【唐遲老師】詞匯的邏輯

《詞匯的邏輯》唐遲老師如何在閱讀中復習英語詞匯1、抓住單詞的感情色彩2、詞以類記2004-text4What

do

American

parents

expect

their

children

to

acquire

in

school?We

can

learn

from

the

text

that

Americans

have

a

history

of

.The

views

of

Ravitch

and

Emerson

on

schooling

are

.Emerson,

according

to

the

text,

is

probably

.Whatdoes

the

author

think

of

intellect?正確的翻譯 ——

感情色彩（摘自

《閱讀的邏輯》）Americans

today

don't

place

a

very

high

value

on

intellect.

Our

heroes

are

athletes,

entertainers,

and

entrepreneurs,

not

scholars.

Even

our

schools

are

where

we

send

our

children

to

get

a

practical

education

—

not

to

pursue

knowledge

for

the

sake

of

knowledge.

Symptoms

of

pervasive

anti-intellectualism

in

our

schools

aren'tdifficult

to

find.60.Whatdoes

the

author

think

of

intellect?It

is

secondtointelligence.It

evolves

from

common

sense.It

is

to

be

pursued.It

underlies

power正確的翻譯 ——

感情色彩（摘自

《閱讀的邏輯》）Americans

today

don't

place

a

very

high

value

on

intellect.

Our

heroes

are

athletes,

entertainers,

and

entrepreneurs,

not

scholars.

Even

our

schools

are

where

we

send

our

children

to

get

a

practical

education

—

not

to

pursue

knowledge

for

the

sake

of

knowledge.

Symptoms

of

pervasive

anti-intellectualism

in

our

schools

aren'tdifficult

to

find.SymptomN-COUNT

癥狀 Asymptomofanillnessissomethingwrongwith

yourbodyormindthatisasign

oftheillness.N-COUNT

征候;征兆 Asymptomofabadsituationissomething

thathappens

which

is

considered

tobeasignofthis

situation.正確的翻譯 ——

感情色彩（摘自

《閱讀的邏輯》）Americans

today

don't

place

a

very

high

value

on

intellect.

Our

heroes

are

athletes,

entertainers,

and

entrepreneurs,

not

scholars.

Even

our

schools

are

where

we

send

our

children

to

get

a

practical

education

—

not

to

pursue

knowledge

for

the

sake

of

knowledge.

Symptoms

of

pervasive

anti-intellectualism

in

our

schools

aren'tdifficult

to

find.60.Whatdoes

the

author

think

of

intellect?It

is

secondtointelligence.It

evolves

from

common

sense.It

is

to

be

pursued.It

underlies

power正確的翻譯 ——

感情色彩（摘自

《閱讀的邏輯》）2段①What’s

nottolike?

②Quite

alot,according

toa

handfulof

scientistsquotedin

theNews

Feature.

③You

cannot

buyclass,

as

theold

saying

goes,

and

these

upstart

entrepreneurs

cannot

buy

their

prizes

the

prestigeofthe

Nobels.

④Thenew

awards

are

an

exerciseinself-promotionforthosebehindthem,say

scientists.

⑤They

could

distortthe

achievement-based

systemof

peer-review-led

research.

⑥They

couldthe

status

quo

ofpeer-reviewedresearch.

⑦Theydo

not

fundthe

myth

of

the

lone

genius.peer-reviewed

research.

⑧Theycement 水泥；粘牢

；鞏固；加強perpetuate

使永存，使不朽2014

text2第一段背景主要介紹目前許多在商業(yè)領域取得成功的人士，拿出大手筆設立科學獎項。本文理解的難點在第二段正確的翻譯 ——

感情色彩（摘自

《閱讀的邏輯》）①What’snottolike?②Quitealot,accordingto

a

handful

ofscientists

quotedin

the

News

Feature.③Youcannotbuyclass,astheoldsayinggoes,

andtheseupstartentrepreneurscannotbuytheir

prizestheprestigeoftheNobels.④Thenew

awards

are

an

exercise

in

forthosebehindthem,sayscientists.⑤Theycould

distorttheachievement-basedsystemofpeer-

review-led

research.

⑥They

could thestatusquoofpeer-reviewedresearch.⑦Theydo

not

fund

peer-

reviewed

research.

