




版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
1、the concept of strategy hendersons central ideas.real unitcostcumulative experience(85% slope).profitmarket sharethe experience curvethe value of market sharethe corporate portfoliorelative market sharemarket growthcash usingcash generatingrelative market sharemarketgrowth-3-icon standardizationport
2、ers central ideasentry barrierseconomies of scaleproprietary product differencesbrand identityswitching costscapital requirementsaccess to distributionabsolute cost differences: proprietary learning curve access to inputs product designgovernment policyexpected retaliationsupplier powerinput differe
3、ntiationseller switching costspresence of substitutessupplier concentrationimportance of volumecost relative to total purchasesthreat of forward integrationindustry rivalry industry growthfixed cost / value addedintermittent overcapacityproduct differencesbrand identityswitching costsconcentration &
4、amp; balanceinformation complexitydiversitycorporate stakesexit barriersbuyer powerbargaining leveragebuyer concentrationbuyer volumebuyer switching costsbuyer informationability to backward integratesubstitute productspull-throughprice sensitivitysubstitution threatrelative price/ performance of su
5、bstitutesswitching costsstrategic advantagestrategic targetbroadnarrowlow costdifferentiationbroadcostfocus costbroad differentiationfocusdifferentiationthe value chainsuccessive stages of value-addedjockeying for positionamong currentcompetitorsthe industrythreat ofnew entrantsthreat ofsubstitutepr
6、oducts bargainingpower ofcustomersbargainingpower ofsupplierssources: porters writings-4-icon standardizationstructure versus behaviorwhy structural segments matterthe premises of traditional competitive theorystructural segments can be identified objectivelythey can be measuredthey are stablethey d
7、ifferentiate among competitorsdifferences in structural segments explain differences in profitsthe value of dominating structural segments can be specifiedthe method for dominating structural segments can be specified-5-icon standardizationdifferences between bcgs and portersconcepts of strategybcg:
8、the missionaryprescriptiverefutablespecificchallenginggeneralizing from the isolated experimentporter:the schoolmandescriptivetautologicalgeneralresonatingsynthesizing from multiple instances-6-icon standardizationthe structural paradigm of strategy contentsegment positioningweproductswhite space(pr
9、e-empt)(identify)disputed spaceenclosed space(consolidate)theytheytheyproducts.cumulative experiencecost. . .experience curvemultidimensional scalingsupply curveab ccostmarkets-7-icon standardizationthe structural paradigm of managementadditivitythe performance of a system can best be understood ana
10、lytically, as the sum of the performances of sub-units. through disaggregation of profitability and of the value-chain relying largely on accounting measures of performanceorganizations should be designed using: markets where information exchange is of low value or low cost hierarchies where informa
11、tion exchange is of high value and high costhence the philosophy of decentralized profit centers and corporate control including the analysis of shareholder value by business and the apparent nullity of corporate strategyhence, also, the emphasis on accountability and individual motivation-8-icon st
12、andardizationthe structural paradigm of changedesignstrategy formulation is a process of controlled and conscious thoughtstrategy is formulated by the ceo (or by a small group)strategy is simplestrategy should be uniquestrategy emerges from this thought process fully-formedstrategy should be explici
13、t and articulatedimplementation occurs only after formulation is complete -9-icon standardizationchallenges to the structural paradigmscounter-exampleshonda, motorola, nec, wal-mart, and dozens of others:scored spectacular reverses against corporations practicing/exemplifying the three standard para
14、digmsrarely have explicit strategies, except at the crudest levelattacked competitors head-on instead of segmenting away from themdeliberately mismatch goals against current strengths & weaknessesformulate strategy incrementally among middle management, rather than through an elite and deliberat
15、ive processevolve continuously in response to success or failurep&g, gm saturn, and dozens of others:attempted big attacks, and failed-10-icon standardizationchallenges to the structural paradigmsseven trendsexhaustion of the incremental advantage from structural playsvarietydemanded at any poin
