版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
HowtoBuildBackBettertheTransatlanticDataRelationship
NIGELCORYANDELLYSSEDICK|MARCH2021
Transatlanticdataflowsareessentialtoorganizationsofallsizesandindustries—notjustlargetechnologyfirms.TheEUandUnitedStatesmustestablishclear,consistentlegalmechanismsfordatatransferssobothsidescanthriveinanincreasinglydigitalglobaleconomy.
KEYTAKEAWAYS
Transatlanticdigitalrelationsareincrisis.WiththeEU-U.S.PrivacyShieldinvalidatedandotherlegalmechanismsfortransferringdataunderscrutiny,thereisaseriousriskofadefactodatalocalizationpolicyhurtingbothsides.
Cross-borderdataflowsarecriticalforfirmsacrossthewholeeconomy—frommanufacturingandtransporttofinancialandInternetservices.Millionsofjobsandalargeshareoftransatlantictradethusdependonstrongdigitalties.
RestrictionsondataflowsdisproportionatelyaffectSMEs,whichoftenrelyondigitaltoolstoreachnewcustomersandgrowtheirbusinessesandarelesslikelythanlargefirmstohavetheresourcestonavigatecomplexlegalrequirements.
Beyondtradeandcommerce,governmentagenciesalsodependoncross-borderdataflowsforpurposesrangingfromregulatoryoversighttoinvestigatingcrimes,protectingnationalsecurity,andmore.
PolicymakersshouldrebuildarobustframeworkfortransatlanticdataflowswithasuccessortothePrivacyShield,newGDPR-complianttransfermechanisms,andimprovedlawenforcementcooperationtoaccesselectronicevidence.
Fullyharmonizingpoliciesisunrealistic,buttheEUandUnitedStatesshouldbepragmaticandforgeabroadcooperativeagendabasedonsharedvaluesasastrategiccounterweighttoauthoritariandigitalpowerslikeChinaandRussia.
ApragmaticU.S.-EUdigitalalliancewouldbemutuallybeneficialininfluencingglobaldata-sharingframeworks,AIregulation,electronicIDs,standardssetting,investmentscreening,andexportcontrolsfordataanddigitaltechnologies.
INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY&INNOVATIONFOUNDATION | MARCH2021
CONTENTS
Introduction 2
TheEUandUnitedStatesNeedtoRepairandReinforcetheDigitalTransatlantic
Relationship
4
TheRoleandValueofDataFlowsandDigitalTradeintheTransatlanticRelationship
5
What’satStake:TheValuableRoleofTransatlanticDataFlowsAcrossSectors
11
Industrial,Transport,andAutomotiveSectors:OfMachinesandData
11
TheAutomotiveandTransportSectorsRelyonDataFlowstoSupportDrivers,
ConnectedVehicles,andRelatedServices
14
AConnectedorFragmentedTransatlanticManufacturingNetwork?
18
Financial,Payment,andInsuranceServices:KeyEnablersofGlobalDigitalTrade
19
DataFlowsSupporttheGrowthofSmallandMedium-SizedEnterprises
24
ConsumerInternetServices:Connected,Personalized,andValuable?OrDisconnected,
Generic,andLessValuable?
27
MaximizingtheBenefitsofTransatlanticHealthDataTransfers
30
DataTransfersDriveTransatlanticLifeSciencesResearch
31
GDPRMakesItHard,IfNotImpossible,forHealthDataTransferstoU.S.and
InternationalPublicHealthAgencies
34
TransatlanticHealthDataSharingBenefitsEveryone:ButItIsGettingHarder,More
Costly,andMoreComplicated
35
PolicyRecommendations
36
NegotiateaNewPrivacyShield
36
EUShouldRedoubleEffortstoBuildNewDataTransferMechanismsUnderGDPR
37
ImproveTransatlanticLawEnforcementCooperationandDataRequests
38
BuildaTransatlanticAgendaBasedon“DigitalRealpolitik”
39
Conclusion
42
Endnotes
44
INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY&INNOVATIONFOUNDATION | MARCH2021 PAGE1
countrybecausetheyareheldaccountableforhowtheymanagedata,meaninglocallegalrequirementstravelwiththedata,regardlessofwhereitisstoredandprocessed.
