Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics Analysis認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)分析中的轉(zhuǎn)喻_第1頁(yè)
Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics Analysis認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)分析中的轉(zhuǎn)喻_第2頁(yè)
Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics Analysis認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)分析中的轉(zhuǎn)喻_第3頁(yè)
Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics Analysis認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)分析中的轉(zhuǎn)喻_第4頁(yè)
Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics Analysis認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)分析中的轉(zhuǎn)喻_第5頁(yè)
已閱讀5頁(yè),還剩5頁(yè)未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

MetonymyinCognitiveLinguisticsAnalysis[Abstract]cognitivelinguisticsthat:thelanguageofmetonymyisageneralphenomenon;infact,itisalsoonewayofthinkingandbehavioringeneral.Metonymyissomethingpeopleunderstandthelinkbetweenthetwo,sothatmeansonethingtoswitchAnotherthingispossible,commonsourceoftheallegedresultsofusefulthingswiththelocalwayoftheallegedoverall.

[Keywords]cognitivemodelofmetonymysignificantdegreeofapplicationMetonymyissomethingpeopleunderstandthelinkbetweenthetwo,sothatmeansonethingtoswitchtoanothermaterialaspossible,commonsourceoftheallegedresultsofusefulthings,allegedthatasawholewiththelocalwayofexample:

Stovewitha.(Refertofurnacestovefire)

TheWhiteHousemadenoindication.(WhiteHousereferstotheU.S.Government)

Hewasblind(hereferstohiseyes)Tounderstandthelanguageinthecognitiveneedtounderstandtheconceptofmetonymymetonymyoftwoterms:the‘cognitivemodel’and‘a(chǎn)significantdegree.’

Mr.ShenJiaxuanthecognitivemodelofmetonymyexpressedasfollows:

‘①inacontextinordertoexpressaparticularpurpose,needtouseConceptAconceptoftheallegedtargetB;②withtheConceptAreferstoB,AandBshallbethesameina‘cognitiveframework’within;③Inthesamecognitiveframework,AandBarecloselyrelated,becausetheactivationofA,B(generallyonlyB)willbeactivatedwith;④AtobeactivatedwithB,Ainthecognitive‘significantdegree’mustbegreaterthanB;⑤AandB,metonymyisacognitiveframeworkinthemodelassociated,thisassociationcanbecalledafunctionfromAtoBrelationship.‘

Themodelusesoneofthemostobviousexampleisthis:‘litthestove.’Istousethestove(conceptA)firemetonymy(thetargetconceptB),stovesandfirewiththe‘container-thecontentsof’thecognitiveframework,twocloselyrelatedconceptsactivatethefurnacewiththeconceptofthefirewillactivate.stovefireinthecognitivethansignificant,thestoveisvisible,butthefireinthestovewhichisinvisible.thefirewaslit,wenotseethefireburning,butthestoveinthesmoke,whichisthemetonymyofthegenerallaw.

Mr.ShenJiaxuanalsopointedoutthatpeopleexperiencecognitiveframeworkisestablishedbetweentheconceptandtheconceptassociatedwitharelativelyfixedpattern,forpeople,experienceavarietyofframeworkisanaturaltypeofcommoncognitiveframeworkare:container-content;whole-part;licensedperson-licensedmaterial;laborauthor-tools;objects-traits;institutions-location;parties-act/experience;agent-(tool)-Action-Shoushi/results;agent-action-andthings/goals-Shoushi,forexample:

Hedrankthreebottles.(Refertothecontentsofthecontainer)

Iteachsenior.(Hierarchicallevelreferstostudents)

Metonymythereisanotherimportantconceptoftheterm‘significantdegree.’Asignificantdegreeofeffectisverycommonineverydaylife.AmetonymyB,AandBinadditiontothesamecognitiveframework,AthanBmustalsobesignificant,accordingtoMr.ShenXuan’spointofview,asignificantdegreemainlydependsonfourareas:

1alook,‘a(chǎn)ndpartoftheoverallsignificancelevel’Significantpartofthewholethanthegeneral,sothere,‘hetookabottleofwater’inhisturnthathehands;‘holdingahammer,’infact,onlyahammerinhishandthehandle.

2Second,lookat‘therelativecontentofthecontainerandasignificantdegree.’

Significantlybetterthanthecontentsofthegeneralcontainer,suchas‘drinkthreebottlesof’means‘todrinkthebottleofwine.’

3Third,lookat‘permanentandtemporarycharactertraitsrelativelysignificantdegree.’

‘White’isthedifferenceofthenatureoftheadjective,so‘white’canturnrefersto‘white’and‘white’isthestateadjectiveisdescriptive,so‘white’cannotturnrefersto‘whiteofpaper.‘cognitivelinguisticsthatisthemainreasontousepropertiestoaclassofthingsofthingsofthiskindofmetonymy,thistraitmustbepermanentratherthantemporarycharactertraitsofaclassofthingseternalinthehumantraitstothebraintoformtheimpressionofsuchremarkablethings.

4fourtosee‘thetermcanbeasignificantdegreeandnature’Termsofthehigherlife,andcanbesignificantlyhigherdegree,thestrongerandthereforeasignificantdegreeofpropernounsthancommonnouns.‘RecyclinginthesoutheastcoastofseveralHongKong’,HongKongisasignificantterm.

