版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
PublicDisclosureAuthorizedPublicDisclosureAuthorized
PolicyResearchWorkingPaper10678
FiscalIncidenceontheIsland
Grenada’sFiscalSystemandItsIncidence
GustavoCanavire-Bacarreza
GuillermoGómezAliaga
ChevanneBritton
FernandoRios-Avila
WilsonJimenezPozo
SilviaGranadosIbarra
RanLi
WORLDBANKGROUP
PovertyandEquityGlobalPractice&
Macroeconomics,TradeandInvestmentGlobalPractice
January2024
PolicyResearchWorkingPaper10678
Abstract
ThispaperexaminesthedistributionaleffectsoffiscalpolicyinGrenada.Usingdatafromthe2017–18LivingConditionsandHouseholdBudgetsSurveyandfollow-ingtheCommitmenttoEquityanalysisframework,thepaperestimatestheeffectsoffiscalpolicyinterventionsoninequalityandpoverty.Itanalyzesthedistributionalincidenceofdirectandindirecttaxes,directtransferspro-videdbysocialtransfersandschoolfeedingprograms,andin-kindtransfersgeneratedbypublicservicesinhealthand
education.TheresultsshowthatGrenadahasataxsystemthatisneutralonthevalue-addedtaxsideandprogressiveonthepersonalincometaxside.Furthermore,directtrans-fersmakeamodestcontributiontopovertyreductionandarealmostneutralintheirdistributiveimpact.TheresultscontributetotheunderstandingofwhobearstheburdenoftaxationandbenefitsfromtransfersandofhowGrenada’sfiscalsystemcanimproveitsredistributiveeffect.
ThispaperisaproductofthePovertyandEquityGlobalPracticeandtheMacroeconomics,TradeandInvestmentGlobalPractice.ItispartofalargereffortbytheWorldBanktoprovideopenaccesstoitsresearchandmakeacontributiontodevelopmentpolicydiscussionsaroundtheworld.PolicyResearchWorkingPapersarealsopostedontheWebat
/prwp.Theauthorsmaybecontactedatgcanavire@
;ranli@;Chevanne.britton@;friosa@;wjimenezpozo@;sgranadosibarra@;andggomezaliaga@.
ThePolicyResearchWorkingPaperSeriesdisseminatesthefindingsofworkinprogresstoencouragetheexchangeofideasaboutdevelopmentissues.Anobjectiveoftheseriesistogetthefindingsoutquickly,evenifthepresentationsarelessthanfullypolished.Thepaperscarrythenamesoftheauthorsandshouldbecitedaccordingly.Thefindings,interpretations,andconclusionsexpressedinthispaperareentirelythoseoftheauthors.TheydonotnecessarilyrepresenttheviewsoftheInternationalBankforReconstructionandDevelopment/WorldBankanditsaffiliatedorganizations,orthoseoftheExecutiveDirectorsoftheWorldBankorthegovernmentstheyrepresent.
ProducedbytheResearchSupportTeam
FiscalIncidenceontheIsland:Grenada’sFiscalSystemandItsIncidence
*
GustavoCanavire-Bacarreza
?
GuillermoGómezAliaga
?
ChevanneBritton
§
FernandoRios-Avila
**
WilsonJimenezPozo
??
SilviaGranadosIbarra
??
RanLi
§§
Keywords:Fiscalincidence,Poverty,Inequality,Taxes,SocialTransfers,PublicExpenditure,PublicRevenue
JELCODES:D31,H11,H22,H5,I14,I24,I3,O54
*Thefindings,interpretations,andconclusionsexpressedinthispaperdonotnecessarilyreflecttheviewsoftheWorldBank,theExecutiveDirectorsoftheWorldBankorthegovernmentstheyrepresent.TheWorldBankdoesnotguaranteetheaccuracyofthedataincludedinthiswork.TheauthorswouldliketothankCarlosRodríguez-Castelan,
GabrielaInchauste,CesarCanchoandGabrielLaraforhelpfulcommentsandsuggestions.
?TheWorldBank,PovertyandEquityGlobalPractice;
gcanavire@.
?TheWorldBank,PovertyandEquityGlobalPractice;
ggomezaliaga@.
§Grenada’sMinistryofFinance;
chevanne.britton@.
