高級英語第五冊第10課- 1_第1頁
高級英語第五冊第10課- 1_第2頁
高級英語第五冊第10課- 1_第3頁
高級英語第五冊第10課- 1_第4頁
高級英語第五冊第10課- 1_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩3頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

PAGE第頁章序名稱Book5Unit10周2次第5周授課時(shí)間2017年月日至年月日教學(xué)目的要求(1)Rhetoricalskill:compareandcontrast(2)Keylanguage&grammarpoints(3)Writingstrategies:argumentativewriting(4)Theme:thecrisisofmorality教學(xué)重點(diǎn)TipsforPublicSpeakerWritingstrategies:rhetoricaldevicesappliedinpersuasivespeech教學(xué)難點(diǎn)1.Speech:anartoflanguage2.Backgroundinformation教學(xué)場所環(huán)境Multi-mediaclassroom授課方式課堂講授(√);實(shí)驗(yàn)();實(shí)踐();雙語(√)課時(shí)分配2學(xué)時(shí)教學(xué)方法課堂講授、小組討論、問題法教學(xué)手段網(wǎng)絡(luò)教學(xué)();多媒體(√)教學(xué)用具PPT,blackboard,Teacher’sBook(5),English-EnglishDictionary教學(xué)內(nèi)容提要備注Review(5mins)Gooverthevocabularyandgrammarofthelastlesson.Lead-in(4mins)I.PictureActivationT:Assayinggoes,“Honestyisthebestpolicy”.Well,whatdoyouthinkofthismotto?Ss:II.Pre-reading(6mins)T:YoumusthaveheardofMr.FangZhouzi(方舟子),aheroicwarrioragainstacademiccorruption,whohaslaidbarequiteanumberofscandalsamongsomeintellectuals.Areyoufororagainstwhathehasbeendoinginthisrespect?Ss:Opentodiscussion.(2)T:Academiccorruptionmakestheuprightscholarsverymuchdepressedandfrustrated.Whatmeasurescanbetakentopreventacademiccorruptionfromspreading?Ss:Opentodiscussion.3.GlobalReading(15mins)I.TextIntroduction(2mins)TheNewImmorality,arevealingargumentativeessay,exposes,analyzes,andcriticizesthenewimmoralityprevalentinourage.II.CultureNotes(5mins)Swift,Jonathan(Paragraph6)(1667-1745),Anglo-Irishsatiristandpoliticalpamphleteer,consideredoneofthegreatestmastersofEnglishproseandoneofthemostimpassionedsatiristsofhumanfollyandpretension.Amonghismanyworks,TravelsintoSeveralRemoteNationsoftheWorld,morepopularlytitledGulliver'sTravels,washismasterpiece.amassman(paragraph11)Amassmanisanassumedtypicalpersoninthemasssociety,whoisapttobeaffectedbythemassmedia,whohasnoindividuality,andwhopossessesnosenseofresponsibility.Amassmangoesalongwithothersandseesnothingwrongindoingwhateverybodyelsedoes.III.Author(3mins)Krutch,JosephWood(1893-1970),Americancritic,educator,andnaturalist,wasborninKnoxville,Tennessee.HewasthedramacriticoftheliberalweeklyTheNationandtaughtdramaatColumbiaUniversityandotherschools.Hepublishedbiographiesandessaysondrama,science,andnature.HismostimportantworksincludeTheMeasureofMan(1954),EdgarAllanPoe(1926),TheModernTemper(1929),TheAmericanDramaSince1918(1957),andTheBestNatureWritingsofJosephWoodKrutch(1970).IV.StructuralAnalysis(5mins)T:Askstudent“Thearticleisdividedintoseveralparts?”Ss:Opentodiscussion.Part1(1-3)beginningpart,illustrateaparadoxofouragePart2(4-10)thebodyofthetext,firstillustratetendencytoacceptpersonaldishonesty,andnextanalyzesthesocialandpsychologicalgroundforthebehavior,attitude,anddefenseofthedishonestpeople.Then,thewriterpresentshisownopinionsaboutthegreatsignificanceoftheconceptofpersonalhonor.Part3(11)presentsthewriter'sideaofwhatanhonestandhonorablepersonoughttodonomatterhowbadtheworldmaybecome.SectionThreeDetailedReading(65mins)THENEWIMMORALITYJosephWoodKrutch1.Paragraph1and2.Readthisparagraphaloud.