominalPlanningSi ocation/

RF

parameters

configurationsSearch

ring

specificationsprediction

&

SimulationCluster

definition

for

project

management移動(dòng)通信

Detail

LTE

Radio

Network

PlanningPage

4TECHNOLOGIES

CO.,.通信人才網(wǎng)

PDF

createdwithpdfFactory

Pro

trialversion

Site

TypeInputOutputLTE

RNP

Output

OverviewCoverage

Requirement--

Coverage

Area--Polygon

Definition--

Cell

Edge

Throughput--

Coverage

Probability…CapacityRequirement--

Frequency

bandwidth--

Subscriber

forecast--

Traffic

Model…Active

UsersS1&X2

ThroughputPower/ChanneleNodeB

Number移動(dòng)通信

Page

5TECHNOLOGIES

CO.,.通信人才網(wǎng)

PDF

createdwithpdfFactory

Pro

trialversion

AgendaLTE

RNP

DimensioningLTE

RNP

OverviewCoverage

DimensioningCapacity

DimensioningActive

User

DimensioningS1&X2

DimensioningLTE

Co-location

SolutionLTE

DeploymentStrategy1234移動(dòng)通信

Page

6TECHNOLOGIES

CO.,.通信人才網(wǎng)

PDF

createdwithpdfFactory

Pro

trialversion

移動(dòng)通信

LTE

Radio

Network

Dimensioning

FlowLink

BudgetCell

RadiusCapacity

DimensioningSatisfy

CapacityRequirement?CapacityRequirementAdjust

eNodeBNumberNoCoverageRequirementStartYesActive

User/S1&X2DimensioningeNodeBAmount&ConfigurationEndPage

7TECHNOLOGIES

CO.,.通信人才網(wǎng)

PDF

createdwithpdfFactory

Pro

trialversion

AgendaLTE

RNP

DimensioningLTE

RNP

OverviewCoverage

DimensioningCapacity

DimensioningActive

User

DimensioningS1&X2

DimensioningLTE

Co-location

SolutionLTE

DeploymentStrategy1234移動(dòng)通信

Page

8TECHNOLOGIES

CO.,.通信人才網(wǎng)

PDF

createdwithpdfFactory

Pro

trialversion

移動(dòng)通信

LTE

Coverage

Dimensioning

FlowCell

RadiuseNodeB

Coverage

AreaPropagationModelAim

of

coverage

dimensioningto

obtain

the

cell

radiusto

estimate

eNodeB

number

for

coverage

requirementStartLink

BudgetTotal

Coverage

Area/eNodeB

Coverage

AreaeNodeB

NumberEndPage

9TECHNOLOGIES

CO.,.通信人才網(wǎng)

PDF

createdwithpdfFactory

Pro

trialversion

移動(dòng)通信L

ink

BudgetProcedure

–

UplinkGainMarginLossUE

Antenna

GainBTS

Ant

GainOther

GainSlow

fading

marginInterference

marginCable

LossPenetration

LossPath

LossBody

LossRxSensitivityTxPowerEIRPPower

levelLink

segmentsMax.

Allowed

Path

LossPage

10TECHNOLOGIES

CO.,.通信人才網(wǎng)

PDF

createdwithpdfFactory

Pro

trialversion

移動(dòng)通信L

ink

BudgetProcedure

–

DownlinkTxPowerBTS

AntGainUE

Ant

GainOther

GainSlow

fading

marginInterference

marginBody

LossCable

LossPenetration

LossPath

LossRxSensitivityObjective:

Max.Allowed

Path

LossPower

levelLink

segmentsEIRPMax.

Allowed

Path

LossGainMarginLossPage

11TECHNOLOGIES

CO.,.通信人才網(wǎng)

PDF

createdwithpdfFactory

Pro

trialversion

0.50.60.7128kbps512kbps0.670.590.490.46

0.460.41

0.410.35

0.350.40.30.20.1HSPA+2.1G@5MHz

0

LTE2.6G@5MHzLTE2.6G@20MHzCell

Radius(km)256kbpsCell

Edge

ThroughputUplink

Cell

Radius

ComparisonLTE

2.6G

has

much

better

coverage

inDL

than

HSPA+

2.1G;