**LevyInstituteatBardCollege;
f.rios.a@.
??FundacionAru;
wjimenezpozo@.
??TheWorldBank,PovertyandEquityGlobalPractice;
sgranadosibarra@.
§§TheWorldBank,MacroeconomicandTradeGlobalPractice;
ranli@.
2
1.Introduction
Becauseoftheiridiosyncraticeconomiccharacteristics,smallislanddevelopingstates(SIDS)facegreaterchallengesthatelevatethecostsassociatedwithdeliveringpublicservices,includingeducation,health,andsocialprograms.Thedirectimpactsofthesechallengeshaverepercussionsonpublicfinances,pushinggovernmentstoassessandprioritizesectorsindeterminingwheretofocustheirinvestments(OECD2018).ThisproblemisaggravatedbythevulnerabilityofSIDStoshocksthatlimittheirdomesticrevenuegeneration,largelyduetotheirdependenceontourismactivities(OECD2018).Inthiscontext,afiscalincidenceanalysisbecomesofprimeimportance,asLustig(2020)pointsout.
ThispaperfocusesonGrenada,anSIDSwithapopulationofaround113,000,thatishighlydependentontourism.Asaresult,thecountryisvulnerabletoclimaticshocksandeconomicdownturnsindevelopedcountries.Grenadaisathighriskforclimate-relateddisasters,rankingthirdgloballyintermsofGDPvulnerabilityandseventhintermsoffatalitiesper100,000inhabitantsduetoweather-relatedlosses.Approximatelyone-fifthofthecountry’spopulationlivesbelowthenationalpovertyline(OECD2018;WorldBank2021;Grenada,MinistryofForeignAffairs2022).TheCOVID-19pandemicseverelyimpactedGrenada’seconomy,particularlyitstourismsector,leadingtoasignificanteconomiccontractionandincreasedunemployment.
1
Thegovernment’sresponsemeasurescontainedtheinitialspreadofthevirus,butsubsequentwavescausedfurthereconomicchallenges.Despitesomerecoveryin2021,Grenada’sGDPremainsbelowpre-pandemiclevels,andthegovernmenthadtosuspendthefiscalruleforthreeconsecutiveyearstoaddressthepandemic’sextendedimpacts.
2
Theextendedimpactsofthepandemichavemadeadditionalfiscalstimulusnecessary(seeAppendixA)tosupportvulnerablegroupsandmaintaineconomicactivities.
Thepaperexaminestheredistributiveimpactoftaxesandpublicspending,followingtheCommitmenttoEquity(CEQ)framework(Lustig2018).Theframeworkaimstoprovideacomprehensivepictureoftheredistributiveeffectsoffiscalpoliciesonhouseholdincomeandconsumption.HeretheCEQframeworkisusedtoassessGrenada’sfiscalpolicies,focusingonpreandpostfiscalincomesinordertodeterminethenetbeneficiariesandpayersofthesepolicies(Lustig2020).FortheGrenadacontext,afiscalincidenceanalysisthroughtheCEQframeworkisrelevant,becauseitcanprovideevidenceconcerningtheextenttowhichthegovernment’sfiscalpoliciesareimpactingthewelfareofthecountry’shouseholdsandinformfuturepolicydecisions.
Thispapermakesmultiplecontributionstotheexistingliterature.First,weassessthefiscalsystemofanSIDS,Grenada,whichfacesresourceconstraints,naturalhazards,andahighpovertyrate.Thesecharacteristicsmakeitimportanttodeterminewhetherthecountry’sfiscalsystemhasaredistributiveimpact.Furthermore,Grenadaislocatedinaregionwherefiscalincidenceisunderstudied.PreviousworkonCaribbeanislandsusingtheCEQmethodologyhasfocusedonbiggerandmoredevelopedislandssuchasJamaica(Katayamaetal.2021),
1BeforetheCOVID-19pandemic,Grenadawasmakingastrongcommitmenttoeconomicreformandresiliencebuildingwiththesupportofinternationalorganizations.Itachievedanaverageannualgrowthof4.5percentbetween2014and2019,surpassingtheregionalaverage.Fiscalreforms,includingtheFiscalResponsibleAct(FRA)of2015,ledtoasignificantreductioninpublicdebtandtheaccumulationofafiscalsurplus.Nevertheless,Grenada’seconomyremainslessdiversifiedandhighlysusceptibletoclimatechangeandnaturaldisasters.
