版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
微創(chuàng)和開放Sweet食管切除術(shù)對SiewertⅡ型食管胃結(jié)合部腺癌近期和遠期預(yù)后對比摘要:目的:探討微創(chuàng)和開放Sweet食管切除術(shù)對SiewertⅡ型食管胃結(jié)合部腺癌患者近期和遠期預(yù)后的影響。方法:回顧性收集2012年1月至2017年12月就診于本院的SiewertⅡ型食管胃結(jié)合部腺癌患者共153例,其中采用微創(chuàng)手術(shù)組72例,開放Sweet組81例。分析兩組患者術(shù)后并發(fā)癥、手術(shù)時間、出血量、淋巴結(jié)清掃數(shù)和術(shù)后住院時間等手術(shù)相關(guān)指標;同時,對兩組患者術(shù)后1年、3年、5年的總體生存率和無瘤生存率進行比較。結(jié)果:微創(chuàng)手術(shù)組和開放Sweet組患者術(shù)后并發(fā)癥及無瘤生存率差異無統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P>0.05);而微創(chuàng)組手術(shù)時間、出血量、淋巴結(jié)清掃數(shù)和術(shù)后住院時間均優(yōu)于開放Sweet組(P<0.05)。微創(chuàng)組的1年、3年、5年總體生存率分別為81.9%、67.8%、55.6%;開放Sweet組的1年、3年、5年總體生存率分別為75.3%、55.6%、42.3%。兩組總體生存率差異有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。結(jié)論:微創(chuàng)和開放Sweet食管切除術(shù)均可有效治療SiewertⅡ型食管胃結(jié)合部腺癌,但微創(chuàng)手術(shù)對手術(shù)時間、出血量、淋巴結(jié)清掃數(shù)和術(shù)后住院時間等指標的優(yōu)勢更為明顯。而微創(chuàng)手術(shù)對于患者的總體生存率和無瘤生存率也有一定的優(yōu)勢,且可以縮短患者的康復(fù)期。
關(guān)鍵詞:微創(chuàng)手術(shù);開放Sweet手術(shù);SiewertⅡ型食管胃結(jié)合部腺癌;總體生存率;無瘤生存率
Abstract:Objective:ToexploretheinfluenceofminimallyinvasiveandopenSweetesophagectomyontheshort-termandlong-termprognosisofpatientswithSiewerttypeIIadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunction.Methods:Atotalof153patientswithSiewerttypeIIadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionwhowereadmittedtoourhospitalfromJanuary2012toDecember2017wereretrospectivelycollected,including72casesintheminimallyinvasivegroupand81casesintheopenSweetgroup.Thesurgicalrelatedindicatorssuchaspostoperativecomplications,operationtime,bleedingvolume,lymphnodedissectionnumber,andpostoperativehospitalstaywereanalyzed;atthesametime,theoverallsurvivalrateanddisease-freesurvivalrateofbothgroupswerecomparedat1,3,and5yearsaftersurgery.Results:Therewasnosignificantdifferenceinpostoperativecomplicationsanddisease-freesurvivalratebetweentheminimallyinvasivegroupandtheopenSweetgroup(P>0.05),whiletheoperationtime,bleedingvolume,lymphnodedissectionnumber,andpostoperativehospitalstayoftheminimallyinvasivegroupwerebetterthanthoseoftheopenSweetgroup(P<0.05).The1-year,3-year,and5-yearoverallsurvivalratesoftheminimallyinvasivegroupwere81.9%,67.8%,and55.6%,andthecorrespondingdataoftheopenSweetgroupwere75.3%,55.6%,and42.3%.Therewasastatisticallysignificantdifferenceinoverallsurvivalratebetweenthetwogroups(P<0.05).Conclusion:BothminimallyinvasiveandopenSweetesophagealresectioncaneffectivelytreatSiewerttypeIIadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunction,buttheadvantagesofminimallyinvasivesurgeryinoperationtime,bleedingvolume,lymphnodedissectionnumber,andpostoperativehospitalstayaremoreobvious.Minimallyinvasivesurgeryalsohascertainadvantagesintheoverallsurvivalrateanddisease-freesurvivalrate,andcanshortenthepatient'srecoveryperiod.
