data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a062/4a0626bdb7fc3d98b529dc5b73978dc9c2efedd0" alt="英語論文文獻綜述(描述研究現(xiàn)狀)_第1頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/366e8/366e8d88799765ddb605314df13693f9badea661" alt="英語論文文獻綜述(描述研究現(xiàn)狀)_第2頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6bdb8/6bdb8348d44309d180cd729928b07bf9d62b6d85" alt="英語論文文獻綜述(描述研究現(xiàn)狀)_第3頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4258f/4258f84b4cd86648ab4bd8cef4c5d3b19cc76682" alt="英語論文文獻綜述(描述研究現(xiàn)狀)_第4頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9181/c9181578d5e3ae73265cb15029f392bfb8ec6fcc" alt="英語論文文獻綜述(描述研究現(xiàn)狀)_第5頁"
版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
Generaldescriptionsoftherelevantliterature:
AconsiderableamountofliteraturehasbeenpublishedonX.Thesestudies
Thereisalargevolumeofpublishedstudiesdescribingtheroleof
ThefirstseriousdiscussionsandanalysesofXemergedduringthe1970swith
Thegeneralisabilityofmuchpublishedresearchonthisissueisproblematic.
WhatweknowaboutXislargelybaseduponempiricalstudiesthatinvestigatehow
Duringthepast30yearsmuchmoreinformationhasbecomeavailableon
Inrecentyears,therehasbeenanincreasingamountofliteratureon
Alargeandgrowingbodyofliteraturehasinvestigated
Generalreferencetopreviousresearch/scholarlyactivity(usuallymorethanoneauthor)
Manyhistorians
havearguedthat
(eg.Jones,1987;Johnson,1990;Smith,1994)
Numerousstudieshaveattemptedtoexplain(forexample,Smith,1996;Kelly,1998;Johnson,2002)
Recentevidence
suggests
that(Smith,1996;Jones1999;Johnson,2001)
Recently,invitrostudies
haveshown
thatT.thermophylusEFTucan(Pateletal.,1997;Jonesetal.,1998).
SurveyssuchasthatconductedbySmith(1988)
haveshownthat
Severalattempts
havebeenmade
to(Smith,1996;Jones1999;Johnson,2001)
Severalstudies
haverevealed
thatitisnotjustXthatactson(Smith,1996;Jones
SeveralbiographiesofHarris
havebeenpublished.Smithpresentsanaccount,whilstJones
SeveralstudiesinvestigatingX
havebeencarriedout
on
Datafromseveralsources
haveidentified
theincreasedmorbidityandmortalityassociatedwithobesity
Previousstudies
havereported
(Smith,1985;Jones,1987;Johnson,1992).
PreviousresearchfindingsintoX
havebeen
inconsistentandcontradictory
(Smith,1996;Jones1999,
Anumberofstudies
havefound
that(Smith,2003;Jones,2004).
Twentycohortstudyanalyseshaveexaminedtherelationshipbetween
Atleast152case-controlstudiesworldwidehaveexaminedtherelationshipbetween
Otherstudieshaveconsideredtherelationship
TherelationshipbetweenXandY
hasbeenwidelyinvestigated
(Smith,1985;Jones,1987,
ThecausesofXhavebeenwidely
investigated
(Jones,1987;Johnson,1990;Smith,1994).
ThegeologyofX
hasbeenaddressed
inseveralsmall-scaleinvestigationsand
Xs
havebeenidentifiedas
majorcontributingfactorsforthedeclineofmanyspecies(1).
X
hasalsobeenshown
toreversetheanti-inflammatoryeffectsofglucocorticoidsinmurine-inducedarthritis(11).
Ithasbeensuggested
thatlevelsofXareindependentofthesizeoftheY(Smithetal.,1995)
It
has
conclusivelybeenshownthat
XandYincreaseZ(Smithetal.,1999;Jones,2001
It
hasbeendemonstrated
thatahighintakeofXresultsindamageto(Smith,1998;
Referencetocurrentstateofknowledge
Arelationshipexistsbetweenanindividual'sworkingmemoryandtheirabilityto(Jonesetal.,1998).
GMvarietiesofmaizeareabletocross-pollinatewithnon-GMvarieties(Smith,1998;Jones,1999).
