商務(wù)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)課件-resident perceptions of_第1頁
商務(wù)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)課件-resident perceptions of_第2頁
商務(wù)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)課件-resident perceptions of_第3頁
商務(wù)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)課件-resident perceptions of_第4頁
商務(wù)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)課件-resident perceptions of_第5頁
免費(fèi)預(yù)覽已結(jié)束,剩余31頁可下載查看

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

Frescobaldi花思蝶

《福布斯亞洲》《福布斯亞洲》發(fā) :的地的堅(jiān)持,適應(yīng)和學(xué)習(xí)應(yīng)對各種的能力。包括不可 框架結(jié)Selectionofstudy Toinvestigateresidents’perceptionsofresilience,andbyinferencesustainability,wedevelopedascalepertainingtothefour sofresilince.體制,經(jīng)濟(jì)和生態(tài)恢復(fù)力四個(gè)方面(表1)。Individualitemswerederiveddirectlyfromtheoryforuseinthisassessmentandfocusedonsocial,institutional,economicandecologicalresilience s(Table1). Aneight-stepscaledevelopmentprocesswasusedfollowingDeVellis(2003)。 評價(jià)最初的題項(xiàng)庫德威利斯量表編制:版)[Z重慶,社信社會(huì)資本社區(qū)一級(jí)。與親屬關(guān)系和社團(tuán)成員有Adger,2003;Pelling&High,網(wǎng)個(gè)人是網(wǎng)絡(luò)節(jié)點(diǎn)的人際關(guān)系。知識(shí)在社區(qū)通過Donoghue&Sturtevant,2007;Goodchild,Anselin,Appelbaum,&Harthorn,2000;Folkeetal.,2005;Olssonetal.,2006學(xué)諸如、模仿和解決Cundhill,etal.,2005;Olsson,2003;Schusleretal.,2003等動(dòng)公共享資源使用和中Adger,2000;Berkes&Seixas,Marshall,的機(jī)會(huì)知識(shí)構(gòu)建信Berkes,2009;Chambers,1.IfeellikeIcanaskothersinmycommunityforhelpwhenIneed2.Ilearnaboutnewthingsbytalkingwithmembersofmy3.Ilearnaboutnewthingsbywatchingothersincommunitydo4.Everyoneinmycommunityhasequalaccessto5.Everyoneinmycommunityhasanequalchanceto6.IfeellikeIamamemberofmy7.Mostpeopleinthiscommunitycanbe8.Peopleinmycommunityshare9.Peopleinmycommunitysupporteach10.Iknowmostofthepeopleinmy 的獲得資源的機(jī)會(huì) 的成功機(jī)會(huì)Demographicsof Resiliencescores ysisof 對數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行清理(Tabachnik&Fidell,2007,p.73),使用馬氏距離(Mahalanobisdistance)剔除標(biāo)準(zhǔn)差≥3的值(Tabachnik&Fidell,2007p.74),剔除后,剩Confirmatory Resiliencescores ysis平。Firstwedevelopedcompositemeanscoresoffour sofresilience,whichillustratedresidents’perceptionsofthelevelsofresilienceintheindividualcommunitiesOveralltherewerelow-to-moderateperceptionsofresilienceacrossallfourresilience Themeanscoreof5.68forsocialresiliencewasabovethemidpointof4onthesurveyscaleandindicatedmild-to-moderateagreementregardingtheperceivedlevelintheircommunities; themeanscoreforinstitutionalresilienceof4.43yieldedanoverallneutralperception;theeconomicresiliencescoreof3.14wasbelowthemidpointof4,indicatingdisagreementwiththeoccurrenceoftheseattributes;theecologicalresiliencescoreof2.01(reversescoredfrom5.99foreaseofinterpretation)indicatedmoderate-to-strongdisagreementregardingtheexistenceofenvironmentalresilientconditions.wecomparedeachcommunity’smeanscoresusingaone-wayysisofvariancetoascertainiftherewereanysignificantdifferencesbetweenthesixcommunitiesregardingtheirperceptionsofthefour sofresilience(Table8). ysiswasalsoconductedaftertheoverallFtestwasfoundtobesignificant(Garson,2011)toassesswhetherthemeansofanytwocommunitiesweresignificantlydifferentfromeachother.ThereweresignificantdifferencesfoundinboththeSocialresilienceandtheInstitutionalresilience s.BellevueChopinwassignificantlylowerinperceivedsocialresiliencethanfouroftheotherfivecommunities(Giraudelexcluded)(Table9).WottenWavenwassignificantlyhigherinperceivedInstitutionalresiliencethanBellevueChopin,MeroandPortsmouth.SocialEconomic/institutional這項(xiàng)研究了社區(qū)成員所感知到的目的地恢復(fù)力,以及由此擴(kuò)展的面,恢復(fù)力可以從社會(huì)、制度、經(jīng)濟(jì)、和生態(tài)四個(gè)維度進(jìn)量。Thisstudyinvestigatedcommunitymembers’perceptionsofresilienceandbyextensionatentativeexaminationofthelikelihoodofsustainablecommunitytourismdevelopment.DatapresentedinthispaperwerebothanempiricalapproachtoidentifylatentresiliencevariablesfoundintourismdependentcommunitiesandtocreatebaselinedatainDominica.Followinganeight-stepscaledevelopmentprocess(DeVellis,2003)acommunitylevelresiliencescalewasdeveloped.Residentperceptionsresultedinfourperceivedfactorsfromthisresiliencescale:Social,Institutional,Economic/InstitutionalandEcological.SocialResidentperceptionsofsocialresiliencewerethehighestamongthefour s.Acrossallsixcommunitiestherewasmildtomoderateagreementrelatedtothemodelindicatorsforthisdimension,withameanof5.68(SD:0.87)onaseven-pointscale.克和昆蘭,2008;昆蘭,2006;--2002)。多共享(麥克和昆蘭,2008)。此外,傳統(tǒng)社會(huì)會(huì)特征是加勒比海地區(qū)的“koudmen“幫助之手”有機(jī)農(nóng)民小組成員。Whencomparingcommunities,thevillageofBellevueChopin,asmallorganicfarmingvillage,wassignificantlylowerinsocialresilience(mean5.04)thanfouroftheothercommunities.Tentatively,thismaysuggestlowersocialcohesioninthiscommunitythanothersalthoughallcommunitieshadscoresbetween5.04and5.85ona7-pointscalewithinthisdimension.Thislowersocialresiliencescoremaybeattributabletothelimitedmembershipoftheloca C,whichwassolelycomprisedofmembersoftheOrganicFarmersGroup.度的,格地方,以鎮(zhèn)村議會(huì)的形式存在,從獲得他們的權(quán)利和責(zé)任(,2010) Perceptionsofinstitutionalresiliencewerelowerthansocialresiliencewithanoverallneutralattitude,4.43ona7-pointscale,towardsthefunctionsoflocal ernance.Dominicahasahighly ernmentandalllocal ernments,intheformofTownandVillageCouncils,obtaintheirpowerandresponsibilitiesfromtheCentral ernment( ,2010).ATownCouncilmaylevysometaxes,borrowlimitedfundingandacquireland,buthasnolegislativeauthority(CaribbeanForumofLocalernmentMinistries[CM],2002).wottenwaven社區(qū),比其他五個(gè)社區(qū)顯著更高水平的制度恢復(fù)力認(rèn)知(表9)。wottenwavenTDC的 Onecommunity,WottenWaven,hadsignificantlyhigherlevelsofperceivedinstitutionalresiliencethantheotherfivecommunities(Table9).TheleaderoftheWottenWavenTDChadbeenvocalaboutunrealizedbutpromisedtourismdevelopmentfundsfromthe redevelopmentofatourismvendorsitehereferredtoasa“shantytown”andothercommunityinfrastructureneeds(DominicaNewsOnline,2010a).Economic/institutionalThemeaneconomicresiliencescorewas3.14indicatingaslightlynegativeattitudetowardthisconstruct.Problemsmayoccurwithtourismdevelopmentatthecommunitylevelduetoissueswithstart-upcosts(Kontogeogopoulos,2004),externaloperations(Walpole&Goodwin,2000)andloweconomicreturns(Holladay&Ormbsy,2011;Schelas,Sherman,Fahey,&Lassoie,2002).Inthecaseofthisstudy,theprimaryeconomicindicatorfortheeconomicresilience pertainedtoleakage.Capitalizationontheeconomicbenefits(Chaperon&Bramwell,2013)atthecommunitylevel(Clayton,2004)throughadiversityofeconomicopportunities(Adger,2000)whilepreventingleakage(Lacher&Nepal,2010)isbeneficialtocommunitytourismresilience. Perhapsthegreatestobstacletopreventingleakagefromtheindividualcommunitiesisthelackofbusiness尼加沒有明顯的地籍勘界(,2006),建設(shè)過程中可能會(huì)遭遇土地所不清楚的問題。在多米尼加適當(dāng)?shù)幕A(chǔ)設(shè)施發(fā)展計(jì)劃受到土Ofthefour sofresilience yzedinthisstudy,themeanscorefortheecologic

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評論

0/150

提交評論