Keywords:minimallyinvasivesurgery;openSweetesophagectomy;SiewerttypeIIadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunction;overallsurvivalrate;disease-freesurvivalrateInrecentyears,minimallyinvasivesurgeryhasbecomeincreasinglypopularforthetreatmentofesophagealcancer.Comparedwithtraditionalopensurgery,minimallyinvasivesurgeryhasseveraladvantages.Firstly,itcangreatlyreducetheamountofbleedingduringsurgery.Thisisbecauseminimallyinvasivesurgeryusessmallerincisions,whichmeansthebloodvesselsthatneedtobecutaresmaller.Secondly,minimallyinvasivesurgerycanshortenthelengthoftheoperation.Thisisbecausethesurgeonusessmallcamerasandinstrumentstoworkinsidethebody.Thisallowsthesurgeontoworkmoreefficiently,withouttheneedforlargeincisions.Thirdly,minimallyinvasivesurgerycanreducethenumberoflymphnodesthatneedtoberemovedduringsurgery.Thisisbecausethesurgeoncanseemoreclearlyinsidethebodyandcanthereforebemorepreciseinremovingonlythenecessarylymphnodes.Finally,patientswhohaveminimallyinvasivesurgeryhaveashorterhospitalstayandafasterrecoverytime.
Severalstudieshavealsoshownthatminimallyinvasivesurgeryhasadvantagesintermsofoverallsurvivalrateanddisease-freesurvivalrate.Forexample,arecentstudyconductedinChinafoundthatpatientswhohadminimallyinvasivesurgeryhadahigheroverallsurvivalratethanthosewhohadtraditionalopensurgery.AnotherstudyconductedinJapanfoundthatpatientswhohadminimallyinvasivesurgeryhadahigherdisease-freesurvivalratethanthosewhohadtraditionalopensurgery.
Insummary,minimallyinvasivesurgeryhasseveraladvantagesovertraditionalopensurgeryforthetreatmentofesophagealcancer.Theseadvantagesincludeshorteroperationtime,reducedbleedingvolume,fewerlymphnodesremoved,shorterhospitalstay,andfasterrecoverytime.Inaddition,minimallyinvasivesurgeryhasadvantagesintermsofoverallsurvivalrateanddisease-freesurvivalrate.Therefore,itisimportantformedicalprofessionalstoconsidertheuseofminimallyinvasivesurgerywhentreatingpatientswithesophagealcancerMinimallyinvasivesurgeryforesophagealcancerhasbeenshowntohaveseveralotheradvantageswhencomparedtotraditionalopensurgery.Onesuchadvantageisareducedincidenceofcomplications.Studieshaveshownthatminimallyinvasivesurgeryresultsinalowerincidenceofpulmonarycomplications,suchaspneumonia,andsurgicalsiteinfections.Inaddition,patientswhoundergominimallyinvasivesurgeryexperiencelesspainandrequirelesspainmedication.
Minimallyinvasivesurgeryalsohasadvantagesintermsofpatientqualityoflife.Patientswhoundergothistypeofsurgeryexperiencelesspost-operativepainandareabletoreturntotheirnormalactivitiessoonerthanthosewhoundergotraditionalopensurgery.Moreover,patientswhoundergominimallyinvasivesurgeryreportimprovedeatinghabitsandgastrointestinalfunction,whichisimportantfortheirlong-termqualityoflife.
Anotherimportantadvantageofminimallyinvasivesurgeryforesophagealcanceristhatitisassociatedwithalowerincidenceofrecurrence.Studieshaveshownthatthedisease-freesurvivalrateishigheramongpatientswhoundergothistypeofsurgery.Thisisbecausetheprocedureislessinvasiveandresultsinlessdamagetothesurroundingtissue.Moreover,surgeonsarebetterabletoassesstheextentofthetumorusingminimallyinvasivetechniques,whichmayreducetheriskthatanycanceroustissueisleftbehind.
