參考文獻(xiàn)格式最新版

1、參考文獻(xiàn)著錄格式示例（APA格式，選題報(bào)告和論文以此為準(zhǔn)）參考文獻(xiàn)按先英文后中文排列，全部按首寫(xiě)字母排序A.1 專著例：龍文佩，（1988），外國(guó)當(dāng)代劇作選。北京：中國(guó)戲劇出版社。Grice, H. P. (2002). Studies in the way of words. Beijing: Foreign Languages Teaching and Research Press. (出版年份加括號(hào)，中文書(shū)目用書(shū)名號(hào)，中文標(biāo)點(diǎn)；英文專著只大寫(xiě)第一個(gè)字母，用斜體；)A.2 學(xué)位論文例： 張筑，（2010），學(xué)術(shù)摘要中的主位研究，碩士學(xué)位論文。北京：北京大學(xué)。Cairns, R. B. (2

2、012). Infared spectroscopic studies on solid oxygen, M.A. Thesis. Berkeley: University of California. （中文學(xué)位論文標(biāo)明“碩士/博士學(xué)位論文”，英文對(duì)應(yīng)用M.A. Thesis或 Ph.D. Dissertation，后加地點(diǎn)和學(xué)校，英文論文標(biāo)題需斜體，第一個(gè)字母大寫(xiě)，格式同專著）A.3 文集中析出的文獻(xiàn)例： 黃蘊(yùn)慧，（2003），國(guó)際礦物學(xué)研究的動(dòng)向，見(jiàn)程裕淇等編，世界地質(zhì)科技發(fā)展動(dòng)向。北京：地質(zhì)出版社，38-39Rivers, S. (2010). Bringing it all toge

3、ther: Applying metaphor analysis to online discussions in a doctorate study. In Cameron, L. & Maslen, R. (eds.). Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities. London: Equinox, 230-247.（析出文章要注明頁(yè)碼范圍，文集書(shū)名的格式同專著，注意中文“見(jiàn)”和英語(yǔ)In的使用)A.4 網(wǎng)絡(luò)文獻(xiàn)例： Joyce, A.

4、S. Research letter: Canadian Group Psychotherapy Association. Retrieved October 26, 2015, from . （網(wǎng)絡(luò)文獻(xiàn)，加入Retrieved后加日期，加網(wǎng)址)A.5 期刊文章例： 楊彥恒，（1997），論尤金·奧尼爾的悲劇美學(xué)思想，中山大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版)，第6期，21-23。Corts, D. & Meyers, K. (2002). Conceptual clusters in figurative language production. Journal of Psycholing

5、uistic Research, 32(4): 391-408.（期刊年份后的數(shù)字表示“卷”，括號(hào)中的數(shù)字表示“期”，英文期刊名稱實(shí)詞都得大寫(xiě)且斜體) 附錄B參考文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)注法與參考文獻(xiàn)表示例（參考件）B.1 著者出版年制正文與引文：Besides Halliday, GM has been studied by other scholars, such as Martin (1992) and Thompson (1996/2004), and they have done research on IM as well, but their researches are limited to t

6、ypes and identification. In China, the study of GM has made some progress since the 1980s. Chang (2001), Fan (1999, 2000, 2007), Hu (1996, 2000), Yan (2000, 2003) and Zu (1994, 2006) introduce and comment on GM, among which Fan (2000) elaborates how to identify metaphors of mood, Chang (2001) summar

7、izes and offers his opinions on the form and function of interpersonal metaphors and Zhu (2006, p.26) makes complementary opinion to the nominalization of modal terms. However, few of the above scholars have tried to research on IM in specific discourse or the function of IM, even though IM is espec

8、ially significant for a more comprehensive understanding of the discourse. In recent years, IM is widely applied to different genres of texts, such as advertisements (Ying, 2012), public speeches (Feng, 2010; Huang, 2010), business negotiation (Tan, 2009) and news reports (Yu, 2000), while only few have researched on debate. Zhang (2006) does a functional analysis of IM exploiting the First Bush-Kerry Presidential Debate in 2004; Liu (2011) studies metaphors of modality in presidential debate but lacking of