歷年考研英譯漢全真試題及詳解

1、Unit 4 （1997年）Do animals have rights? This is how the question is usually put. It sounds like a useful，ground-clearing way to start.（71）Actually，it isnt，because it assumes that there is an agreed account of human rights，which is something the world does not have.On one view of rights，to be sure，it n

2、ecessarily follows that animals have none.72）Some philosophers argue that rights exist only within a social contract，as part of an exchange of duties and entitlements. Therefore，animals cannot have rights. The idea of punishing a tiger that kills somebody is absurd，for exactly the same reason，so is

3、the idea that tigers have rights. However，this is only one account，and by no means an uncontested one. It denies rights not only to animals but also to some peoplefor instance，to infants，the mentally incapable and future generations. In addition，it is unclear what force a contract can have for peopl

4、e who never consented to it: how do you reply to somebody who says “I dont like this contract?”The point is this without agreement on the rights of people，arguing about the rights of animals is fruitless.（73）It leads the discussion to extremes at the outset: it invites you to think that animals shou

5、ld be treated either with the consideration humans extend to other humans，or with no consideration at all. This is a false choice. Better to start with another，more fundamental question: is the way we treat animals a moral issue at all?Many deny it.（74）Arguing from the view that humans are different

6、 from animals in every relevant respect，extremists of this kind think that animals lie outside the area of moral choice. Any regard for the suffering of animals is seen as a mistakea sentimental displacement of feeling that should properly be directed to other humans.This view，which holds that tortu

7、ring a monkey is morally equivalent to chopping wood，may seem bravely “l(fā)ogical.”In fact it is simply shallow: the ethical equivalent of learning to crawlis to weigh others interests against one s own. This in turn requires sympathy and imagination: without which there is no capacity for moral though

8、t. To see an animal in pain is enough，for most，to engage sympathy.（75）When that happens，it is not a mistake: it is mankinds instinct for moral reasoning in action，an instinct that should be encouraged rather than laughed at.Unit 4翻譯題解：71） Actually, it isn't, because it assumes that there is an a

9、greed account of human rights, which is something the world does not have.句子分析：第一、句子可以拆分為三段：Actually, it isn't, because it assumes / that there is an agreed account of human rights, / which is something the world does not have.第二、句子主干結(jié)構(gòu)是主從復(fù)合句。1）because引導(dǎo)原因狀語從句2）that引導(dǎo)賓語從句，從句中是存在句結(jié)構(gòu)there is an ag

10、reed account of human rights,3）which從句的先行詞是human rights，something后面是定語從句the world does not have.第三、詞的處理：Actually 事實(shí)上；it主語代詞，根據(jù)上下文意思這種問法，這種說法，isn't后面省略的詞應(yīng)該是so或true；an agreed account 約定的看法，共同的認(rèn)識；human rights 人的權(quán)利，人權(quán)完整的譯文：71）事實(shí)并非如此，因?yàn)檫@種問法是以人們對人的權(quán)利有共同的認(rèn)識為基礎(chǔ)的，而這種共同認(rèn)識并不存在。72） Some philosophers argue t

11、hat rights exist only within a social contract, as part of an exchange of duties and entitlements.句子分析：第一、句子可以拆分為三段：Some philosophers argue / that rights exist only within a social contract, / as part of an exchange of duties and entitlements.第二、句子的結(jié)構(gòu)：1）主干結(jié)構(gòu)是主從復(fù)合句：Some philosophers argue that.2）that

12、引導(dǎo)的是賓語從句3）as part of.是賓語從句中的rights的主語補(bǔ)足語。第三、詞的處理：argue 論證；a social contract 社會契約；as part of 作為（是）的一部分entitlements 利益，權(quán)利完整的譯文：72）有些哲學(xué)家論證說，權(quán)利只存在社會契約中，是責(zé)任與利益相交換的一部分。73） It leads the discussion to extremes at the outset: it invites you to think that animals should be treated either with the consideratio

13、n humans extend to other humans, or with no consideration at all.句子分析：第一、句子可以拆分為三段：It leads the discussion to extremes at the outset: / it invites you to think that animals should be treated / either with the consideration humans extend to other humans, or with no consideration at all.第二、句子的結(jié)構(gòu)是：1）it

14、 invites you to think that.后面是賓語從句。2） animals should be treated either with., or with.要么要么，是表示選擇的方式狀語。3）the consideration后面的humans extend to other humans是定語。第三、詞的處理：leads .to extremes 引向極端；at the outset 從一開始；invites you to think 使人們認(rèn)為；consideration 關(guān)切，體諒；humans extend to other humans 人對待人完整的譯文：73）這種

15、說法從一開始就將討論引向兩個極端，它使人們認(rèn)為應(yīng)這樣對待動物：要么像對人類自身一樣關(guān)切體諒，要么完全冷漠無情。74） Arguing from the view that humans are different from animals in every relevant respect, extremists of this kind think that animals lie outside the area of moral choice.句子分析：第一、句子可以拆分為三段：Arguing from the view that humans are different from an

16、imals in every relevant respect, / extremists of this kind think / that animals lie outside the area of moral choice.第二、句子的結(jié)構(gòu)：1）主干結(jié)構(gòu)是現(xiàn)在分詞短語狀語，主語+謂語+賓語從句。Arguing from.現(xiàn)在分詞短語作狀語。2） the view和后面的從句that.是同位語關(guān)系3） that.引導(dǎo)賓語從句。第三、詞的處理：Arguing from the view 從觀點(diǎn)看，持觀點(diǎn)；different from. 與不同；in every relevant resp

17、ect 在各相關(guān)方面；extremists 極端主義者，持極端觀點(diǎn)的人；lie outside the area of moral choice 不在道德問題范圍，與道德取舍無關(guān)完整的譯文：74）這類人持極端看法，認(rèn)為人與動物在各相關(guān)方面都不相同，對待動物無須考慮道德問題。75） When that happens, it is not a mistake: it is mankind's instinct for moral reasoning in action, an instinct that should be encouraged rather than laughed at.句子分析：第一、句子可以拆分為三段：When that happens, it is not a mistake: / it is mankind's instinct for moral reasoning in action, / an instinct that should be encouraged rather than laughed at.第二、句子主干結(jié)構(gòu)是兩個復(fù)合句：1）When.是前一個復(fù)合句的時間狀語2）instinct后面的介詞短語for moral reaso