本科畢業(yè)設(shè)計-圖示理論與英語聽力教學(xué)_第1頁
本科畢業(yè)設(shè)計-圖示理論與英語聽力教學(xué)_第2頁
本科畢業(yè)設(shè)計-圖示理論與英語聽力教學(xué)_第3頁
本科畢業(yè)設(shè)計-圖示理論與英語聽力教學(xué)_第4頁
本科畢業(yè)設(shè)計-圖示理論與英語聽力教學(xué)_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩11頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

AbstractConsideringthefactthattheunderstandingoflisteningmaterialsistheinteractionalresultofthelistener’slanguageandschemaknowledge,schematheorynowisusedwidelyintheresearchareaofacquiringasecondlanguage.ThepaperaimstoexploretheapplicationsofschematheoryduringtheteachingofEnglishlisteningfromtheperspectivesoftheschematheory,itseffectsontheteachingofEnglishlistening,thestrategiesguidedbyschematheoryinlisteningteaching.Byimplementingacomparativestudyandanalysizingitsresults,theauthorhasfinallycometoaconclusion:TheteachingmodelofEnglishlisteningbasedonschematheoryismoreeffectivetoimprovestudents’listeningskillsthanthetraditionalteachingmodel;thebackgroundknowledgeproducesagreatimpactonthepromotionoflisteningcomprehension.Basedonsuchfindingspedagogicalimplicationshavebeenmadeinthehopeofhelpingteachersandstudentstouseschematheorytoamelioratethetraditionalteachingmodelandfinallytoapplythetechniquesandskillsguidedbyschematheorytopracticalteachingandlearning.KeyWords:schematheory;teachingofEnglishlistening;effects;experimentalresearch;teachingmodel

中文摘要鑒于聽者對所聽材料的理解是其語言知識和圖式知識相互作用的結(jié)果,圖式理論如今被廣泛應(yīng)用于第二語言教學(xué)研究中。本文試圖從圖式理論及其對英語聽力教學(xué)的影響,圖式理論支持的聽力教學(xué)策略等方面來探討圖式理論對英語聽力教學(xué)的啟示。筆者通過進(jìn)行對比實驗以及分析實驗數(shù)據(jù),得出以下結(jié)論:以圖式理論為基礎(chǔ)的英語聽力教學(xué)模式比傳統(tǒng)的英語聽力教學(xué)模式更能有效地提高學(xué)生聽力理解能力;教授聽力材料的背景知識對提高聽力水平影響頗深?;谶@些結(jié)論筆者對提高現(xiàn)有英語聽力教學(xué)給出了相應(yīng)建議,希望能夠使得教育者與學(xué)習(xí)者有意識地利用圖式理論來改變傳統(tǒng)的教學(xué)模式,最終將在圖式理論指導(dǎo)下的學(xué)習(xí)策略和方法運用于實際教學(xué)中。關(guān)鍵詞:圖式理論;英語聽力教學(xué);影響;實驗研究;教學(xué)模式ChapterOneIntroduction1.1IntroductionListeningisoneofthecriticallanguageskillsthataremostlyusedinourdailylife.Studentsandteachershavebecomemoreawareofhoweffectivelisteningfunctionsinsecondlanguageacquisition.However,thecurrentteachingofEnglishlisteninginChinaisnotsatisfying,sinceitisregardedasastaticprocessandcharacterizedbygrammar–centeredness,whichtoagreatextenthasinhibitedthedevelopmentofstudents’listeningability.Itisverynecessarytoreformtheinefficientteachingmodelandtoexploreusefullisteninginstructions.Afterlong-termstudies,linguistshavefoundthatlisteningisaninteractiveprocessinwhichthelistenercouldcombinethenewinformationwithhispreviousknowledgeandexperience,inordertoreachafullcomprehension(LiuYumeietXiaoSu,2007).Therefore,studiesonschematheoryhavegainedgreatattentioninthefieldofEnglishteachingandhavebeenevokedsincethenbothintheforeigncountriesandinChina.Inthisdissertation,theauthorhasdecidedtoassociateschematheorywiththeteachingofEnglishlisteningandtocarryoutastudyinthehopeofinvestigatingtheinteractionbetweenthem.1.2AimandObjectivesThisdissertationaimstoapplyschematheorytotheteachingofEnglishlisteningandtoprovethefunctionsofschematheorybyimplementingastudy.Ingeneral,thestudyhasthefollowingthreeobjectives:(i)tostudyschematheoryanditsroleintheteachingprocedure,(ii)toexploretheeffectsofschematheoryonclassroomlisteningteaching,and(iii)topresentusefulsuggestionsoftransformingteachingmodelsinthefutureteachingprocess.1.3OrganizationThewholedissertationconsistsofsixchapters.