《研究生學(xué)術(shù)英語讀譯教程》課件Unit 5 Triple Package of Personality Traits_第1頁(yè)
《研究生學(xué)術(shù)英語讀譯教程》課件Unit 5 Triple Package of Personality Traits_第2頁(yè)
《研究生學(xué)術(shù)英語讀譯教程》課件Unit 5 Triple Package of Personality Traits_第3頁(yè)
《研究生學(xué)術(shù)英語讀譯教程》課件Unit 5 Triple Package of Personality Traits_第4頁(yè)
《研究生學(xué)術(shù)英語讀譯教程》課件Unit 5 Triple Package of Personality Traits_第5頁(yè)
已閱讀5頁(yè),還剩25頁(yè)未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

Tigermother:AmyChuaThisbestsellingparentingmemoirgeneratesalotofpublicity.Anarticlepublishedundertheheadline"WhyChineseMothersAreSuperior"in

TheWallStreetJournal

onJanuary8,2011,containedexcerptsfromherbook,inwhichChuadescribeshereffortstogiveherchildrenwhatshedescribesasatraditional,strict"Chinese"upbringing.

Infact,itisamisunderstandingthatChuawasadvocatingthe"superiority"ofaparticular,verystrict,ethnicallydefinedapproachto

parenting.Inanycase,Chuadefines"Chinesemother"looselytoincludeparentsofotherethnicitieswhopracticetraditional,strictchild-rearing,whilealsoacknowledgingthat"Westernparentscomeinallvarieties,"andnotallethnicallyChineseparentspracticestrictchild-rearing.Inherbook,Chuareportedthatinonestudyof48Chineseimmigrantmothers,thevastmajority"saidthattheybelievetheirchildrencanbe'thebest'students,that'academicachievementreflectssuccessfulparenting,'andthatifchildrendidnotexcelatschoolthentherewas'aproblem'andparents'werenotdoingtheirjob.'"Chuacontraststhemwiththeviewshelabels"Western"

–thatachild's

self-esteem

isparamount.Tough-love/AuthoritarianParenting

&

HelicopterParentsintheWestHelicopterparentspayextremelycloseattentiontotheirchild'sorchildren'sexperiencesandproblems,particularlyateducationalinstitutions.Theyrushtopreventanyharmorfailurefrombefallingthemandwillnotletthemlearnfromtheirownmistakes,sometimesevencontrarytothechildren'swishes.Theyaresonamedbecause,likehelicopters,theyhovercloselyoverhead,rarelyoutofreach,whethertheirchildrenneedthemornot.Discussion&

SearchreadingDiscussinpairs:Doyouthinktough-loveparentingislinkedtoone’sacademicsuccess?Whatfactorscanexplainone’ssuccess?Chance?

SkimthetexttofindoutabouttheauthorGrewal’sopinion.SearchReadingExaminethetitlecloselyandthenquicklygothroughthetextforrelevantinformation.FinishExerciseII.Drill

ReadandSummarizeKeyfeaturesofasummaryItisshorterthanthesource.Itrepeatstheideasofthesourceindifferentphrasesandsentences.Tips&Tricks:GuidelinesforSummarizing

Trycreatingtwocolumnsonapieceofpaper:oneforimportantinformation,andonefortrivialinformation.Organizeyourthoughtsonthispage,andtrytoonlyincludeimportantinformationinyoursummary.Thebestsummariesareusuallyonlyaparagraphlong,clearandtothepoint.

