體驗商務(wù)英語綜合教程3-U11-U13課文雙語版_第1頁
體驗商務(wù)英語綜合教程3-U11-U13課文雙語版_第2頁
體驗商務(wù)英語綜合教程3-U11-U13課文雙語版_第3頁
體驗商務(wù)英語綜合教程3-U11-U13課文雙語版_第4頁
體驗商務(wù)英語綜合教程3-U11-U13課文雙語版_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩3頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

商英Unit11Trustworthy牢靠的 law-biding守法的 corrupt貪污的Aslushfund行賄基金 asweetener賄賂 compensation 補償Insidertrading內(nèi)幕交易 industrialespionage工業(yè)間諜disclosuren.揭露,被泄露的丑聞Awhistleblower告密者 afraudster騙子 aconartist騙子Abribe賄賂 abonus獎金 acommission提成Fraud詐騙 secrecy保密 integrity正直的Aconfidentialityagreement保密協(xié)議 acoverup隱瞞 awhitewash洗白Ourcompanydoesnothingillegal.Weareverylaw-abiding.We’vegotaslushfundwhichisusedincountrieswhereitisdifficulttodobusinesswithoutofferingbribes.Theircarlookedsomuchlikeournewmodel,wesuspectindustrialespionage.Theyfiredhimbecausehewasawhistleblower.Heinformedthepressthatthecompanywasusingunder-ageworkersinthefactory.Hedeniedacceptingabribewhenhegavethecontracttomostexpensivesupplier.Iadmireourchairman.He’samanofhiswordandisgreatlyrespectedforhisintegrity.Manycompaniesasknewemployeestosignaconfidentialityagreementtoavoidfuturelitigationproblems.Controversial 有爭議的 corruption腐敗 transparency透亮度threats威逼Regulation規(guī)章制度 peerpressure同輩壓力companiesintheoilandminingsectorhavebeentakingtheissueofcorporatreesponsibilitymuchmoreseriouslyrecently.Theyareworriedaboutthreatstotheirreputationsduetorumoursofcorruptionandbribery.Gocernmentregulationandpeerpressurefromothercompanieshasresultedinmoretransparencyintheindustryandlesssecrecy.Theaviationindustryhasalsoreceivedattention.Seniormanagershavebeencriticisedfor controversialdecisionsregardingpaymentstosecurecontracts.Unit13Drawingboard打算階段prototype雛形 brainwave靈機一動 patent專利證Concept觀念 discovery覺察 setback挫折阻礙R&D〔researchanddevelopment〕Breakthrough突破 pioneers開發(fā)者eafaerosayrsnraesalittleourofdatetoday.Whilethesetypesofpioneersdostillexist,thesedayscompaniesoftenhavelargeR&Ddepartments-teamsofpeoplewhoareconstantlyinnovatingandperfectingdesigns.Perhapstheybeginwithaconceptandthenbuildaprototype,orworkingmodel.Sometimesduringtestingthereisasetbackwhenitbecomesclearthedesignhasafault.Atthispointmaybeitistimetostartagainorgobacktothedrawingboard.Moreworkisdoneandthereisabreakthrough-asolutionisfound.Theproductcanberetestedandthen,hopefully,manufactured.Thecompanywillapplyforapatentforthedesignsothatotherscannotcopyitandstealtheidea.Unit11缺乏社會責任感的企業(yè)無處藏身食品德業(yè)因?qū)е路逝侄鴤涫苤肛?。手機運營商面臨如何保護青少年免遭網(wǎng)絡(luò)色情侵害的挑戰(zhàn)。Thefoodindustryisblamedforobesity.Mobilephoneoperatorsarechallengedtoprotectteenagersfromonlinepornography.唱片公司因起訴在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)上共享非法文檔的音樂愛好者而患病抨擊。Recordcompaniesareattackedwhentheysuemusic-loversforsharingillegalfilesontheinternet.大企業(yè)紛紛被要求解釋它們應(yīng)對越來越多的社會、道德和環(huán)境問題的措施。