ChapterOneisanintroductiontotheresearchtopic,theresearchbackgroundandthereasonsandpurposesofthestudy.ChapterTwoisthedetailedtheoreticalpremisesofschematheoryfromtheperspectivesofitsconcept,developmentandclassification.ChapterThreeismainlyabouttheinteractionbetweenschematheoryandthelisteningteaching,includingtheanalysisofthreelisteningstages,threelisteningabilitiesandtheeffectsofschematheory.ChapterFourisanelaborationofacomparativestudywhichaimstoprovehowschematheoryfunctionsactivelyintheteachingofEnglishlistening.AccordingtotheanalysisofthestudyinChapterFour,ChapterFivefocusesonthepedagogicalsuggestions,whichcanbedividedintothreecategoriesintermsofstudents,teachersandteachingmaterials.Thelastchapterisabouttheconclusionwheretheresearchresultsaresummarized.

ChapterTwoSchemaTheory2.1TheConceptofSchemaTheorySchematheoryhasbeenoneoftheprevailingtheoriesinthefieldoflanguageteachinginthepasttwentyyears.“Schema”referstopeople’sgeneralknowledgeabouttheworld,namelyone’s“pre-existentknowledge”or“backgroundknowledge”.Thetheoryofhowareaderoralistenerutilizeshisschematicknowledgetoachieveefficientcomprehensionwhenreadingorlisteningiscalledschematheory(Long,1989).Theapplicationofschematheoryintheteachingoflisteningbymeansofactivatingstudents’previousschemastoredintheirbrainsorbuildingnewschemabeforelisteningwillacceleratetheconstructionofmeaningandfacilitatelisteningcomprehensioninthelisteningprocess.Schematheoryholdstheviewthatlisteningcomprehensionisanactiveanddynamicprocessinwhichschematicknowledgeplaysanimportantrole.Successfullisteningisachievedthroughinteractivecombinationoflistener’sexistingschemaandtheincominginformationoflisteningmaterials.Inaddition,psychologicalexperimentshaveproventhatschemaplaysactivelyinlisteningcomprehensionandmemoryaccumulation(Carroll,1984).Firstly,schemapresentsapsychologicalframeworkforinterpretationofinformation,namely,apositivestateofunderstandingofnewknowledgeinthepreparation,sothatpeoplecanbuildamorespecificschemabyconnectingitwiththepriorknowledge.Secondly,schemawillhelpthedistributionofattention.Inthelisteningprocess,thebrainisactiveontheonehandtoprocessthepriorinformation,andontheotherhandtoobtainnewknowledge.Ifthebrainisnotguidedbyrelatedschemaforunderstandingthecontent,itiseasyforlearnerstodispersetheattentionandtoloseaccuratememory.Finally,schemaofferscluestointerpretation,editionandsummary.Listenersusethebackgroundknowledgeandstylisticschematomakejudgmentsanddrawconclusions,inthepurposeofspeedingupanddeepeningtheirunderstanding.Becauseoftheirlackofrelevantschema,listenerscannotunderstandthelisteningtexttoafullanddeepextent.2.2TheDevelopmentofSchemaTheory\o"Plato"PlatoelaboratedontheGreekdoctrineofidealtypes–suchastheperfectcirclethatexistsinthemindbutwhichnoonehaseverseen.\o"ImmanuelKant"ImmanuelKantfurtherdevelopedthenotionandintroducedtheword“schema”.Forexample,hedescribedthe“dog”schema:amentalpatternwhich“candelineatethefigureofafour-footedanimalinageneralmanner,withoutlimitationtoanysingledeterminantfactorasexperience,oranypossibleimagethatIcanrepresentinconcerto”.Earlydevelopmentsoftheideainpsychologyemergedwiththe\o"Gestaltpsychology"Gestaltpsychologistsand\o"Piaget"Piaget.In1926,theterm“schema”wasusedbyPiagetinhistheoryofdevelopment,whichdeemedthat“childrenadoptaseriesofschematounderstandtheworld”.R.C.Anderson,arespectededucationalpsychologist,alsomadecontributionstodevelopschematheory.SchematheorywasinitiallyintroducedintopsychologyandeducationthroughtheworkoftheBritishpsychologistSirFredericBartlett,withwhoseworkthetermcametobeusedinitsmodernsense.FurtherworkontheconceptofschemawasconductedbyBrewerandTreyenswhodemonstratedthattheschema-drivenexpectationofthepresenceofanobjectwassometimessufficienttotriggeritserroneousrecollection.2.3TheClassificationofSchemaTheoryTheschemathatinfluencelisteningcomprehensioncanbeclassifiedasthreemaintypes:languageschema,contentschemaandformschema(Long,1989).2.3.1LanguageSchemaLanguageschemareferstolisteners’priorknowledgeofthelanguage,whichinvolvedpronunciation,vocabularyandgrammar.Withouttheknowledgeoflanguage,listenerswillencounterobstaclesinthelisteningcomprehension.Languageschemainforeignlanguagelisteningfunctionsmoreimportantlythaninthenativelanguagelistening,becausecomprehensionofaforeignlanguageneedsaccuratedecoding,whichcannotbeobtainedmerelybyexperience.

2.3.2ContentSchemaContentschemaisthecontentandthesubjectofthetext,soitcanalsobecalledthematicschema.Whenlisteningtoafragmentofatext,listenersusuallypredictitstheme,whichenableslistenerstoguessthegeneralcontentofthetext.Tosomeextent,thethemeofthetextdirectlyaffectsthelevelofcomprehensionoflisteningmaterials.2.3.3FormSchemaFormschemaisequallyimportantasthecontentschema.Itreferstolisteners’knowledgeindiscourseandrhetoric.Understandingtheschematicstructureofthediscoursehelpslistenerstograspthemainideaandtoestablisheffectivepredictionandexpectation.Taking“makingreservationforahotelroom”forinstance,learnerswillassociatethethemetopriorknowledgesuchasahotelroom,telephone,price,place,etc.Thewholeprocessofbookingahotelroomnormallyinvolvesseveralsteps:opening,requirements,confirmation,closing.Withthesimilarpredictionguidedbyschema,listeners’comprehensionofmaterialswillbegreatlyenhanced.

ChapterThreeSchemaTheoryandTeachingofEnglishListeningInthehistoryoflanguage,people’sviewsonnatureoflisteninghavegonethroughmanychanges.Theytraditionallyobserveitasapassiveprocess,inwhichthelistenerresemblesatape-recorderwhosemaintaskissimplymemorizingwhatthespeakerhassaid.Duetothestudiesofschematheory,listeningisregardedasaprocessthatdealswiththenewinformationbyconnectingitwiththepriorknowledge.SchematheoryfunctionsvitallyintheteachingprocessofEnglishlistening.Accordingtoschematheory,theknowledgeinourbrainhasbeensystemizedtoformastructure,inwhichallsortsofinformationareconnectedwitheachother.Attheverybeginningofabsorbingnewknowledge,peopleusuallyassociateitwiththerelevantthingsthroughtheactivereflectionofthebrain,toactivatethenewschemawhichcanimproveunderstanding(MendelsohnetRubin,1995).Asuccessfullisteneriscompetentofcombiningtheverbalsystemwiththenon-verbalsystemofknowledge,soastogetthemosteffectiveaccesstoinformation.3.1ThreeStagesintheProcedureofTeachingUsingSchemaTheoryTheprocedureoflisteningteachingcanbedividedintothreestages:pre-listening,while-listeningandpost-listening.Eachofthethreestageshasitsownfeaturesandfunctionsinthelisteningprocess.Inthefirststage,teachersorganizesomewarm-upactivitiessuchasthediscussionofquestionsorkeywords,inordertohelpstudentstobuildthenewschemaandtoactivatethepreviousschema.Inthesecondstage,teachersremindstudentstousesometechniquesandstrategiestocomprehendandtorecalllisteningmaterials.Inthethirdstage,teachersusesomeexercisesofcombininglisteningwithspeakingandwritingtoconsolidatestudents’impressionofthegiveninformation(Rost,2006).Therefore,exploringthistypeofteachingmodelcorrectlytoemphasizethefunctionofpre-existentknowledgeinlisteningcomprehensionaswellastheroleofpre-listeningandpost-listeningcanimprovetheeffectoflisteningteaching.3.1.1Warm-upinPre-listeningStageAccordingtoschematheory,schemahasthefunctiontopredictintheprocessoflisteningbyinteractingtheinputinformationandthepriorknowledge(DongGuangzhietLiuLixin,2003).Withoutenoughpreparationtoactivatetherelevantschema,itisdifficultforstudentstounderstandthecontentoflisteningmaterials.Therefore,warm-upactivitiesservetoactivatetheschemainthemindsofstudentsaswellasinthecontentoflisteningmaterialsandtohelpstudentstobuildthenewschema.Theconstructionofschemainalistener’mindisthekeytounderstandlisteningmaterials.Thenarrowerscopeofknowledgethelistenerowns,theharderhebuildsthenewschema.Teachersshouldprovidesubstantialguidancetostudentstoactivatetherelevantschemaaccordingtospecificlisteningmaterials.Intheway,studentsshouldnotonlyhaveagoodcommandoflanguagebutalsounderstandthedifferencesbetweencultures,particularlybetweenthatofChinaandEnglish-speakingcountries,soastograduallyenrichandexpandtheirschema.Inthepre-listeningstage,teacherscanguidestudentstopreviewmaterials,suchasdifficultwords,specialsentences,customaryexpressionsandgrammaticalknowledgetohelpthemdevelopanewrelevantschema.Anothergoodwaytobuildandtoactivatethenewschemaistoproviderelatedpicturesandvideo,i.e.thebackgroundinformationoflisteningmaterials,whichusuallycomesfromsupplementarymaterialsanddiversifiedexercisessuchasdictation,multiplechoice,trueorfalse(MoYunguo,2002).Inaddition,anumberofteachingactivitiescanbeorganizedtoenablestudentstoenrichtheirknowledge.Forexample,certainscenescanbesettomakestudentsusethenewvocabularyandgrammar,aswellasdiscussions,debatesanddialogues,whichareveryhelpfulforstudentstograspthekeyelementinthelisteningprocess.3.1.2ComprehensioninWhile-listeningStageInthewhile-listeningstageoflisteningcomprehension,listenersusebothbottom-upandtop-downprocessestocomprehend.Knowingthecontextofalisteningtextandthepurposeforlisteninggreatlyreducestheburdenofcomprehension.Atthisstage,itisofgreatimportanceforstudentstobringtheinitiativeintofullplay.Successfulcomprehensioninvolvesthefollowingthreemaintypesofschema.(i)LanguageSchemaLinguisticschemaistheknowledgeaboutlinguistics,suchasvocabulary,grammarandlinguisticrules,withoutwhichwillleadtomisunderstandings.IntheactualinteractioninEnglish,agoodunderstandingdependsonthepriorlinguisticknowledge,thecertaincontent,thefamiliaritybetweenthespeakerandthelistenerandsoon,insteadoftheunderstandingofeachword.Forexample,ifthelistenerisfamiliarwiththephrase“afishoutofwater”,hewillcorrectlyunderstandthepurposeofthespeakerandwon’tinterpretthephrasefromitsliteralmeaning.(ii)ContentSchemaContentschemaplaysapredominantroleinthelisteningprocess,sinceitdeterminesthecontentinwhichthelanguageisused.Forexample:M:Goodmorning,Mrs.White,whatcanIdoforyou?W:Couldyoupleaselookovermywatch?Itsometimesgainsandsometimesloses.Q:Whatdidthewomanwanttohavedone?A.Tosellherwatch.B.Tobuyanewbook.C.Toasksomeonetofindherwatch.D.Tohaveherwatchchecked.Thecommonmeaningsof“gain”and“l(fā)ose”are“acquire,obtain”and“miss”respectively,butintheabovedialogue,itisapparentthatthetwowordshavedifferentmeanings.Asthewomanrefersto“watch”and“l(fā)ookover”inherremarks,wecancomeupwiththeassumptionthatthisdialoguehappensinawatch-repairingshopandshewantstohaveherwatchchecked.Inthiscontent,“gain”means“goquicker”while“l(fā)ose”means“goslower”(WuHaiyan,2004).