16、t in time smaller segmentsoffered through time briefer segmentsfaster technology changeglobalizationredefines market shareinformation technologies permit finer understanding and greater flexibilityimplementation gapbcgs own practicerejection of the machine bureaucracy -11-icon standardizationthe new
17、 paradigm: behavior the new locus of competitive advantagethe key competitive advantage lies increasingly with behavior, rather than structureless: factor cost, product, segment, location-what you haveand more: innovation, speed, quality, customer response, understanding customer needs-what you doan
18、d the behavior that results from the strategy becomes indistinguishable for that which formulates it timeabcdabc dcostthe global pharmaceutical industrystructural drivers of profitability?economies of scaler&d expenditure1520251051500250035004500sales (average 1985-1989)returnon sales(%)upjohnsk
19、cibabmpfizerlillymerckglaxo152025105350250r&d expenditure (average 1985-1989)returnon sales(%)upjohnskcibabmpfizerlillymerckglaxo450550500400300l ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l051015202530024681012l ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l051015202530024681012the global pharmaceutical industrybehavioral drivers of profit
20、abilitydrug development timeability to identify high potential compounds returnon sales(%)returnon sales(%)average time from us ind to nda filing (index)average clinical gain of drugs externally licenced (index, as rated by the fda)upjohnskcibapfizerlillymerckglaxobristol meyersupjohnskcibapfizerlil
21、lymerckglaxobristol m-14-icon standardizationthe global pharmaceutical industrycompetitive positioning in capabilities space external innovativeness index1squibbcibamerckpfizerbristolskscheringupjohnglaxorochelilly1. average innovativeness (as rated by the fda) of licensed drugs approved by the fda
22、in the 1980s.2. time from u.s. ind filing to nda filingthe global pharmaceutical industrycompetitive positioning in capabilities space-80%-60%-40%-20%0%20%40%60%02468101214l ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ldevelopment time2 (as a % from average)-15-icon standardizationstructure versus behaviorwhy cap
23、abilities matterthe premises of new competitive theorycapabilities can be identified objectivelythey can be measuredthey are stablethey differentiate among competitorsdifferences in capabilities explain differences in profitsthe value of building capabilities can be specifiedthe method for building
24、capabilities can be specified-16-icon standardizationthe behavioral paradigm of strategy contentcapabilities-based positioningweproductswhite space(pre-empt)(identify)disputed spaceenclosed space(consolidate)theytheytheycapabilitiescapabilities-17-icon standardizationthe behavioral paradigm of manag
25、ementnetworkinformation technology enables nodal information flowsteams are more effective than markets and hierarchiesempowerment is worth more than accountabilityshared purpose (vision) is worth more than controlthe informal organization is more valuable than the formalthe performance of a system
26、must be understood holisticallysystems dynamics, not accounting analysisassets may be additive, but capabilities are multplicativethe role of organization is to facilitate the flow of knowledge among nodes-18-icon standardizationthe behavioral paradigm of changelearningthe world is too complex and t
27、oo fast moving for centralized, deliberate strategies to be feasible or valid for longemployees at all levels need and expect challenge, responsibility and freedom to innovatethey need to own the strategy adaptation needs to occur:continuously, not continuallyat all levels of the organization, not j
28、ust the topin response to events, not abstracted from themstrategy formulation and implementation are continuous and mutually modifying-19-icon standardizationstructural versus behavioral paradigms segment positioning competitive advantage is achieved in product/market spaceadditivity the performanc
29、e of an organization is the sum of the performances of its partsdesign strategy and implementation are separate processesstructuralstrategymanage-mentchangebehavioralcapabilities positioning competitive advantage is achieved in capabilities space network the performance of an organization depends on
30、 its behavior as a systemlearning thought, action and experience are intertwined, not sequential -20-icon standardizationan exampletime based competitionsegment positioning tbc cannot be understood as a new segmentadditivity the problem addressed by tbc arises from managing each value-added step or