SummaryFormatAsummaryessayshouldbeorganizedsothatotherscanunderstandthesourceorevaluateyourcomprehensionofit.Theintroduction(usuallyoneparagraph)Containsaone-sentencethesisstatementthatsumsupthemainpointofthesource.Alsointroducesthetext(title,author,etc.)Thearticlewrittenbywhomisconcernedwithwhat.Thebody(oneormoreparagraphs)Includesimportantpoints.Includesoneormorekeyexamplesorillustrations.Donotincludeyourownideas.Thereiscustomarilynoconclusion.Donotaddyourownconcludingparagraph.ChecklistIsitclearwhatisbeingsummarized?Isthethesisoftheoriginalessayclearinthesummary?Ifyouhavereadtheoriginalsource,didyouidentifythesamethesis?Isanykeypointmissing?Isthereanyofthesummarizer’sownopinions?Isthereanyunimportantdetails?Isthereanypointinthesummarywhereyouarelostbecauseatransitionismissing?Let’sreadthetext,takenotesandevaluatesummaries.(ExerciseV.)SummaryIntroThearticlewrittenbywhomisconcernedwithwhat.In“…”,who(theauthor)doeswhat.SummaryIntroThearticlewrittenbywhomisconcernedwithwhat.In“…”,who(theauthor)doeswhat.In“”,D.G.explains/discusses/introduces…AmyChua’striplepackagethesis/hypothesisHowitisrefutedbyscience/twoscholars…Paragraphs1-3Keypoints DetailsParagraphs1-3Keypoints (whose)claiminBattleHymnoftheTigerMother(whose)claiminTheTriplePackage:HowThreeUnlikelyTraitsExplaintheRiseandFallofCulturalGroupsinAmericaHarshoppositionagainstwhat.DetailsValueanecdotes.Examplesoftheirtheoryatwork.Paragraphs1-3

ExampleWork

Chua,theauthorofthebookBattleofHymnoftheTigerMother,assertsthatherparentingwayswerenotonlyrepresentativeofChineseimmigrants,butgaveareasonwhyChineseAmericans,onaverage,havebeenbetteratstudythanotherethnicgroups.Threeyearslater,sheandherhusband,TedRubenfeld,wroteabookthatmakesevenbolderassertionsabouthowculturaldiversityinterpretgroupdisparityinsuccess.Accordingtothebook,peoplewhobelongtoculturesthatgiveaspecialimportanceto“threetraits”arelikelytobesuccessful.Theiropinionwasmetwithfierceopposition,especiallyfromAsianAmericans,whocriticizetheirdisregardofthegreatvarietyamongtheAsianAmericanpopulationaswellasthechallengesfacedbylotsofpeopleamongthatgroup.Paragraphs1-3

SampleWork

AmyChuageneratedlotsofpublicitywhenshepublishedherbookBattleHymnoftheTigerMother,amemoirdocumentingher

tough-loveparentingstyle,whichsheclaimedcanexplainwhyChineseAmericansonaveragehaveeducationallyoutperformedotherethnicgroups.Laterintheirnewbookthetriplepackage,ChuaandherhusbandJ.R.putforwardthe“triplepackage”hypothesisclaimingthatauniquecombinationofthreepersonalitytraits(…)arekeytosuccessandthatonetendstodobetterifhebelongstoculturesemphasizingthesethreetraitsjustasthe“modelminority”does.TheharshoppositionclaimedthatthemodelminoritystereotypeignoresthevastdiversitywithintheAsianAmericangroupandthechallengesfacedbythem.Paragraphs4-7Keypoints DetailsParagraphs4-7Keypoints

