提單轉(zhuǎn)讓的法律效力探析,國際商法論文

提單轉(zhuǎn)讓的法律效力探析,國際商法論文本篇論文目錄導(dǎo)航：【題目】提單轉(zhuǎn)讓的法律效力探析【從提單本身性質(zhì)和功能入手，并框定住研究的可轉(zhuǎn)讓提單的類型和方式，比擬分析一般債的轉(zhuǎn)移和票據(jù)流通，得出提單轉(zhuǎn)讓系介于兩者之間，具有一定的特殊性。第二部分筆者通過總結(jié)在運(yùn)輸領(lǐng)域中提單轉(zhuǎn)讓中權(quán)利來源的理論問題，以為提單轉(zhuǎn)讓的權(quán)利來自于運(yùn)輸合同的部分權(quán)利讓與，并由此對提單持有人和承運(yùn)人之間在提單轉(zhuǎn)讓經(jīng)過中轉(zhuǎn)讓的權(quán)利內(nèi)容進(jìn)行研究，進(jìn)而分析提單轉(zhuǎn)讓的債權(quán)效力；在國際貨物貿(mào)易領(lǐng)域中，對于提單本身的物權(quán)憑證功能進(jìn)行理論分析，并得出提單的物權(quán)憑證功能并沒有消失的結(jié)論，并進(jìn)一步討論提單實(shí)際是代表的是對運(yùn)輸合同項(xiàng)下貨物的占有權(quán)。第三部分從(鹿特丹規(guī)則〕對于該問題牽涉到的制度和規(guī)范的新發(fā)展和新變化著眼，對于運(yùn)輸單證和電子運(yùn)輸記錄制度、貨物控制權(quán)制度作出重點(diǎn)介紹，分析(鹿特丹規(guī)則〕項(xiàng)下的提單轉(zhuǎn)讓效力問題的變化。第四部分提出我們國家(海商法〕在修改時應(yīng)建立完善的運(yùn)輸單證轉(zhuǎn)讓制度，并有效借鑒和有選擇的采納(鹿特丹規(guī)則〕中對于運(yùn)輸單證轉(zhuǎn)讓的問題的規(guī)定，最后為我們國家(海商法〕的修改提出幾點(diǎn)建議。本文關(guān)鍵詞語：提單轉(zhuǎn)讓的效力，鹿特丹規(guī)則，海商法修改AbstractDuringintheinternationalsalesofgoods,simplythetraditionalwaytotradehardlykeeppacewiththetimes,thenegotiationofthebillofladingisbeingwidelyused,throughlong-termtradinghabits,inordertoachievesalesofgoodsthoughthetransferofthebilloflading.Billofladingisatransportdocumentsinthefieldofinternationalcarriageofgoodsbysea,itsultimatepurposeistoservethetradebetter,becauseofthefunctionandattributesofthebilloflading,namelythereceiptofgoodsandtheprooftothecontractofcarriageofgoods,anddocumentoftitle,theyplayaveryimportantroleintheprocessoftransportationandtradeofgoods.Itmeansthenegotiabilityofthebillofladinggivevitalitytothebilloflading,thisthesisfocusesonthevalidityofthetransferofthebilloflading,namelystudyonthelegalconsequencestotherelatedpartieswhenthetransferofthebilloflading,theauthorfocusontheRotterdamrules,althoughtheconventiondoesnottakeeffectuntilnow,buttheauthorconsidersitsmodernityandadvancingandprospectiveisinconformitywiththeinternationaltrendofthelegislationofcarriageofgoodsbysea,andthedevelopmentandchangeoftheRotterdamrulesprovidesanewperspectivetostudythevalidityofthetransferofthebillofladingalso,suchaswhatisthedifferenceandconnectionintheRotterdamrulesbetweenthetransportdocumentandelectronictransportrecordsandthetraditionalbilloflading;whetherbillofladinghasbeenabandonedbytheshippingpracticeandwithdrewfromthehistoricalstageornot;IntheRotterdamruleswhetherthedocumentoftitleofthenegotiabletransportdocumentshavebeendisappearedornot,ifithasbeennotdisappeared,sohowtoreflectthevalidityofdocumentofthetitlewhenthetransferofthebilloflading;UndertheframeworkoftheRotterdamruleshowtodefineforthecarrier,theshipper,theholderofthebilloflading,whenthetransferofthebillofladinghowthelegalconsequencesforthepartiesabovementioned,whatscopeoftheirrespectiverightsandobligations.ThesystemofthetransferofrightintheRotterdamrulesmakesupportforthemodificationofmaritimelaw.Withtheseproblemsbycomparinganalysisandtextanalysis,inchapteronetheauthorcarriesonthepreliminarystudyfortheproblemofthevalidityofthetransferofthebilloflading,thisthesisstartsfromthefunctionsofbillofladingitself,andfromtheperspectiveandtypeofthenegotiablebilloflading,makeacomparativeanalysisbetweenthegeneraldebttransferandinstrumentnegotiation,itisconcludedthatthebillofladingtransfersystemisaparticularitysystembetweenthem.Thechaptertwotheauthorsummarizesthesourceofbillofladinginthetransferofrightsinthefieldoftransportofgoods,considerthatthetransferofrightofthebillofladingisfromthepartialassignmentofthecontract,andmakeresearchontherightcontentintheprocessoftransferofthebillofladingbetweentheholderofthebillofladingandthecarrier,andfurtheranalyzedonthevalidityofthetransferofbilloflading;Inthefieldofinternationaltradeofgoods,focusonthedocumentoftitleofthebillofladingitselfthroughtheoreticalanalysisandmakeaconclusionthatthedocumentoftitleofthebillofladingdidnotdisappear,andfurtherdiscussionofthebillofladingisactuallyrepresentsthepossessionofgoodsunderthecontractofcarriage.ThethirdpartfromtherespectiveoftheRotterdamrulesaboutthethenewdevelopmentandchangeofspecificationsfortheproblemsinvolved,especiallyfocusonthetransportdocumentsandelectronicrecordssystemandthegoodscontrolsystem,sothatmaketheanalysisundertheframeoftheRotterdamrulesabouttheeffectchangeofthetransferofthebilloflading.Thefourthpartwhenthemodifyingthemaritimelawweshallestablishthesystemofthetransferofthebilloflading,andtaketheeffectivereferenceandselectiveadoptionoftheRotterdamrulesforit,finallyputforwardsomesuggestionforthemodificationofmaritimelaw.KeyWords:TheValidityofTransferoftheBillofLading,TheRotterdamRules,ModificationofMaritimeLaw目錄內(nèi)容摘要Abstract目錄一、引言〔一〕問題的提出〔二〕選題的背景和意義〔三〕研究方式方法和文章構(gòu)造二、提單轉(zhuǎn)讓概述〔一〕可轉(zhuǎn)讓提單的類型和方式1.提單和運(yùn)輸單證的關(guān)系3.提單轉(zhuǎn)讓的方式〔二〕提單的性質(zhì)和含義1.提單的可轉(zhuǎn)讓性2.提單轉(zhuǎn)讓的含義〔1〕提單轉(zhuǎn)讓與債的轉(zhuǎn)移的比擬分析〔2〕提單轉(zhuǎn)讓與票據(jù)流通的比擬〔三〕提單的功能三、提單轉(zhuǎn)讓的屬性〔一〕提單功能屬性對提單轉(zhuǎn)讓效力的作用〔二〕提單轉(zhuǎn)讓的債權(quán)效力1.提單轉(zhuǎn)讓債權(quán)效力的理論學(xué)講2、提單轉(zhuǎn)讓對提單持有人的效力〔1〕提單持有人的權(quán)利〔2〕提單持有人的義務(wù)〔3〕提單轉(zhuǎn)讓對托運(yùn)人的效力〔4〕提單轉(zhuǎn)讓對承運(yùn)人的效力〔三〕提單轉(zhuǎn)讓的物權(quán)效力1.提單的物權(quán)憑證