英語論文文獻綜述(描述研究現(xiàn)狀)_第1頁
英語論文文獻綜述(描述研究現(xiàn)狀)_第2頁
英語論文文獻綜述(描述研究現(xiàn)狀)_第3頁
英語論文文獻綜述(描述研究現(xiàn)狀)_第4頁
英語論文文獻綜述(描述研究現(xiàn)狀)_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩3頁未讀 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

Generaldescriptionsoftherelevantliterature:

AconsiderableamountofliteraturehasbeenpublishedonX.Thesestudies

Thereisalargevolumeofpublishedstudiesdescribingtheroleof

ThefirstseriousdiscussionsandanalysesofXemergedduringthe1970swith

Thegeneralisabilityofmuchpublishedresearchonthisissueisproblematic.

WhatweknowaboutXislargelybaseduponempiricalstudiesthatinvestigatehow

Duringthepast30yearsmuchmoreinformationhasbecomeavailableon

Inrecentyears,therehasbeenanincreasingamountofliteratureon

Alargeandgrowingbodyofliteraturehasinvestigated

Generalreferencetopreviousresearch/scholarlyactivity(usuallymorethanoneauthor)

Manyhistorians

havearguedthat

(eg.Jones,1987;Johnson,1990;Smith,1994)

Numerousstudieshaveattemptedtoexplain(forexample,Smith,1996;Kelly,1998;Johnson,2002)

Recentevidence

suggests

that(Smith,1996;Jones1999;Johnson,2001)

Recently,invitrostudies

haveshown

thatT.thermophylusEFTucan(Pateletal.,1997;Jonesetal.,1998).

SurveyssuchasthatconductedbySmith(1988)

haveshownthat

Severalattempts

havebeenmade

to(Smith,1996;Jones1999;Johnson,2001)

Severalstudies

haverevealed

thatitisnotjustXthatactson(Smith,1996;Jones

SeveralbiographiesofHarris

havebeenpublished.Smithpresentsanaccount,whilstJones

SeveralstudiesinvestigatingX

havebeencarriedout

on

Datafromseveralsources

haveidentified

theincreasedmorbidityandmortalityassociatedwithobesity

Previousstudies

havereported

(Smith,1985;Jones,1987;Johnson,1992).

PreviousresearchfindingsintoX

havebeen

inconsistentandcontradictory

(Smith,1996;Jones1999,

Anumberofstudies

havefound

that(Smith,2003;Jones,2004).

Twentycohortstudyanalyseshaveexaminedtherelationshipbetween

Atleast152case-controlstudiesworldwidehaveexaminedtherelationshipbetween

Otherstudieshaveconsideredtherelationship

TherelationshipbetweenXandY

hasbeenwidelyinvestigated

(Smith,1985;Jones,1987,

ThecausesofXhavebeenwidely

investigated

(Jones,1987;Johnson,1990;Smith,1994).

ThegeologyofX

hasbeenaddressed

inseveralsmall-scaleinvestigationsand

Xs

havebeenidentifiedas

majorcontributingfactorsforthedeclineofmanyspecies(1).

X

hasalsobeenshown

toreversetheanti-inflammatoryeffectsofglucocorticoidsinmurine-inducedarthritis(11).

Ithasbeensuggested

thatlevelsofXareindependentofthesizeoftheY(Smithetal.,1995)

It

has

conclusivelybeenshownthat

XandYincreaseZ(Smithetal.,1999;Jones,2001

It

hasbeendemonstrated

thatahighintakeofXresultsindamageto(Smith,1998;

Referencetocurrentstateofknowledge

Arelationshipexistsbetweenanindividual'sworkingmemoryandtheirabilityto(Jonesetal.,1998).

GMvarietiesofmaizeareabletocross-pollinatewithnon-GMvarieties(Smith,1998;Jones,1999).

Thereisanunambiguousrelationshipbetweenspendingoneducationandeconomicdevelopment(Rao,1998).

XisoneofthemostintensereactionsfollowingCHD(Lane,2003).

MIFhasbeenfoundtoopposetheanti-inflammatoryactionsofXonY(Alourfi,2004).

Referencetosingleinvestigationsinthepast:researcher(s)assentencesubject

Smith(1999)

found

that

aslevelsofliteracyandeducationofthepopulationrise

showed

thatreducingXto190oCdecreased(seefigure2).

demonstrated

thatwhenthemaximumtemperatureisexceeded

Someanalysts(e.g.Carnoy,2002)haveattemptedtodrawfinedistinctionsbetween

Otherauthors(seeHarbison,2003;Kaplan,2004)questiontheusefulnessofsuchanapproach.

Referencetootherwriters'ideas(authorassubject)

Accordingto

Smith(2003),preventativemedicineisfarmorecosteffective,andthereforebetteradaptedtothedevelopingworld.

Smith(2003)

pointsout

argues

maintains

claims

concludes

suggests

that

preventativemedicineisfarmorecosteffective,andthereforebetteradaptedtothedevelopingworld

Smith(2003)

arguesfor

offers

proposes

suggests

anexplanatorytheoryforeachtypeofirrationalbelief.

ThisviewissupportedbyJones(2000)whowrites

SmitharguesthatherdatasupportO'Brien's(1988)viewthat

AsSmithremindsus,

Elsewhere,Smithhasarguedthat

Somewaysofintroducingquotations

InthefinalpartoftheTheses,Marxwrites:"Philosophershavehithertoonlyinterpretedtheworldinvariousways;thepoint"

Sachsconcludes:"Theideaofdevelopmentstandstodaylikearuinintheintellectuallandscape…"(Sachs,1992a:156).

