上外年翻譯真題版_第1頁(yè)
上外年翻譯真題版_第2頁(yè)
上外年翻譯真題版_第3頁(yè)
上外年翻譯真題版_第4頁(yè)
上外年翻譯真題版_第5頁(yè)
已閱讀5頁(yè),還剩13頁(yè)未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

勤思考研翻碩MTI主要用于考翻譯的同學(xué)更新熱點(diǎn)信息,幫助大家及時(shí)的公布信掃描上,關(guān)注即可每天收到干貨內(nèi)容 whytheauthor’sfatherwenttoAmericainwhatwasAmerica’seducationlikeinwhatwasBritain’seducationlikeinhowtofixtheWouldReligionMakeusBetter翻譯(翻譯,題目要求是寫(xiě)作writeadescriptionaboutthefutureofthecitiesbasedonthefollowingwritingasummaryaboutthefollowingpassagein2:00-5:00今年這一大題和去年一樣,一篇文章,A423000205個(gè)回答問(wèn)題。今年的題目主要講autoindustry,感覺(jué)沒(méi)去年的難。作文是howernmentcandevelopourauto建議:考上外MTI不要浪費(fèi)時(shí)間在文學(xué)或者散文上,絕對(duì)不會(huì)考。當(dāng)然了如果時(shí)多看看外文書(shū),每天看一點(diǎn),積少成多。那種DAILY少看看,上外的選題都是直接選的外國(guó)人寫(xiě)的文章,建議多讀ECONOMIST,TIMES之類(lèi)。本人都是外文舊書(shū)店買(mǎi)的,福州路有賣(mài)很方便,價(jià)格也不貴。每個(gè)月去買(mǎi)個(gè)基本讀讀,經(jīng)濟(jì)條件不允許的可以淘寶上買(mǎi)本,便上午8:30-11:30翻譯英第一大題,中譯英+510個(gè)30解釋。英譯中用中文翻譯再解釋?。?0分,就寫(xiě)那么幾個(gè)字?怎么可能天上掉莫言盡職寬松量化英譯中:Shanghai ClimatechangeEuropeanParliamentShareholderLinsanity(想破了頭也篇章翻譯:那個(gè)量大?。”菴ATTI2級(jí)考試那個(gè)量還大?。?!迅速下筆 英譯中:USshouldworkwith,notcontainit(一個(gè)人寫(xiě)的文章,主要說(shuō)的是向亞太戰(zhàn)略轉(zhuǎn)移不要遏制中國(guó),政治性較強(qiáng))一.百科知識(shí)填空題(不是選擇題了!?。。。?0分科舉考試殿試前三甲狀元榜眼探花中國(guó)六大古都杭州西安開(kāi)封(最后那個(gè)我填安陽(yáng)了,可好像是洛陽(yáng),儒家孔子和道家的繼承者分別是誰(shuí)?孟子莊子唐朝小說(shuō)叫什么?唐56070新文化運(yùn)動(dòng)德先生和賽先生是指?與科(題目全,一道不漏,回憶的我也腦袋痛二.5個(gè)成語(yǔ)解釋,要求寫(xiě)出含義,出處典故,并造句!40分(死傷一片,樓三.大作文!(直接上大作文?。?yīng)用文取消了?。。。?00080分今年給了一篇材料,說(shuō)的是的文章從中小學(xué)中剔除了,寫(xiě)一篇讀后感。(覺(jué)得這個(gè)出的挺敏感的,里面寫(xiě)很多污吏娼什么的,所 (一)16.以下詞匯不來(lái)自的是?現(xiàn)在,宇宙,自由(二)形影,陽(yáng)春白雪,杯弓蛇影,樂(lè)不思蜀翻譯英今年的這科目比以往簡(jiǎn)潔,完型、閱讀都是同一篇文章,Reuters的,網(wǎng) Cloze(30’FillintheblankswithoneappropriateNEWYORK,Nov15(Reuters)-ForAmerica,2012willgodowninhistoryastheyearoftheLatinos,theblacks,thewomenandthegays.ThatrainbowcoalitionwonBarackObamahissecondterm.ThistriumphoftheoutsidersispartlyduetoAmerica'schangingdemographics.AnditisnotjusttheUnitedStatesthatis ingmorediverse.Canadais,too,1.asismuchofThatiswhyitisworththinkinghardabouthowtomake2.diverseteamseffective,andhowpeople3.whostraddletwoculturalworldscansucceed.Threeacademics,appropria yenoughadiversegroupbasedinAsiaandAmerica,havebeen ngsomeprovocativeresearch4.thatsuggeststhatourabilitytocomfortablyintegrateourdifferentidentities-ornot-isthe5.key.In"ConnectingtheDotsWithin:CreativePerformanceandIdentityIntegration,"Chi-YingChengofSingaporeManagementUniversity,JeffreySanchez-BurksoftheRossSchoolofBusinessattheUniversityofMichigan,andFionaLee,6.alsoattheUniversityofMichigan,arguethatethnicminoritiesandwomeninmale-dominatedprofessions7.aremostcreativewhentheyhavefoundawaytobelievethattheir"multipleand8.ingsocialidentitiesarecompatible.""Wetriedtoseehowpeoplewhohavetodealwith9.seeminglyin-cultureorgenderidentitiescope,"Chengtoldme.Their10.conclusionwasthatpeoplewhohavefoundawaytoreconciletheirtwoidentities--Americans,for11.example,orwomenwhoworkindominatedjobslikeengineering-arethebest12.atfindingcreativesolutionstoproblems."Tpatible,theyarebetteratcombiningideasfromthetwoidentitiestocomeupwithsomethingnew,"Chengsaid.14.Whilethosewhoalsosharethesetwosocialidentities,15.butseethemasbeingin,theycannotcomeupwithnewideas."Cheng,BurksandLeedevisedaresearchstrategytoprobethisissuethatyoudonotneedaPh.D.toappreciate:TheyaskedAsian-AmericanstoinventnewfusioncuisinedishesusingbothtypicallyAsianandtypicallyAmericaningredients,andtheyaskedfemaleengineerstodesignproductsgearedspecificallytowomen.Inbothcases,peoplewhowereatpeacewiththeirdualidentitiesperformedbetter."Asian-Americanswhohadhigherbiculturalintegrationcouldcreatemorecreativerecipes,andtheybelieveditwaspossibletocomeupwithmorerecipes,"Chengsaid."Bycontrast,Asian-Americanswhofeeltheirtwoidentitiesarein cannotcomeupwithasmanycreativerecipes.''Chenghasherownexperienceofbeingaminority.Sheisfrom butwenttograduateschoolintheUnitedStates;sheisawomanbuthastaughtinthemale-dominatedenvironmentofgraduatebusinessschools.Shedoesnotminimizethechallengeofcomingtotermswiththissortofdiversity."Peoplewhohavehighidentityintegration,itisnotthattheyaremoreeasygoing.Itisthattheyfindpeacebetweenthetwodifferentworlds,"Chengsaid."Itisnotthateasy.Pretendingdoesn'twork.Therehastoberealunderstandingandintegrationbetweenthetwoworlds.TheyfindawayforthetwoworldstocoexistinsideaThisacademicworkisausefulprismforunderstandingthemanwhomaybetheworld'smostprominentintegratoroftwopotentiallyingidentities:PresidentObama.Hehasgainedadmissiontowhatusedtobethemostexclusivewhiteclubofall,theWhiteHouse,whileremainingpatentlyateasewithhisblackidentity.AsChengadvises,Obamadoesnotignorethecomplexitiesofstraddlingthesetwoworlds:He ernswithanacuteawarenessoftheparticularchallengesablackskinposesforthemanAmericansstillliketodescribeastheleaderoftheworld.Buttheisalsodeeplyateasewithhisvariousidentities,apsychologicalstatethatmayhelphimusethemtopowerfuleffect-asintheelectionn,whenheralliedprettymuchallAmericanswhothinkofthemselvesasdifferent.TheconclusionsofCheng,Sanchez-BurksandLeesuggestatantalizingfollow-upquestion:Howcanweachievethe alintegrationthesescholarshaveidentifiedascrucialtomakingavirtueofdiversity?FurtherresearchbyChengoffersoneanswer:"Youcanintegrateyouridentitiesifyouhavepositivebiculturalexperiences.Themacrosystemcaninfluencethemicrosystem."Inotherwords,iftheworldarounduslsusourdualidentitiesarecompatible,wewillbelievethat,andactaccordingly.Iffemaleengineersworkinacompanythattreatstheirgenderasavirtue,theywilldobetter.IfAsian-Americansliveinacommunitythatcelebratesbothaspectsoftheiridentity,theywillbemoreeffective.America'srainbowcoalitionwonattheballotboxthismonth,butinotherngsthenation