國(guó)際商務(wù)談判 中國(guó)人民大學(xué)出版社 PART2_第1頁(yè)
國(guó)際商務(wù)談判 中國(guó)人民大學(xué)出版社 PART2_第2頁(yè)
國(guó)際商務(wù)談判 中國(guó)人民大學(xué)出版社 PART2_第3頁(yè)
國(guó)際商務(wù)談判 中國(guó)人民大學(xué)出版社 PART2_第4頁(yè)
國(guó)際商務(wù)談判 中國(guó)人民大學(xué)出版社 PART2_第5頁(yè)
已閱讀5頁(yè),還剩33頁(yè)未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶(hù)提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

PracticalSolutionsToGlobalBusinessNegotiations克勞德?賽利奇(ClaudeCellich)蘇比哈什?C?賈殷(SubhashC.Jain)著Part2NegotiationofEnvironmentandSettingChapter2RoleofCultureinCross-BorderNegotiationsChapter3SelectingYourNegotiatingStylePART2Merchantsthroughouttheworldhavethesamereligion.—HeinrichHeineCHAPTER2

RoleofCultureinCross-BorderNegotiationsCultureCultureincludesalllearnedbehaviorandvaluestransmittedthroughsharedexperiencetoanindividuallivingwithinasociety.

Itiscommonlyagreedthataculturemusthavethesethreecharacteristics:1.Itislearned—thatis,peopleovertimetransmitthecultureoftheirgroupfromgenerationtogeneration.2.Itisinterrelated—thatis,onepartofthecultureisdeeplyconnectedwithanotherpart,suchasreligionwithmarriageorbusinesswithsocialstatus.3.Itisshared—thatis,mostmembersofthegroupacceptthetenetsoftheculture.CHAPTER2

RoleofCultureinCross-BorderNegotiationsCulturaldifferencescanin?uencebusinessnegotiationsinsigni?cantandunexpectedways.DefinitionofNegotiationThebasicconceptofNegotiationisinterpreteddifferentlyfromonecul-turetoanother.IntheUnitedStates,negotiationisamechanicalexerciseofoffersandcounteroffersthatleadstoadeal.InJapan,negotiationissharinginformationanddevelopingarelationshipthatmayleadtoadeal.EffectofCultureonNegotiationSelectionofNegotiatorsThecriteriaforselectingnegotiatorsvaryfromculturetoculture.Usually,thecriteriaincludeknowledgeofthesubjectmatter,seniority,familyconnections,gender,age,experience,andstatus.ProtocolCultureaffectsthedegreeofformalitythepartiesuseinnegotiations.Culturein?uencesmethodsofgreetingaswellasdresscodesEffectofCultureonNegotiationCommunicationThemanydifferentlanguagesoftheworlddonottranslateliterallyfromonetoanother,andunderstandingthesymbolicandphysicalaspectsofdifferentcultures’communicationisevenmoredif?culttoachieve.Forexample,Table

