語言文化論文-Learning Strategy Instruction in L2 Acquisition and Metacognitive Strategy.doc_第1頁
語言文化論文-Learning Strategy Instruction in L2 Acquisition and Metacognitive Strategy.doc_第2頁
語言文化論文-Learning Strategy Instruction in L2 Acquisition and Metacognitive Strategy.doc_第3頁
語言文化論文-Learning Strategy Instruction in L2 Acquisition and Metacognitive Strategy.doc_第4頁
語言文化論文-Learning Strategy Instruction in L2 Acquisition and Metacognitive Strategy.doc_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩6頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

語言文化論文-LearningStrategyInstructioninL2AcquisitionandMetacognitiveStrategy【Abstract】LearningstrategyinstructioninL2acquisitionisreallyatissue.Itisaverycomplextask.Thegoalofstrategyinstructionistohelplearnerstolearnhowtoemploystrategiesflexiblyandhowtoselectappropriatestrategiestoperformaparticularlearningtask.Metacognitivestrategiesmaybethoughtofascorelearningstrategiesbecausetheyareapplicabletoavarietyoflearningtasksandalsobecausetheyareoverarchingstrategiesabovecognitivestrategiesandsocial/affectivestrategies.ThispaperexplorestheissuesofstrategytraininginL2,andstressestheimportanceofmetacognitivestrategiesinstrategyinstruction.【Keywords】learningstrategies;strategyinstruction;metacognitivestrategy;metacognitiveskills.WhenitcomestotraininglearnersintheuseoflearningstrategiesinL2acquisition,maybeitismostappropriatetosay“thereisalottoplayfor”(Skehan1991ascitedinEllis,1994,p.558).Uptonow,therearealargenumberofmaterialontraininglearnerstouseeffectivelanguagelearningstrategies(e.g.,EllisandSinclair1989;Brown1989;Oxford1990;Wenden1986band1991).However,therehavebeenfewempiricalstudiesevaluatingthethesuccessofthetrainingonL2learners(Ellis,1994).Ithasnotprovedaneasytasktoincorporatetheaccumulationofknowledgeaboutstrategiesineffectivelearningintotheteachingprocess(Williams&Burden,2000).Becauseofthelackofsolidevidence,thereappearedtwooppositeviewpointsontheissueofstrategyinstruction.1.ArgumentonstrategyinstructionItisarguedthatsincenotenoughisyetknownabouttherelationsbetweenlearningstrategiesandlanguagelearning,cautionshouldbeexercisedinattemptingtotrainlearnerstouseparticularstrategies.Rees-Miller(1993;1994)arguesthatinviewofthelackofevidencefortheeffectiveness,resourcesspentonstrategytrainingmightbebetterdirectedelsewhere.Benson(2005)arguethatthecorrelationbetweenstrategyuseandimprovedperformanceisnotnecessarilyacausal-effectrelationship.Theresearchliteraturecontainsawealthofdescriptionsofattemptstoteachlanguagelearningstrategies.TheseresearchersmainlyincludeOMalleyandChamot(1990),WendenandRubin(1987),andOxfordandCrookall(1989).Itisworthnotingthattheresultsofmostoftheirstudiesindicatethatthosewhowereexplicitlytaughtstrategiesperformbetteronarangeoflanguagetasksthandidthecontrolgroupswhoreceivednostrategytraining(Williams&Burden,2000).McDonoughs(1999)reviewofresearchsuggeststhatthehypothesisthatlearnerscanlearnhowtouseeffectivestrategiesremainsvalid.Obviously,theexplicitteachingofstrategieshasreceivedaconsiderableamountofattention.Mostofresearchersareinfavorinstrategytraining.InChina,thesummerinstituteonL2learningstrategytrainingandresearchwasheldinNanjingUniversityin2003(Wang,L.F&WenQ.F.,2003).2IssuesofstrategytraininginL2Ellis(1994)identified5keyissuesinlanguagelearningstrategiestrainingafterreviewingthemajorstudiesonstrategytraining.Hegaveawarningthatissuesshouldbepaidmuchattentiontobeforestrategytrainingisimplemented:moreworkisneededtodiscoverwhatstrategiesand,inparticular,whatcombinationsofstrategiesshouldbetaught.wayshavetobefoundoftakingintoaccountlearnersownpreferredlearningstrategies.Somelearnersmayneedconvincingthatstrategytrainingisworthwhile.Itisnotclearwhetherlearnertrainingwillworkbestwhenitexistsasaseparatestrandinalanguageprogramorwhenitisfullyintegratedintothelanguageteachingmaterials.whetherlearnersshouldbemadeconsciousofthestrategiestheyaretaught,orwhetherjustprovidingpracticeopportunitiesissufficient.Whyistheissueofstrategytrainingsocomplex?Itmaybeduetothedifferentfactorsthatinteracttoinfluencetheteachingandlearningofstrategies:age,gender,personallearningstyleandteachersattitudeandbeliefs.Forexample,thelearningstrategiesemployedbythechildlearnersandadultlearnersaredifferent.Thestudiesmadebyresearchers(e.g.,OMalleyetal1985;Chamotetal1987)suggestthatlearnersabilitytouseabroadrangeofstrategiesflexiblymaydependtoalargeextentonthenatureofandrangeoftheinstructionaltasksintheclassroom.However,itmaynotbepossibletopredictthekindsofstrategiesthatalearnerwillemployinaparticulartask.Ontheonehand,strategyinstructionisdependentonthetasks;ontheotherhand,thetasksisunlikelytospecifycertainstrategiestobeusedbythelearners.MaybeitisbettertociteElliswords(1994):specifictasksmaypredisposelearnerstouseparticularstrategies,buttheycannotpredeterminetheactualstrategiestobeused.