But

HSPA+

2.1Ghas

better

coverage

in

UL

than

LTE2.6G.LTE

can

reuse

existing

3G

sites,

noadditional

LTE

alone

sites

are

requiredat

the

beginning

of

LTE

deployment.0.90(km)0.36(km)51210246432561397252826903634705680007000600050004000300020001000HSPA+2.1G@5MHz

0

LTE2.6G@5MHzLTE2.6G@20MHzCell

Edge

Throughput(kbps)0.56(km)Cell

Radius移動(dòng)通信

Coverage

Comparison

b/w

HSPA+

and

LTEDownlink

Cell

Edge

parisonPage

12TECHNOLOGIES

CO.,.通信人才網(wǎng)

PDF

createdwithpdfFactory

Pro

trialversion

AgendaLTE

RNP

DimensioningLTE

RNP

OverviewCoverage

DimensioningCapacity

DimensioningActive

User

DimensioningS1&X2

DimensioningLTE

Co-location

SolutionLTE

DeploymentStrategy1234移動(dòng)通信

Page

13TECHNOLOGIES

CO.,.通信人才網(wǎng)

PDF

createdwithpdfFactory

Pro

trialversion

移動(dòng)通信

LTE

Capacity

Dimensioning

FlowCell

AverageThroughput

CalculationSubscribers

Supportedper

CellTraffic

ModelysisConfiguration

ysisStarteNodeB

Number(initialized

by

Coverage

Dimensioning)Adjust

eNodeBNumberNoSatisfy

CapacityRequirement?Total

SubscribersYeseNodeB

NumberEndPage

14TECHNOLOGIES

CO.,.通信人才網(wǎng)

PDF

createdwithpdfFactory

Pro

trialversion

Scenario

ParametersMorphologySectorizationBandwidth…MC

Parameterssnapshot

numbersSchedule

Strategy…Cell

ParametersCarrier

FrequencyCarrier

power…InputCell

AverageThroughputOutputMonteCarloSimulation移動(dòng)通信

LTE

Cell

Average

Throughput

CalculationPage

15TECHNOLOGIES

CO.,.通信人才網(wǎng)

PDF

createdwithpdfFactory

Pro

trialversion

FrequencyBandwidthScenarioCell

Average

ThroughputPeak

Throughput（Multi-users）DL(Mbps)UL(Mbps)DL(Mbps)UL(Mbps)2600MHz5MHzUrban8.1734.7154339Suburban6.2663.342433910MHzUrban16.9189.7618655Suburban12.9716.918865515MHzUrban25.54614.739129126Suburban19.58710.44612912620MHzUrban34.34419.814172165Suburban26.33214.044172165LTE

2600MHz

Cell

Average

Throughput

with

different

bandwidth移動(dòng)通信

LTE

Cell

Average

ThroughputLTE

Cell

Average

Throughput

(Urban)Frequency

Band

(MHz)Bandwidth

(MHz)DL

(Mbps)UL

(Mbps)26002034.34419.81418002034.71921.6758002035.21824.704Capacity

comparison

with

different

frequency

bandPage

16TECHNOLOGIES

CO.,.通信人才網(wǎng)

PDF

createdwithpdfFactory

Pro

trialversion

20.0015.0010.005.000.00HSUPA

10msHSUPA

2msHSUPA

16QAMLTE

5

MHzLTE

10MHzLTE

20MHzUL

Cell

Average

Throughput(Mbps)移動(dòng)通信

Capacity

Comparison

b/w

HSPA+

and

LTE15.0010.005.000.0035.0030.0025.0020.00HSPA(16QAM)HSPA+(64QAM)HSPA+(MIMO)HSPA+(MIMO+64QAM)HSPA+(DC+16QAM)HSPA+(DC+64QAM)LTE

5MHzLTE

10MHzLTE

20MHzDL

Cell

Average

Throughput(Mbps)Page

17TECHNOLOGIES

CO.,.通信人才網(wǎng)

PDF

createdwithpdfFactory

Pro

trialversion

移動(dòng)通信

Traffic

ModelysisTraffic

ParametersULDLBearer

Rate(Kbps)PPP

SessionTime(s)PPP

SessionDuty

RatioBLERBearer

Rate(Kbps)PPP

SessionTime(s)PPP

SessionDuty

RatioBLERVoIP26.901080.61%26.901080.61%Phone62.533611%62.533611%Conference62.53180011%62.53180011%IMS