4
ThiscontrastswiththeEuropeanfocusonthegeographyofdatastorage.MakinginternationaltransfersofEUpersonaldataincreasinglydifficult,costly,andlegallyuncertainleaveslocaldatastorageandprocessingastheonlyviableoption,whichistheendgoalformanyprivacyadvocatesandpolicymakersinEurope.Asitstands,theEU’sapproachtodataprivacyiscreatingtheworld’slargestdefactodatalocalizationframework.TheEU’sonlypeerisChina’sbroadandgrowingexplicitdatalocalizationregime,withlawsthatmakelocaldatastorageandprocessingthenormandtransferstheexception.Atsomepoint,thepressureonU.S.policymakerstoreciprocatewithequallyrestrictiverulespreventingEUfirmssuchasVolkswagen,Phillips,Siemens,andSanofifromtransferringdatafromtheirU.S.operationstotheirEUheadquarterswillbecomesignificantenoughtospurretaliatoryaction.
Itisinfeasibleforfirmstobuildoutlocalhumanresources,management,researchanddevelopment(R&D),regulatorycompliance,andinformationtechnology(IT)andcustomersupportservicesineachandeverymarketthathaslocaldatastoragerequirements.Suchrequirementsunderminetheabilityofallfirms—especiallygloballyengagedones—toleveragethedistributedpoweroftheInternetandcentralizedITsystemstomanagelocal,regional,andglobalbusinessoperationsandcomplianceactivities.Itisimpossibletofullylocalizeanydigitalprocess,good,orservicewithoutsomelevelofimpactordisruption.Whileitmaybetechnicallypossibleforacompany—particularlyalargeone—tofullylocalizedatastorage,therewouldbemajordisruptionsandchangestothetypeandqualityofservices,aswellaslimitsontheuseoftechnologiessuchasartificialintelligence(AI)whereinalgorithmsimprovewithlargerdatasets.Theunderlyingdatastorageinfrastructuredoesnotnecessarilyrelyontheabilitytoexchangedataacrossborders,buttheservicesbuiltonitcertainlydo.
Transatlanticdataflowshaveenormouseconomicimplications.Two-wayEU-U.S.digitaltradegrewfromanestimated$166billionin2005to$292billionin2015.Thesectoralcasestudiesinthisreportshowwhatisatstake.Despitethepopularmisconceptionthatdataflowsonlybenefitsearchenginesandsocialnetworks,severingtransatlanticdataflowswouldhavewide-reachingimpactsacrosstheglobaleconomy.Yet,someEUpolicymakersthinkthatrestrictingorcuttingoffdataflowsanddigitaltradewiththeUnitedStatesisagoodthingasitalignswiththeir“digitalsovereignty”goals,believingthatifithurtsleadingU.S.techfirms,thenitmustbegood—withoutrealizingorappreciatingthebroaderandmuchlargercosts.ThisstanceignoresthefactthatdoingsowouldalsohurtthehundredsofEuropeanfirmsthatusedPrivacyShieldandSCCstomanagedatatransfersbetweentheirheadquartersandofficesandoperationsintheUnitedStates.
5
Unfortunately,thisprotectionistimpulseisalsoevidentinEurope’songoingefforttodefineitsowndigitaleconomyframework,suchastheEuropeanCommission’sdatastrategyanditsDataGovernanceAct.
6
Buttheimpactisnotonlytradeandinnovation-related—governmentsonbothsidesoftheAtlanticdependonfirmsbeingabletotransferdataaspartofday-to-dayregulatoryrequirements,whetherforfinancialoversightofthebanking,financial,andpaymentssectors(forfinancialstability,counter-terrorismfinancing,oranti-money-launderingpurposes)orthereviewofclinicaltrialsbyrespectivepublichealthagencies.Thisisobviouslyinadditiontolawenforcementandnationalsecuritycooperation.
INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY&INNOVATIONFOUNDATION | MARCH2021 PAGE3
ThisreportstartsbyoutliningthehistoryofthetransatlanticdigitalrelationshiptoshowhowboththeEUandUnitesStateshavecontinuouslyrecognizedthevalueinworkingtogethertoaddressissuesastheyarise.However,thisreportalsomakesthecasethatthisrelationshipshouldnotbebasedontroubleshooting,butideally,onabroaderdigitalagenda,givenbothsidessharemanyvaluesandinterests.Itthenanalyzesestimatesoftheeconomicvalueoftransatlanticdigitaltrade,beforeprovidingaseriesofsectoralcasestudiestoshowhowfirmsinadiverserangeofsectors—fromautomotiveandotheradvancedmanufacturerstolifesciencestoconsumerInternetservicestofinancialandbankingservices—usetransatlanticdataflows.
