演講稿之卡西歐杯法語(yǔ)演講比賽

演講稿之卡西歐杯法語(yǔ)演講比賽卡西歐杯法語(yǔ)演講比賽【篇一：2012法語(yǔ)演講比賽細(xì)則】中南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)外語(yǔ)學(xué)院第二屆法語(yǔ)演講大賽暨第五屆卡西歐杯全國(guó)法語(yǔ)演講比賽校內(nèi)選拔賽新學(xué)期伊始，為促進(jìn)本院法語(yǔ)專業(yè)學(xué)習(xí)氛圍與加強(qiáng)師生間的溝通交流，也為全力響應(yīng)第五屆卡西歐杯全國(guó)高校法語(yǔ)演講比賽的順利舉辦，特組織舉行我院第二屆法語(yǔ)演講大賽?；顒?dòng)時(shí)間：2011年9月15日（教學(xué)第三周周四）下午2:00-5:00活動(dòng)地點(diǎn)：文波樓教室活動(dòng)安排：1）報(bào)名要求：本次比賽限本院法語(yǔ)專業(yè)學(xué)生報(bào)名參加（主要集中在大二至大四三個(gè)年級(jí)的學(xué)生群體中），報(bào)名人數(shù)不限，報(bào)名截止時(shí)間為比賽日前一天（即2012/09/19）。二年級(jí)學(xué)生報(bào)名統(tǒng)計(jì)工作由王璇老師負(fù)責(zé)，三年級(jí)學(xué)生報(bào)名統(tǒng)計(jì)由夏正華老師負(fù)責(zé)。2）參賽準(zhǔn)備：賽前通知各報(bào)名選手自行準(zhǔn)備講演稿一份，話題范圍不限（可借鑒或摘錄引用各類文獻(xiàn)資料），演講時(shí)間控制在三到五分鐘之間（比賽時(shí)可帶稿上臺(tái)，但不可朗讀全文，盡量脫稿完成演講）。3）比賽流程：比賽當(dāng)日，各參賽選手按照抽簽結(jié)果排列出場(chǎng)順序。每位選手首先報(bào)告自己的選題，然后完成自己的演講。演講結(jié)束后由評(píng)委組老師根據(jù)該選手的演講內(nèi)容及選題予以提問(wèn)2-3個(gè)，選手作答（提問(wèn)及回答要求使用法語(yǔ)進(jìn)行）。所有選手的個(gè)人成績(jī)將在整輪比賽流程進(jìn)行完畢后予以公布，同時(shí)公布所有選手的名次排列順序。備注1：鑒于本次比賽還同時(shí)負(fù)有選拔參加全國(guó)比賽的人選名單，比賽當(dāng)天也將同期宣布接下來(lái)參加后續(xù)比賽的人員名單。備注2：要求各位參賽選手在演講結(jié)束時(shí)向評(píng)委組呈交演講稿一份。4）評(píng)選標(biāo)準(zhǔn)：a）演講環(huán)節(jié)要求主題明確，立意積極，發(fā)音清晰，語(yǔ)言流暢，感情真摯，表情生動(dòng)，舉止得當(dāng)…….每項(xiàng)要求占演講環(huán)節(jié)總分值不同比值（見附表），單項(xiàng)打小分，歸總后成為此環(huán)節(jié)得分；b）即興問(wèn)答環(huán)節(jié)要求反應(yīng)機(jī)敏，語(yǔ)言組織迅速，……打分方式如上；c）兩個(gè)環(huán)節(jié)得分合并即成為評(píng)委之一為該選手的打分；d）各評(píng)委對(duì)一位選手的打分取平均值即成為該選手的最終得分。5）評(píng)委組成：法語(yǔ)專業(yè)教研室各位老師均要參加評(píng)選工作，出席當(dāng)天比賽。6）獎(jiǎng)勵(lì)辦法：本次比賽設(shè)一等獎(jiǎng)一名，二等獎(jiǎng)兩名，三等獎(jiǎng)三名，其余均為優(yōu)秀獎(jiǎng)。每位選手都將獲得相應(yīng)的獎(jiǎng)狀一份，獎(jiǎng)品一份。其中一等獎(jiǎng)獲得者同時(shí)將作為我校推薦參加全國(guó)法語(yǔ)演講比賽的參賽者。每位評(píng)委老師也將給予勞務(wù)補(bǔ)貼150元。選手得分細(xì)評(píng)規(guī)則表法語(yǔ)演講比賽選手得分細(xì)則le/laparticipant(e):_____________________選手姓名（年級(jí)）：lanote:【篇二：卡西歐杯演講比賽計(jì)劃】卡西歐杯首屆寧波市日語(yǔ)演講比賽計(jì)劃比賽內(nèi)容、日程和規(guī)則1、舉辦時(shí)間：2010年12月14日（星期二）2、比賽地點(diǎn)：寧波大學(xué)外語(yǔ)學(xué)院報(bào)告廳3、比賽規(guī)則：（1）以“日本語(yǔ)勉強(qiáng)の楽しさ”為題進(jìn)行5分鐘的命題演講比賽。downloadingreadingmaterialfromanamericani.p.address.asoftheeveningistoppedsearchingtheinternetandactuallywentouttoenjoyberlin,e-booksaccountedfornearly20percentofthesalesofamericanpublishers.ingermany,however,e-booksaccountedforonly1percentlastyear.ibeganaskingthemultilingual,multi?ethnicartistsaroundmewhythatwas.itwas2a.m.,atsohohouse,aprivateclubi’dcrashedintheformerhitler?jugendheadquarters.oneinstallationistsaid,“americanslikee-booksbecausethey’reeasiertobuy.”aperformanceartistsaid,“they’realsoeasiernottoread.”trueenough:theirpresencedoesn’tremindyouofwhatyou’remissing;theydon’ttakeupspaceonshelves.thenextmorning,alexanderprovanandiluggedthebooksfordistribution,gratis.question:ifbooksbecomemereartobjects,doe-booksbecomeconceptualart?juxtaposingpsychiatriccasenotesbythephysician-novelistrivkagalchenwithadramaticallyillustratedinvestigationintothedevastationofneworleans,“invalidformat”isamongthemostartfulnewattemptstoreinventthewebbythecodex,andthecodexbytheweb.itstexts“scroll”:horizontally,vertically;titlepagesevoke“screens,”reframingcontentthatfollowsnotuniformlyandcontinuouslybutratherasawelterofcolumnshiftsandfonts.itsclosestpredecessorsmightbemixed-mediadada(duchamp’sloose-leafed,shuffleable“greenbox”);orperhaps“icanhascheezburger?,”thebest-sellingbookversionofthepet-pictures-with-funny-captionswebsite;orsimilarvolumesfromand.theselatterbooksaremerelythekitschiestproductsofpublishing’srecententhusiasmfor“back-engineering.”they’repseudoliterature,commoditiessubjecttothesamereversingprocessthatforoveracenturyhaspaused“movies”into“stills”—intop.r.photosanddormposters—andnotatedpoprecordingsforsheetmusic.translatingmediumscanseemjustasunm?glichastranslatingbetweenuelatedlanguages:therewillbeconfusions,distortions,technicallimitations.thewebande-bookcaninfluencetheprintbookonlyinmattersofstyleandsubject—nolinks,ofcourse,justtheirmetaphor.“theghostinthemachine”can’tbeexorcised,onlyturnedaround:themachineinsidetheghost.asforme,iwashauntedbymysuitcase.theextraone,theempty.mylastdayinkreuzbergwasspentconsideringitsfate.mywheeliebagwaspacked.mylaptopwasstowedinmycarry-on.iwantedtoleavethepleatherimmensityonthecornerofkottbusserdamm,downbythecanal,buti’veneverbeenawaster.ibroughtitback.itsitsinthemiddleofmyapartment,uevertible,onlyimprovable,hollow,itslidfloppedopenlikethecoverofabook.模糊不清，語(yǔ)意歪曲和技術(shù)的限制。網(wǎng)絡(luò)和電子書只能在形式和主題上影響紙質(zhì)書籍——沒有相互聯(lián)系，當(dāng)然，僅僅是他們的比喻。“機(jī)器中的鬼魂”不能被驅(qū)散，只能倒過(guò)來(lái)說(shuō)是：鬼魂體內(nèi)的機(jī)器。于我而言，我被自己的行李箱困擾著。那個(gè)多余的空箱子。我在克羅伊茨貝格的最后一天是憂慮著它的命運(yùn)度過(guò)的。我那個(gè)帶小輪子的包裹已經(jīng)打包好了。我的筆記本電腦也已經(jīng)整齊的收起。我想把這個(gè)人造革的產(chǎn)物扔在科特布斯的角3落，順運(yùn)河而下，但是我從不是一個(gè)浪費(fèi)者。我又把箱子帶了回來(lái)。它蹲坐在我公寓的正中間，即使修理也不能完好如初了。它失落地展開了蓋子，中間空著，就像一本書的封面。第八屆卡西歐杯翻譯競(jìng)賽原文（英文組）來(lái)自:flaa(《外國(guó)文藝》)howwritersbuildthebrandbytonyperrottetaseveryauthorknows,writingabookistheeasypartthesedays.it’swhenthepublicationdateloomsthatwehavetorollupoursleevesandtackletherealliterarylabor:rabidself-promotion.forweeksbeforehand,wearecompelledtobombardeveryfriend,relativeandvagueacquaintancewithcreativee-mailsandfacebookalerts,polishupourwebsiteswithsuspiciouslyyouthfulauthorphotos,and,inanorgyofblogs,tweetsandyoutubetrailers,attempttoinformanalreadyinundatedworldofoureveryreading,signing,review,interviewand(well,onecandream!)tv?appearance.inthiserawhenmostwritersareexpectedtodoeverythingbutruntheprintingpresses,self-promotionissoacceptedthatwehardlygiveitasecondthought.andyet,wheneverihaveanewbookabouttocomeout,ihavetoshaketheunpleasantsensationthatthereissomethingunseemlyaboutmyownclamorforattention.peddlingmyworklikeaviagrasalesmanstillfeelsatoddswiththehighcallingofliterature.insuchmomentsofdoubt,ilooktohistoryforreassurance.it’salwayscomfortingtoberemindedthatliterarywhoring—imean,self-marketing—hasbeenpracticedbythegreats.themostreveredoffrenchnovelistsrecognizedtheneedforp.r.“forartists,thegreatproblemtosolveishowtogetoneselfnoticed,”balzacobservedin“l(fā)ostillusions,”hisclassicnovelaboutliterarylifeinearly19th-centuryparis.as