Signalling15.6370.21%15.6370.21%Web

Browsing62.5318000.051%250.1118000.051%File

Transfer140.6960011%750.3460011%P2P

file

sharing250.11120011%750.34120011%User

BehaviorTraffic

Penetration

RatioBHSABusy

Hour

Throughput

Per

User

(bps)ULDLConference0.00%0.263166316IMS

Signalling0.00%53131Web

Browsing100.00%0.46322526File

Transfer20.00%0.247372526410.00%0.2395632P2P

file

sharing20.00%0.433685101055Total--835527853Traffic

Model

varies

from

different

operators

which

is

mainly

usedtocalculate

Busy

Hour

Throughput

per

User.Page

18TECHNOLOGIES

CO.,.通信人才網(wǎng)

PDF

createdwithpdfFactory

Pro

trialversion

移動(dòng)通信

Traffic

Model

Comparison

b/w

LTE

and

UMTSService

typeUnitUL

ThroughputDL

ThroughputVoiceErl/BH0.04000.0400CS64Erl/BH0.0003200.000320PS64Kbit/BH460.8069.12PS128Kbit/BH0.001105.92PS384Kbit/BH0.00207.36CS

over

HSPAErl/BH0.00000.0000VoIP

over

HSPAErl/BH0.00000.0000HSPAKbit/BH5299.2015897.60UnitValueVOIPmErl/BH40PhonemErl/BH10Other

PS

TrafficKbps50Total

UL

TrafficKbps11.27Total

DL

TrafficKbps41.27Standard

UMTS

Traffic

ModelStandard

LTE

Traffic

ModelUMTS

traffic

model

is

mu ore

complex

than

that

of

LTE

because

there

are

manykinds

of

CS

and

PS

services

in

UMTS.There

are

only

PS

services

(even

VOIP

andmodel

can

be

very

simple;Phone)

in

LTE

so

that

LTE

trafficPage

19TECHNOLOGIES

CO.,.通信人才網(wǎng)

PDF

createdwithpdfFactory

Pro

trialversion

DL

Cell

Average

CapacityStep

1a

34.344Mbps/cellSubscribers

supported

in

a

siteStep

7g

=

c

*

f

/

(1+d)/e

=

2140

subscribersStep

2Designed

DL

CellLoadingb

50%

Cell

loading

assumedStep

3Designed

DL

CellCapacityc

=

a

x

b

=17.127MpbsStep4Peak

to

Average

Ratiod

20%Step

5Average

DL

BH

Throughput/sub.e

20kbpsStep

6Sector

number

per

sitef

3

sectorsAssumptions:S11120MHz20kbps

per

userin

DLPeak

to

AverageRatio

20%

in

BH移動(dòng)通信

LTE

Capacity

Dimensioning

Case

StudyPage

20TECHNOLOGIES

CO.,.通信人才網(wǎng)

PDF

createdwithpdfFactory

Pro

trialversion

AgendaLTE

RNP

DimensioningLTE

RNP

OverviewCoverage

DimensioningCapacity

DimensioningActive

User

DimensioningS1&X2

DimensioningLTE

Co-location

SolutionLTE

DeploymentStrategy1234移動(dòng)通信

Page

21TECHNOLOGIES

CO.,.通信人才網(wǎng)

PDF

createdwithpdfFactory

Pro

trialversion

移動(dòng)通信

Active

User

DimensioningNumber

_

ActiveUser

_

i

BHSA*

PPP

_

Session

_

Time

*

RatRrcToPPP*

Number

_

User

/

3600Total

_

Number

_

ActiveUser

Number

_

ActiveUser

_

i

*

Percentage

_

Service

_

iiDall

(session)

W

W

WDall

(session)

W

W

WRRC1RRC2RRC3Packet3PPPSessionPacketsDall

(session)

W

W

WtimeRRC1RRCtimeRRC2RRC3Packet1timePacket2Packet3RRC_Idleall

(session)

W

W

W

DRRC_Connected(Active

User)BHCA:

Busy

Hour

SessionAttemptPPP

Time:

Duration

of

PPPSessionRatio

of

RRC

to

PPP:Percentage

of

RRC

duringone

PPP

sessionNumber

of

User:

Number

ofusers

using

service

iActive

User

DefinitionActive

users

is

also

called

RRC-Connected

Users

which

refer

to

the

users

having

a

RRCconnection

with

the

networkDirectly

influences

eNodeB

quotation

and

controlled

by

software

licensePage

22TECHNOLOGIES

CO.,.通信人才網(wǎng)

PDF

createdwithpdfFactory

Pro

trialversion

移動(dòng)通信

Active

User

Dimensioning

Case

StudyUser

ParameterDLULsceneUE

TypeBHCAPPPTime(s)PercentageRatRrcToPPPRatPackToRrcAvedatarate

inpacket(kbps)RatRrcToPPPRatPackToRrcAve

datarate

inpacket(kbps)Dense

UrbanHandset1.430070%10.412810.4128D

ard2.530020%0.80.85000.80.5100Wireless

DSL1240010%0.90.83000.90.3100UrbanHandset1.38050%10.45010.450D

ard230030%0.80.82200.40.8100Wireless

DSL0.8180020%0.60.73000.30.7100Dense

UrbanUrbanParameterDLULDLULThroughput/User/BH

(kbps)31.97.617.43.6number

of

subscribers

in

one

Site398800Num

Active

User7082Active

Ratio0.180.10Ave

data

rate

/Active

User

(kbps)181.543.5169.834.8=Min

(Total

number

of

Subscribers

/Total

number

of

eNodeBs,

umsubscribers

supported

consideringtraffic

requirement)Page

23TECHNOLOGIES

CO.,.通信人才網(wǎng)

PDF

createdwithpdfFactory

Pro

trialversion

移動(dòng)通信

Active

User

Dimensioning

Case

StudyUser

BehaviorTrafficPenetrationRatioBHSAPPP

SessionTime(s)RatRrcToPPPActive

TimeVoIP100.00%11081108.00Phone100.00%136136.00Conference0.00%0.2180010.00Real

Time

Gaming0.00%0.218000.80.00Streaming

Media0.00%0.236000.80.00IMS

Signalling0.00%570.80.00Web

Browsing100.00%0.418000.8576.00File

Transfer20.00%0.26000.819.2010.00%0.2500.80.80P2P

File

Sharing20.00%0.412000.876.80Active

Time

per

Subscriber----816.80Active

Factor

per

Subscriber----0.23Max.

Subscriber

NumberSupported

per

Site----860.00Actual

Subscriber

Number

per

Site----135.00Active

User

Number

per

Site----30.63Page

24TECHNOLOGIES

CO.,.通信人才網(wǎng)

PDF

createdwithpdfFactory

Pro

trialversion

AgendaLTE

RNP

DimensioningLTE

RNP

OverviewCoverage

DimensioningCapacity

DimensioningActive

User

DimensioningS1&X2

DimensioningLTE

Co-location

SolutionLTE

DeploymentStrategy1234移動(dòng)通信

Page

25TECHNOLOGIES

CO.,.通信人才網(wǎng)

PDF

createdwithpdfFactory

Pro

trialversion

MSC/SGSN/GGSNBSCRNCBTSBTSNodeBNodeB2G/3G:Legacy

ArchitectureLTE:

Flat

Architecture移動(dòng)通信

S1&X2

Interface

of

LTEPage

26TECHNOLOGIES

CO.,.通信人才網(wǎng)

PDF

createdwithpdfFactory

Pro

trialversion

移動(dòng)通信

S1&X2

Dimensioning

Case

Study

(1)然TTTr已損壞。請(qǐng)重新啟動(dòng)arraafffffifciiccR計(jì)RR算機(jī)，然后重新打開(kāi)該文件。如果仍顯示紅色aaatittoiiooooof

ffUUUL

L=L==“x”，無(wú)法顯示圖像。計(jì)算機(jī)可能沒(méi)有足夠的內(nèi)存以打開(kāi)該圖像，也可能是該圖像無(wú)法顯示圖像。計(jì)算機(jī)可能沒(méi)有足夠的內(nèi)存以打開(kāi)該圖像，也可能是該圖像已損壞。請(qǐng)重新啟動(dòng)計(jì)算機(jī)，然后重新打開(kāi)該文件。如果仍然顯示紅色“x”，則可能需要?jiǎng)h除該圖像，然后重新將其。則可能需要?jiǎng)h除該圖像，然后重其。TTTr已損壞。請(qǐng)重新啟動(dòng)arraafffffifciiccRRR計(jì)算機(jī)，然后重新打開(kāi)該文件。如果仍然顯示紅色aaatittoiiooooof

ffDDDL=L

L==“x”，無(wú)法顯示圖像。計(jì)算機(jī)可能沒(méi)有足夠的內(nèi)存以打開(kāi)該圖像，也可能是該圖像無(wú)法顯示圖像。計(jì)算機(jī)可能沒(méi)有足夠的內(nèi)存以打開(kāi)該圖像，也可能是該圖像已損壞。請(qǐng)重新啟動(dòng)計(jì)算機(jī)，然后重新打開(kāi)該文件。如果仍然顯示紅色“x”，則可能需要?jiǎng)h除該圖像，然后重新將其