Finally,thisreportprovidesrecommendationstobuildabetter,stronger,andbroadertransatlanticdigitalrelationship:
PolicymakersshouldnegotiateanewPrivacyShield.Longterm,thetwosidescouldworktowardlegislationandatreatyagreementthatwouldcodifysomeoftheircommitments.Inanidealworld,theUnitedStatesandEuropewouldworktogetherwithlike-mindedcountriestodevelopa“GenevaConventionforData,”whichwouldcreateconsensusonissuesaroundgovernmentaccesstodata.
TheEUshouldredoubleeffortstobuildnewdatatransfermechanismsunderGDPR.Thiswouldbeinadditiontothemoreimmediateneedtomakeexistinglegaltools(SCCsandbindingcorporaterules)clear,reasonable,andaccessible.
TheUnitedStatesandEUshouldconcludenegotiationstoimprovetransatlanticaccesstoelectronicevidenceforlawenforcementinvestigations.
TheEUandUnitedStatesshouldbuildabroaderagendaforpragmaticcooperationondataanddigitalpolicyissues—onebasedon“digitalrealpolitik.”Suchcooperationwouldbeeconomicallybeneficialtobothsidesgiventheirextensiveeconomicconnections.Furthermore,whiletherearepointsofconflict,overall,theirsharedvaluesstandinstarkcontrasttothoseofauthoritariandigitalpowerssuchasChinaandRussia.Suchanagendacouldworkonhowtodevelopdatasharingframeworks;developandapplytheappropriateregulationofAI,suchasviaalgorithmicaccountability;developinteroperableelectronicidentitysystems;buildpre-standardizationcooperationfornewandemergingtechnologies;developacoordinatedstrategytocounterChina’seffortstoundulyinfluenceinternationalstandardssettingforAIanddigitalpolicies;andcooperateandcoordinateinvestmentscreeningandexportcontrolsthatincreasinglydealwithdataanddigitaltechnologies.
THEEUANDUNITEDSTATESNEEDTOREPAIRANDREINFORCETHEDIGITALTRANSATLANTICRELATIONSHIP
Despiteconstantpressureoverthelastdecade—andasreactionstotheSnowdenrevelationscontinuetoreverberate—boththeEUandUnitedStateshavekeptthetransatlanticdataanddigitalrelationshipgoing.Despitethechallenges,thereislargelybipartisansupportintheUnitedStatesforEU-U.S.digitalengagement.
TherewassubstantialcontinuityacrosstheObamaandTrumpadministrations,whichislikelytocontinueintheBidenadministration.In2014,PresidentObamaissuedpresidentialpolicydirectivenumber28on“SignalsIntelligenceActivities,”whichincludedsafeguardsfornon-U.S.
INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY&INNOVATIONFOUNDATION | MARCH2021 PAGE4
personsinsignalsintelligence.
7
PrivacyShieldwassignedunderPresidentObama,andwasalsosupportedbytheTrumpadministration.TheU.S.FederalTradeCommissionenforcedPrivacyShieldthroughoutbothadministrations.Meanwhile,theU.S.CongresscontinuestodebateacomprehensiveU.S.dataprivacybillthatwouldnodoubtimprovetheoverallcontextforengagementwiththeEU.However,dataprivacylegislationwouldnotaddressthefundamentaldisagreementoverU.S.governmentsurveillancethatisattheheartofSchremsII.
Withoutpoliticalintervention,itislikelythattransatlanticdatatransferswilleventuallybecutoff.
Giventhis,rebuildingastrongtransatlanticrelationshipwillrequireactiononbothsides.MostofthefocushasbeenontheUnitedStates,whichhasalreadymadechangestoaccountforEUconcernsandsignaleditswillingnesstoconsiderfurtherchanges.Yet,ongoingconflictoverEUpolicyremains.TheUnitedStatesshouldtakeintoconsiderationEuropeanconcernsasitupdatesitslawsandpoliciesaroundgovernmentaccesstodataanddataprotection.However,theEUshouldalsoconsiderpolicyandlegalreformstoGDPRandotherdigitalpoliciesaspartofconstructiveeffortstobuildbothshort-andlong-termtoolstoaddressbothnewandongoingissuesregardinginternationaldatagovernance.EUmemberstatesalsoneedtobeconsistentinaddressingdataprivacyandsurveillanceissues.NationalsecurityisnotaEuropeanCommissionorEUcompetency,sodoingsowillrequireEUmemberengagement.IftheEUcontinuestotakealargelyhands-offapproachabouttheneedtoaddressallrelatedissue—notjustprivacy,buttradeandnationalsecurity—itwillleadtoruinasitleavesprivacyadvocates,theEDPB,andthecourtsinthedriver’sseatofacriticallyimportantpartofthetransatlanticrelationship.
