版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
1、從高血壓到心力衰竭挑戰(zhàn)與對策1. McKee et al. N Engl J Med. 1971;285:1441-1446.2. Levy D. JAMA 1996;275:1557-1562.高血壓: 心力衰竭的主要危險因素Framingham Heart Study Framingham 隨訪研究的資料顯示,高血壓 是心力衰竭發(fā)生的主要危險因素。 約90%的心力衰竭患者,在發(fā)生心力衰竭前 曾有高血壓史。160/100BP (mm Hg)Lloyd-Jones et al. Circulation 2002;106: 3068-3072.3343 men and 4199 women fo
2、llowed for 25 years no HF at baseline血壓水平與心力衰竭危險AgeMaleFemaleMaleFemaleMaleFemale051015202530Lifetime risk (%)40 years80 years60 yearsYears Normal LV Subclinical Clinical heartLV structure remodeling LV dysfunction failure& function Heart failureObesityDiabetesHTNSmokingDyslipidemiaDiabetesMILVHDias
3、tolicdysfunctionYears/months SystolicdysfunctionDeathVasan RS et al. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:1789-1796.HTN = HypertensionMI = Myocardial InfarctionLVH = Left ventricle hypertrophy高血壓如何進(jìn)展到心力衰竭因心力衰竭首次住院患者左心室射血分?jǐn)?shù)ALLHATHF BY EF LEVELN=1399EF50%心力衰竭預(yù)后:人群研究隨訪(年) 死亡率(%) HF-REF HF-PEFOlmsted(1998) 5.0 65
4、65Framingham(1999) 6.2 75 46Helsinki(1997) 4.0 54 43心力衰竭預(yù)后:臨床研究薈萃分析(Somaratne, 2008) 17項研究,24501例,平均治療隨訪47個月 38%患者死亡,RF-REF 40%,HF-PEF 32%降壓治療有效降低心、腦血管病事件17項臨床試驗薈萃分析-50-40-30-20-100Heart failure1Fatal/Nonfatalstroke1Fatal/NonfatalCHD1Risk reduction (%)1. Moser and Herbert. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996; 2
5、. Collins R et al. Lancet 1990.Vascular deaths-52%-38%-16%-21%HYVET: Heart Failureplaceboactive- Placebo_ ActiveStrokeSystolic BP Difference Between Randomized Groups (mm Hg)0.250.500.751.001.251.50-10-8-6-4-2024Systolic BP Difference Between Randomized Groups (mm Hg)0.250.500.751.001.251.50-10-8-6-
6、4-2024CHDA = CA vs placebo; B = ACE inhibitor vs placebo; C = more intensive vs less intensive blood- pressure-lowering; D = ARB vs control; E = ACE inihibitor vs CA; F = CA vs diuretic or -blocker; G = ACE inhibitor vs diuretic and -blocker.Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists Collaboration.
7、 Lancet. 2003;362:1527-1535.RR of Outcome EventRR of Outcome EventABCDEFGABCDEFGBP-Lowering Treatment TrialistsHeart FailureSystolic BP Difference BetweenRandomized Groups (mm Hg)RR of Outcome Event-10-8-6-4-20240.250.500.751.001.251.50ABCDEFGA = CA vs placebo; B = ACE inhibitor vs placebo; C = more
8、 intensive vs less intensive blood- pressure-lowering; D = ARB vs control; E = ACE inihibitor vs CA; F = CA vs diuretic or -blocker; G = ACE inhibitor vs diuretic and -blocker.Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists Collaboration. Lancet. 2003;362:1527-1535.BP-Lowering Treatment TrialistsACEI vs
9、. placeboCA vs. placeboMore vs. lessARB vs. controlACEI vs. D/BBCA vs. D/BBACEI vs. CA219/8233104/338254/7494302/5935547/12498732/23425502/10357269/824688/327472/13394359/5919809/18652850/29734609/10345-5/-2-8/-4-4/-3-2/-1+2/0+1/0+1/+10.82 (0.69-0.98)1.21 (0.93-1.58)0.84 (0.59-1.18)0.84 (0.72-0.97)1
10、.07 (0.96-1.19)1.33 (1.21-1.47)0.82 (0.73-0.92)0.51.02.0Heart FailureEvents/participants1st Listed2nd ListedDifference in BP(Mean, mmHg)Relative risk(95% CI)Relative RiskFavours 1st listedFavours 2nd listed1. Table adapted from Blood Pressure Lowering Trialists Collaboration. Lancet. 2003;362:1527-1
11、535.2. Gottdiener JS et al. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:631-639.ACEI = ACE inhibitorCA = calcium antagonistARB = angiotensin receptor blockerD/BB= diuretic or beta blockerEffects of antihypertensive treatment on the development of HF in hypertensive patients0.060.060.030.000123456Cumulative HF RateNo.