則?？赡苄枰?jiǎng)h除該圖像，然后重新將D則可能需要?jiǎng)h除該圖像，然后重新將其。ata

Traff

ic/Sub

s.(U

L)，無(wú)法顯示圖像然

。計(jì)算機(jī)可能沒(méi)有足夠的內(nèi)存以無(wú)法顯示圖像。

計(jì)算機(jī)可能沒(méi)有足夠的內(nèi)存以打開(kāi)該圖像，

也可能是該圖像已損壞。請(qǐng)重新啟動(dòng)計(jì)算機(jī)后重新打開(kāi)該文件。如果仍然顯示紅色打開(kāi)該圖像，

也可能是該圖像已損壞。請(qǐng)重新啟動(dòng)計(jì)算機(jī)，

然后重新打開(kāi)該文件。如果仍然顯示紅色““xx””，，則可能需要?jiǎng)h除該圖像，然后重新將其

。===DDDaaatattaaTTTrarraafffffifciiccooof

ffaaallllCCI

IItyttyypppe/eeS//SSubububs.ss.*

*.

*

TTTrarraafffffifciiccRRRaaatittoiiooooof

ffULULULD示紅色at“ax”，則可能需要?jiǎng)h除該圖像，然后重新將其

。Traff

ic/Sub

s.(D..DD((DDLaa)Ltt)L) aa

TTrraaffff

iicc//SSububss無(wú)法顯示圖像。無(wú)法顯示圖像計(jì)。計(jì)算機(jī)可能沒(méi)有足夠的內(nèi)存以打開(kāi)該圖像，也可能是該圖像已損壞。請(qǐng)重新啟動(dòng)計(jì)算機(jī)，然后重新打開(kāi)該文件。如果仍然顯算機(jī)可能沒(méi)有足夠的內(nèi)存以打開(kāi)該圖像，也可能是該圖像已損壞。請(qǐng)重新啟動(dòng)計(jì)算機(jī)，然后重新打開(kāi)該文件。如果仍然顯===DDDaaatattaaTTTrarraafffffifciiccooof

ffaaallllCCI

IItyttyypppe/eeS//SSubububs.ss.*

*.

*

TTTrarraafffffifciiccRRRaaatittoiiooooof

ffDLDLDLTraffic

Ratio

of

UL

==新將

1/(1+4)20%BDDH

Data

Traffiact/aSuTbrasf.f(fUicL//)Sububs

..

((U

L)L)Traffic

Ratio

of

DL

=其。4/(1+4)=80%BH

Data

Traffic/Subs.

(DL)示紅色“x”，則可能需要?jiǎng)h除該圖像，然后重新將其

。=BH

DataTraffic/Su

*Traffic

Ratio

of

DL=

25kbps

*

80%

=

20kbps=

BH

Data

Traffic/S

*Traffic

Ratio

of

UL=

25kbps

*

20%

=5kbpsData

Traffic

Throughput/Subs.

In

Maclayer=DataTraffic/Subs

*ER=

5

*1.37

=6.85(UL)Data

Traffic

Throughput/Subs.

In

Maclayer=DataTraffic/Subs

*ER=

5

*1.37

=6.85(UL)Data

Traffic

Throughput/Subs.

In

Maclayer=DataTraffic/Subs

*ER=

20

*

1.37=

27.4kbps(DL)Data

Traffic

Throughput/Subs.

In

Maclayer=DataTraffic/Subs

*ER=

20

*

1.37=

27.4kbps(DL)Traffic

PeakRatio

=

1.2Traffic

PeakRatio

=

1.2T_UL_Data

Traffic/Subs.=

6.85*1.2

=

8.22kbpsT_UL_Data

Traffic/Subs.=

6.85*1.2

=

8.22kbpsSubs/Site

=

1000Subs/Site

=

1000T_UL_user

plane/site=

T_UL_Data

Traffic/Subs.