thereportintheUnitedStatesmeans“postponement”;inEngland,itmeans“bringthemattertotheforefront.”Bodylanguageisacaseofnonverbalcommunication.EffectofCultureonNegotiationTimeThemeaningandimportanceoftimevaryfromculturetoculture.InEasterncultures,timeis?uidandcircular.IntheUnitedStates,timeis?xedandvaluable.EffectofCultureonNegotiationRiskPropensityInculturesinwhichriskpropensityishigh,negotiatorsareabletocloseadealevenifcer-taininformationislackingbutthebusinessopportunityotherwiselooksattractive.Negotiatorsbelongingtorisk-averseculturesdemandadditionalinformationtoexamineallsidesofadealcarefullybeforereachinga?nalagreement.EffectofCultureonNegotiationGroupsVersusIndividualsInsomecultures,individualityishighlyvalued.Inothers,theemphasisisonthegroup.NatureofAgreementIntheUnitedStates,emphasisisplacedonlogic,formality,andlegalityoftheagreement.Intraditionalcultures,adealisstruckdependingonfamily/politicalconnections,evenwhencertainaspectsoftheagreementareweak.EffectofCultureonNegotiationThe?rststepingainingculturalunderstandingistoidentifythegrouporcommunitywhosecultureyouwanttostudy.Fornegotiators,therelevantculturalknowledgecanbedividedintotwocategories:(a)traditions,etiquette,andbehaviorofthe(b)playersandtheprocess.Inadditiontonationalcultures,negotiatorsneedtobeawareofprofessionalandcorporatecultures.UnderstandingCultureCulturaldifferencesamongmanagersbelongingtodifferenttypesofcompaniesProtocolandDeportmentCross-culturaletiquetteHall’sFrameworkRelationshipIstheculturedealfocusedorrelationshipfocused?CommunicationArecommunicationsindirectand“highcontext”ordirectand“l(fā)owcontext”?TimeIstheculturegenerallyconsideredtobe“monochronic”or“polychronic”?SpaceDopeoplepreferalotofpersonalspace,oraretheycomfortablewithless?DeeperCulturalCharacteristicsHofstede’sCulturalDimensionsPowerDistance(DistributionofPower)UncertaintyAvoidance(ToleranceforUncertainty)IndividualismVersusCollectivismMasculinity(HarmonyVersusAssertiveness)long-termorientationversusshort-termorientationDeeperCulturalCharacteristicsKeyIndividualsKeyindividualsrefertothosepeopleinsideandoutsidethecompanywhoseapprovalmustbesoughtbeforeanegotiateddealis?nalized.DecisionProcessEquallyimportantistheneedtounderstandtheroleeachindividualislikelytoplayintheapprovalprocess.InformalInfluencesManycountrieshavewebsofin?uencemorepowerfulthantheformalbossesPlayersandProcessNegotiatingGoal:ContractorRelationshipInsomecultures,negotiatorsaremoreinterestedinshort-termdeals;Inothercountries,theemphasisisonbuildinglong-termrela-tionships.TraitsforCopingWithCultureNegotiatingAttitudeThestrongerpartycantakethefollowingstepstosoftentheattitudeoftheopponent:(a)Explaintheperspectivesofthetransactionfullybecausetheotherpartymightlackthesophisticationtounderstandthenitty-grittyofthenegotiatedbusinessdeal.(b)Determinetherealinterestoftheotherpartythroughquestioning.Thismayrequirethenegotiatortounderstandtheother’shistoryandculture.(c)Amendtheproposaltosatisfytheinterestoftheotherparty.TraitsforCopingWithCulturePersonalStyle:InformalorFormalIndividuals’negotiatingstylecanbeinformalorformal.Styleherereferstothewayanegotiatortalks,usestitles,anddresses.Communication:DirectorIndirectInculturesinwhichcommunicationisdirect,suchasGermany,anegotiatorcanexpectdirectanswerstoquestions.Inculturesthatcommunicateindirectly(Japan,forinstance),itmaybedif?culttointerpretmessageseasily.TraitsforCopingWithCultureSensitivitytoTime:HighorLowSomeculturesaremorerelaxedabouttimethanothers.ForNorthAmericans,timeismoney,whichisalwaysinshortsupply.Mexicans,asanexample,aremorerelaxedabouttime.Thus,negotiationsessionsshouldbeplannedandscheduledsothatthepaceofdiscussionsrunssmoothly.TraitsforCopingWithCultureEmotions:HighorLowSomenegotiatorsaremoreemotionalthanothers.Anegotiatorshouldestablishtheemotionalbehavioroftheotherpartyandadjustnegotiationtacticsappropriatelytosatisfysuchbehavior.FormofAgreement:GeneralorSpecificCultureoftenin?uencestheformofagreementapartyrequires.Usually,NorthAmericanspreferadetailedcontractthatprovidesforalleventualities.TheChinese,however,preferacontractintheformofgeneralprinciples.TraitsforCopingWithCultureBuildinganAgreement:BottomUporTopDownSomenegotiatorsbeginwithagreementongeneralprinciplesandproceedtospeci?citems,suchasprice,deliverydate,andproductquality.Othersbeginwithagreementonspeci?cs,thesumofwhichbecomesthecontract.TeamOrganization:OneLeaderVersusConsensusInsomecultures,oneleaderhastheauthoritytomakecommitments.Inothercultures,groupconsensusmustbesoughtbeforeagreeingtoadeal.TraitsforCopingWithCultureRiskTaking:HighorLowAnegotiatormustexaminetheotherparty’sattitudeaboutrisk.Ifthenegotiatordeterminesthattheotherpartyisriskaverse,heorsheshouldfocustheattentiononproposingrules,mechanisms,andrelationshipsthatreducetheapparentrisksinthedeal.TraitsforCopingWithCultureThankYou!It’sawell-knownpropositionthatyouknowwho’sgoingtowinanegotiation:it’shewhopausesthelongest.

—RobertHolmesCHAPTER3

SelectingYourNegotiatingStyleDodgersGenerally,dodgersdonotlikefacingsituationsinwhichdecisionsmustbemadeandrisksassumed.Thedodgerisareluctantpartywhodoesnotenjoynegotiatingandwhowithdrawsfromthediscussionsorsimplyrefusestoparticipate.DreamersDreamersapproachnegotiationswithonemajorgoalinmind,thatis,topreservetherelationshipevenifitmeansgivingupunnecessaryconcessionswhilereducingtheirownexpectations.StyleDifferencesAmongNegotiatorsHagglersHagglersviewnegotiationsasagive-and-t-akegame.Hagglersbuildsuper?cialrelationshipsandaresatis?edwithsplittingthedifferencetoreacha?nalagreement.Thisstyleismoresuitableforonetimedealsindomesticmarketsituations.StyleDifferencesAmongNegotiatorsCompetitorsCompetitorsenjoycon?icts,feelcomfortablewithaggressivebehavior,andemployhardballtactics.Competitorsusewhateverpowertheyhavetowinandfullyexploittheotherparty’sweaknesses.Negotiatorsrelyingoncompetitivestrategiesandtacticsarefoundeverywhere,withagreaterconcentrationintask-orientedcultures.StyleDifferencesAmongNegotiatorsCreativeProblemSolversProblemsolversdisplaycreativityin?ndingmutuallysatisfyingagreements.

Duringthediscussions,theyemphasizecommonneedsandfrequentlysummarizewhathasbeenagreedtosofar.Theytendtohavelong-termvision,sometimesatthecostofshort-termbene?ts.Duringthediscussions,creativeproblemsolversexchangerelevantinformationandaskquestionsinacooperativeandconstructiveenvironment.StyleDifferencesAmongNegotiatorsStyleDifferencesAmongNegotiatorsStrengthsandweaknessesofdifferentnegotiationstylesStyleDifferencesAmongNegotiatorsStrengthsandweaknessesofdifferentnegotiationstyles(continued)

SeeCaseF:TheRenault-NissanAllianceNegotiationsAppropriateNegotiatingStyleMaximizingjointgainsMostpeoplerelyononeormore

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶(hù)所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶(hù)因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論