5fivevisits‘contextofthesignificantdegreeofcontrol’ofContext(thecontext)istobethegeneralperceptionisnotincludedwithintheframeworkoftheconceptoftemporarycognitiveframework.Contextofageneraltendencyofregulation:thecloserthetwoconcepts,thegreatertheforce,suchas:generalWedonotsay‘Xiaohong,eyeslarge,Xiaoyun’snot.’andthat‘XiaohongeyesarebetterthanXiaoyunbig.’Linkstofreedownload

Understandthebasicconceptsofmetonymytwolater,welookatthelanguageofmetonymyincertainapplications:First,onthe‘degreeadverb+noun’phenomenon,criminaljusticeFusaid:‘Fromthesemanticperspective,atypicaltermaccesstosuchstructuresarenotusingtheprimordialsense,butatemporarygiventhe‘differentsenseof’meaning.

①Theman’snameiswoman.

②HeisverylonginChina.

Here,‘Woman,China’clearlythanthe‘light,elegant,’‘blackhairandyellowskin’moreeasytoidentify,processandmemory,whichhasahigh‘significantdegree.’Indeed,thetermofsuchstructuresactuallynotageneralsenseoftheterm,thatisexpressedinthesewordsbeforeandafterthedifferentconcepts,sowecanputarationalmeaningofthetermiscalledtheconceptA,theterminthe‘degreeadverb+noun’structureshownsignificanceofaconceptB,andasignificantdegreeofConceptAConceptBhigherthanthisismetonymyinthelanguageofanapplication.

Second,metonymyasacognitivemechanismfortheconversionoftheChineseobjectalsoplayedanimportantroleofhumanthinkingwithmetonymy,soinlanguageuse,thiswillbeamanifestationoftheunconsciousnatureofmetonymy.toolsandmethodscanbeacomponentobject,partlybecauseoftheirownwiththenewinformation,suchas‘calligraphy’,the‘word’didnotoccur.Becausethe‘word’is‘write’theconventionalobject,even‘theword’donotsayit,peopleknowthat‘write’anything.Andifthe‘brush’doobject,then,canthisnewinformationtoolhasahigherdominantdegree.verbpositionallowingdirectobjectappearsindifferentthematicroles,suchas‘eatcafeteria,’‘reflectsenvironmentEveryday.’thesedifferentthematicrolesbelongto‘eat’thesemanticframework,inconceptwiththeproximity.‘matter,weranseveraltimesthe’numberofthisobject,thespeakertoreflectthenatureofthingsbeaccomplishedwhilethenumberonthedirectobjectposition,makingthisnewinformationishighlighted.Inaddition,thenumberofobjectcanbetoexpresssimple,toachieveeconomicresults.

Third,thetautologywords(tautologicalutterance)istheverbalcommunicationinaninterestinglinguisticphenomenon,surfacewordstautologyisacumbersomeexpression,butinfacthasarichcommunicativecontent.ItisconciseandpragmaticfunctionsForexample:

(1)half-daymeeting,shehadnotcome.Whatwomanisawoman!

(2)Yousee,evenontheroadtoeatthefoodshegaveyouareready,whetherawomanisawoman!(3)workefficiencyprocrastination,whatawomanisawoman!Thethreeexamplesinthesecond‘woman’activatedand‘woman’inthiscategoryrelatedtocharacteristicsofwomen:womenprocrastination;womancautious,conscientious;womendonotdosomethingdecisive,etc.heareruseofcognitivecontext,thesethreesentencesformetonymicreasoning,activatescorrespondingpart,youcangetacorrectunderstandingoftheright.

Fourth:euphemismisthatpeopletrytoavoiddirectuseofunpleasantwordsandtheuseofanunknownthatcanmakepeoplefeelhappytosay.Euphemismfortheunderstandingoftheprinciplesofpolitenesspragmaticscanmakebetterexplanation,whiletheexpressionofcognitivelinguistics,metaphorcanbefurthertransittorevealthecognitivemechanismofeuphemism,suchas:peopledonot‘stool,urine,’insteadof‘gotothebathroom(toilet),’thegentlewordstoexpress;‘buried’asthe‘buried’;‘trash’into‘cleanbox’;Chineseabusesinsomeofthewords:NB,TMD,NMD,EnglishintheBO-generationbodyodor(bodyodor).Theseareactuallymetonymyatwork,butpeopledonotknowifthisismetonymy,thatthisisjustaeuphemismisasubstitutionofwordsonly.

Inshort,metonymyinlanguagethatreflectsnotonlytheabove,therearemanyherefarmoreprominentinafewsimpleandelaborate.Metonymyisoneofthefoundationsofourknowledge,thisisreflectedinthecognitivebasislanguagewhichisanaturalthing,sowehadsomelinguisticphenomenahavemanydifferentinterpretations,andnowhavebeenareasonableexplanation.tounderstandlanguagesyntax,semantics,pragmaticscannotbeunderstoodinisolation,putthethreetogether,becauselanguageinthefinalanalysisis

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論