*

Subs/site=

8.22

*1000

=

8.22MbpsT_UL_user

plane/site=

T_UL_Data

Traffic/Subs.

*

Subs/site=

8.22

*1000

=

8.22MbpsT_DL_user

plane/site=

T_DL_Data

Traffic/Subs.

*

Subs/site=

32.88

*1000

=

32.88MbpsT_DL_user

plane/site=

T_DL_Data

Traffic/Subs.

*

Subs/site=

32.88

*1000

=

32.88MbpsT_DL_Data

Traffic/Subs.=

27.4*1.2

=

32.88kbpsT_DL_Data

Traffic/Subs.=

27.4*1.2

=

32.88kbpsT_Total_user

plane/site=

T_UL_user

plane/site

+

T_DL_userplane/site=

8.22+

32.88

=

41.1MbpsT_Total_user

plane/site=

T_UL_user

plane/site

+

T_DL_userplane/site=

8.22+

32.88

=

41.1MbpsUplink

and

downlink

busy

hour

datatraffic

volume

per

subscriber

is25kbpsTraffic

data

ratio

for

uplink

anddownlink

is

1:4Peak

to

average

traffic

ratio

is

1.2Number

of

subscribers

per

eNodeBis1000Assuming

IPV4

and

IPsec

withtunnel

mode

is

used

for

IP

overEthernet

transmissionAssuming

the

packet

size

is

300byteswhi eans

the

ER

is

1.37Page

27TECHNOLOGIES

CO.,.通信人才網(wǎng)

PDF

createdwithpdfFactory

Pro

trialversion

T

_

control

plane

T

_

Total

_

user

_

Plane

/

Site*

2

41.1*2%

0.82MbpsT

_

S1/

Site

T

_

control

_

Plane

/

Site

T

_

Total

_

user

_

plane

/

Site

0.82

41.1

41.92MbpsT

_

X

2

/

Site

T

_

S1/

Site*3%

41.92*3%

1.26MbpsControl

PlaneS1

BandwidthX2

Bandwidth移動(dòng)通信

S1&X2

Dimensioning

Case

Study

(2)Page

28TECHNOLOGIES

CO.,.通信人才網(wǎng)

PDF

createdwithpdfFactory

Pro

trialversion

CSCS

TTrraaffifficcVVooiiccee

TTrraaffffiiccVPVP

TTrrafaffificcGGooSS

RReeqquuiirreemmeennttssCS

TrafficVoice

Traffic

VP

TrafficGoS

RequirementsSuSubbssccrriibbeerrssSSuubbss

ppeerr

NNooddeeBBPSPSTTrraaffifficcPS64PS64

TThhrroouugghhppuutt

PS128PS128

TThhrroouugghhppuuttPS384PS384

TThhrroouugghhppuuttPSPS

RReettrraannssmmiissssiioonnPS

TrafficPS64Throughput

PS128

ThroughputPS384ThroughputPSRetransmissionHHSSPPAA

TTrraaffffiiccHSPA

TrafficCSCS

IubIub

BBaannddwwiiddtthhCS

IubBandwidthPSPS

IubIub

BBaannddwwiiddtthhPSIub

BandwidthBBaannddwwiiddtthh

ffoorrTTrraaffifficcBandwidth

forTrafficHHSSPPAA

IubIubBBaannddwwiiddtthh

HSPA

Iub

BandwidthCCoommmmoonn

CChhaannnneellBBaannddwwiiddththCommonChannelBandwidthSSiiggnnaalllliinnggBBaannddwwiiddtthhSignalling

BandwidthOO&&MM

BBaannddwwiiddtthhO&M

BandwidthIubIub

BBaannddwwiiddtthhIub

BandwidthInputSubscribersSubsperNodeBIub

Bandwidth S1

BandwidthIub

Dimensioning

OutputComparison

between

Iub

and

S1

BandwidthO&MCCHSignallingHSPACS

_

AveragePSCS

_

PeakTotal+

Iub+

Iub

+

Iub+

Iub

)]+

Iub,(

IubIub

=

Max

[

IubS1

T

_

user

plane

T

_

control

plane

(1

2%)

*T

_

user

planeThroughput

atMac

layer/Subs.S1

User

PlaneDimensioningOutputSubscribersPereNodeBUplink

anddownlinkdata

Traffic

per

subs.