2MFMODDatabase,theWorldBank’sWorldDevelopmentIndicators(WDI),andGEMdatabases,IMF.Mostsourcesavailablein
/
.
3
Barbados(García-Pe?aBersh2019),andtheDominicanRepublic(Aristy-Escuderetal.2016).Second,weprovideacomparisonwithsimilarcountriesintheCaribbeaninordertounderstandthedifferencesbetweenasmalldevelopingislandandlargercounterparts.Finally,weincorporateintotheanalysisfiscalinterventionsthathavenotbeenpreviouslyanalyzed,suchasthepersonalincometax(PIT),whichwasreadjustedin2019;themostimportantdirecttransfertopoorandvulnerablehouseholds,theSupportforEducation,EmpowermentandDevelopmentProgramme(SEED);andschooltransfers.
TheresultsindicatethatGrenada’sfiscalsystemhasthepotentialtodecreasepovertyratesandinequalityinthecountry,butitshowsneutralincidence.Grenada’sfiscalpolicydesignisindeedorientedtowardthelow-incomepopulation.Focusingonlyoninequalityandaccountingforallfiscalinterventionsdoesdecreaseinequality,asobservedincountrieslikeJamaicaandtheDominicanRepublic.TheseresultspointtotheredistributivepotentialoffiscalpoliciespursuedbythegovernmentofGrenada.Asexpected,highersegmentsoftheincomedistributionpaymoretaxesthanthelow-incomepopulation,andfurthermore,themiddle-incomepopulationpaysmorethantheyreceive,asdoesthepopulationmakingupthehighpartoftheincomedistribution.However,overallindirecttaxestendtobeneutral,meaningtheyaffecthouseholdincomeproportionallyacrosstheincomedistribution;thesetaxesdolowerinequality,butalsoincreasepovertyrates.Whiledirecttaxes(PIT)donothaveaneffectonpoverty,theyhelptoreduceinequalityinGrenada,indicatingawell-targetedstructure.Insum,indirecttaxesareneutral,anddirecttaxesarealmostprogressive.
Inthecaseofdirecttransfers,theireffectonreducingpovertyishigherthantheirimpactoninequality.However,SEEDreducesheadcountpovertybyalmostthreepercent,signalingthatthepolicyiswelltargeted,butithasalowredistributiveeffect,eventhoughlow-incomehouseholdsreceiveahigheramount,indicatingthisprogramisrelativelyregressive.In-kindtransfersshowmixedresults:governmentfundingofeducationbenefitsthepoor,withprimaryandsecondaryeducationbenefitinglow-andmiddle-incomehouseholds,whilegovernmentfundingoftertiaryeducationbenefitsthehigherechelonsoftheincomedistribution.Healthisclearlyregressive,providingagreaterbenefittopoorerhouseholds.However,theirimpactonmonetarypovertyischallengingtodescribeduetotheneedtomonetizetheseservicestoestimatetheireffect.
Followingthisintroduction,section2providesthecontextofGrenada’seconomicperformanceandpovertyandinequalitysituation,aswellasanoverviewoffiscalrevenuesandexpenditures.Thefiscalincidencemethodologyisdescribedinsection3,whilesection4presentsthemainresults.Section5concludesthepaper.
2.Grenada’sContext:Growth,Poverty,andFiscalPerformance
Grenada’seconomicgrowthisheavilyaffectedbyexternalfactors,thoughstructuralreformscontributedtothecountry’ssustainedpositivegrowthbetween2014and2019
(figure13,
AppendixA1).Thankstogrowth-enhancingreformsthatexpandedtourismandabenignglobaleconomicenvironment,realoutputgrowthaveraged4.5percentannuallybetween2014and2019.ThehighgrowthrateledtoadramaticincreaseinGrenada’spercapitaGDP.By2019,Grenada’sGDPpercapitawasonlysurpassedbythoseofSt.KittsandNevisandAntiguaandBarbuda
(figure14,
AppendixA1).However,thepandemic,compoundedbythewarinUkraine,endedthetrendofsolidgrowthandledtoasharpeconomiccontractionof13.8percentin2020,followedbyaslowrecoveryin2021–22.TheeconomicvolatilitydrivenbyexternalfactorsreflectstheintrinsicvulnerabilitiesofGrenadaasanSIDS.