Bigbusinessisbeingaskedtoexplainitsapproachtoagrowingnumberofsocial,ethicalandenvironmentalconcerns.美國的一家名為?企業(yè)社會責任〔BSR〕?的非盈利性詢問機構(gòu)的首席執(zhí)行官鮑勃·鄧恩說,?企業(yè)對于BSR所供給的幫助的需求,現(xiàn)在到達了BSR成立九年以來的最頂峰。?向BSR繳納年費的會員包括很多世界頂級的跨國公司。“we’refacingthegreatestdemandforourassistancethatwe’veseeninournine-yearhistory,”saysBobDunn,chiefBSR·莫里斯的母公司,奧馳亞集團始終是壓力團體和民事訴訟的重點對象。Microsoft,LucentandUnitedTechnologieshavejoinedBSRthisyear,aswellasAltria,amoreobvioustargetforpressuregroupsandlitigation,astheparentcompanyofbothKraftFoodsandPhilipMorris.一些始終成功地躲避了聚光燈的行業(yè)現(xiàn)在也覺察自己正成為留意的焦點。社會活動人士已經(jīng)開頭關(guān)注一些計算機和通訊公司在加工廠里的工作條件。Industriesthatuntilnowhadavoidedthespotlightarefindingattentionisnowfocusingonthem.Campaignersarebeginningtoshowinterestinworkingconditionsinfactoriesthatmakeequipmentforcomputerandtelecommunicationscompanies.旗銀行,巴克萊銀行和荷蘭銀行,紛紛承諾不為有社會和環(huán)境問題的工程供給貸款。Thefinancialsectorhascomeunderpressureoverlendingtocontroversialprojectsinsomecountries.InJune,agroupofleadingbanks,includingCitigroup,BarclaysandABNAmro,promisedtoavoidgivingloansforsociallyorenvironmentallyquestionableprojects.巨大壓力,它們被要求公開其在一些國家的付款狀況,其目的在于打擊腐敗。Oilandmininggroupshavecomeunderstrongpressurethisyearfromacoalitionofinvestors,activistsandtheUKgovernmenttomakepublictheirpaymentstosomecountriesinanefforttofightcorruption.·過美國公正勞工協(xié)會主動實行措施增加其供給鏈的透亮度。Someoftheworld’sbiggestfootwearandclothingbrands,includingLeviStrauss,NikeandReebok,havemeanwhiletakenvoluntarymeasuresthroughtheUSFairLaborAssociationtoincreasethetransparencyoftheirsupplychain.他們在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)上公布了第一批針對其供給廠商的獨立審計報告勞動標準的措施。Theypublishedontheinternetthefirstindependentauditsoftheirsupplierfactories,alongwiththestepstakentoimproveoftenterriblelabourstandards.企業(yè)在其聲譽面臨現(xiàn)實的或潛在的威逼時通常會實行行動脂肪和糖的含量,限制每份食品的大小,停頓在學校進展營銷活動。Companiesusuallytakeactionwhentheyfacearealorpotentialthreattotheirreputation,aswhenKraftannouncedinJulyitwouldcutfatandsugarinitsfood,limitportionsizesandstopmarketinginschools.一場針對卡夫食品中的脂肪酸過量的訴訟,在卡夫宣布將解決這個問題后很快就撤訴了。AlawsuitagainstKraftoverfattyacidswasrapidlywithdrawnafteritsaiditwouldaddresstheissue.但是,也有一些公司主動實行這方面的行動,他們意識到這樣做能提高其競爭力。據(jù)鄧恩的一個重要因素。afewcompaniesare,however,takingaleadbecausetheybelieveitwillgivethemacompetitiveedge.Mr.DunnsaysthesearchforcompetitiveadvantageisonefactorcreatinginterestincorporateresponsibilityamongcompaniesincountriessuchasRussia,Poland,TurkeyandSouthAfrica.英國的兩個著名的詢問機構(gòu)SalterBaxter和Context于本月發(fā)表的一份題為?方向?的爭論報告250指數(shù)公司都公布這樣的年度報告。IntheUK,thetrendisalsoreflectedinthesharpriseinsocialandenvironmentalreportingoverthepasttwoyears.MorethanhalftheFTSE250companiesnowproduceannualreports,accordingtoDirections,astudypublishedthismonthbySalterBaxterandContext,twowell-knownUKconsultancies.有些行業(yè),包括賓館業(yè)、休閑業(yè)以及軟件和計算機效勞業(yè),照舊在遮遮掩掩。然而,隨著投數(shù)量越來越小的少數(shù)派。