ealittlewearyofcheeringmovementslikemulticulturalismandevenexplicitfeminism.Cheng'sworksuggeststhatcynicismmaybemisced.Diversitycanwork,butwehavetoworkatit.Readingthepassageandanswerfollowingquestions.Accordingtotheauthor,howcana succeedintheU.S.?)WhydoesChengconsiderBarackObamasuccessful?ElaborateonCheng’ssaying“Themacrosystemcaninfluencethemicrosystem.”(8’)Whatdoestheauthoralludetointhephrase“rainbowcoalition”?WritingCommentonhowtosucceedinanincreasinglydiverseworld?5001.68:30-11:30GreatAmericapivottoThe18thCPCGazaCapitolEuroZone獨(dú)立自主和平政策長(zhǎng)角洲節(jié)選自ForeignAffairs這本的一篇文章。全文如下 BrokenBRICs:WhytheRestStoppedRisingByRuchirSharmaNovember/December2012TheRisingoftheRestOverthepastseveralyears,themostabouttrendintheglobaleconomyhasbeenthecalledriseoftherest,whichsawtheeconomiesofmanydevelocountriesswiftlyconvergingwiththoseoftheirmoredevelopedpeers.Theprimaryenginesbehindthisphenomenonwerethefourmajoremerging-marketcountries,knownastheBRICs:Brazil,Russia,,and.Theworldwaswitnessingaonce-in-a-lifetimeshift,theargumentwent,inwhichthemajoryersinthedeveloworldwerecatchinguptoorevensurpassingtheircounterpartsinthedevelopedworld.Theseforecaststypicallytookthedeveloworld’shighgrowthratesfromthemiddleofthelastdecadeandextendedthemstraightintothefuture,juxtaposingthemagainstpredictedsluggishgrowthintheUnitedStatesandotheradvancedindustrialcountries.Suchexercisessupposedlyprovedthat,forexample,wasonthevergeofovertakingtheUnitedStatesastheworld’slargesteconomy-apointthatAmericansclearlytooktoheart,asover50percentofthem,accordingtoaGalluppollconductedthisyear,saidtheythinkthatisalreadytheworld’s“l(fā)eading”economy,eventhoughtheU.S.economyisstillmorethantwiceaslarge(andwithapercapita eseventimesashigh).Aswithpreviousstraight-lineprojectionsofeconomictrends,suchasforecastsinthe1980sthatJapanwouldsoonbenumberoneeconolaterreturnsarethrowingcoldwaterontheextravagantpredictions.Withtheworldeconomyheadingforitsworstyearsince2009,growthisslowingsharply,fromdoubledigitsdowntosevenpercentorevenless.AndtherestoftheBRICsaretumbling,too:since2008,Brazil’sannualgrowthhasdroppedfrom4.5percenttotwopercent;Russia’s,fromsevenpercentto3.5percent;and’s,fromninepercenttosixpercent.Noneofthisshouldbesurprising,becauseitishardtosustainrapidgrowthformorethanadecade.Theunusualcircumstancesofthelastdecademadeitlookeasy:comingoffthecrisis-ridden1990sandfueledbyaglobalfloodofeasymoney,theemergingmarketstookoffinamassupwardswingthatmadevirtuallyeveryeconomyar.By2007,whenonlythreecountriesintheworldsufferednegativegrowth,recessionshadallbutdisappearedfromtheinternationalscene.Butnow,thereisalotlessforeignmoneyflowingintoemergingmarkets.Theglobaleconomyisreturningtoitsnormalstateofchurn,withmanylaggardsandjustafewwinnersrisinginunexpectedces.Theimplicationsofthisshiftarestriking,becauseeconomicmomentumispower,andthustheflowofmoneytorisingstarswillreshapetheglobalbalanceofpower.