(iii)CulturalSchemaCulturalschemareferstothe“culture”blockoftheknowledgestructure,whichaccumulatesthroughpreviousexperiences.Inthelisteningprocess,thelistenermustdecodethelanguagecorrectlyaccordingtoculturalschema.InordertohaveabetterunderstandingofChristmasforstudents,forinstance,diversifiedactivitiesshouldbeorganizedforstudentstobuildandtoactivateappropriateculturalschema,suchasusingEnglishtodiscussthetopicsonWesternfestivalsandtraditions,andmakingcomparisonbetweenChineseandWesterncultures,thustoimprovetheirlisteningcomprehension.3.1.3ConsolidationinPost-listeningStageTheusualwayofclasslisteningteachingisdoingthenextpracticeimmediatelyafterthecompletionofonepractice.Beingignorantofthefactthatlisteningmaterialsinvolvesimportantculturalbackgroundknowledge,teachersrarelyhelpstudentstoreviewthelisteningmaterialsandhencemissagoodopportunitytoconsolidatetheimpressionofknowledgeinstudents’minds(YiZhen,2005).Therefore,theconsolidationinpost-listeningstageisanimportantphaseintheteachingprocedureoflistening.Teacherscantakesomemeasurestohelpstudentstoconsolidatetheschema,suchasusingquizzestostudyculturalbackgroundknowledge,askingstudentstorepeatortakenotesandorganizingstudentstoplayroles.Accordingtodifferentmaterials,differentlearningstagesanddifferentlevelsofstudents,teacherscanchooseappropriatemethodstoimprovestudents’learninghabits.Aftertheexplanationandreviewoflisteningmaterialsbyteachers,studentscanacquireabetterunderstandingofthegiveninformationanddeepentheschema.Meanwhile,theycanstorethenewbackgroundknowledgeinalong-termmemoryforthefurtherpreparationforlisteningcomprehension.Themorebackgroundknowledgestudentsacquire,themorebenefitstheycangetinthelisteningprocess.Inthisway,students’listeningskillscanbeimprovedgreatly.3.2ThreeAbilitiesintheProcessofListeningStrengthenedbySchemaTheoryCognitivepsychologistsregardlisteningasamentalprocessofinteractingtheexistingknowledgeandtheinputinformationtransportedbyacousticsignals.Intheprocessoflistening,schematheorycanstrengthenthreelisteningabilitiesasbelow.3.2.1ReasoningAbilitySchemaplaysavitalroleinfosteringreasoningability(Widdowson,1983).IntheteachingprocessofEnglishlistening,thefunctionsofstudents’reasoningabilitytotheirlisteningcomprehensionareself-evident.Reasoningcannotonlyenablestudentstomakepredictionstounknownlisteningmaterials,butalsomakethembeawareoftheconnotationofspeakers,whichwasstudiedintheprincipleofcooperationbyGriceinhisexplanationofhowlistenersunderstandthecommunicativediscourse.Gricebelievesthatitisreasoningthathelplistenerstounderstandtheimplicationsofone’sremarks,insteadofdecodingthelanguage.3.2.2UnderstandingAbilityAccordingtoLynch(1998:13),everytimewhenapersonisreceivinginformation,hisunderstandingofthegiveninformationcallsfortheinvolvementofexistingknowledge,namelyschema.Therefore,themoreschemalistenersbearinmind,themorecorrectlyandaccuratelytheycomprehendthelisteningmaterials;themorebackgroundknowledgetheyacquire,themorebenefitstheygaintocreatenewschemaandtoformavirtuouscycleoflisteningcomprehension.3.2.3MemoryAbilityRumelhart(1982:21)haspointedoutthat“Schemadescribesthelayoutofthecontentsofourmemory.”Inotherwords,schemaprovidesaframeoftherelevantconceptsinmemoryfortheinformationrecipients.IntheEnglishteachingprocess,thereisnodoubtthatstudents’memoryabilityhasagreatimpactonlisteningcomprehension.Ifthememorystoredinmindcanbeactivatedappropriately,studentscancollecttherelevantexistinginformationfromtheirmemory.3.3TheEffectsofSchemaTheoryonTeachingofEnglishListeningSchematheoryproducesmarkedinfluencesonunderstandinglisteningcomprehensioninfirstandsecondlanguage.Listeningisaskillthatrequirescoordinationofthelistener’smentalpowerswithanoutsideforce,whichisthree-dimensionalwiththeears,themindandtheeyes.Ithasmadeclearthatunderstandingtheroleofschemainthelisteningprocessprovidestheoreticalfoundationandinsightsintowhystudentsmayfailtocomprehendlisteningmaterials.AccordingtoaresearchconductedbyJohnFlowerdewandLindsayMiller(2005),asstudentsarefamiliarwiththethemeofthelistening(i.e.,possesscontentschema),awareofthediscourselevelandstructureofthetext(i.e.,possessformschema),andskillfulindecodingfeaturestorecognizewordsandsentences(i.e.,possesslanguageschema),theyareinabetterpositiontocomprehendlisteningmaterials.Deficiencyinanyoftheaboveschemaswillresultinacomprehensiondeficit.However,studentsmayhavesufficientschema,yetunabletocomprehendthetextifsuchschemaisnotappropriatelyactivated.Whenthenewinformationisintegratedwiththeexistingbackgroundknowledgeandisputintotheappropriateslots,schemaisconsideredasbeingactivated.(ShiXushengetLvYanping,2004)ChapterFourExperimentalResearchandAnalysisInordertoverifytheactivefunctionofschematheoryinimprovingstudents’Englishlisteningcomprehension,theauthorconductedasmall-scaleteachingexperimentwithtwoteams.TheteachingmodelsupportedbyschematheorywasadoptedintheExperimentalTeamwhilethetraditionalteachingmodelwasusedintheControlTeam.Aftertheexperiment,thetwoteamsweregiventhesametestandthescoreswerecomparedandanalyzedbytheauthor.4.1ResearchPurposeandSubjectThepurposeoftheresearchistoprovethatschematheoryfunctionsactivelyinteaching.Thesubjectsofthisresearcharecomposedof100ChinesestudentsselectedfromtwoclassesinGradeSixinJiujiangPrimarySchoolofJiangxiProvince.Allofthemarehighlyfamiliarwiththeformatsofthelisteningtaskssothattheunfamiliaritytothetasksshouldnotbeafactorthatcandisturbtheirperformanceintheresearchprocess.Inaddition,theyhavelearnedoverfiveyearsofEnglishandacquiredsometechniquesandskillsinlistening.Thisfeatureguaranteesthatallthesubjectsareabletoyieldsomeobservableandanalyzabledatafortheresearch.4.2ResearchDesignThedatacollectingprocesswasfinallycarriedoutbytheauthorherselfonMarch12,2010,mainlyconsistingofthefollowingfoursteps:(i)Theauthorrequiredthe100subjectstoformtheExperimentalTeamandtheControlTeam,eachincluding50participants.Accordingtotheirperformanceofthelasttest,thelisteninglevelofthetwoteamswasassessedtoberelativelycloseorthesame.(ii)Theauthorspent30minutesonthesubjectsintheExperimentalTeaminexplainingkeywordsandphrasesfromthelisteningmaterial(SeeAppendixA)andthenthebackgroundknowledgeoftheOlympicGames,includingitshistory,organizationandimportance.(iii)AllthesubjectsintheExperimentalTeamandtheControlTeamwererequiredtoanswerthequestions(SeeAppendixB)whilelisteningtothematerial(SeeAppendixA)andthenhandtheiranswersheetsinimmediatelyaftertherecordingwasover.