國際商法英文閱讀資料1_第1頁
國際商法英文閱讀資料1_第2頁
國際商法英文閱讀資料1_第3頁
國際商法英文閱讀資料1_第4頁
國際商法英文閱讀資料1_第5頁
全文預(yù)覽已結(jié)束

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

TheCommonLawandItsCompetitors

Thereisabewilderingvarietyoflegalsystemsintheworld.Everycountryhasitsown;andintheUnitedStates;eachstatehasalegalsystemfordealingwithitsinternalaffairs,withthenational(federal)systemontopofit.Alawstudentusuallystudiesthelawofasinglecountry---theoneheorsheplanstopracticein.Butlawisstrictlydefinedbynationality:itstopsattheborder.Outsideitshomebase,ithasnovalidityatall.

Notwolegalsystems,then,areexactlyalike.Eachisspecifictoitscountryoritsjurisdiction.Thisdoesnotmean,ofcourse,thateverylegalsystemisentirelydifferentfromeveryotherlegalsystem.Notatall.Whentwocountriesaresimilarincultureandtradition,theirlegalsystemsarelikelytobesimilaraswell.NodoubtthelawsofAustraliaandNewZealandarenotthatfarapart.

Wecanalsoclumplegalsystemstogetherintoclusters,or“families”----groupsoflegalsystemsthathaveimportanttraitsofstructure,substance,orcultureincommon.Thewordfamilyisuseddeliberately:inmostcases,membersofalegalfamilyarerelated,thatis,theyhaveacommonparentorancestor,orelsehaveborrowedtheirlawsfromacommonsource.EnglishsettlerscarriedEnglishlawwiththemtotheAmericancolonies,toCanada,Australia,NewZealandetc.ManycountriesintheworldoncewerepartoftheBritishEmpire.Thesecountriesarenowindependentandhavedistinctlegalsystemsoftheirown;buttheyhavekepttheirbasictraditions.

Thelargestmostimportantfamilyistheso-calledcivil-lawfamily.MembersofthisfamilyoweacommondebttoRomanlaw.TheancientRomansweregreatlawmakers.TheirtraditionnevercompletelydiedoutinEurope.IntheMiddleAges,Romanlaw,initsclassicform,wasrediscoveredadrevived;eventoday,codesoflawinEuropereflect“theinfluenceofRomanlaw”.WesternEurope----France,Germany,Italy,Spain,Portugaletc.------isdefinitelycivil-lawcountry.ThroughSpainandPortugal,thecivillawtraveledtoLatinAmerica.TheFrenchbroughtittotheircoloniesinAfrica.TheFrenchbroughtittotheircoloniesinAfrica.InCanada,thecivillawisdominantintheFrench-speakingprovinceofQuebec.Itplaysamajorrole,too,incountrieslikeJapanandTurkey,whichstandcompletelyoutsidethehistoricaltraditionbutwhichborrowedchunksofRomanlawinrecenttimes,inhopesofgettingmoderninahurry.

Civil-lawsystemsare,generallyspeaking,“codified”systems;thebasiclawissetoutincodes.Thesearestatutes,orrathersuperstatutes,enactedbythenationalparliament,whicharrangewholefieldsoflawinanorderly,logical,andcomprehensiveway.Historically,themostimportantofthecodeswasthecivilcodeofFrance,theso-calledCodeNapoleon.Ithashadatremendousinfluenceontheformandsubstanceofmostlatercodes.

DuringtheRenaissance,EuropeanlegalscholarshipwasdazzledbythepowerandbeautyoftherediscoveredRomanlaw.Onecountry,however,managedtoresisttheso-called“reception,”thatis,theacceptanceofRomanlaw.Englandalonewasnotseduced.Itheldfasttoitsnativetraditions.ManyideasandtermsfromRomanandEuropeanlawdid,tobesure,creepintoEnglishlaw;butthecorelegalsystemofthisislandheldfirm.Thistenaciouslocalsystemwastheso-calledcommonlaw.Itdifferedandcontinuestodifferinmanywaysfromthelegalorderinitsneighboringcountries.Foronethingthecommonlawresistedcodification.ThereeverwasanEnglishequivalentoftheNapoleonicCode.ThebasicprinciplesoflawwerenotfoundprimarilyinactsofParliament,butinthecaselaw-----thebodyofdecidingparticularcases.Thedoctrineof“precedent”-----themaximthatajudgeisboundinsomewaybywhathasalreadybeendecided----isstrictlyacommon-lawdoctrine.Thecommonlawalsohasitsownpeculiarfeaturesofsubstance,structure,andculture.Thejury,forexample,isacommon-lawinstitution.Soisthe“trust,”anarrangementinwhichaperson(orbank)astrusteereceivesmoneyorpropertytoinvestandmanageforthebenefitofcertainbeneficiaries.

Thecommonlawisnolongerconfinedtoasinglesmallcountry.TheEnglishbroughtittotheircolonies,andinmostcasesittookrootandthrived.Allcommon-lawcountrieswereoncecoloniesofGreatBritain,or,insomecases,coloniesofcolonies.

Thecivil-lawsystemwasdescribedasthedominantsysteminWesternEurope.NomentionwasmadeofEasternEurope,whichisaratherdifficultareaforpurposesofclassification.Russiaanditssatellitesoncehadclosetieswiththecivil-lawsystems.Socialistrevolutionshavetransformedthesecountries;butlegalresemblancetoWesternEuropeisstillfairlyclose.Thisiswhysomescholarstreatthesesystemsasstillpartofthatfamily.

Ingeneral,itisafairlyc

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論