8
Withoutpoliticalintervention,itislikelythattransatlanticdatatransferswilleventuallybecutoff.
Thestakesinvolvedinbuildingasuccessfultransatlanticdigitalrelationshiparealreadyhigh,buttheygrowevenhigher,giventhemanyglobaldebatesaboutdataanddigitaltechnologies.IftheEUandUnitedStateswanttotrulyworktogetherontheseissues—astheEuropeanCommissionfrequentlycallsfor—theybothneedtoshowthattheycanaddresstheirownissuesinawaythatpresentsamodelforothercountries.Absentsuchanoutcome,callsfortransatlanticcooperationonglobalissueswouldbeseenasmeaningless.
THEROLEANDVALUEOFDATAFLOWSANDDIGITALTRADEINTHETRANSATLANTICRELATIONSHIP
Digitaltrade—includingbothdigitalanddigitallyenabledservices—isanincreasinglyimportantcomponentoftheglobaleconomy.Asthesectoralcasestudiesshow,cross-bordertransfersofdataunderpinvirtuallyallbusinessprocessesininternationaltradeandinvestment.
9
Estimatingthevalueoftransatlanticdataflowsanddigitaltradeischallenging.
10
Forexample,approximatingvaluebytheaggregatevolumeofdatatransfershassignificantlimitations.
11
Thevalueofdatadependsonitscontent.
12
Dataisalsohighlycontextspecific.Anindividualperson’sdatamaybevaluabletothatperson,butonlyholdbroadervaluewhenaggregatedwithdatafrommanyotherindividualsandothersourcesofdata.Thevalueofdataistemporalinthatitmayonlybecomevaluablewhenusedaspartoffutureanalysis.Furthermore,somedataflowsmaybenon-monetized—representingintra-companytransfersthatarecommerciallyvaluable,butnotcapturedinaformaltransaction.Similarly,grossdomesticproduct(GDP)andothereconomicstatisticsdonotmeasurethevalueofconsumersurplus,suchaswhenconsumers
INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY&INNOVATIONFOUNDATION | MARCH2021 PAGE5
accessdigitalgoodsandservicesatnofinancialcost.
13
Whileestimatingthevalueofthespecificunderlyingdataanditstransferisdifficult,itisclearthatcontinuousdataaggregationandanalysisbyfirmscreatesenormousvalue,inwhattheOrganizationforEconomicCooperationandDevelopment(OECD)callsthe“globaldatavaluecycle.”
14
Whileprecise,comprehensive,andconsistentmeasurementofthevalueofdataanddigitaltradeinandbetweentheUnitedStatesandEUisnotyetpossible,therearearangeofestimatesthatsupportwhatweknowanecdotally—thatdataanddigitaltraderepresentanimportantandfast-growingpartoftheglobaleconomy.
15
InAugust2020,theU.S.DepartmentofCommerce’sreport“NewDigitalEconomyEstimates”calculatedthatthedigitaleconomyaccountedfor9percentofU.S.GDPin2018,whichrankeditjustbelowthemanufacturingsector(whichaccountedfor11.3percent)andjustabovefinanceandinsurance(7.6percent).
16
From2006to2018,theU.S.digitaleconomy’srealvalueaddedgrewatanannualrateof6.8percent.Itsupported8.8millionjobs,whichrepresented5.7percentofU.S.totalemployment.
17
InEurope,thevalueaddedfromtheinformationandcommunicationtechnology(ICT)sectorin2017wasequivalenttoatleast3.9percentofGDP,2.5percentoftotalemployment,and18.6and20.6percentofthetotalR&DpersonnelandresearchersintheEU,respectively.
18
EmploymentintheEU’sICTservicessectorgrewby22.7percentbetween2012and2017.
19
Andasof2020,oneofthefastest-growingaspectsoftheglobaldigitaleconomy,the“appeconomy,”accountsforover2millionjobsintheU.S.andEUalike.
20
Dataanddigitaltraderepresentanimportantandfast-growingpartoftheglobaleconomy.
TraditionaltradestatisticscapturesomeoftheEU-U.S.digitaltraderelationship,butnotall.
21
TheUnitedStatesisboththelargest(non-EU)marketforEurope’sdigitallyenabledservicesanditslargestsupplier.