4
0.40
0.37
0.45
1998
2008
Gini
2018
Inlinewiththemacroeconomicbehavior,moderatepovertydecreasedfrom2008to2018.However,inthesameperiodextremepovertyincreasedslightly.Asof2018,Grenada’spovertyratehaddecreasedbyalmost13percentagepointscomparedto2008(thepreviousyearforwhichdatawereavailable).Incontrast,extremepovertyinGrenadaincreasedby1.2percentagepoints
(figure1,
panela).Regardinginequality,weobservethatduringthis10-yearperiod,theGinicoefficient,whichmeasurestheinequalityoftheincomedistribution,increasedfrom0.37to0.40
(figure1,
panelb).Thisincreaseininequalityfrom2008to2018mayimplysomedegreeofdeteriorationofconditionsforthelowerpartoftheconsumptiondistribution,whichisalsoshownintheincreaseoftheextremepovertyrateduringthisperiod.
Figure1PovertyandInequalityMeasures
(a)PovertyandIndigence(%)(b)GiniIndex
37.7
32.1
24.8
12.9
2.43.6
199820082018
ExtremepovertyTotalpoverty
Sources:GovernmentofGrenada,CentralStatisticalOffice,SurveyofLivingConditionsandHouseholdBudgetSurvey(SLCHBS)1998,2007–08,and2018–19.
Grenada’sfiscalpositionhasvariedovertheyears,partlyduetonaturalandexternalshocks.Followingamodestperformancein2009–13,revenuesandgrantcollectionshiftedtoanupwardtrajectoryin2014,growingbyanaverageof11.2percentannuallyuntil2019.Taxesaccountedfor83.2percentoftotalgovernmentrevenuebetween2009and2021
(figure2)
.Taxrevenuecomprisesdirectandindirecttaxesleviedonindividualsandbusinesses.Thedirecttaxesaretaxesonincomeandprofitsandonproperty,whiletaxesondomesticgoodsandservicesandoninternationaltradeandtransactionscomprisetheindirecttaxes.Forthepurposesofthispaper,wefocusonthePITunderdirecttaxesandthevalue-addedtax(VAT)andexcisetaxunderindirecttaxes,becausethesehavethemostsignificantimpactonindividualsandhouseholdswhilealsobeingcrucialincomeearnersforthegovernment,asshowninfigure3.PITin2021accountedfor53.4percentofTaxesonIncomeandProfitsand10.2percentoftaxrevenue.TheVATaccountedfor83.8percentofTaxesonDomesticGoodsandServicesand35.0percentoftotaltaxrevenuein2021.BecausetheVATischargedtoconsumersatthepointofpurchase,ithasimplicationsforindividualandhouseholdconsumption.Theexcisetaxischargedatafixedrateperquantityofspecificgoods(importedandlocallymanufacturedgoods)referredtoas“excisablegoods”andaccountedfor2.8percentoftaxrevenuein2021.
5
Figure2RevenueandGrantsCollection
Source:EasternCaribbeanCentralBankStatistics.
3
Figure3TaxRevenuebyTaxType
■TaxesonlnternationalTadeandTransactions
■TaxesonDomescicGoodsandservices
■Taxesonlncomeandprofits
Source:EasternCaribbeanCentralBankStatistics.
4
Turningtogovernmentexpenditures,onaverage,from2017to2021,32percentwasallocatedannuallytosocialprograms,includingeducation,health,andpublicassistancetransfers
(figure
15,
AppendixA2).
5
ThemostimportantdirecttransfertopoorandvulnerablehouseholdsisdonethroughSEED,whichisadministeredthroughtheMinistryofSocialDevelopment.AlsoimportantistheSchoolFeedingProgramme,whichfocusesonprovidingmealstoneedystudents.
