american medicine, mid20th century_第1頁
american medicine, mid20th century_第2頁
american medicine, mid20th century_第3頁
american medicine, mid20th century_第4頁
american medicine, mid20th century_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩36頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領

文檔簡介

1、American Medicine, mid-20th CenturyEvolution of Internal MedicineGeneralism 1940s-60sDevelopment of health insurance 1930sffMedicine and Medical Economics in the 60sMedicine vs SurgeryTraditional: Physician vs empiric Physician vs surgeon“Physician” after Paris: the “naturalist of disease”Knows dise

2、ase concretely through:long and varied clinical experience gained in the hospital as well as outside of itThe autopsy labPrizes accurate diagnosis and prognosisInternal Medicine1880s Germany: “Innere Medizin”Physiological/chemical aspects of diseaseContribution of laboratory experiment to medical kn

3、owledgevs surgery and dermatology“Consultant-generalist” IdealKnows disease through long and varied clinical experience gained in the hospital as well as outside of itThe autopsy labPrizes accurate diagnosis and prognosisLaboratory knowledge supplements clinical and pathological knowledgeWilliam Osl

4、er, M.D. 1849-1919 M.D. 1872England and Germany 1872-74FacultyMcGill 1874-1884Penn 1884-1889Hopkins 1889-1905Osler as a young professor of physiology at McGill 1875Osler at the autopsy table, Philadelphia Almshouse Hospital, mid-1880sDoing autopsies with students and residents, Philadelphia Almshous

5、e Hospital, 1885Horse and carriage in front of Penn Medical building, 1875Urban streetcar, 1887Osler teaching at Hopkins n.d.Oslerian InternistAbstract knowledgeWide, deep clinical experience/knowledgeExpert differential diagnosisHumanistic, holistic, compassionateSpecialist (in spite of general foc

6、us)Internal Medicine 1920s-WWIIMedical SchoolsResearch emphasis on “innere medizin”Research increasingly subspecialty-orientedBench researchers take over departments of internal medicineInternal Medicine 1920s-WWIIAcademic Practice/Residency TrainingRemains generalist“consultant-generalist” ideal po

7、werfulWorld of PracticeSome primary care(preventive medicine, common outpt problems in their simpler manifestations; e.g. dm, htn, utis)Complicated patients referred by gpsGeneralists (GPs) Dilemma: to certify or not?ProOfficial recognition of educationComparison to specialist credentialsConWill def

8、inition of general practice?surgery ?obstetrics1960s: Generalisms Transformation1960: American Academy of General Practice (AAGP) opposes board certification1965: AAGP favors board certification1969: American Board of Family Practice formed1975: rotating internships eliminatedFamily Practice vs Gene

9、ral PracticeGPPrimary careAdult and child (non-surgical) medicineVarying amounts surgery, obstetrics, orthopedics, otherFPPrimary careExpertise in psycho-social aspects of careLess emphasis on all-round competence (esp regarding surgery)Primary CareTraditional: GP1970s and afterFPIMPedsOb/gynEconomi

10、cs of Medicine 1920sAn unfettered marketplaceLots of docs relative to populationDocs exhibit a wide spectrum of incomes, statusCharges: Sliding scaleMedical Costs $ av total bill/yr/ $1999 hosp % family1918 48.41 530 7.61929 108 1044 13Obstacles to Insurance for Hospitalizationunpredictability of cl

11、aimsadverse selectionservice benefits threatened unlimited liabilitymoral hazardInsurance BenefitsIndemnity: Payment of a preset monetary amount in settlement of a claim (no matter how large the claim)Service:Payment for given medical services in response to a claim (whatever they may cost)1st Hospi

12、tal Insurance PlanBaylor University 1929Unpaid bills from schoolteachersVP Justin Ford KimballFormer superintendent Dallas SchoolsDesigned a prepayment plan for schoolteachers50 cents/month 21 days/yr hospitalization semiprivate room at BaylorProgenitor of Blue CrossJustin Ford Kimball1872-1956AHA P

13、rinciples Governing Acceptable Insurance Plans (1933)Non-profitpromotion and advertising limitedcoverage to be hospital charges only“free choice of physician and hospital”AMA Principles for Acceptable Private Insurance Plans (1934)No restrictions on treatment“free choice of physician”indemnity plans

14、 acceptable, service benefits not soPost WWII Boosts to Health Insurance1942: employer tax incentive to offer health insurance as fringe benefit1947: unions allowed to include health insurance benefits as subject to collective bargainingMedical Profession, 1929-1949 19291949#doctors 140,000 160,000i

15、ndependentsalariedDistribution gps74% 54% part-specialists (21%)(16%) specialists26% 46%Median Net Incomes, 1949Private Practice $1949 $1999General Practice 7428 51,748Internal Medicine 10,944 76,240Surgery 15,389 107,205 Pediatrics 10,695 74,505Orthopedics 15,063 104,934OB/GYN 14,288 99,535Radiolog

16、y 16,550 115,293All specialties 12,599 87,769Physician Income Spread 1929-49Median% mean overIncome median1929 3827 38%1949 9561 23%Insurance Coverage for Hospital ExpenseMedical Care Price Inflation (1982-84 =100)60s Medicine70% Hospital Patients are 65% Docs who are Specialists: 70% 1966Style of M

17、edical Practice11% Group89% Solo or Small PartnershipHospitals increasingly complex, high techMedical Technology1960: longterm hemodialysis1000 pts by 1969mid-60s: renal transplantationearly 50s to early 60s: development of positive pressure ventilationicus common by mid 60slate 60s-early 70s: cardi

18、ac catheterizationMedicare/MedicaidPart Ahospital carepayroll taxes during working years (2.9% of wages)Part Bdoctor visitsgeneral revenues and subsidized insurance premiumMedicaidcare for the poorgrants to states, which put up their own funds, design their own programMedicare Administration“fiscal inte

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論