12、at RiskChlorthalidone 152551456313980133251162465863212Amlodipine9048858782687904688939121899Lisinopril9054854881817790681139091907Years to HF0.050.040.020.01ALLHAT: 住院心力衰竭發(fā)生率Davis BR, et al. Circulation 2008;118:ChlorthalidoneLisinoprilAmlodipine0.020.010.000123456Cumulative HF RateNo. at RiskChlor
13、thalidone 152551456313980133251162465863212Amlodipine9048858782687904688939121899Lisinopril9054854881817790681139091907Years to HFALLHAT: 住院HF-REF發(fā)生率Davis BR, et al. Circulation 2008;118:ChlorthalidoneAmlodipineLisinopril0.020.010.000123456Cumulative HF RateNo. at RiskChlorthalidone 1525514563139801
14、33251162465863212Amlodipine9048858782687904688939121899Lisinopril9054854881817790681139091907Years to HFALLHAT-HF: 住院HF-PEF發(fā)生率Davis BR, et al. Circulation 2008;118:ChlorthalidoneAmlodipineLisinoprilLewis et al. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:851-860.Proportion With Death From Any Cause (%)Follow-up (months)
15、0.0061218243036424854AmlodipinePlaceboIrbesartanIDNT: No Significant Difference in Death From Any Cause061218243036424854Follow-up (mo)603001020IrbesartanAmlodipineControlRRR 37%p 0.001RRR 23%p = 0.15Subjects (%)Lewis EJ et al. N Engl J Med 2001;345(12):851-60.IDNT: Time to CHFMeta
16、-regression analysis: Relation between odds ratios for CHF and differences in achieved SBP between randomized groups 5.03.01.41.00.2-5-2.52.557.51000-5-2.52.557.52.55107.52.55Systolic blood pressure difference between randomized groups (mmHg)Odds ratio for congestive heart failure
17、ACE inhibitors orangiotensin-receptor blockersCalcium channel blockersMIDASDREAMVHASINSIGHTALLHAT/CCB-DCONVINCEIDNT/CCB-PLBSHELLINVESTSYST-EURACTIONASCOTSTOP2/CCB-BBFEVERCamelot/CCB-PLBSYST-ChinaSTONEPREVENTNICSTRANSCENDALLHAT/ACE-DUKPDS39LIFESTOP2/ACE-BBRENAACIDNT/ARB-PLBCamelot/CCB-PLBEUROPA1.2CAP
18、PPANBP2DIABHYCARPEACEPART-2HOPENORDILVerdecchia P, et al. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:679-688. 病程早期阻止病情進(jìn)展和逆轉(zhuǎn)靶器官結(jié)構(gòu)與功能損害 病程中晚期 預(yù)防心、腦血管病和腎臟病終點事件降壓治療目標(biāo)的演進(jìn)與轉(zhuǎn)移:不同病程階段的目標(biāo)Devereux R, et al. JAMA. 2004;292:2350-2356Hazard Ratio: 0.58 (0.38-0.86) p .008LIFE-ECHO substudyImpact on LVH regression on outcomes210-1-2-3-4-5HCTZAtenololCaptoprilClonidineDiltiazemPrazosinChange in left atrial size (mm)Time
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 車位租賃協(xié)議
- 吉首大學(xué)《跨境電子商務(wù)》2021-2022學(xué)年第一學(xué)期期末試卷
- 吉首大學(xué)《電磁學(xué)》2021-2022學(xué)年期末試卷
- 吉林藝術(shù)學(xué)院《影視導(dǎo)演基礎(chǔ)》2021-2022學(xué)年第一學(xué)期期末試卷
- 吉林藝術(shù)學(xué)院《市場營銷學(xué)》2021-2022學(xué)年第一學(xué)期期末試卷
- 報廢出租車轉(zhuǎn)讓協(xié)議書范本
- 2024年供料結(jié)算協(xié)議書模板范本
- 2024年多方出租轉(zhuǎn)讓合同范本
- 2024年大型耕地出售合同范本
- 2024年大米買賣雙方合同范本
- 江西省萍鄉(xiāng)市2024-2025學(xué)年高二上學(xué)期期中考試地理試題
- 2023年貴州黔東南州州直機(jī)關(guān)遴選公務(wù)員考試真題
- 黑龍江省龍東地區(qū)2024-2025學(xué)年高二上學(xué)期階段測試(二)(期中) 英語 含答案
- 4S店展廳改造裝修合同
- 送貨簡易合同范本(2篇)
- 全國職業(yè)院校技能大賽賽項規(guī)程(高職)智能財稅
- 七年級上冊音樂教案 人音版
- 某小區(qū)住宅樓工程施工組織設(shè)計方案
- 3-4單元測試-2024-2025學(xué)年統(tǒng)編版語文六年級上冊
- 北師版數(shù)學(xué)八年級上冊 5.8三元一次方程組課件
- 2025屆湖北省武漢市新洲一中陽邏校區(qū)高二上數(shù)學(xué)期末學(xué)業(yè)水平測試模擬試題含解析
評論
0/150
提交評論