AsSmithargues:"Inthepast,thepurposeofeducationwasto"(Smith,2000:150).

AsCarnoy(2004:215)states:"therearemanygoodreasonstobesceptical".

BeingCritical

Asanacademicwriter,youareexpectedtobecriticalofthesourcesthatyouuse.Thisessentiallymeansquestioningwhatyoureadandnotnecessarilyagreeingwithitjustbecausetheinformationhasbeenpublished.Beingcriticalcanalsomeanlookingforreasonswhyweshouldnotjustacceptsomethingasbeingcorrectortrue.Thiscanrequireyoutoidentifyproblemswithawriter'sargumentsormethods,orperhapstorefertootherpeople'scriticismsofthese.Constructivecriticismgoesbeyondthisbysuggestingwaysinwhichapieceofresearchorwritingcouldbeimproved.

beingagainstisnotenough.Wealsoneedtodevelophabitsofconstructivethinking.EdwarddeBono

Introducingquestions,problemsandlimitations(theory)

Onequestionthatneedstobeasked,however,iswhether

Aseriousweaknesswiththisargument,however,isthat

Oneofthelimitationswiththisexplanationisthatitdoesnotexplainwhy....

OnecriticismofmuchoftheliteratureonXisthat

Thekeyproblemwiththisexplanationisthat

TheexistingaccountsfailtoresolvethecontradictionbetweenXandY.

However,thereisaninconsistencywiththisargument.

Smith'sargumentreliestooheavilyonqualitativeanalysisof

ItseemsthatJones'understandingoftheXframeworkisquestionable.

Smith'sinterpretationoverlooksmuchofthehistoricalresearch

OnemajorcriticismofSmith'sworkisthat

ManywritershavechallengedJones'claimonthegroundsthat

X'sanalysisdoesnottakeaccountofnordoesheexamine

Introducingquestions,problemsandlimitations(method/practice)

AnotherproblemwiththisapproachisthatitfailstotakeXintoaccount.

Perhapsthemostseriousdisadvantageofthismethodisthat

Difficultiesarise,however,whenanattemptismadetoimplementthepolicy.

Nevertheless,thestrategyhasnotescapedcriticismfromgovernments,agenciesandacademics.

Onemajordrawbackofthisapproachisthat

Themainlimitationofbiosyntheticincorporation,however,is

However,thismethodofanalysishasanumberoflimitations.

However,approachesofthiskindcarrywiththemvariouswellknownlimitations.

Allthestudiesreviewedsofar,however,sufferfromthefactthat

However,therearelimitstohowfartheideaof/conceptofXcanbetaken.

However,suchexplanationstendtooverlookthefactthat

However,oneoftheproblemswiththeinstrumenttheresearchersusedtomeasureXwas

However,allthepreviouslymentionedmethodssufferfromsomeserious

limitations

weaknesses

disadvantages

drawbacks.

Identifyingastudy'sweakness

(However,)

themainweaknessofthestudyisthefailuretoaddresshow

thestudyfailstoconsiderthedifferingcategoriesofdamagethat

theresearchdoesnottakeintoaccountpre-existingsuchas

theauthoroffersnoexplanationforthedistinctionbetweenXandY.

SmithmakesnoattempttodifferentiatebetweenvariousdifferenttypesofX.

Jonesfailstofullyacknowledgethesignificanceof

thepaperwouldappeartobeoverambitiousinitsclaims.

theauthoroverlooksthefactthatXcontributestoY.

whatSmithfailstodoistodrawadistinctionbetween

anotherweaknessisthatwearegivennoexplanantionofhow

noattemptwasmadetoquantifytheassociationbetweenXandY.

Offeringconstructivesuggestions

Smith'spaper

Herconclusions

Thestudy

Thefindings

wouldhavebeen

mighthavebeen

more

muchmore

farmore

useful

convincing

interesting

persuasive

original

ifhe/shehad

iftheauthorhad

included

considered

adopted

used

Abetterstudywouldexaminealarge,randomlyselectedsampleofsocietieswith

AmuchmoresystematicstudywouldidentifyhowXinteractswithothervariablesthatarebelievedtobelinkedto

Highlightinginadequaciesofpreviousstudies

MoststudiesinthefieldofXhaveonlyfocussedon

MoststudiesinXhaveonlybeencarriedoutinasmallnumberofareas.

Thegeneralisabilityofmuchpublishedresearchonthisissueisproblematic.

Theexperimentaldataarerathercontroversial,andthereisnogeneralagreementabout

Suchexpositionsareunsatisfactorybecausethey

However,fewwritershavebeenabletodrawonanystructuredresearchintotheopinionsandattitudesof

TheresearchtodatehastendedtofocusonXratherthanY.

TheexistingaccountsfailtoresolvethecontradictionbetweenXandY.

ResearchershavenottreatedXinmuchdetail.

PreviousstudiesofXhavenotdealtwith

However,thesestudiesusednon-validatedmethodstomeasure

Halfofthestudiesevaluatedfailedtospecifywhether

However,muchoftheresearchuptonowhasbeendescriptiveinnature….

AlthoughextensiveresearchhasbeencarriedoutonX,nosinglestudyexistswhichadequatelycovers

However,theseresultswerebasedupondatafromover30yearsagoanditisunclearifthesedifferencesstillpersist.

I

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論