31、function separately design tbc cannot be implemented through a grand plancapabilities positioning but it can be understood as a new capability network but the oe methodology comprises managing the system as an integrated wholelearning but it can be implemented through collaboration and incrementalis
32、mstructuralbehavioralstrategymanage-mentchange-21-icon standardizationan analogythe advent of mechanized warfare 1916-1936from:static, positional, defensiveinfrequent, major assaults concentration of strengthpreparatory logisticsfront line numberscentralized staff planningdeterministic planningfunct
33、ional divisionsto:mobile, tactical, aggressivecontinuous operationssurprise, speedbattlefield logisticsintelligence, technologyfield commandimprovisational joint operations-22-icon standardizationbcgs consulting method identify key capabilities & competences required in the businessmeasure the c
34、lients capabilities and competences map the competitive space identify how trends will change the map develop the strategy specify the platforms required to enable the strategyassess the current platforms in relation to the ideal build the new platforms-23-icon standardizationbcgs consulting method
35、identify the key capabilities & competences required in your businessthose that your organization is pursuing-beliefs auditthose that competitors are pursuing-competitive assessmentthose that customers value-focus groups, market interviews measure your capabilities and competences your performan
36、ce versus the best competitors-benchmarkingtheir value to the customer -behavioral research, conjointrelation of capabilities to profitability-profitability analysis-24-icon standardizationbcgs consulting method map the competitive space strategic mappingdimensions of the space (capabilities, compet
37、ences, products, markets)relative positioning (competitive advantage)value potential (where the paying customers are) identify how the map will change trends analysisdemand-side: trends in capabilities expected/ valued by the customersupply-side: trends in technologies that enable new capabilitiesco
38、mpetitive and regulatory trends-25-icon standardizationbcgs consulting method develop the strategy strategic analysisfocussing on, or investing in, or leveraging offa current capability or a competence or a product/market positionto achieve a new capability or competence or product/market positionth
39、at offers a desired combination of profit and growth specify the ideal platforms required by the strategy platform specificationdefine a small list of required platforms, one per capabilityspecify the content of each separately, in terms of:-information systems, -human resource management policies,
40、-organizational structure, -common culture, -systems dynamics (ie. internal process flows) and -shared vision-26-icon standardizationbcgs consulting method assess the current platforms in relation to the idealidentify gapsset priorities build the new platform acquisitions, alliances corporate develo
41、pmentinternal restructuring change managementlearning by doing oeinformation systems it architecturemeasures of progress in gaining capabilities capability metrics diagnostics: organization information oe culture human resources-27-icon standardizationan agenda for the futuresome hypotheses to testcapability differences explain variations in company or industry profitability more than do structural differencescapability differences are more stable than structural differencesall capabilities can be measuredcapability differences determine (and therefore predi
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 研學(xué)課程開發(fā)師筆試試題及答案
- 兒童康復(fù)訓(xùn)練師考試試卷及答案
- 《特種設(shè)備使用單位作業(yè)人員管理規(guī)范》編制說明20250422
- 2025年高精度數(shù)字測溫儀表合作協(xié)議書
- 國開學(xué)習(xí)網(wǎng)《園林樹木學(xué)》形考任務(wù)1234答案
- 青島西海岸新區(qū)教育和體育系統(tǒng)專項(xiàng)招聘公費(fèi)師范生筆試真題2024
- 2025年紙品用膠項(xiàng)目合作計(jì)劃書
- 消防知識競賽題庫2
- 2025年暑假.實(shí)踐調(diào)查報(bào)告范文
- 2025年收費(fèi)的生產(chǎn)服務(wù)及修理合作協(xié)議書
- 保山隆陽區(qū)小升初數(shù)學(xué)試卷
- 2025年上半年北京市西城區(qū)教委事業(yè)單位公開招聘考試筆試易考易錯模擬試題(共500題)試卷后附參考答案
- RoHS知識培訓(xùn)課件
- 2024-2025學(xué)年北京西城區(qū)高一(上)期末語文試卷(含答案)
- 2025年貴州貴旅集團(tuán)雷山文化旅游產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展有限責(zé)任公司招聘筆試參考題庫附帶答案詳解
- 2024年初升高數(shù)學(xué)銜接教材講義
- 血小板減少護(hù)理查房課件
- 人教版(2024)數(shù)學(xué)七年級上冊期末測試卷(含答案)
- 辦公用品、易耗品供貨服務(wù)方案
- 火龍罐治療頸椎病個(gè)案
- 2024年葡萄糖注射液項(xiàng)目可行性研究報(bào)告
評論
0/150
提交評論