22
Indicativeofthis,abouthalfofalldataflowsinboththeUnitedStatesandEuropearetransatlantictransfers.
23
In2018,digitallyenabledservicesaccountedforthemajorityofU.S.servicesexports(55percent),nearlyhalfofU.S.servicesimports(48percent),andafull69percentofU.S.globalsurplusinservices.
24
TheU.S.alsoaccountedfor32percentofexportsand39percentofimportsofdigitallyenabledservicesfromandtotheEU.
25
TheU.S.DepartmentofCommerce’sICTandpotential-ICTbaseddigitaltradedataprovidesthebroadest,andmostrecent,estimateoftransatlanticdigitaltrade,whichintotal,wasworth$295billionin2018.ItcapturesbothICTservicesthatareusedtofacilitateinformationprocessingandcommunication(e.g.,computerandtelecommunicationservices)andpotentiallyICT-enabledservicesthatcanpredominantlybedeliveredremotelyoverICTnetworks,suchasfinancial,insurance,intellectualproperty,professionalandmanagementservices,andR&Dservices,amongothers.
26
Thedataestimatesthat,in2018,ICTandpotential-ICTbaseddigitaltradebetweentheUnitedStatesandEuropewas$188billioninexportsto,and$107billioninimportsfrom,theEU,respectively(see
figure1)
.
INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY&INNOVATIONFOUNDATION | MARCH2021 PAGE6
Figure1:U.S.exportsandimportsofICTandpotentialICT-baseddigitaltradewiththeEU(2018)
27
UpdatingtheU.S.DepartmentofCommerce’s“digitallydeliverableservices”(DDS)estimate—whichcomprisesamorenarrowsetofservicesthanthoseincludedintheestimatesabove—ismorereadilycomparableacrosscountries(usingtradeinvalueadded(TiVA)andEurostatdatabases),butdoesnothavedataforrecentyears(mostrecentdataisfor2015).AnalysisofDDStradecapturesamixoftransactionsthatareentirelydigital,somewhatdigital,orentirelynon-digital.
28
Italsoshowsthattransatlantictradeislargeandgrowing.U.S.DDSexportstotheEUrosefrom$98billionto$183billionbetween2005and2015,whileEUDDSexportstotheUnitedStatesrosefrom$67billionto$108billion(see
figure2)
.
Figure2:U.S.exportsandimportsofdigitallydeliveredserviceswiththeEU(2005-1015)
29
INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY&INNOVATIONFOUNDATION | MARCH2021 PAGE7
TheEU’sDDSexportsvaryconsiderablybymemberstate,whichhighlightstheeconomicdifferencesbetweenmemberstatesandtheiruseofdata,services,andICTs.
30
AccordingtoTiVAdata,GermanyhasseenconsistentlyrisingDDSexports,growingfrom$36billionin2010to$65billionin2018(see
figure4)
.FrancehasalsoseenitsDDSexportsgrow,from$27billionin2011to$41billionin2018(see
figure5)
.Bycontrast,Italy’sexportshavebarelygrown(see
figure6),
increasingonlyfrom$6.1billionto$8.6billionbetween2010and2018.TheNetherlands’DDSexportsdeclined,fallingfrom$41billionin2010to$26billionto2018.Despitethatcountry’slowoverallDDSexports,however,DDSservicesremainimportanttotheNetherlands,exhibitingahighdegreeofDDSexportintensity(DDSexportsasapercentageoftotalserviceexports).
ParsingoutDDSexportsbyindustryshowsfurthervariationbetweentheUnitedStatesandtheEU.IntheUnitedStates,“other”DDSexports,representedbyservices(e.g.,thelegal,scientific,andarchitecturalfields),hasdominatedinrecentyears(see
figure3)
.Royaltiesandlicensing,aswellasfinancialservices,arealsobothsignificantdriversofDDSexports.ITservicesdominateinGermany(growingfrom$11.6billionin2012to$22billioninyear2018),while“other”remainsataclosesecond,indicatingaheavyITfocusinGermanyrelativetootherEUcountries(see
figure4)
.InFrance,licensingand“other”servicestakethelead,followedbyITandfinancialservices(see
figure5)
.ITservicesalsodominateinItaly,withthatsectoroutweighinglicensingand“other”relatedDDSexports(see
figure6)
.TheEUwillcontinuetoremainakeyregionformanyDDSsectorsgoingforward,rivaledbytheUnitedStates,Japan,andincreasingly,China.
