應(yīng)用文寫作+演講稿主題是“言之有理和言之有物哪一個(gè)更重要”+講義-2025屆廣東省建文教育集團(tuán)高三1月第一次模擬考試英語試題_第1頁
應(yīng)用文寫作+演講稿主題是“言之有理和言之有物哪一個(gè)更重要”+講義-2025屆廣東省建文教育集團(tuán)高三1月第一次模擬考試英語試題_第2頁
應(yīng)用文寫作+演講稿主題是“言之有理和言之有物哪一個(gè)更重要”+講義-2025屆廣東省建文教育集團(tuán)高三1月第一次模擬考試英語試題_第3頁
全文預(yù)覽已結(jié)束

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

應(yīng)用文寫作假定你是李華,你將要參加一場演講比賽,主題是“言之有理和言之有物哪一個(gè)更重要”,請(qǐng)你寫演講稿,內(nèi)容包括:1.你的觀點(diǎn);2.原因。注意:1.寫作詞數(shù)應(yīng)為80左右;2.請(qǐng)按如下格式在答題卡的相應(yīng)位置作答。_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________寫作提綱第一段:開場點(diǎn)明演講主題,清晰表明自己的觀點(diǎn),即認(rèn)為言之有物更重要(也可根據(jù)個(gè)人想法選擇言之有理更重要)。第二段:通過列舉具體原因來支撐自己的觀點(diǎn)。例如,闡述言之有物能提供實(shí)質(zhì)信息,更易引發(fā)共鳴,能展現(xiàn)作者的知識(shí)儲(chǔ)備等。若認(rèn)為言之有理更重要,則從邏輯嚴(yán)密性、說服力等方面闡述。第三段:總結(jié)全文,再次強(qiáng)調(diào)自己的觀點(diǎn),同時(shí)呼吁聽眾重視自己所認(rèn)為更重要的一方,并說明這對(duì)溝通交流、表達(dá)觀點(diǎn)等方面的積極意義。語言積累Inmyopinion,havingsubstanceinspeechisofutmostimportance.在我看來,演講中有實(shí)質(zhì)內(nèi)容至關(guān)重要。Soundreasoning,whilesignificant,lacksthepowertoengagetheaudiencedeeplywithoutsubstantialcontent.雖然合理的推理很重要,但如果沒有豐富的內(nèi)容,就缺乏深度吸引觀眾的力量。Concreteexamplesandreal-lifeexperiencescanvividlyillustrateourpoints.具體的例子和現(xiàn)實(shí)生活中的經(jīng)歷能夠生動(dòng)地闡明我們的觀點(diǎn)。Content-richspeechescanarousetheaudience'semotionsandresonatewiththem.內(nèi)容豐富的演講能夠激發(fā)觀眾的情感并引起他們的共鳴。Itisthroughsubstantialcontentthatwecandemonstrateourknowledgeandunderstandingofthetopic.通過豐富的內(nèi)容,我們能夠展示對(duì)主題的知識(shí)和理解。Withoutsolidreasoning,eventhemostinterestingcontentmayseemdisorganizedandunconvincing.沒有堅(jiān)實(shí)的推理,即使是最有趣的內(nèi)容也可能顯得雜亂無章且缺乏說服力。Awell-reasonedargumentcanguidetheaudiencetofollowourtrainofthought.一個(gè)條理清晰的論證能夠引導(dǎo)觀眾跟上我們的思路。Reasoningprovidestheframeworkthatholdsthecontenttogether.推理提供了將內(nèi)容整合在一起的框架。Inconclusion,weshouldstrivetobalancebothsoundreasoningandsubstantialcontentinourspeeches.總之,我們應(yīng)該在演講中努力平衡合理的推理和豐富的內(nèi)容。Letusrememberthatapowerfulspeechisonethatcombinesbothlogicandsubstance.讓我們記住,一場有力的演講是邏輯與內(nèi)容相結(jié)合的演講。寫作示范一Dearfellowstudents,Today,Iamheretotalkabouttheimportanceofhavingsubstanceinspeechcomparedtosoundreasoning.Inmyview,havingsubstancetakesprecedence.Firstly,substantialcontentoffersrealvalue.Whenwefillourspeecheswithfacts,data,andreal-lifestories,weprovidelistenerswithsomethingtangible.Forexample,ifwetalkaboutenvironmentalprotection,sharingactualcasesofpollutionandeffectivesolutionscanmakeourmessagemoreimpactful.Secondly,content-richspeechesaremorelikelytoevokeemotionsandbuildaconnectionwiththeaudience.Wecantouchtheirheartsandminds,makingthemmorereceptivetoourideas.Tosumup,whilesoundreasoningisimportant,itissubstancethatbreatheslifeintoourwords.Letusfocusondeliveringcontent-richspeechestomakearealdifference.Thankyou!寫作示范二Ladiesandgentlemen,Thequestionofwhethersoundreasoningorhavingsubstanceismorecrucialhasalwaysintriguedme.Ifirmlybelievethatsoundreasoningisthecornerstoneofagreatspeech.Soundreasoningensuresclarityandlogic.Whenwepresentawell-structuredargument,theaudiencecaneasilyfollowourthoughtprocess.Ithelpstoavoidconfusionandmakesourpointsmorepersuasive.Forinstance,inadebateabouteconomicpolicies,awell-reasonedanalysisoftheprosandconscanconvinceothersofthevalidityofourstance.Moreover,reasoningprovidesaframeworkthatholdsallthecontenttogether.Withoutit,eventhemostinterestingfactsmayseemscattered.Inconclusion,soundreasoningisthekeytoeffectivecommunication.Letusalwaysprioritizeconstructinglogicalargumentsinourspeeches.Thankyouforlistening!寫作示范三Dearfriends,Aswediscusswhethersoundreasoningorhavingsubstanceismoreimportant,Iwouldliketoadvocateforthesignificanceofhavingsubstance.Substantialcontentshowcasesourdepthofknowledge.Whenwebringinvariousexamples,researchfindings,andhistoricalreferences,weprovethatwehavedoneourhomework.Thisnotonlyearnstherespectoftheaudiencebutalsomakesourspeechmorecredible.Additionally,itcaninspiretheaudience.Astoryofperseveranceinthefaceofdifficultiescanmotivatethemtoovercometheirownchallenges.Insummary,havingsubstanceenrichesourspeechandmakesittrulymemorable.Letusallstrivetocreatespeechesfilledwithvaluablecontent.Thankyou!【答案】Dearjudges,

Inmyopinion,speakingwithsubstanceismoreimportantthanspeakingwithreason.Firstly,substanceprovidesthefoundationforspeech.Withoutsubstantialcontent,eventhemostlogicalargumentsmaylackpersuasiveness.Whilelogiciscrucialforstructuringarguments,substanceprovidesthecoreideasthatengageandpersuade.Secondly,s

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論