Logical Fallacies_Dean.ppt_第1頁
Logical Fallacies_Dean.ppt_第2頁
Logical Fallacies_Dean.ppt_第3頁
Logical Fallacies_Dean.ppt_第4頁
Logical Fallacies_Dean.ppt_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩10頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

1、Logical Fallacies,Logical Fallacies,“Fallacy” comes from the Latin word fallacia, which means deceit(lie) or trick.,Logical Fallacies,Fallacies are statements that might sound reasonable or true but are actually flawed(not perfect) or dishonest.,1.Appeal to Tradition,This line of thought asserts tha

2、t a premise must be true because people have always believed it or done it. Alternatively, it may conclude that the premise has always worked in the past and will thus always work in the future.,1.Appeal to Tradition,“Jefferson City has kept its urban growth boundary at six miles for the past thirty

3、 years. That has been good enough for thirty years, so why should we change it now? If it is not broke, dont fix it.”,2.Appeal to Force,This argument uses force, the threat of force, or some other unpleasant backlash to make the audience accept a conclusion. It commonly appears as a last resort when

4、 evidence or rational arguments fail to convince. Logically, this consideration has nothing to do with the merits of the points under consideration.,2.Appeal to Force,“Superintendent(director or leader), it would be a good idea for your school to cut the budget by $16,000. I need not remind you that

5、 past school boards have fired superintendents who cannot keep down costs.”,Using a word in a different way than the author used it in the original premise, or changing definitions halfway through a discussion. When we use the same word or phrase in different senses within one line of argument, we c

6、ommit the fallacy of equivocation.,3.Equivocation(ambiguity),3.Equivocation,“Plato says the end of a thing is its perfection; I say that death is the end of life; hence, death is the perfection of life.”,4.Circular Reasoning,Often the authors word the two statements sufficiently differently to obscu

7、re the fact that the same argument occurs as both a premise and a conclusion.,4.Circular Reasoning,God exists. How do you know that God exists? The Bible says so.“ Why should I believe the Bible?“ Because its the inspired word of God.,5. Red Herring(a kind of fish),A red herring is a deliberate(inte

8、nded) attempt to change the subject or divert the argument from the real question at issue.,5. Red Herring,“I should not pay a fine for reckless driving. There are many other people on the street who are dangerous criminals and rapists, and the police should be chasing them, not harassing a decent tax-paying citizen like me.”,Logical Fallacies,It is important to avoid these logical fallacies in your own arguments. When detected, they backfire by making the audience think the speaker is unintelligent or deceptive. And it is als

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評論

0/150

提交評論