Figure3:U.S.exportsofdigitallydeliveredservicesglobally,byproductgroup(2010-2018)
31
$500B
$400B
Other
$300B
FinancialServices
$200B
IntellectualProperty
$100B
ICTServices
InsuranceandPensionServices
$0B
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY&INNOVATIONFOUNDATION | MARCH2021 PAGE8
Figure4:Germany’sexportsofdigitallydeliveredservicesoutsidetheEU,byproductgroup(2010-2018)
32
$70B
$60B
$50B
$40B
Other
$30B
ICTServices
$20B
IntellectualProperty
$10B
FinancialServices
InsuranceandPensionServices
$0B
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Figure5:France’sexportsofdigitallydeliveredservicesoutsidetheEU,byproductgroup(2011-2018)
33
$50B
$40B
$30B
Other
$20B
ICTServices
$10B
IntellectualProperty
InsuranceandPensionServices
FinancialServices
$0B
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY&INNOVATIONFOUNDATION | MARCH2021 PAGE9
Figure6:Italy’sexportsofdigitallydeliveredservicesoutsidetheEU,byproductgroup(2010-2018)
34
$12B
$10B
Other
$8B
$6B
ICTServices
$4B
IntellectualProperty
$2B
FinancialServices
InsuranceandPensionServices
$0B
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Acomprehensiveassessmentoftransatlanticdigitaltradeneedstotakeintoaccountvaluable(butnon-monetized)intra-firmdatatransfersthatrepresentservicessuppliedviaaffiliateslocatedinbothEuropeandtheUnitedStates.
35
Asin2018,abouttwo-thirdsoftheservicesprovidedinternationallybothbyandtotheUnitedStateswerethroughaffiliates.
36
Many(ifnotall)multinationalcompaniesintheUnitedStatesandEUrelyoncross-borderdatatransferstosupporttheirinternationalbusinessoperations.Again,therearemeasurementissuesasdifferencesincoverageandclassificationmakeitdifficulttocomparetradeinserviceswithservicessuppliedthroughaffiliates.
37
However,theyarestillusefulinshowingthatthedatadisplayedin
figure5
and
figure6
areconservativeestimatesofthefullvalueofdigitalanddigitallyenabledservicesinthetransatlanticeconomicrelationship.
38
Acomprehensiveassessmentoftransatlanticdigitaltradeneedstotakeintoaccountvaluable(butnon-monetized)intra-firmdatatransfersthatrepresentservicessuppliedviaaffiliateslocatedinbothEuropeandtheUnitedStates.
TheU.S.DepartmentofCommerceestimatedthat53percentofthe$839billioninservicesprovidedinEuropebyU.S.affiliatesin2017wasdigitally
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 單位管理制度呈現(xiàn)合集【職工管理】十篇
- 《全面質(zhì)量管理ol》課件
- 《沙盤游戲治療》課件
- 第5單元 國(guó)防建設(shè)與外交成就(A卷·知識(shí)通關(guān)練)(解析版)
- 某磚混結(jié)構(gòu)住宅樓招標(biāo)文件
- 《園林景觀小品設(shè)計(jì)》課件
- 明確財(cái)務(wù)數(shù)據(jù)分析目標(biāo)的路徑計(jì)劃
- 公園保安工作職責(zé)概述
- 2023年項(xiàng)目部安全管理人員安全培訓(xùn)考試題【必考】
- 教師暑假培訓(xùn)心得體會(huì)800字(九篇)
- 科研年終總結(jié)匯報(bào)
- 汽車維修安全應(yīng)急預(yù)案范文(5篇)
- 安全教育教案大班40篇
- 2024-2030年中國(guó)清潔供熱行業(yè)發(fā)展趨勢(shì)與投資前景預(yù)測(cè)報(bào)告版
- 2025屆上海市交大附中嘉定分校物理高二上期末達(dá)標(biāo)檢測(cè)試題含解析
- 放飛心靈 激揚(yáng)青春-中職生心理健康學(xué)習(xí)通超星期末考試答案章節(jié)答案2024年
- 行政事業(yè)單位內(nèi)部控制規(guī)范專題講座
- 不良反應(yīng)事件及嚴(yán)重不良事件處理的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)操作規(guī)程藥物臨床試驗(yàn)機(jī)構(gòu)GCP SOP
- 2024年6月浙江高考?xì)v史試卷(含答案解析)
- 保密工作會(huì)議領(lǐng)導(dǎo)講話稿
- DB6101-T 3196-2024 生活無著的流浪乞討人員站內(nèi)救助服務(wù)規(guī)范
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論