Praiseforwhat.J.H.&C.C.’sresearchfocus

andmethodology.DetailsWhattraits.Pastresearch.Paragraphs4-7

ExampleWorkThebookreceivedpraisefromcriticsbecausetheyproposethataspecificcombinationofpsychologicaltraitscanexplainsuccess,andpeoplefromcertaingroupsaremorelikelytopossessthem.TheresearchersdeliberatelychosetostudyasampleofrepresentativeAmericanssincethiswouldofferastrongertestofthetheory.Thetriplepackage’sfirsttraitisabeliefinthesuperiorityofone’sowngroup.Thesecondtraitismeasuringinsecuritythatcantakemanyformsincludinglowself-esteem,feelingsofdanger,orfearoflosingwhatonealreadyhas,byusingmultiplescales.Theyidentifiedthreefactorsofinsecurity:personalinsecurity,contingentself-worth,andfamilyinsecurity.Thethirdtraitis“control”usedscalesofimpulsiveness,conscientiousness,andgrit.Theresearchersalsomeasuredcognitiveabilitiesandshowthatgeneralcognitiveabilitiesareoneofthestrongestpredictorsofachievementandsuccess.Finally,tomeasurelifesuccess,participantsreportontheirannualincome,levelofeducation,andhonorsandawardstheyhavereceived.Allofthesemeasuresofsuccesswerecombinedtocreateasingle,combined“success”variable.Paragraphs4-7

SampleWork

Thebookalsoreceivedpraisebecausesomecriticsthoughtittoucheduponanimportantquestion:whydosomegroupsinAmerica,onaverage,tendtobemoresuccessfulthanothers?Sincethetriplepackagehypothesisseemspsychologicalratherthancultural,twopsychologistsJ.H.&C.C.atUnionCollegedecidedtoempiricallytestit,usingtwostudieswithacombinedonlinesampleofover1200Americanadultsofvariousethnicbackgrounds.Theycameupwithdifferentwaystomeasurethethreetraits.Thefirsttraitwasmeasuredwithahow-much-the-participants-agree-with-statementsscale.Thesecondtraitwasmeasuredusingmultiplescales.Andthethirdtraitwasmeasuredusingscalesofimpulsiveness,conscientiousness,andgrit.What’smore,theparticipants’cognitiveabilitiesweremeasuredthoughvocabularyandmathematicalreasoningtests.Andtheirlifesuccesswasmeasuredwiththeirownreportontheirannualincome,levelofeducation,andhonorsandawardsreceived.Allofthesemeasuresofsuccesswerecombinedintoasingle,combined“success”variable.Paragraphs8-10Keypoints DetailsParagraphs8-10Keypoints

J.H.&C.C.’sresearchfindings.MainfindingIsolatedfindingswhytriplepackagetheoryseemscompelling.Whatbestexplainssuccess.DetailsExplanationsonthefindings.Paragraphs8-10

ExampleWorkTheresearchresultsofHartandChabrisdidnotsupportChuaandRubenfeld’stheoryinthattherearepositivecorrelationsbetweenself-reportedsuccessandcognitiveability,parentaleducation,personalsecurityandthatthereisnotconsistentrelationshipbetweentheuniquecombinationofthethreetraits(groupsuperiority,personalinsecurity,andimpulsecontrol)andgreatersuccess.However,theyhavesomethingincommon—therearepositivecorrelationsbetweenself-reportedsuccessandcontingentself-worth,betweenfeelingsofgroupsuperiorityandattainingahigherincome.FromtheopinionsofHartandChabris,somefactors(suchassmart,conscientious,stableenvironment)overlookedbytheory,canbetterexplainone’ssuccessthanotherfactors(suchasone’shardworkandpersonalqualities).Thus,theChuaandRubenfeld’stheorycan’texplainthesuccessofcertaingroups.Paragraphs8-10

SampleWorkUponregressionanalysis,J.H.&C.C.didnotfindanyconsistentevidenceforthetriplepackagehypothesis.Itistruethattherearecertainindividualfindingsthatdidsupportelementsofthetriplepackage,including:peoplewithhighcontingentself-worthandtheyfeelingsofgroupsuperiority.However,themainfindingsshowthatthebiggestpredictorsofsuccesswerecognitiveabilityandparentaleducationandgreaterpersonalinsecuritywasrelatedtolesssuccessinlife.Thetriplepackagehypothesis,thoughseemsappealing,cannotexplainsuccess.Thefactorscanincludebeingsmart,beingconscientiousandbeingbornintoawell-offfamily.TranslationPracticeTheideaofa“triplepackage”mayseemcompelling

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論