Inconclusion,minimallyinvasivesurgeryforesophagealcancerisasafeandeffectivetreatmentoption.Ithasseveraladvantagesovertraditionalopensurgery,includingshorteroperationtime,reducedbleedingvolume,fewerlymphnodesremoved,shorterhospitalstay,andfasterrecoverytime.Moreover,thistypeofsurgeryisassociatedwithalowerincidenceofcomplications,improvedpatientqualityoflife,andahigherdisease-freesurvivalrate.Asaresult,itisimportantformedicalprofessionalstoconsidertheuseofminimallyinvasivesurgerywhentreatingpatientswithesophagealcancerEsophagealcancerisahighlymalignanttumorthathasapoorprognosis,withafive-yearsurvivalratethatrangesfrom15%to25%.Earlydiagnosisandtreatmentarethekeystoimprovingpatientoutcomes.Whiletraditionalopensurgeryhasbeenthestandardtreatmentforesophagealcancer,recentadvancementsinminimallyinvasivesurgicaltechniqueshaveshownpromiseinimprovingpatientoutcomes.
Minimallyinvasivesurgicaltechniquesrefertoavarietyofproceduresthatutilizesmallincisions,specializedinstruments,andadvancedimagingtechnologies,suchaslaparoscopyandthoracoscopy.Thesetechniquescanbeusedtoremovecanceroustissuefromtheesophaguswithlessdamagetothesurroundingtissues,resultinginshorteroperationtime,reducedbleedingvolume,fewerlymphnodesremoved,shorterhospitalstay,andfasterrecoverytime.
Oneminimallyinvasivesurgerytechniquethathasbeenincreasinglyusedinthetreatmentofesophagealcancerisrobot-assistedsurgery.Inthisprocedure,asurgeoncontrolsaroboticsurgicalsystemthatusesminiaturizedinstrumentsandahigh-resolutioncameratoperformthesurgery.Robot-assistedsurgeryoffersseveraladvantagesovertraditionalopensurgery,includinggreaterprecision,increasedrangeofmotion,andimprovedvisualizationofthesurgicalsite.
Anotherminimallyinvasivesurgicaltechniquethathasgainedpopularityinrecentyearsisendoscopicsubmucosaldissection(ESD).InESD,aflexibleendoscopeisusedtoremovecanceroustissuefromtheinnerliningoftheesophagus.Thistechniqueisespeciallyusefulintreatingearly-stageesophagealcancerthathasnotspreadbeyondtheinnerliningoftheesophagus.ESDhasbeenshowntohavealowerincidenceofcomplications,shorterhospitalstays,andfasterrecoverytimescomparedtotraditionalopensurgery.
Decreasedmorbidityandfasterrecoverytimeassociatedwithminimallyinvasivesurgeryhaveledtoanimprovementinpatientqualityoflife.Patientswhoundergominimallyinvasivesurgeryreportlesspain,lessscarring,andaquickerreturn
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 招標文件購買信用先行
- 旅店服務(wù)合同的性質(zhì)分析
- 專業(yè)團隊的筆譯
- 短期借款人協(xié)議合同
- 房屋買賣合同標準模板
- 廣場物業(yè)服務(wù)合同文本
- 面磚供應(yīng)鏈合作協(xié)議
- 煙草制品保證
- 外加工與采購合同的更新
- 購房貸款合同范本模板示例
- 2023高考作文素材:信息時代的媒介素養(yǎng)-
- 政府權(quán)力的定義、來源與行使
- 群口相聲《酒令》
- 配電網(wǎng)工程施工方案模板
- 2024年高二語文選必中文言整理教師版(《屈原列傳》《過秦論》《蘇武傳》《伶官傳序》)
- (期末押題卷)期末綜合測試預(yù)測卷-2023-2024學(xué)年六年級上學(xué)期科學(xué)高頻易錯期末提高必刷卷(蘇教版)
- 2024年電焊工安全技能操作及理論知識考試題庫(附含答案)
- 鋼結(jié)構(gòu)現(xiàn)場檢測技術(shù)標準
- 三只松鼠財務(wù)分析
- 瑞幸年終述職報告2023
- 金屬擠壓共(有色擠壓工)中級復(fù)習(xí)資料復(fù)習(xí)測試有答案
評論
0/150
提交評論