Expendituresineducationincreasedovertheperiod2017–21andaccountedforroughly10percentofannualgovernmentexpenditures
(figure16,
AppendixA3).Governmentrecurrentexpenditureinpubliceducationgenerallyisprovidedinfourstages:pre-primary,primary,secondary,andtertiary(includingvocationaltraining).Severalinstitutionsalsoprovidespecialeducationtoservestudentswithdisabilitiesandspecialneeds.Thegovernmentlargelysubsidizeseducationuptothesecondarylevel(includingspecialeducation).Thelevelofsubsidizationdecreasesatthetertiarylevel,withhigherfeesrequiredtoaccesstrainingleading
3Availablein
/statistics.
4Availablein
/statistics.
5ThisisbasedondataretrievedfromtheAnnualNationalBudgetandexcludesdebtrepayments(bothprincipalandinterest).In2022,theGrenadagovernmentinstitutedacapongasolineprices,whichconstitutedanenergysubsidy.Thismeasurewillbeanalyzedinafutureiterationofthetool.
6
toassociatedegreesandcertificationsfromtheinstitutionsprovidingthislevelofschooling.Governmentexpenditureinpubliceducationisconsideredanin-kindtransferbecausetheservicecanbeaccessedbyallschool-agechildrenregardlessofsocioeconomicbackground.
Expendituresonhealthalsoincreasedintheperiod2017–21,accountingfor7percentofannualgovernmentexpenditureasof2018
(figure16,
AppendixA3).Inthispaper,fundsspentbythegovernmentinthehealthsectoramounttoin-kindtransferstothepublicbecausetheseservicesareavailabletoall.Citizens,residents,andvisitorscanfreelyaccesstheservicesinthepublichealthsystemwithnodifferentiationinfees
6
accordingtoincomelevelorsocioeconomicclass.
Inadditiontothein-kindtransfersineducationandhealth,thegovernmentimplementedasocialprotectionsystemwithintheSEEDprogram.Theprogramtargetedschool-agechildren,peoplewithdisabilities,theelderly,thechronicallyill,pregnantwomen,lactatingmothers,andtheadultpoor.Beneficiariesareselectedviaproxymeanstesting,whichuseshouseholdcharacteristicssuchasage,householdsize,maritalstatus,assets,disability,andhousingconditionsasindicatorsor“proxies”todeterminehouseholdexpenditureorconsumption.Cashistransferredtohouseholds:in2017,itwasEC$300permonthorEC$3,600perannum.In2018,theamountgiventoelderlyhouseholdswasincreasedbyEC$100permonth,andin2022,thegovernmentraisedtheamountpaidtoallbeneficiariesbyEC$150permonth.GovernmentannualexpenditureonSEEDincreasedfromEC$14millionin2017toapproximatelyEC$18millionin2021andisexpectedtohaveincreasedfurtherin2022.From2017to2021,thegovernmentspentanaverageofEC$2.9millionperyearontheschoolfeedingprogram.
3.DataSources
TheprimarydatasourceistheSurveyofLivingConditionsandHouseholdBudgets(SLCHBS)conductedbytheCentralStatisticalOffice(CSO),thecountry’snationalstatisticsoffice,betweenAprilandMayof2018–19.Thissurveyencompassedasampleofapproximately1,689households.Theprimaryobjectiveofthisquestionnairewastocollectinformationrelatedtohouseholdsocioeconomicandlivingconditionsaswellasthehouseholdbudgetinordertoconstructtheconsumptionvariable(asthesurveydidnotcollectincomeinformation),datathatarecrucialformeasuringpovertyinGrenada.Itshouldbenotedthatthissurveydidnotgatherinformationregardingpensionsreceivedoranysocialsecuritycontributions,neitherbyindividualsnorthegovernment.Thesurveycomprisedtwodistinctparts,onefocusingonhouseholdconditionsandanotherforobtainingindividualcharacteristicsofeachhouseholdmember.Thepersoninterviewedwasoneadultmember(olderthan18yearsold),thoughthesurveycollectedinformationoneverysinglehouseholdmember.
7
TheuseofadministrativedataontaxablewagesforthePITcomplementsthesurveyinformation.ThesourceofthisdatasetwastheInlandRevenueDivision(IRD),adivisionwithinGrenada'sMinistryofFinance(MOF).Thisdatasetcoverswagesfordifferentworkersandisdisaggregatedintotwoparts:theestimationoftheshareofthewageallocatedforpensionfunds,andtheotherbeingthegrossincome,whichisthetaxablepartofthewagereceived.