Somesectorsremainsecretive,includinghotelsandleisure,andsoftwareandcomputerservices.Buttheyformadecreasingminorityasinvestorinterest,regulationandpeerpressurecombinetoforcegreaterdisclosure.250指10050家公司中的40家也公布這樣的報告。Whenthefirstnonfinancialreportscameoutmorethanadecadeago,theyfocusedontheenvironment,socialandethicalissues.FortyofthefiftylargestEuropeancompaniesalsoproducereports.?最好的領(lǐng)導方式是以身作則?,坎普拉德先生說過,?讓我坐頭等艙,而讓我的同事們坐旅游艙,是我確定不能承受的。?AllIkeaexecutivesareawareofthevalueofcost-consciousness.Theyarestronglydiscouragedfromtravellingfirstorbusinessclass.‘Thereisnobetterformofleadershipthansettingagoodexample.IcouldneveracceptthatIshouldtravelfirstclasswhilemycolleaguessitintouristclass,’Mr.Kampradsays.他巡察宜家集團的店鋪時,他總是要和員工們握手或擁抱,以此向員工傳遞一種?伙伴?的感覺,這種做法在瑞典絕不多見。?叫我英格瓦,?他對員工說。他不寵愛打領(lǐng)帶,而是寵愛放開襯衫的領(lǐng)口,這樣的衣著方式也突顯了他的不拘禮節(jié)和沒有等級觀念。Ashewalksaroundthegroup’sstores,heexpressesthefeelingof‘togetherness’physically,claspingandhugginghisemployees.ThisisveryuncharacteristicofSweden.‘callmeIngvar,’hesaystostaff.Theinformalityandlackofhierarchyareemphasizedbyhisdressstyle,withanopen-neckedshirtpreferredtoatie.在個人生活方面和事業(yè)方面坎普拉德先生都經(jīng)受過困難的奮斗過程其他疾病抗爭。Mr.Kampradhashadbothpersonalandbusinessbattles.Hehasfoughtagainstdyslexiaandillness.他性格中很突出的一點就是對細節(jié)的偏執(zhí)性關(guān)注。巡察他的商店時,他不僅和經(jīng)理們交談,?覺察了100個需要爭論的細節(jié)性問題。?OneofMr.Kamprad’scharacteristicsishisobsessiveattentiontodetail.Whenhevisitshisstores,hetalksnotonlytothemanagersbutalsotofloorstaffandcustomers.Arecentvisittosixofthegroup’sSwedishstoreshasproduced‘100detailstodiscuss’,hesays.在他自己看來,他最大的優(yōu)點就是選擇正確的人員來治理他的企業(yè)。Byhisownreckoning,hisgreateststrengthischoosingtherightpeopletorunhisbusinesses.他下定決心不讓宜家集團上市,由于股東的短期要求和企業(yè)長期的規(guī)劃會有沖突。?我厭煩曾不得不打算要虧損十年。?Heisdeterminedthatthegroupwillnotgopublic,becauseshort-termshareholderdemandsconflictwithlong-termplanning.‘Ihateshort-termistdecisions.Ifyouwanttotakelong-lastingdecisions,it’sverydifficulttobeonthestockexchange.WhenenteringtheRussianmarket,wehadtodecidetolosemoneyfor10years.’自1986年從集團總裁位置上退下來以后,坎普拉德先生就漸漸地從業(yè)務(wù)中淡出。盡管他承認自己格外不情愿完全退出,但他仍舊堅持說自己是?參與過多,過問的細節(jié)太多。?Mr.Kampradhasbeenslowlywithdrawingfromthebusinesssince1986,whenhesteppeddownasgrouppresident.Hemaintainsthathiisstill‘toomuchinvolvedandintoomanydetails’,althoughheadmitstoadistinctreluctancetowithdrawaltogether.問題是:假設(shè)沒有坎普拉德先生,宜家能否恒久存在?宜家是否太過于依靠其創(chuàng)始人?宜家掌握權(quán)漸漸從坎普拉德先生轉(zhuǎn)移到他的三個兒子手中以后,宜家帝國能否連續(xù)輝煌?Thequestionis:cantherebeaneternalIkeawithoutMr.Kamprad?Doesthegroupdependtoomuchonitsfounder?Willtheempirecontinue,ascontrolofIkeagraduallymovestoMr.Kamprad’sthreesons?Unit13寶潔創(chuàng)機器的內(nèi)情寶潔首席執(zhí)行官A.G.雷富禮給寶潔的創(chuàng)過程添加了制造力和嚴謹。A.G.Lafley,theCEOofProcterandGamble,hasbroughtalotofcreativityandrigortoP&G’sinnovationprocess.70%提高到90%“信息資源“還不到一年?!拔谊P(guān)注寶潔18年了,”德意志銀行的分析員安德魯·肖說,“它現(xiàn)在的業(yè)績前所未有的好。”