⑧

Theythe

myth

of

the

lone

genius.譯文1

①這有什么讓人不喜歡的呢？②

根據(jù)該新聞專題所援引的幾位科學家的觀點，不喜歡的人不在少數(shù)。③古語云，金錢買不來地位，所以這些企業(yè)家暴發(fā)戶們也不能為其贊助的獎項買到諾貝爾獎的威望。④科學家們稱，對于那些贊助者們來說，新獎項是一種自我提升的手段。⑤它們可能會破壞以同行評審為導向的基于學術成就的研究體系。⑥它們可能會 同行評審研究的現(xiàn)狀。⑦

它們不會資助同行評審研究。⑧它們使孤獨天才的神話 。正確的翻譯 ——

感情色彩（摘自

《閱讀的邏輯》）2003

text2 To

paraphrase

18th-century

statesman

Edmund

Burke,“all

that

is

needed

for

the

triumph

of

a

misguided

causeis

that

good

people

do

nothing.”正確的翻譯 ——

感情色彩（摘自

《閱讀的邏輯》）Perpetuate：tomakesthsuchasabadsituation,abelief,etc.

continuefor

a

longtime

使永久化；使持久化；使持續(xù)正確的翻譯 ——

感情色彩（摘自

《閱讀的邏輯》）①What’snottolike?②Quitealot,accordingtoa

handful

of

scientists

quoted

in

the

News

Feature.③Youcannotbuyclass,astheoldsayinggoes,

andtheseupstartentrepreneurscannotbuytheir

prizestheprestigeoftheNobels.④Thenew

awards

are

an

exercise

in forthose

behindthem,sayscientists.⑤Theycoulddistort

theachievement-basedsystemofpeer-review-led

research.

⑥They

could the

status

quo

of

peer-reviewedresearch.⑦Theydonotfundpeer-

reviewed

research.

⑧They themyth

ofthelonegenius.譯文2

①這有什么讓人不喜歡的呢？②

根據(jù)該新聞專題所援引的幾位科學家的觀點，不喜歡的人不在少數(shù)。③古語云，金錢買不來地位，所以這些企業(yè)家暴發(fā)戶們也不能為其贊助的獎項買到諾貝爾獎的威望。④科學家們稱，對于那些贊助者們來說，新獎項是一種 的手段。⑤它們可能會破壞以同行評審為導向的基于學術成就的研究體系。⑥它們可能讓同行評審研究的現(xiàn)狀

。⑦它們不會資助同行評審研究。⑧它們使孤獨天才的神話正確的翻譯 ——

感情色彩（摘自

《閱讀的邏輯》）譯文2

①這有什么讓人不喜歡的呢？②

根據(jù)該新聞專題所援引的幾位科學家的觀點，不喜歡的人不在少數(shù)。③古語云，金錢買不來地位，所以這些企業(yè)家暴發(fā)戶們也不能為其贊助的獎項買到諾貝爾獎的威望。④科學家們稱，對于那些贊助者們來說，新獎項是一種自抬身價的手段。⑤它們可能會破壞以同行評審為導向的基于學術成就的研究體系。⑥它們可能讓同行評審研究的現(xiàn)狀停滯不前⑦它們不會資助同行評審研究。⑧它們使孤獨天才的神話頑固不化。正確的翻譯 ——

感情色彩（摘自

《閱讀的邏輯》）①What’snottolike?②Quitealot,accordingtoa

handful

of

scientists

quoted

in

the

News

Feature.③Youcannotbuyclass,astheoldsayinggoes,

andtheseupstartentrepreneurscannotbuytheir

prizestheprestigeoftheNobels.④Thenew

awards

are

an

exercise

in forthose

behindthem,sayscientists.⑤Theycoulddistort

theachievement-basedsystemofpeer-review-led

research.

⑥They

could the

status

quo

of

peer-reviewedresearch.⑦Theydonotfundpeer-

reviewed

research.

⑧They themyth

ofthelonegenius.1段 ①Just

howmuchdoesthe

Constitutionprotect

your

digital

data？……作者希望法律能保護公民隱私2段 ①Californiahasasked

thejustices

torefrainfromasweepingruling,

particularlyone

that

upsets

theold

assumptions

that

authorities

may

search

throughthepossessionsofsuspectsatthetimeoftheirarrest.

……27.Theauthor’sattitudetoward

California’sargumentis

oneof

.[A]

disapproval[C]

tolerance[B]indifference

[D]cautiousness正確的翻譯——感情色彩（摘自

《閱讀的邏輯》）正確的翻譯——logic

（摘自

《閱讀的邏輯》）3段

①The

court

would

be

recklessly

modest

if

it

followed

California’s

advice.

……27.Theauthor’sattitudetoward

California’sargumentis

oneof

.[A]

disapproval[C]

tolerance[B]indifference

[D]cautiousness正確的翻譯——感情色彩（摘自

《閱讀的邏輯》）正確的翻譯——logic

（摘自

《閱讀的邏輯》）2014text4Today,professorsroutinelytreattheprogressiveinterpretationofhistoryand

progressivepublicpolicyasthepropersubjectofstudy

whileportrayingconservative

orclassicalliberalideas—suchasfreemarketsandself-reliance—asfallingoutsidethe

boundaries

ofroutine,and

sometimes

legitimate,

intellectualinvestigation.39.

The