科學基金績效評估的體系的設計ppt課件_第1頁
科學基金績效評估的體系的設計ppt課件_第2頁
科學基金績效評估的體系的設計ppt課件_第3頁
科學基金績效評估的體系的設計ppt課件_第4頁
科學基金績效評估的體系的設計ppt課件_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩13頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內容提供方,若內容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領

文檔簡介

1、The Roles of Users in Enhancing Utility of EvaluationWith Special Reference to the International Evaluationon the Funding and Management Performance of the National Natural Science Foundation of ChinaProf. Yonghe Zheng, Deputy Director, Bureau of Planning, NSFCProf. Zhaoying Chen, Deputy Director, N

2、CSTEOutlineo Brief overview of the national evaluation effort in Chinao NSFC case: International Evaluation on NSFCs Funding and Management Performanceo The Roles of Users in Enhancing Utility of Evaluation1. Brief overview of the national evaluation effort in Chinao Currently, to establish an evalu

3、ation system within the public administration system in China has become an urgent need in Chinese governments. o The whole of - government performance evaluation system has not established in China.MoF is the leading bodyo Ministry of Finance (MOF) is the leading body of the performance evaluation

4、of public sectors in China.o There are already some pilot activities of performance evaluation, which carried out by line ministries or local governments in China. 2. NSFC case: International Evaluation on NSFCs Funding and Management Performanceo The evaluation is commissioned by MOF and NSFC toget

5、her. The State Council attached importance to this evaluation. o The NSFC case is the most influential evaluation in public sector in China up to now and represents good practice from China. 6Dual Objectives of the Evaluation6 Accountability Provide an independent assessment of the overall performan

6、ce of NSFCs funding and management during the past 25 years Lesson learning Improve the NSFCs funding and management performance; redefine NSFCs strategic role within the NIS of China 7What the evaluation focuses on and what the evaluation does not attempt to do 7The evaluation doesFocus on NSFCs fu

7、nding and management performance over 25 years Focus on NSFCs overall performance as a whole The evaluation does NOTAssess NSFC from the agencys internal perspective Assess individual projects supported by NSFCEvaluation Approach and PrincipalsModality: domestic preparation followed by international

8、 evaluationApproach: Evidence-basedPrincipals: Independent, Objective, FairnessThe scope of the Evaluation will cover four dimensions: o NSFCs strategic positioning, o funding performance,o management performance, o impact on Chinas S&T system. Evaluation IssuesIssue 1. NSFCs strategic positioni

9、ng in the national innovation system of ChinaIssue 2. Funding strategyIssue 3. Contributions to original innovationIssue 4. Promoting the balanced development of scientific disciplinesIssue 5. Fostering innovative talentsIssue 6. Supporting the national demands and challenges Issue 7. Modality of fu

10、nding managementIssue 8. Funding instrumentsIssue 9. Peer Review SystemIssue 10. Impact of NSFCs funding11Implementation of the Evaluation 11PhaseMajor Evaluation ActivitiesPhase12019. 22019. 6 Inception and evaluation designPhase22019. 72019.12Prepare evaluation evidence report The IEC first meetin

11、g in Beijing Phase32019. 12019. 6Complete the Evaluation Report Phase42019年710月Use and dissemination of the evaluation results 12Use of the Evaluation 12NSFC leadership understands why the organization needs evaluationThe use of evaluation has been considered to be key issues to be addressed in the

12、evaluation design from the very beginning and also made systematic arrangementsDuring the implementation of the evaluation, some findings have already been put into application.There will be a series of follow-up activities to ensure that evaluation is used appropriately3. Users Role in Enhancing Ut

13、ility of Evaluation NSFC: Inception and evaluation designEnsure that the evaluation is targeted to the demands of users, respond to current concerns and debates;Discuss with NCSTE team about the conception framework of the evaluation; Identify the 10 key issues and evaluation questions; Promote IEC

14、and NCSTE team to understand NSFCs funding and management system;NSFC: Evaluation ImplementationProvide coordination and support requested by IEC and NCSTE team; Prepare a volume of case-based evidence for the evaluation;Assure that NCSTE can access to all relevant information and select the target

15、group for interview or focus group meeting;Judge the credibility of the message in the evaluation report3. Users Role in Enhancing Utility of Evaluation NSFC: Response and DisseminationTake management response to the evaluation report at the draft stage Distribute the evaluation report to line minis

16、tries, the National Peoples Congress, the Chinese Peoples Political Consultative ConferenceArranging dissemination events of the evaluation.3. Users Role in Enhancing Utility of Evaluation NSFC: Follow-upNSFC leading level and director level: One week seminar to discuss the main results of the evaluation; identify possible action in NSFC strategy and funding management; NSFC staff: improving conditions for evaluation-based learning in NSFC;Release the report to the public3. Users

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內容負責。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論