(p.545)3.RoleofmetacognitioninL2trainingThegoalofstrategyinstructionistohelplearnerstolearnhowtoemploystrategiesflexiblyandhowtoselectappropriatestrategiestoperformaparticularlearningtask.Buthereistheproblemfortheteachersandthelearners:howtodefinetheword“appropriate”?AmongthreetypesofstrategiesintheclassificationofOMalleyandChamot,metacognitivestrategiesmaybethoughtofascorelearningstrategiesbecausetheyareapplicabletoavarietyoflearningtasksandalsobecausetheyareoverarchingstrategiesabovecognitivestrategiesandsocial/affectivestrategies.Metacognivestrategiesarehigherorderexecutiveskillsentailinggoalidentification,planning,monitoringandevaluation.AccordingtoAnderson(2002),understandingandcontrollingcognitiveprocessesmaybeoneofthemostessentialskillsintheclassroom.Thedistinctionsbetweencognitiveandmetacognitivestrategiesareimportant,partlybecausetheygivesomeindicationofwhichstrategiesarethemostcrucialindeterminingtheeffectivenessoflearning.Itseemsthatmetacognitivestrategies,whichallowstudentstoplan,control,andevaluatetheirlearning,havethemostcentralroletoplayinthisrespect,ratherthanthosethatmerelymaximizeinteractionandinput.Thustheabilitytochooseandevaluateonesstrategiesisofcentralimportance.Therearealsootherresearcherswhoemphasizemetacogitioninlearningstrategies.WilliamsandBurden(2000)stressmetacognitioniscentraltoeffectivelearning.Wenden(1987)saysthatmetacognitionis“theprocessthatunderliestheefficientuseofstrategiesandtheessenceofintelligentactivity”(p.573).Quicke(1994)similarlyviewsthatmetacognitiveawarenessiscrucialinlearningstrategies.Ellis(1994)isrelativelyreserved,sayingthatmetacognitivestrategiesassumeconsiderableimportanceatleastforadults.Hecontinuestosaythatmanylearnersseemtounderutilizethisstrategy.Thisfindingsuppliesmeaningfulimplicationsforstrategytraining.Inaddition,mostofthestudies(OMalleysndChamot1990;WendenandRubin1987;OxfordandCrookall1989)foundthelearnerswhowereparticularlytaughtmetacognitivestrategiesperformedbetterthanthoseinthecontrolgroup.Goodlanguagelearnersmakeuseofmetacognitiveknowledgetohelpthemassesstheneeds,evaluateprogressandgivedirectionstotheirlearning.4.TeachingmetacognitiveskillsSincetheimportanceofmetacognitionhasbeenstressed,itisadvisabletoheightenlearnersmetacognitiveawareness.Wen(1995)emphasizedthatsuccessfullearnersarethoughfulandawareofthemselvesinrelationtothelearningprocess.Theyareabletoemploystrategiesunconciously,andmaketheirmetacogitiveawarenessintoplaywhennecessaryorwhentheyarefacedwithdifficulties.Suchawarenessgiveslearnerscontrolovertheirownlearning.Therefore,metacoginitiveawarenessisanecessaryandessentialfocusinlearningtoregulatelearning.Traininginmetacognitiveawarenessincludeawarenessofwhatlearningalanguageinvlovesaswellastrainingintheselectionofappropriatestrategiesfordifferentsituations.Inaddition,metacognitivetrainingshouldincludeheighteningawarenessofthefeelingsindefferentaspectsoflanguagelearning,andofalearnerspersonalitiesandstrengths.(Williams&Burden,2000)Toraisemetacognitiveawarenessinvolvesfiveaspects.preparingandplanningforlearning:Theseimportantmetacognitiveskillsrelatestoidentifyingwhatistobeaccomplished.Teachersarticulatetheparticularlearninggoalsforclassandguidethestudensinsettingtheirownlearninggoals.knowinghowtoselectanduselearningstrategies:Inthisrespect,teachersteachstudentshowtousespecificstrategiesbasedonvarioustasks.Teachersshowhowtochoosethestrategythatismostlikelytosucceedinagivensituation.Itisthemostdifficultskillforteacherstoinstructstudents.monitoringstrategyuse:Bymonitoring,studentscankeepthemselvesontracktomeettheiraims.Duringthetimestudentsimplementspecificstrategies,teachersneedtoremindstudentstostopregularlyandthinkaboutwhethertheyusestrategiesasintended.knowinghowtodeployvariousstrategies:Teacherscanaidstudentsbymakingthemawareofvariousstrategiesavailable.Tomasterthisskillmeansthatastudenthastheabilitytocoordinate,organizeandmakeassociationamongthevariousstrategies.self-assessingonesownstrategyuse:Self-assessmenthelpsstudentsreflectthroughthecycleoflearning.Teachersmayasksuchquestionsas“WhatamItryingtoaccomplish?”“HowwellamIusingthem?”.Throughthisskill,studentscanlearntoassesstheirperformancemoreaccurately.Thefiveaspectsarevaluablesuggestionsforteacherstoinstructthemetacogn

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論