(iv)Allthesubjects’scoreswererecordedandthefinaldatafromeachteamwasassessedintheresearch.Asubjectwhogotthescoresunder6wasconsideredasfailed.4.3ResearchResultTable4-1:AccuracyofQuestionsoftheTwoTeamsAccuracyQsoftheTestQsonBackgroundKnowledgeQsonLanguageKnowledgeFullScore100%60%40%ExperimentalTeam70%40%30%ControlTeam50%30%20%Table4-2:PassNumberandRateoftheTwoTeamsTotalNumberPassNumberPassRateExperimentalTeam504386%ControlTeam503162%Table4-3:TheNumberofSubjectsinDifferentScoreBracketsoftheTwoTeamsTheNumberofStudentsScoresExperimentalTeamControlTeam10319538105716969135310424324201100000ExplanationsofTable4-1,Table4-2andTable4-3:Intermsoftheaccuracyofthequestions,thesubjectsintheExperimentalTeamheld20%higheraccuracythanthatoftheControlTeam.Subjectswhowereaccessibletomorebackgroundandlanguageknowledgehadabetterunderstandingofthecontentthanthosewhowerenot.Intermsofthepassnumberofsubjects,therewere43and31subjectsintheExperimentalTeamandtheControlTeamrespectively.Theformerkept24%higherofthepassratethanthatofthelatter,whenturningthenumberintopercentage.Intermsofthenumberofsubjectsdividedindifferentbracketsaccordingtotheirscores,thenumberofthesubjectswhogot7scoreswas16intheExperimentalTeam,whereas13subjectsscored6intheControlTeam,bothofwhichwerecountedasthebiggestgroupintheirownteam.Asasignificantfeatureshowninthetable,themajorityofthesubjectsintheExperimentalTeamwerescored6,7and8whilethescorebracketswereintensifiedinthescoresof5,6and7.4.4ResearchAnalysisAccordingtotheaboveexperimentalanalysisanddiscussion,theauthorprovedthattheteachingmodelofEnglishlisteningbasedonschematheoryismoreefficientthanthetraditionaloneinEnglishlisteninginstruction.Inaddition,thebackgroundknowledgeproducesagreatimpactonthepromotionoflisteningcomprehension.Inotherwords,strategiesrelatedtotheenhancementofbackgroundknowledgemaybemoreefficientinhelpingEnglishteacherstopreventstudentsfromwastingtimeonguessingtheansweraimlessly,hencetoimprovetheeffectivenessoflisteningcomprehension.Althoughthestudyhasyieldedapromisingresult,itstillhassomelimitations,whichthefuturestudiesshouldtakeintoconsideration.Firstofall,becauseofthetimelimitation,thenumberofsubjectsusedinthisstudyisstillinadequate,sofuturestudiestargetingalargernumberofsamplesarestillneeded.Thepatternoftestissimple,sothereisaneedforustofurthermuchbroaderresearches.Furthermore,thelisteninglevelsofthesubjectsintwoteamsarenotaccuratelythesame;henceithasinfluencesontheresultofthisresearch.ChapterFiveTheMethodsofImprovingListeningSkillsItisabigchallengeforEnglishteacherstoapplyschematheorytotheteachingoflistening.Regardlessofmanylimitationssuchastheteachers’qualityandthelisteningenvironment,methodsherebyaregiventopromoteeffectivelisteningskillsandteachingstrategies,inthehopeofmakingsomeenlightenmenttothecurrentteachingofEnglishlistening.5.1FromthePerspectiveofStudentsToimprovetheirlisteningskills,studentsneedtomastersomelisteningtechniquesandstrategiestodevelopasmatureandactivelisteners,forexample,thinkingaroundthetopicbylisteningbetweenthelines,summarizingwhathasbeenheard,puttingwhattheyhearintotheirownwords,takingnotestogetasmuchoutofalectureaspossible,makingeffortstoignorephysicalproblems,payingattentiontothemessage,andnotinterruptinginthemid

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評論

0/150

提交評論