版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
摘要PAGE6ChapterThreeResearchesPlan3.1researchesquestionsTherearethreequestionsinthispapertoexplore:First,whatisteachers’cognitivestatusofTBLTwhoteachinthemiddleschool?Second,whatisthestatusintheirimplementationofTBLT?Third,whataretheproblemsintheirimplementationofTBLT?3.2researchesobjectsIntheprocessofthesiswriting,inordertoensurethatthesurveyresultsaremoreintuitive,reducetheworkloadofthesurvey,andconductthesurveymoreeffectively,thispaperrandomlyselects60teachersastheresearchobjectfromgradetwoinShijiazhuangNo.22middleschool,ShijiazhuangNo.44middleschoolandNo.27middleschool,whicharemainlyonthesamelevel.3.3researchesmethodsBeforeissuingquestionnaires,theauthorcollectedmaterialsaboutTBLTandsentthemtoteachers,sothatteacherscouldacquireknowledgebyreadingrelevantmaterials.Intheprocessofresearch,thisstudyusesthefollowingresearchesmethod:(1)QuestionnaireThisquestionnairesurveyisdesignedbasedonthequestionnairesurveyofGaoSuju’sthesis.Inacertaininspiration,theauthorbegantoprepareanddistributethequestionnairefromFebruary28th,collectedandanalyzedthedatatodrawaconclusion.Inordertoensurethatthesurveyisintuitive,savetimeandimprovetheefficiencyofthesurvey,randomsamplingmethodisadoptedinthissurvey.60teacherswererandomlyselectedfromthequestionnaire.Inthequestionnaire,60teachersfilledinthequestionnairethroughofflineway.Theinvestigationtimeis15minutes.Atotalof60questionnairesweredistributed,and60validquestionnaireswereobtained.Theeffectiveratewas100%.Questionnaire(AppendixA)contains16questions:questions1-5aredesignedtoinvestigateaboutteachers’cognitionofTBLT;Questions6to10aredesignedtoinvestigatetheimplementationofTBLT;Questions11to13aredesignedtoinvestigatetheproblemsencounteredintheimplementationofTBLT;Questions14to16aredesignedtoinvestigatetheevaluationofTBLT.(2)InterviewmethodThroughtheinterviewquestionsofYeWeilin’smasterthesis,theauthorgetssomeenlightenment.TheinterviewstartedonMarch3rd,inordertomakeupfortheinsufficiencyofthequestionnairesurvey,theauthorsupplementedtheinterview.Theinterviewwascompletedbytheauthoralone.twoteacherswereselectedfromthe60teacherswhoparticipatedinthequestionnairesurveyforface-to-faceinterview.ThebasisofextractionwastoselectateacherAwithhighfrequencyofusingTBLTandateacherBwithlowfrequencyofusingTBLT.Bothofthemareamongtheteacherswithhighcognitivelevelaccordingtothequestionnairesurveydata.Theinterviewwasconductedintheformofopenquestion.Theauthorusedtwowaystorecordaninterview:takingnotesandrecording.Theaimistodocumenttheinterviewprocessmoreclearly.Therearefourquestionsintheinterview,mainlyfromtheunderstanding,theproblemsintheimplementationprocess,thesolvingstrategiesandsoon.ThepurposeistoaccuratelygrasptheapplicationstatusofTBLTinEnglishreadingteachinginShijiazhuangNo.22middleschool,ShijiazhuangNo.44middleschoolandShijiazhuangNo.27middleschoolthroughthecommunicationwithteachers.ChapterFourResearchResultsandAnalysis4.1Statisticalanalysisoftheresultsofteacherquestionnairesurvey4.1.1Theinvestigationonteachers’cognitionstatusofTBLTTable4.1DoyouknowTBLT?frequencypercentageIunderstandGeneralunderstandingDonotunderstandNeverheardofit132423022%40%38%0%Itcanbeseenfromtable4.1that22%ofteachersarefamiliarwithTBLT,and40%ofteachersgenerallyunderstandit,whichindicatesthatmostteachershaveagoodcognitivefoundationforTBLT.Table4.2WhatwayyouusetolearnabouttheTBLT?frequencypercentageListentotheopenclassofexpertsListentothenewcurriculumstandardtrainingcourseTextbookguidanceColleagueslearnfromeachother11453118%75%5%2%Itcanbeseenfromtable4.2thatamongthe60teachers,thehighestproportionofthedataistolistentotheopenclassofthenewcurriculumstandard,followedbylistentoexpertlectures,readtextbookguidanceandexchangebetweencolleagues,accountingfor75%,18%,5%and2%respectively.Therefore,itcanbeseenthattheimplementationofTBLTforteachershasbeenorganized,improvetheefficiencyandqualityofmiddleschoolEnglishreadingteachinghaslaidasolidfoundation.Table4.3Whatisyourunderstandingof"task"inTBLT?frequencypercentageStudents’autonomousreadingAnswerthequestionsinthematerialbyreadingFillintheblankswithappropriateformsSetquestions-studentsreadwithquestions-answerquestions1318161322%30%26%22%Thedatashowthatthehighestproportionistoanswerquestionsthroughreadingmaterials,followedbyfillingintheblankswithcorrectforms,followedbysetquestions-studentsreadwithquestions-answerquestionsandstudents’autonomousreading,accountingfor30%,26%and22%respectively,theystillthinkthattocompletethe“task”istobeabletoanswerthequestionsinthereadingmaterialsaccurately,whichisnotessentiallydifferentfromthetraditionalcrammingteachingmode,andhasanegativeimpactonimprovingtheabilityofmiddleschoolstudentstouseEnglishknowledge.Table4.4What’syouropiniononTBLT?frequencypercentageVeryreasonableIt’sreasonableuncertainunreasonable1810201230%17%33%20%Theresultsshowthat53%ofthe60subjectsthoughtthattheywereuncertainandunreasonable,morethanhalfofthetotal.ThisshowsthattherearesomeproblemsintheimplementationofTBLTinmiddleschoolEnglishreadingclass,whichismainlymanifestedintheteachers’lowrecognitionofTBLT.Table4.5Howdoyouunderstandthemode,conceptandconnotationofTBLT?frequencypercentageKnowverywellGeneralunderstandingKnowitalittle10123817%20%63%Theresultsshowthat63%ofthe60teachersknowlessaboutTBLT,morethanhalfofthem.ThisshowsthatteachersstilllackdeepunderstandingofTBLT.Tosumup,mostteachers’understandingofTBLTremainsonthesurface,notreachingadeeplevel.Forexample,theunderstandingof“task”isbiased,thelackofexplorationofdetails,andthegeneralrecognitionisnothigh.Therefore,itisnecessarytoformulatecorrespondingimprovementmeasurestopromotetheapplicationandimplementationofTBLTinmiddleschoolEnglishreadingteaching.4.1.2TheinvestigationontheimplementationofTBLTTable4.6HowoftendoyouuseTBLT?FrequencypercentageFrequentlyusedGeneraluseLessusedNeveruse121830020%30%50%0%Asshownintable4.6,upto50%ofthesubjectschoosethelessusedTBLT,whichshowsthatmiddleschoolEnglishteachersdonotpracticetheTBLTenoughanduseitlessfrequently,fromtheside,itreflectsthatthereisacertainconflictbetweentheconceptofTBLTandtheconceptoftraditionalteaching.Therefore,upto50%ofteachersarestillusedtotraditionalteachingmethods,andtheimplementationofTBLTisnothigh.Table4.7IntheimplementationofTBLT,whatisyourgroupingbasis?FrequencypercentageAccordingtostudents’readinglevelBasedonpreviousteachingexperienceComprehensiveanalysisofstudents’learningattitude,wayandlevel8411113%68%18%Theresultsofthesurveyshowthat41teacherschoosetogroupandimplementTBLTmainlybasedontheirpreviousteachingexperience,accountingfor68%ofthetotalsurvey.ThisshowsthattheapplicationofTBLTinEnglishreadingteachingisnotbasedontheactualstatusofstudents,itismainlybasedontheirownsubjectiveexperiencetojudge,whicheasilyleadstotheteachers’grouping,taskdesignisdifficulttomeettheactualstatusofstudents,studentsaredifficulttosuccessfullycompletethe“task”,thenumberofteacherswhochoose“comprehensiveanalysisofstudents’learningattitude,wayandlevel”accountfor18%.ItcanbeseenthatintheprocessofimplementingandapplyingtheTBLT,teachersdesigntasksmorefromtheirownsubjectivewillandcognition,andlessfromtheactualstatusofstudents,whichisdifferentfromtheTBLTdesign,applicationshouldfollowtheprincipleof“student-centered”,whichiscontrarytotheapplicationeffectofTBLT,andalsohasanegativeimpactonmiddleschoolEnglishreadingteaching.Table4.8Whatdoyoupaymoreattentiontowhenassigningtasks?frequencypercentageAcceptanceabilityofstudentsClasstimeNumberofstudentsThetaskitself102212717%3%35%45%Thedatashowsthatamongthe60teachers,theproportionofchoosingtofocusonthetaskitselfisthehighest,followedbythenumberofstudents,students’acceptanceability,andfinallytheclassroomtime,accountingfor45%,35%,17%and3%respectively.Itcanbeseenthatthedesignofteachingcontent,thearrangementofteachingcontentandstudents’acceptanceabilityaretheimportantfactorsaffectingtheimplementationofTBLTinmiddleschoolEnglishreadingteaching.Table4.9WhichwayareyouusedtocarryoutmiddleschoolEnglishreadingteaching?frequencypercentageExplanation-practice-applicationPresentation-inquiry-analysispracticeReview-presentation-practiceconsolidationpractice4013767%22%11%Amongthe60subjects,40chosethewayofexplanation-practice-applicationtocarryouttheEnglishreadingmoduleteaching,accountingfor67%ofthetotalnumber.ThisshowsthatalthoughmiddleschoolEnglishteachers’cognitionoftheTBLTisrelativelyideal,andtheyhavealsocarriedoutsomepracticeinEnglishclassroomteaching,buttheyarenotsatisfiedwiththestatus,therearestillquiteanumberofteacherswhoareusedtousingthetraditionalteachingmethodof“explanationpracticeonebyone”tocarryoutEnglishreadingmoduleteaching,whichprovestosomeextentthattheimplementationofTBLTisnotideal.Table4.10Whatistheorderinwhichyouusethetextbook?frequencypercentageAccordingtothetextbookorderSelectthekeypointsTherewillbeexpansionbeyondthetextbook1240820%67%13%Thedatashowsthat40ofthe60teachersareusedtoteachingaccordingtothekeyteachingmaterials,thatis,teachingforthepurposeofexamination,accountingfor67%,morethan50%.ThisshowsthatundertheTBLT,teachersstilltakethecompletionofteachingtasksasthemaingoalwhenarrangingteaching.Tosumup,therearestillmanyproblemsintheimplementationofTBLT,suchaslackofsystematicbasisforgrouping,strongsubjectivity,deep-rootedtraditionalteachingideas,theimplementationofTBLTispoor.4.1.3TheinvestigationontheproblemsintheimplementationofTBLTTable4.11WhatarethemainproblemsintheimplementationofTBLT?frequencypercentageTaskcontentdesignTheoperationprocessistoocomplicatedClasstimeislimitedOrganizethestudentstocompletethetask34691157%10%15%18%Asshownintable4.11,34ofthe60subjectschose“taskcontentdesign”,whichisoneofthemaindifficulties,accountingfor57%ofthetotalnumberofthesurvey,morethanhalfofthetotalnumber.Therefore,howtodesigntheteachingcontentandorganizestudentstocompletetheTBLTprocessarethemaindifficultiesencounteredintheimplementationofTBLTinmiddleschoolEnglishreading.Therefore,itisnecessarytoimprovethecomprehensivequalityofteachers,guidethemtoestablishadvancedteachingideasandideas,andimplementtheteachingideaofTBLTintotheprocessofEnglishreadingclassroomteaching.OnlyinthiswaycanweimprovetheefficiencyofEnglishreadingclassroomteachingandachievetheteachingobjectivesofthenewcurriculum.Table4.12WhatdoyouthinkarethereasonsthatrestrictyoufromusingTBLT?frequencypercentageUndertheexamination-orientededucation,wehavetofocusonthetraditionalteachingmethodsRestrictionsonTeachers’professionallevelTheconceptoftask-basedteachingisnotclearTeachersarereluctanttospendtimeonresearch33817255%13%28%4%Asshownintable4.12,amongthe60subjects,theproportionofexaminationorientededucationmustadopttraditionalteachingmethodisthehighest,followedbyteachers’choiceofunclearconceptofTBLT,thethirdistherestrictiononTeachers’professionallevel,andthelastisteachers’timespentonresearch,accountingfor55%,28%,13%and4%respectively,thisshowsthattherearebothsubjectiveandobjectivefactorsinfluencingtheapplicationofTBLTinmiddleschoolEnglishreadingteaching.InordertopromotetheapplicationandimplementationofTBLTinmiddleschoolEnglishreadingteachingandachievemorefruitfulresults,wemustovercometheseproblems.Andcomparedwiththetraditionalteachingmode,TBLThashigherrequirementsforteachers’teachingphilosophy,teachingcontent,teachingdesignandtheimplementationofteachingprocess.WhetherteacherscanmaketimelychangestoadapttotheactualrequirementsofTBLTisthekeytothesuccessfulimplementationofthisteachingmethodinmiddleschoolEnglishreadingteaching.Table4.13Whatisthebiggestdifficultyyouencounterinorganizingstudentstocompletetasks?frequencypercentageStudentgroupingRolechangeClassroomcontentarrangementStudentreport41127187%18%45%30%Theresultsshowthatamongthe60teachers,thebiggestdifficultiesinorganizingstudentstocompletethetaskofEnglishreadingteachingarethearrangementofclassroomteachingcontents,studentreports,roleswitchingandstudentgrouping.45%,30%,18%and7%respectively.Thus,intheprocessoforganizingandimplementingthenewteachingmethod,howtodetermineandarrangetheteachingcontentofreadingclassandguidestudentstomakereasonablereportsarethemainproblemsofTBLTinmiddleschoolEnglishreadingclass.Tosumup,intheimplementationprocessofTBLT,themaindifficultyisthedesignoftaskcontent,andthemainreasonisthatteachersdonotunderstandthetaskthoroughly,lackofscientificbasis,andlackofin-depthresearchonTBLTunderthepressureofexam-orientededucation.4.1.4TheinvestigationontheevaluationofTBLTTable4.14WhatdoyouthinkoftheimplementationeffectofTBLT?frequencypercentageverynicecommonlyNotgoodItdidn’twork922181115%37%30%18%Itcanbeseenfromtable4.14that15%ofthe60teachersthinkthattheeffectofTBLTisverygood,and37%thinkthattheeffectofTBLTisaverage.ThedatashowsthatthemajorityofteachersagreewiththeeffectofTBLT,morethanhalfofthetotalnumber.ItcanbeseenthatTBLTisascientificandadvancedteachingmethod.Althoughitisrecognizedbymostteachers,therecognitionisnothigh.Table4.15WhatisthemainbasisforyourdailyevaluationofTBLT?frequencypercentageDailylearningevaluationPerformanceevaluationAcombinationofthetwo536198%60%32%Theresultsshowthatupto60.0%ofEnglishteachersarestillusedtousing“performanceevaluationbased”toevaluatetheeffectofTBLTinimprovingmiddleschoolstudents’Englishreadingteaching,andthetestorientationisstillrelativelyobvious,whichhasacertaindeviationfromtheimplementationvalueofTBLTadvocatedinthenewcurriculumteachingstandard.Table4.16DoyouthinkTBLTissuitableforEnglishreadingteaching?frequencypercentageVerysuitablecommonlyunsuited438972%13%15%Theresultsshowthat72%ofthe60teachersthinktheexistingtextbooksareverysuitableforTBLT,whichismorethanhalfofthetotalnumber.ThisindicatesthatthecurrentforeignEnglishtextbooksformiddleschoolsaresuitablefortheimplementationofTBLT.Atthesametime,combinedwiththecurrentsituationofmiddleschoolEnglishcourses,theEnglishtextbooksshouldbefurtherimproved.Teacherscanchoosetaskssuitableforstudents’actualsituationandarrangethemsystematically,ordigoutavailablematerialsfromtextbookstoserveTBLT,soastoeffectivelypromotetheimplementationofTBLTinEnglishreadingteaching.Ingeneral,althoughmostteachersaffirmtheimplementationeffectofTBLT,mostteacherslackscientificevaluationcriteriaandaremoresubjective.4.2Statisticalanalysisofteachers’interviewanswersRegardingtheresearchquestion,besidestheproblemsmentionedinthequestionnaire,whatotherproblemsdoyouthinkmayexistintheapplicationofTBLTinEnglishclass?Accordingtotheanswersoftheinterview,in2teachers,thatinadditiontotheaboveproblems,TBLTstillexistssomeproblems,butmainlyfocusedonhowtodetermineareasonabletask,howtoinspiretheenthusiasmofstudents’activethinking,howtomanagetheprocessofthetaskcompletionandhowtomeasurestudents’ability,thesearerestrictingtheobstaclefactorofteachingactivities.Inviewoftheresearchquestion,howdoyouthinktheseproblemsshouldbesolvedintheimplementationofTBLT?Accordingtotheanswersoftheinterview,teacherAbelievesthatthetaskdesign,implementationprocessandcomprehensiveevaluationshouldbeimprovedtomaximizetheagreementwithstudents’“abilitytoaccept”.Onlyinthiswaycantheteachinggoalofimprovingmiddleschoolstudents’Englishreadingabilitybeachieved.TeacherBthinksitisnecessarytoreadtheTBLTthroughandapplyTBLTaccordingtolocalconditions.Intermsofresearchquestion,objectivelyspeaking,TBLThasadvantagesanddisadvantages.WillyoucontinuetouseTBLTinthefuture?Accordingtotheanswersoftheinterview,teacherAwillcontinuetouseTBLT.ThereasonisthatTeacherAthinksTBLThasmoreadvantagesthandisadvantagesandcanimprovetheeffectofEnglishreadingteaching.However,TeacherBwillnotcontinuetouseTBLTbecausehebelievesthatTBLTmayleadtopolarizationofteachingandotherfactors.Regardingtheresearchquestion,inordertoimprovetheeffectivenessofTBLTintheteachingprocessofEnglishreading,whatimprovementsdoyouhopetomake?Accordingtotheanswersoftheinterview,teacherAbelievesthatTBLTshouldgrasptheessenceofthetheoryandgetridofthemisunderstanding.Forexample,TBLTshouldnotbegeneralized,andTBLTshouldnotbemistakenasthatthewholeclassmustusetheso-called“task”toteach.TeacherBbelievesthatthedesignoftasksshouldfocusontherealityofstudents,closetolife,andgivefullconsiderationtothecognitiveandemotionalneedsofstudents.Accordingtotheanalyzetheanswersoftheinterview,theauthorhaslearnedthattherearesomeacknowledgeddrawbacksofTBLTintheimplementationprocess,butthemeanstosolvetheproblemsarediversified,andTBLTstillneedstobeimprovedfrommanyaspects,whichrequiresteacherstocontinuetoexploreinthefutureteaching.4.3ThemainproblemsofTBLTinimplementationinEnglishReadingTeaching(14頁總結(jié)一一對(duì)應(yīng))4.3.1HowtodesignthecontentofthetaskisdifficultInmiddleschoolTBLT,studentsarethecenterofTBLT.Althoughintheprocessofdesigningtasks,Englishteacherscandesignthedifficultyoftasksaccordingtotheactualsituationofstudents.However,atpresent,thenumberofstudentsineachclassofmiddleschoolisrelativelylarge.Therefore,intheprocessofdesigningtasks,thenumberofstudentsineachclassisrelativelylarge,andthedesignedtasksaredifficulttomeettheneedsofalllevelsofstudents,whichleadstomanymiddleschoolEnglishteachersarenotwillingtouseTBLTinreadingteaching.4.3.2HowtomanagethetaskcompletionprocessisdifficultItisdifficultforteacherstoeffectivelycontrolstudents’activitieswhenTBLTisusedinmiddleschoolEnglishreadingteaching,theefficiencyofclassroomfeedbackisalsolow.ThemainfeatureofTBLTistodecomposetheclassactivitiesintotasks.Studentscanlearnlanguageknowledgeandimprovetheirreadingabilitybycompletingthetasks.However,intheactualteachingactivities,EnglishteachersusuallyfindthatstudentsoftenusetheirmothertongueinsteadofEnglishtocommunicatewhentheyfinishthetaskandaskstudentstocompletethetaskingroups.Althoughteachersconstantlyremindandemphasizethisproblem,itstillcan’tbeimproved.4.3.3Howtomeasurestudents’abilityisdifficultThecurrentassessmentsysteminourcountrydeterminesthatitisdifficultformiddleschoolEnglishteacherstodeterminewhetherstudents’readingabilityisreal,theyonlyjudgethestudents’readingabilityfromwhetherthescoresofreadingquestionsareimproved,whichincreasesthedifficultyofapplyingTBLTinmiddleschoolEnglishreadingteaching,andalsomakesteachersinadilemmaintheactualteachingprocess.Ontheonehand,middleschoolEnglishteachershopetouseTBLTinEnglishreadingteaching.Afterdesigningcorrespondingtaskactivitiesforstudents,theycanletstudentsimprovetheirreadingabilityintheapplicationandexperience.However,ontheotherhand,teachersareafraidthattheapplicationofTBLTcan’timprovestudents’academicperformance,sotheycan’texplaintoparentsandstudents.Atthesametime,theschoolwilldirectlydenytheteachinglevelandteachingabilityofteachersbecauseofthepoorperformanceofstudents.ItcanbeseenthattheexistingexaminationsystemhasgreatlyaffectedtheenthusiasmofteacherstouseTBLTinEnglishreadingteaching,whichgreatlyinhibitstheapplicationofTBLTinmiddleschoolEnglishreadingteaching.4.4SuggestionsforpromotingtheapplicationofTBLTinEnglishreadingteaching4.4.1TheteachersshouldbegiventheoreticalguidanceandpracticaltrainingonTBLTInordertoimprovetheircomprehensivequalityandbroadentheirscopeofknowledge,middleschoolEnglishteachersinChinamuststrengthentheirstudy.Inthisway,theywillhaveabetterunderstandingandgraspoftheTBLT,adapttotherequirementsofTBLTonteachers’quality,andachievegoodresultsinreadingteaching.SchoolsoreducationalresearchdepartmentscantrainteachersinthetheoryofTBLT.Thetrainingcontentcanincludetheprocess,characteristics,design,stepsandprinciplesofTBLT.Organizeexperts,professorsandscholarstocarryouttheoreticaltrainingforfront-lineteachersonaregularbasis,sothatteachershaveaclearerunderstandingoftheconceptandimplementationofTBLTandcanapplyitwithease.Inaddition,expertscangodeepintotheclassroomandguidethefront-lineteacherstouseTBLTtoconductactualteaching.4.4.2Designreading“tasks”accordingtoreadingmaterialsandstudents’characteristicsTeachersshouldmakefulluseofthepreviouseffectivemethodstodesignreadinglearningtasks,designteachingaccordingtothespecificcharacteristicsoflearningcontentandstudents’characteristics,andachieveflexibleapplicationofTBLT.Thecarefuldesignofreadingtaskishelpfultoimprovestudents’initiativeandenthusiasminlearning.Thereadingtaskdesignedbyteachersshouldinvolvethecontentandtopicsthatstudentsareinterestedin.Thetaskmustbechallenging,andtheformofthetaskshouldbeflexibleandvaried.Whendesigningthetask,teachersshouldalsopayattentiontotheaccomplishmentofthetasktostudents.Atthesametime,theteachermusttakeintoaccountthestudents’mainpositionwhendesigningthetask,andfullyconsiderandgrasptheorder,difficultyandconnectionbetweendifferenttasks.Inaddition,teacherscanalsoconsidersettingupdiversifiedtaskforms.Forexample,forrelativelysimplereadingmaterials,teacherscanincreasethecomplexityofstudents’activitiesandtasks;Forreadingmaterialswithrelativelyhighdifficulty,teachersshoulddesigntasksandactivitiesfromeasytodifficult,stepbystep,andmakethetasksstepbystep.Forthoseactivitiesandtasksthatrequirestudents’abilityrelativelyhigh,teacherscandesignstudentstoworkingroupsandusetheenergyofallthestudentsinthegrouptocompletethemtogether.Ifthetaskisnottoodemandingofthestudent’sability,thestudentcanbeaskedtocompletethetaskindependently.4.4.3EstablishaperfectEnglishreadingevaluationsystemfortask-basedteachingFirstofall,theevaluationcontentofTBLTmustbecomprehensive.Theevaluationshouldnotonlyexaminestudents’abilitytousethelanguage,butalsoexaminestudents’learningstrategiesandinterests.Secondly,theevaluationformsofTBLTmustbediversified,includingformativeevaluationandsummativeevaluation,andthetwoevaluationmethodsshouldbecombinedtopayattentiontotheevaluationofnotonlythelearningresults,butalsothelearningprocess.ChapterFiveConclusionandLimitations5.1ConclusionThispapermainlyadoptsthemethodsofquestionnairesurveyandinterview,andrandomlyselectsthreemiddleschoolsinShijiazhuangwiththesameleveltostudyandanalyzethecurrentsituationofEnglishreadingteaching.TheresultsshowthattheeffectofmiddleschoolEnglishreadingteachingisrecognizedbymostteachers,butthedegreeofrecognitionisnothigh.TherearestillsomeproblemsintheimplementationofTBLTintheclassroom,suchasteachers’lackofin-depthunderstandingofTBLT,difficultyindesigningtaskcontent,anddifficultyinmeasuringstudents’ability.Tosolvetheseproblems,middleschoolEnglishteachersmustpayattentiontotheimprovementoftheircomprehensivequality,updateteachingconcepts,andextendtheimplementationtimeofTBLT.Inshort,weshouldfurtherpromotetheapplicationandpracticeofTBLTinmiddleschoolEnglishreadingteaching.Therefore,itisnecessarytoimprovethecomprehensivequalityofmiddleschoolEnglishteachers,carefullydesignreadingtasks,establishaperfectTBLTEnglishreadingevaluationsystem,andcreateagoodinternalandexternalenvironmentfortheapplicationofTBLT.5.2limitationDuetothelimitationsoftheinvestigationconditionsandtheauthor’sability,thispaperhassomelimitationsandtheresearchisnotdeepenough.Therefore,theresearchontheapplicationofTBLTinmiddleschoolEnglishreadingteachingisnotcomprehensiveandrepresentative.Duetothelittlenumberofcandidates,wecan’tdrawaverycomprehensiveandaccurateconclusion.Only60EnglishteachersfromShijiazhuangNo.22middleschool,ShijiazhuangNo.44middleschoolandShijiazhuangNo.27middleschoolareanalyzed.Itdoesnotrepresentallth
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 新疆維吾爾自治區(qū)喀什地區(qū)巴楚縣2024-2025學(xué)年高一上學(xué)期1月期末測(cè)試生物試卷(含答案)
- 陜西省漢中市二中類校2024-2025學(xué)年高一上學(xué)期12月第二次月考物理試卷(含答案)
- 2025年江蘇省南京市、鹽城市二市高考一模試卷-物理(含答案)
- 5計(jì)算題-工程核算(江蘇)
- 化學(xué)-內(nèi)蒙古鄂爾多斯市西四旗2024-2025學(xué)年2025屆高三第一(上)學(xué)期期末聯(lián)考試卷試題和答案
- 2025年度廠長任期目標(biāo)管理與創(chuàng)新激勵(lì)合同2篇
- 2024門窗工程材料供應(yīng)與安裝施工總承包合同3篇
- 2024年心理咨詢師題庫參考答案 (一)
- 2024生產(chǎn)車間技術(shù)改造項(xiàng)目承包合同3篇
- 2024雇傭臨時(shí)駕駛員合同
- (八省聯(lián)考)河南省2025年高考綜合改革適應(yīng)性演練 思想政治試卷(含答案)
- 綜合測(cè)試 散文閱讀(多文本)(解析版)-2025年高考語文一輪復(fù)習(xí)(新高考)
- 鈑金設(shè)備操作培訓(xùn)
- 2024駕校經(jīng)營權(quán)承包合同
- 福建省能化集團(tuán)筆試題目
- 快遞公司與驛站合作協(xié)議模板 3篇
- 手糊補(bǔ)強(qiáng)工A卷考試 (1)附有答案
- 電纜熱穩(wěn)定校驗(yàn)計(jì)算書
- 2020國際大專辯論賽順境或逆境更有利于人的成長
- 管理制度評(píng)價(jià)表(填寫模板)
- 西師版五年級(jí)數(shù)學(xué)上冊(cè)期末測(cè)試題(共6頁)
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論