6Feesarewaivedforsomeservicesprovidedtochildren,theelderly,andtheindigent.Allfeesandco-paymentswerenotincludedintheanalysisgiventhelowamountsreportedintheSLCHBSof2017–18.
7Toevaluatetheaccuracyofthedataforfiscalinterventions,amacroeconomicvalidationispresentedinAppendixB3.
7
Weutilizethisadministrativedatabasefortwoyears,2017with7,442observationsandfor2018with8,146.
Becauseincomeinformationisnotavailableinthesurvey,wecomparetheadministrativedata,specificallythetaxableportion,withtheconsumptionestimation.Thisallowsustoobtainamorecomprehensiveunderstandingoftheincomedistribution.Insomecases,wecomplementmissingsurveyinformationwithadministrativedata.Becausethisdatasetisdisaggregatedbygenderandoccupationalcategory,bothwithvaluesforthetaxableincome,theadministrativedataproveuseful.Additionally,theadministrativedataenableustocomparetheincomedistributiontoensuredataconsistencyandimprovetheexercise'smacroeconomicvalidation.Theresultisanaccuratesetofinformationthatmakesconstructingthetaxableincomedistributionpossible.
4.Methodology
ThispaperusestheCommitmenttoEquity(CEQ)methodologytoassessthedistributionalimpactofthefiscalsysteminGrenada.AccordingtoLustig(2018),“TheCEQAssessmentisadiagnostictoolthatusesfiscalincidenceanalysistodeterminetheextenttowhichfiscalpolicyreducesinequalityandpovertyinaparticularcountry”(62).Fiscalredistributioneffectsrefertotheprocessbywhichastatecollectsrevenuefromindividualsandhouseholds(throughtaxation)andallocatesthisrevenuetofinancedirecttransfers,subsidies,andin-kindbenefitsindividualsandhouseholdsenjoy(LustigandHiggins2018).Becausethisstudyfocusesonthedistributionaleffectsonthepopulation,stateinterventionsthataffectfirmsorotherprivate-sectorinstitutionsareexcludedfromthemethodology.TheCEQframeworkaimstoanswerfourmainquestions:(1)Howmuchincomeredistributionandpovertyreductionisbeingaccomplishedthroughfiscalpolicy?(2)Howequalizingandpro-poorarespecifictaxesandgovernmentspending?(3)Howeffectivearetaxesandgovernmentspendinginreducinginequalityandpoverty?and(4)Whatistheimpactoffiscalreformsthatchangeaparticulartaxorbenefit'ssizeand/orprogressivity?(Lustig2018).
Tocalculatethedistributionaleffectsoffiscalpolicy,theCEQframeworkconstructsdifferentincomeconceptsinsequentialstages,startingfrompre-fiscalincomethatincludesonlyprivateincomesourcestofinalincomethatincorporatesthe(almost)fullsetoftaxesandgovernmentbenefits.Insummary,theCEQ(LustigandHiggins2018)identifiesfourmainconceptsofhouseholdincome(whenthehouseholdsurveysincludevariablesofdifferentsourcesofincome).
8
8Marketincomeincludesfactorincome(allwagesandsalariesreceivedbyworkersandcapitalincome),plusprivatetransfers(remittances,privatepensions,etc.)plusimputedhousingrent,allincomebeforetaxesandsocialsecuritycontributions,governmenttransfersandold-agepensions,minusthecontributiontosocialinsuranceold-agepensions(onlyincaseswherepensionsareconsidereddeferred.Thecontributiontoold-agepensionsisnotsubtractedwhencontributorypensionsarefinancedbythestate).Disposableincomeismarketincomeplusdirectcashandnear-cashtransfers,minuspersonalincometaxesandemployeesocialsecuritycontributions(onlywhencontributorypensionsaretreatedastransfers).Consumableincomeincludesindirectsubsidies(energy,food,andothergeneraltargetedpricesubsidies)andexcludesindirecttaxes(VAT,excisetaxes,andotherindirecttaxes).Finalincome(post-fiscal)isconsumableincomeplusthevalueofin-kindtransfers,suchasfreeorsubsidizedgovernmentservicesineducationandhealthwithcopaymentsanduserfeessubtracted;itreflectspost-fiscalincome.