Duringthepast2yearsP&Ghasraiseditsnew-producthitratefrom70%to90%.That’sterrificinanindustrywherehalfofnewproductsfailwithin12months,accordingtomarketresearchfirmInformationResources.‘Inthe18yearsthatI’vefollowedProcter,’saysDeutscheBankanalystAndrewShore,‘Ihaveneverseenthecompanythisgood.’內(nèi)生增長基。依據(jù)雷富禮的觀點,內(nèi)生增長加強了企業(yè)的創(chuàng)力量。Organicgrowth–meaninggrowthfromcorebusinesses,excludinggainsfromacquisitions–isattherootofP&G’stransformation.AccordingtoLafley,organicgrowthstrengthensacompany’sabilitytoinnovate.士頓詢問公司最近對假設(shè)干公司高管進展的一項調(diào)查,超過三分之二的企業(yè)高管優(yōu)先考慮創(chuàng)57%的高管對創(chuàng)的投資回報感到不滿足。Coke,KraftandUnileverarejustafewofthegiantsthatarestrugglingtoinnovateandbuildthebrandstheyalreadyhave.AccordingtoarecentBostonConsultingGroupsurveyofseniorexecutives,morethantwo-thirdssayinnovationisapriority,but57%aredissatisfiedwiththereturnsontheirinnovationinvestments.拉夫雷有一個大公司創(chuàng)模型:Lafleyhasamodelforinnovatinginabigcompany:保潔公司首席營銷官吉姆斯坦格爾已經(jīng)不像過去那樣一來焦點小組訪談這樣的傳統(tǒng)消費者調(diào)查手段了。JimStengel,Procter’sChiefMarketingOfficer,hascuthisrelianceonfocusgroups–theconventionalmethodforstudyingconsumers.他說:“你無法從中得到任何有真實見解的意見?!彼€說,寶潔和它的對手們已經(jīng)滿足了消費者較為明顯的需求,現(xiàn)在的時機僅在于滿足消費者們尚無法表述清楚的需求?!甕oudon’treallylearnanythinginsightful,’hesays,contendingthatP&Ganditsrivalshavealreadymetconsumers’obviousneedsandthattoday’sopportunitieslieinmeetingneedsthatconsumersmaynotarticulate.所以,他要求營銷人員多花些時間在消費者家里,看看他們?nèi)绾未┮?,如何清潔地板,了解他們的習慣和令他們懊喪的事情。Sohehasurgedthemarketerstospendlotsoftimewithconsumersintheirhomes,watchingthewaystheyweartheirclothes,cleantheirfloors,andaskingthemabouttheirhabitsandfrustrations.保潔公司共有7500名研發(fā)人員,分布在9個國家。為了從如此寬闊的地域手機反響信息,公司鼓舞員工把自己想到的問題貼到公司內(nèi)部網(wǎng)站上。ProcterandGamblehas7500R&Dpeoplelocatedinninecountries.Inordertocollectfeedbackoverthisvastarea,thecompanyencouragesemployeestopostproblemsonaninternalwebsite.“創(chuàng)回憶”會議上公開他自己的爭論結(jié)果。Lafleyevaluatestheideasthathavebeensharedbetweenemployees.Eachyearhepresentshisfindinginhalf-dayinnovationreviews’foreachbusinessunit.拉夫雷說,他的目標是讓寶潔一半的創(chuàng)來自公司外部,現(xiàn)在的比例已從四年前的20%上升到今日的35%“試驗室里得到制造,在車庫里也同樣可以得到。LafleysaysthathisgoalistogethalfofP&G’sinventionfromexternalsources,upfrom20%fouryearsagoandabout35%today.‘Inventorsareevenlydistributedinthepopulation,andwe’reaslikelytofindinventioninagarageasinourlabs,’heexplains.寶潔從不未經(jīng)市場測試就推出產(chǎn)品。但消費者試用格外耗時,這種時間上的白費,對于寶潔高管們來說是越來越少了。It’snottheP&Gwaytoputoutaproductwithouttest-marketingit.Butconsumertestingtakestime–aluxurythatP&Gexecutivesincreasinglydon’thave.寶潔選美皇后蘇珊·阿諾德說:“我們沒有時間做到事無巨細。這個行業(yè)的根基是潮流和時尚,必需靠直覺?!盨aysSusanArnold,P&G’sbeautyqueen:‘Wedon’thavetimetocrossalltheT’sanddotalltheI’s.Thisbusinessistrend-basedandfashion-based.Youhavetobeintuitive.’的318個月。Bycuttingdownontest

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評論

0/150

提交評論