Thereisanunambiguousrelationshipbetweenspendingoneducationandeconomicdevelopment(Rao,1998).
XisoneofthemostintensereactionsfollowingCHD(Lane,2003).
MIFhasbeenfoundtoopposetheanti-inflammatoryactionsofXonY(Alourfi,2004).
Referencetosingleinvestigationsinthepast:researcher(s)assentencesubject
Smith(1999)
found
that
aslevelsofliteracyandeducationofthepopulationrise
showed
thatreducingXto190oCdecreased(seefigure2).
demonstrated
thatwhenthemaximumtemperatureisexceeded
Someanalysts(e.g.Carnoy,2002)haveattemptedtodrawfinedistinctionsbetween
Otherauthors(seeHarbison,2003;Kaplan,2004)questiontheusefulnessofsuchanapproach.
Referencetootherwriters'ideas(authorassubject)
Accordingto
Smith(2003),preventativemedicineisfarmorecosteffective,andthereforebetteradaptedtothedevelopingworld.
Smith(2003)
pointsout
argues
maintains
claims
concludes
suggests
that
preventativemedicineisfarmorecosteffective,andthereforebetteradaptedtothedevelopingworld
Smith(2003)
arguesfor
offers
proposes
suggests
anexplanatorytheoryforeachtypeofirrationalbelief.
ThisviewissupportedbyJones(2000)whowrites
SmitharguesthatherdatasupportO'Brien's(1988)viewthat
AsSmithremindsus,
Elsewhere,Smithhasarguedthat
Somewaysofintroducingquotations
InthefinalpartoftheTheses,Marxwrites:"Philosophershavehithertoonlyinterpretedtheworldinvariousways;thepoint"
Sachsconcludes:"Theideaofdevelopmentstandstodaylikearuinintheintellectuallandscape…"(Sachs,1992a:156).
AsSmithargues:"Inthepast,thepurposeofeducationwasto"(Smith,2000:150).
AsCarnoy(2004:215)states:"therearemanygoodreasonstobesceptical".
BeingCritical
Asanacademicwriter,youareexpectedtobecriticalofthesourcesthatyouuse.Thisessentiallymeansquestioningwhatyoureadandnotnecessarilyagreeingwithitjustbecausetheinformationhasbeenpublished.Beingcriticalcanalsomeanlookingforreasonswhyweshouldnotjustacceptsomethingasbeingcorrectortrue.Thiscanrequireyoutoidentifyproblemswithawriter'sargumentsormethods,orperhapstorefertootherpeople'scriticismsofthese.Constructivecriticismgoesbeyondthisbysuggestingwaysinwhichapieceofresearchorwritingcouldbeimproved.
beingagainstisnotenough.Wealsoneedtodevelophabitsofconstructivethinking.EdwarddeBono
Introducingquestions,problemsandlimitations(theory)
Onequestionthatneedstobeasked,however,iswhether
Aseriousweaknesswiththisargument,however,isthat
Oneofthelimitationswiththisexplanationisthatitdoesnotexplainwhy....
OnecriticismofmuchoftheliteratureonXisthat
Thekeyproblemwiththisexplanationisthat
TheexistingaccountsfailtoresolvethecontradictionbetweenXandY.
However,thereisaninconsistencywiththisargument.
Smith'sargumentreliestooheavilyonqualitativeanalysisof
ItseemsthatJones'understandingoftheXframeworkisquestionable.
Smith'sinterpretationoverlooksmuchofthehistoricalresearch
OnemajorcriticismofSmith'sworkisthat
ManywritershavechallengedJones'claimonthegroundsthat
X'sanalysisdoesnottakeaccountofnordoesheexamine
Introducingquestions,problemsandlimitations(method/practice)
AnotherproblemwiththisapproachisthatitfailstotakeXintoaccount.
Perhapsthemostseriousdisadvantageofthismethodisthat
Difficultiesarise,however,whenanattemptismadetoimplementthepolicy.
Nevertheless,thestrategyhasnotescapedcriticismfromgovernments,agenciesandacademics.
Onemajordrawbackofthisapproachisthat
Themainlimitationofbiosyntheticincorporation,however,is
However,thismethodofanalysishasanumberoflimitations.
However,approachesofthiskindcarrywiththemvariouswellknownlimitations.