原自《》社評(píng):美把中國(guó)公司當(dāng)“特洛伊木馬”太荒唐2012-11-0907:18原文如下: 美中經(jīng)濟(jì)與安全評(píng)估星期三出具了一份156頁(yè)的報(bào)告,公司的在美投資做了充滿警惕的描述。它宣稱來(lái)自中國(guó)的大型投資給制造的經(jīng)濟(jì)和安全風(fēng)險(xiǎn)就像“潛在的特洛伊木馬”,這樣的比喻頗令我們。一個(gè)簡(jiǎn)單的反應(yīng)是:在華投資規(guī)模要大得多,很多公司同“關(guān)系密切”“潛在的特洛伊木馬”呢?這些年居然還睡得著覺(jué),中國(guó)各地仍在積極對(duì)外招商引資,他作臺(tái)的機(jī)構(gòu)設(shè)置,即使有哪個(gè)組織“管閑事”拿出類(lèi)似的報(bào)告,告訴微軟的互視心態(tài)的確在出現(xiàn)歷史性轉(zhuǎn)變,過(guò)去時(shí)時(shí)刻刻擔(dān)心“亡我之心不死”的,開(kāi)始變得或者豁達(dá)了,或者盲目樂(lè)觀了。而原來(lái)什么都不在乎的人,突然有了草木皆兵的緊張,不僅中國(guó)“”多多,而且在美的中資我們的確搞不清楚,這些警惕里面有多少成分是人的真實(shí)擔(dān)憂,有多少成分是那些管事的人“裝蒜”,那些奇奇怪怪的罪名或許只是他們?nèi)蚧M(jìn)程不斷對(duì)國(guó)際分工的格局施加新壓力,長(zhǎng)期處在最上游的漸漸有了感。過(guò)去幫助美歐企業(yè)完成最佳性價(jià)比制造環(huán)節(jié)的中國(guó)利益最肥厚的那一塊,對(duì)一些國(guó)家的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力構(gòu)成潛在。這樣的情緒同星期三的那份報(bào)告有多少直接們不清楚,但它們的確在西方世界、包括在精英中蔓延。我們可以體諒它們的出現(xiàn),但為平息它化成行動(dòng),那將意味著世界自由貿(mào)易體系一張關(guān)鍵的多米諾骨牌,意味著中國(guó)坐視中資企業(yè)被肆意欺侮,坐視國(guó)家利益被隨意。需要克制在競(jìng)爭(zhēng)和面前的驚慌,克制用“安全”幫助本國(guó)公司解困的邪門(mén)歪道。需要以誠(chéng)實(shí)的態(tài)度應(yīng)對(duì)新興國(guó)家的產(chǎn)業(yè)升級(jí),如此強(qiáng)大,回旋空間充裕,要想永保世界第一位置,必須靠真功夫,而不能靠作為GDP總量剛到一半的發(fā)展中國(guó)家,要對(duì)苦口婆心講如何正確競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的道理,這真讓我們意外,甚至都不好意思。實(shí)在不應(yīng)耍賴皮,它無(wú)獨(dú)有偶,國(guó)際貿(mào)易星期三決定光伏產(chǎn)品征收反補(bǔ)貼和反傾銷(xiāo)關(guān)稅,中國(guó)的措施必將出現(xiàn)。如果說(shuō)真的在“”,本文說(shuō)到的兩個(gè)決不是這種“”的者,而是者。英文報(bào)導(dǎo)見(jiàn)其英文,如下 Opportunismwon’thelpWashingtonstayontopGlobalTimes|2012-11-90:40:07ByGlobalAnAmericancommittee,theEconomicandSecurityReviewCommission(UCESRC)issueda156-pagereportWednesday,whichgivesdetaileddescriptionsofcompanies'investmentsintheUS.Itclaimsthesecurityandeconomicrisksposedby'slarge-scaleinvestmentsasa"potentialTrojanhorse,"whichshockedTheUS'investmentinisofamuchlargerscale.ManycompanieshaveclosetieswithWashington.Ifweusethelogicinthereport,thereareagreatnumberof"Trojanhorses"in.Ifso,peopleshouldbewaryofthese"Trojanhorses,"aslocal ernmentsinarebusycourtingforeigndoesn'thaveanorganizationliketheUCESRC,whichdoesnothingbutdestroyopportunitiesformutualeconomiccooperation.Eveniftherewassuchacommissionwhichissuedasimilarreport,sayingthatandIBMmayoverthrow,thosewhowrotethereportwouldbecondemned.ThementalitywithwhichandtheUSseeeachotherischanging.TheC

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論