(4mins)Theprovostofoneofourlargestandmosthonoredinstitutionstoldmenotlongagothataquestionnairewasdistributedtohisundergraduatesandthat40percentrefusedtoacknowledgethattheybelievedcheatingonexaminationstobereprehensible.RecentlyareporterforaNewYorknewspaperstoppedsixpeopleonthestreetandaskedthemiftheywouldconsenttotakepartinariggedtelevisionquizformoney.Hereportedthatfiveofthesixsaidyes.Yetmostofthesefive,likemostofthecollegecheaters,wouldprobablyprofessastrongsocialconsciousness.Theymaycheat,buttheyvoteforforeignaidandforenlightenedsocialmeasures.II.Languageworkofparagraphs(10mins)Paragraph1T:provostn.ahigh-rankingadministrativeofficialofauniversitye.g. Theprovostsofsomecollegesoftheuniversitywerepresentatthegraduationceremony.Theprovostpresidedoverthefacultymeetingyesterday.reprehensibleadj.deservingtobereprehended;deservingtobecriticizedorrebukede.g. Plagiarismwasamorallyreprehensibleact.Itwasmostreprehensibleofhimtostealfromhismother.Paragraph2rigvt.toarrangetheoutcomeofsth.dishonestlye.g. Theyclaimedthattheresultoftheelectionwasrigged.Somestockholdersriggedthestockmarket.“Yetmostofthesefive,likemostofthecollegecheaters,wouldprobablyprofessastrongsocialconsciousness.”Paraphrase:However,mostofthesefivepeople,likeamajorityofthecollegestudentswhocommitcheatingonexaminations,wouldprobablyclaimthattheyhaveastrongsenseofresponsibilityforfessvt.claimsth.oftenfalsely;stateopenlythatonehasabelief,feeling,etc.e.g. Idon'tprofessexpertknowledgeofthissubject.Sheprofessedherselfsatisfiedwiththeprogressmade.III.QuestionsforParagraphs(5mins)Paragraph1-2:QuestionT:Whatispresentedinthefirsttwoparagraphs?Ss:Opentodiscussion.T:Twotypicalexamplestoshowaparadoxofouragearegiventhatsocialmoralityseemstobemakingprogresswhileprivatemoralityseemstobedeteriorating.IV.ChineseTranslationofParagraphs(4mins)1. 不久以前,有一家最大、也是最著名學(xué)校的教務(wù)長告訴我,給本科生發(fā)了一份調(diào)查問卷,其中有40%的人拒絕承認(rèn)他們相信考試作弊應(yīng)該受到譴責(zé)。2.最近,紐約一家報(bào)紙的一位記者在街上攔住六名行人,問他們是不是同意為了錢參加有舞弊性質(zhì)的電視測試。他報(bào)道說,這六個(gè)人當(dāng)中有五個(gè)說同意。但是,就像大多數(shù)在大學(xué)里作弊的人那樣,這五個(gè)人當(dāng)中很可能多數(shù)會宣稱有很強(qiáng)烈的社會覺悟。也許他們徇私舞弊,但是他們投票支持提供外援,支持實(shí)行開明的社會措施。2.Pargraph3and4.I.Readthisparagraphaloud.(5mins)Thesetwoexamplesexhibitaparadoxofourage.Itisoftensaid,andmyobservationleadsmetobelieveittrue,thatourseeminglygreatgrowthinsocialmoralityhasoddlyenoughtakenplaceinaworldwhereprivatemorality—asenseofthesupremeimportanceofpurelypersonalhonor,honesty,andintegrity—seemstobedeclining.Beneficentandbenevolentsocialinstitutionsareadministeredbymenwhoalltoofrequentlyturnouttobeaccepting"gifts."Theworldofpopularentertainmentisrockedbyscandal.Collegestudents,putontheirhonor,cheatonexamination.CandidatesforthePh.D.hireghostwriterstopreparetheirtheses.But,onemayobject,haven'tallthesethingsalwaysbeentrue?Istherereallyanyevidencethatpersonaldishonestyismoreprevalentthanitalwayswas?LanguageworkofparagraphsII.Languageworkofparagraphs(15mins)Paragraph3T:“Thesetwoexamplesexhibitaparadoxofourage.”Paraphrase:Thesetwoexamplesclearlydisplayacontradictorysituationinourage.paradoxn.astatementthatseemstobeabsurdorcontradictorybutisormaybetrue;useofthisintalkingorwriting;person,thing,orsituationdisplayingcontradictoryfeaturese.g. "Morehaste,lessspeed"isawell-knownparadox.Itisaparadoxthattherearesomanypoorpeopleinsucharichcountry.honorn.aprivilege,sourceofprideandpleasure;goodpersonalcharacter;strongsenseofwhatismorallyright;reputationforgreatness,goodbehavior,truthfulness,etc.;greatrespecte.g. Itisagreathonorformetobeinvited.Honordemandsthatheshouldresign.Theyarefightingforthehonoroftheircountry.Theystoodinsilenceasamarkofhonortoegrityn.honesty,moraluprightness;wholenessorsoundnesse.g. Weadmirehergreatlyforherintegrity.Theymakegreatefforttokeeptheirculturalintegrityintact.Thetwonationshavemutualrespectfortheirterritorialintegrity.Weshouldmaintaintheintegrityofourbrainfunction.“…andmyobservationleadsmetobelieveittrue,…—asenseofthesupremeimportanceofpurelypersonalhonor,honesty,andintegrity—seemstobedeclining.”Paraphrase:…andonthebasisofmyobservationI'vecometobelieveittruethatoursocialmoralityseemstohavemadegreatprogress,whichhasoddlyenoughtakenplaceinaworldwhereprivatemorality—anawarenessoftheparamountimportanceofpurelypersonalhonor,honesty,andintegrity—seemstobeweakening.ghostwriter:someonewhowritesabookorotherpublishedworkinsteadofthepersonwhoisnamedastheauthore.g. Itturnedoutthatallhisarticleswereactuallyboughtfromghost-writers.Mostghost-writersaredrivenbymoneytoghost-writeforothers.“Beneficentandbenevolentsocialinstitutionsareadministeredbymenwhoalltoofrequentlyturnouttobeaccepting"gifts.“”Paraphrase:Charitablesocialorganizationsaremanagedorcontrolledbymenwhoveryoftenprovetobeeasilybribed.beneficentadj.showingactivekindness;generous,charitablee.g. Manyrichbusinessmenhavebecomebeneficentpatrons.Theorphanwaslookedafterbyabeneficentoldlady.benevolentadj.willingorwishingtobekind,friendlyandhelpful;charitable,doinggoodratherthanmakingprofitse.g. Iamdeeplyimpressedbyhisbenevolentmanner.Thefeministestablishedabenevolentinstitutionwhensheretired.“Theworldofpopularentertainmentisrockedbyscandal.Collegestudents,putontheirhonor,cheatonexamination.CandidatesforthePh.D.hireghost-writerstopreparetheirtheses.”Paraphrase:Theworldofpopularentertainmentisshockedbysocialdisgrace.Collegestudentswhoareconsideredtodeservegreathonor,actdishonestlyinexaminations.CandidatesforthePh.D.hireotherpeopletowritetheirdissertations.Paragraph3:QuestionT:1.Whatdowefindinthethirdparagraph?Theparadoxexhibitedbythetwoexamples,andmorerevealingexamples.2.Whatistheparadoxreferredtointhebeginningpartoftheessay?Theparadoxmentionedandillustratedinthetextis"?ourseeminglygreatgrowthinsocialmoralityhasoddlyenoughtakenplaceinaworldwhereprivatemorality—asenseofthesupremeimportanceofpurelypersonalhonor,honesty,andintegrity--seemstobedeclining."III.Analysis(8mins)Paragraph1-4Analysis Thesethreeparagraphsmakeupthebeginningpartoftheargumentativeessay.Inthispart

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論