8
Foreachincomeconcept,theinequalityandpovertyindexesarecalculatedandbothmagnitudesarecomparedbeforeandafterfiscalinterventions.Inthisregard,theCEQframeworkconsidersvariantsaccordingtothecharacteristicsofeachcountry,harmonizingtheaggregatesbutnotthespecificitems.
4.1IncomeAggregatesEstimation
Grenada’sinformationsystemhaslimitationswhenitcomestoapplyingthedetailedCEQframework.Certaindatacharacteristicsareneededtomodelfiscalincidencewithinthisframework,suchasanadequatehouseholdincomeaggregate.WhileGrenadahasconductedtheSLCHBSrecently,
9
aswellasmaintainingadministrativerecordsofsocialprogramsandthecharacteristicsofthetaxsystem,themoduleofincomeswithintheSLCHBSislimited.Thesurveycapturesincomedatainbrackets,recordsfewdetailsonnonlaborincomes,anddoesnothaveinformationonpensionaffiliationoramountreceivedbyindividuals,soitisnotpossibletoconstructnetmarketincomepluspensionsforthisexerciseintheGranadacontext.Thus,theNSOoptedforbuildingwelfareaggregatesfromhouseholdconsumption
10
insteadofhouseholdincome.Thisposesachallengefortheimplementationinthispaperbecauseweneedhouseholdincomestoestimatethefiscalincidenceandrunsimulations.Following(Katayama&al.,2021)forthecaseofJamaica,inthispaperweassumethatcurrentconsumptionequalsdisposableincome.
11
ThisassumptionisthemostimportantforapplyingtheCEQmethodologytoGrenada,inthatitsimplifiesthereconstructionofincomeaggregatesbytracingbacktomarketincomedefinitionasourmeasureofbaseincome(beforetaxesorfiscalinterventions).Asisknownintheestimationofwelfaremeasuresindevelopingcountries,thedistributionofhouseholdconsumptiontendstobemoreconcentratedthanincome.Ofcourse,thischaracteristiccouldintroducesomebiasandunderestimatetheextremesofthedistribution;however,thereisnootheroptionintheabsenceofhouseholdincomedata.
Oncehouseholdconsumptionisdefinedandthusconsumableincomeisavailable,therestoftheincomeaggregatesestablishedintheCEQmethodologyarecalculatedaccordingtothetaxstructure,socialprotection,andsocialdeliveryinGrenada.Ourpointofdepartureisdisposableincome,whichisreportedbythesurveyandisassumedtoequalhouseholdconsumption.Then,toidentifythedistributionofgrossincomeand,afterthatrecreatethedistributionofthemarketincome,itisnecessarytoworkbackward,followingthestepsshownin
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 車輛租賃協(xié)議合同范例
- 電商服務(wù)合同爭議解決途徑解析
- 投資咨詢服務(wù)合同范例
- 外墻瓷磚買賣合同協(xié)議
- 糧食購買協(xié)議案例
- 貨物倉儲與保管協(xié)議
- 企業(yè)安全防護(hù)招標(biāo)
- 偽協(xié)議現(xiàn)象合同與非合同協(xié)議的鑒別
- 房屋買賣合同糾紛起訴狀寫作
- 企業(yè)人才引進(jìn)合同
- 雙塊式無砟軌道道床板裂紋成因分析應(yīng)對措施
- 安全生產(chǎn)領(lǐng)域刑事犯罪-兩高司法解釋PPT課件
- 全級老年大學(xué)星級學(xué)校達(dá)標(biāo)評價細(xì)則
- 土地增值稅清算審核指南
- 死亡通知書模板
- 最新全球4G頻段精編版
- 真速通信密拍暗訪取證系統(tǒng)分冊
- 基于閱讀文本的寫作課堂觀察記錄表
- 2018年建設(shè)工程質(zhì)量檢測企業(yè)組織架構(gòu)、部門職能、商業(yè)模式、行業(yè)現(xiàn)狀研究
- 失業(yè)保險金申領(lǐng)表_11979
- 淺談信息技術(shù)和幼兒園教育的融合三篇
評論
0/150
提交評論