InputExtension

Ratio

(ER)

Peak

toAverage

RatioPeakThroughput

at

Mac

layer/Subs.PeakThroughput

atMac

layer/SiteS1

user

PlaneThroughput移動(dòng)通信

Page

29TECHNOLOGIES

CO.,.通信人才網(wǎng)

PDF

createdwithpdfFactory

Pro

trialversion

AgendaLTE

RNP

Dimensioning1LTE

RNP

Overview2LTE

Co-location

Solution3LTE

DeploymentStrategy4移動(dòng)通信

Page

30TECHNOLOGIES

CO.,.通信人才網(wǎng)

PDF

createdwithpdfFactory

Pro

trialversion

移動(dòng)通信

LTE

Co-location

General

ConsiderationPage

31TECHNOLOGIES

CO.,.Co-existing

Systems

InterferenceGuard

band

&

isolation

requirementInstallation

SpaceTower

LoadImpact

on

existing

networkCoverage

performance,

optimizationCivil

Work

&

MaintenanceCostReuse

&

replacingetc…通信人才網(wǎng)

PDF

createdwithpdfFactory

Pro

trialversion

移動(dòng)通信

Typical

Co-location

Scenario

-

Separate

Antenna

&

FeederExisting

2G/3G2G/3G

+

LTEJust

takingwide-bandfor

exampleAdvantagesNo

impact

on

the

performance

ofexisting

network.Independent

tilt

andazimuth,independent

network

planningand

optimization.DisadvantagesRequire

more

installation

spacefor

both

antenna

and

feeder.Require

higher

tower

load.Too

many

antennas,

causingvision

pollution.mendationThe

highest

priority

ofconsideration2G/3GSingle-band2600(K80010541)LTE26002G/3GNew

equipmentsExisting

equipmentsTECHNOLOGIES

CO.,.Page

32通信人才網(wǎng)

PDF

createdwithpdfFactory

Pro

trialversion

移動(dòng)通信

Typical

Co-location

Scenario

-

Separate

Antenna,

Shared

FeederAdvantagesExisting

2G/3G2G/3G

+

LTEReusing

existing

feeder,

no

needadditional

space

for

new

feeder.Independent

tilt

andazimuth,independent

network

planningand

optimization.DisadvantagesRequire

more

antenna

installationspace

and

higher

tower

load.Additional

diplexer

cost.Additional

diplexer

loss,negativeimpact

on

existing

networkToo

many

antennas,

causing

visionpollution.mendationApplicable

to

impossibleadditional

feeder2G/3G2G/3GLTENew

equipmentsExisting

equipmentsSingle-band2600(K80010541)Combiner

isrequired.TECHNOLOGIES

CO.,.Page

33通信人才網(wǎng)

PDF

createdwithpdfFactory

Pro

trialversion

移動(dòng)通信

Typical

Co-location

Scenario

-

Shared

Antenna,

Separate

FeederExisting

2G/3G2G/3G

+

LTEAdvantagesNo

need

additional

spacefornew

antenna

.No

or

Small

impact

onperformance

of

existing

network.DisadvantagesRequire

more

feeder

installationspace.Replacing

new

antenna.Independent

tilt

but

same

azimuth,partly

independent

network

planningand

optimization.mendationNew

antenna

should

keep

samebeam

width

and

gain

for

leastnegative

impact

on

existingnetwork.New

equipmentsExisting

equipments2G/3G2G/3GLTEMulti-bandwithout

interiorcombiner(K80010544/K80010622)TECHNOLOGIES

CO.,.Page

34通信人才網(wǎng)

PDF

createdwithpdfFactory

Pro

trialversion

移動(dòng)通信

Typical

Co-location

Scenario

-

Shared

Antenna

&

Feeder

(1)Existing

2G/3G2G/3G

+

LTEAdvantagesNo

need

additional

spacefornew

antenna

and

feeder.Reusing

existing

feeder.DisadvantagesReplacing

new

antenna.Independent

tilt

but

same

azimuth,partly

independent

network

planningand

optimization.Additional

diplexer

cost

and

loss,negative

impact

on

existing

network.mendationNew

antenna

should

keep

samebeam

width

for

least

negativeimpact

on

existing

network.RRU

installed

near

the

antenna.Thicker

feeder(optional).New

equipmentsExisting

equipments2G/3G2G/3GLTEMulti-bandwithout

interiorcombiner