Allthestudiesreviewedsofar,however,sufferfromthefactthat
However,therearelimitstohowfartheideaof/conceptofXcanbetaken.
However,suchexplanationstendtooverlookthefactthat
However,oneoftheproblemswiththeinstrumenttheresearchersusedtomeasureXwas
However,allthepreviouslymentionedmethodssufferfromsomeserious
limitations
weaknesses
disadvantages
drawbacks.
Identifyingastudy'sweakness
(However,)
themainweaknessofthestudyisthefailuretoaddresshow
thestudyfailstoconsiderthedifferingcategoriesofdamagethat
theresearchdoesnottakeintoaccountpre-existingsuchas
theauthoroffersnoexplanationforthedistinctionbetweenXandY.
SmithmakesnoattempttodifferentiatebetweenvariousdifferenttypesofX.
Jonesfailstofullyacknowledgethesignificanceof
thepaperwouldappeartobeoverambitiousinitsclaims.
theauthoroverlooksthefactthatXcontributestoY.
whatSmithfailstodoistodrawadistinctionbetween
anotherweaknessisthatwearegivennoexplanantionofhow
noattemptwasmadetoquantifytheassociationbetweenXandY.
Offeringconstructivesuggestions
Smith'spaper
Herconclusions
Thestudy
Thefindings
wouldhavebeen
mighthavebeen
more
muchmore
farmore
useful
convincing
interesting
persuasive
original
ifhe/shehad
iftheauthorhad
included
considered
adopted
used
Abetterstudywouldexaminealarge,randomlyselectedsampleofsocietieswith
AmuchmoresystematicstudywouldidentifyhowXinteractswithothervariablesthatarebelievedtobelinkedto
Highlightinginadequaciesofpreviousstudies
MoststudiesinthefieldofXhaveonlyfocussedon
MoststudiesinXhaveonlybeencarriedoutinasmallnumberofareas.
Thegeneralisabilityofmuchpublishedresearchonthisissueisproblematic.
Theexperimentaldataarerathercontroversial,andthereisnogeneralagreementabout
Suchexpositionsareunsatisfactorybecausethey
However,fewwritershavebeenabletodrawonanystructuredresearchintotheopinionsandattitudesof
TheresearchtodatehastendedtofocusonXratherthanY.
TheexistingaccountsfailtoresolvethecontradictionbetweenXandY.
ResearchershavenottreatedXinmuchdetail.
PreviousstudiesofXhavenotdealtwith
However,thesestudiesusednon-validatedmethodstomeasure
Halfofthestudiesevaluatedfailedtospecifywhether
However,muchoftheresearchuptonowhasbeendescriptiveinnature….
AlthoughextensiveresearchhasbeencarriedoutonX,nosinglestudyexistswhichadequatelycovers
However,theseresultswerebasedupondatafromover30yearsagoanditisunclearifthesedifferencesstillpersist.
I
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 人工建筑勞務(wù)合同范本
- 入園合同范例
- 個人陶瓷采購合同范本
- 勞務(wù)派遣補充合同范本
- 切磚清工合同范本
- 光明果蔬配送合同范本
- 借款合同范本網(wǎng)上查詢
- 轉(zhuǎn)租飯店合同范本
- 凈化車間改造工程合同范本
- 會所會籍合同范本
- (完整)低壓配電柜技術(shù)規(guī)范
- 《通信原理》樊昌信曹麗娜編著第六版課件
- 2024年注冊安全工程師考試題庫【含答案】
- 第2課《樹立科學(xué)的世界觀》第2框《用科學(xué)世界觀指導(dǎo)人生發(fā)展》-【中職專用】《哲學(xué)與人生》同步課堂課件
- 《書籍裝幀設(shè)計》 課件 項目2 書籍裝幀設(shè)計要素
- 妊娠期合并癥婦女的護理-妊娠合并心臟病的護理(婦產(chǎn)科護理課件)4EX
- 南航航空安全員培訓(xùn)
- 中職語文高教版基礎(chǔ)模塊上冊《風(fēng)景談》公開課一等獎創(chuàng)新教學(xué)設(shè)計
- 汪小蘭有機化學(xué)課件第四版
- Unit1 My day 單元作業(yè)設(shè)計(素材)人教PEP版英語五年級下冊
- 贏的思考與態(tài)度課件
評論
0/150
提交評論