版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
考研英語一閱讀歷年真題Text3Consumersmaycreate“earned”mediawhentheyareobscssedwithonlineshoppingatcertainWebsitesinspiredbyproduct-promotinge-mailssenttothemeagertohelptheirfriendspromotequalityproductsAccordingtoParagraph2,soldmediafeatureasafebusinessenvironment.[C]strongusertrafficflexibilityinorganizationTheauthorindicatesinParagraph3thatearnedmediainviteconstantconflictswithpassionateconsumerscanbeusedtoproducenegativeeffectsinmarketingToyotaMotor‘sexperienceiscitedasanexampleofrespondingeffectivelytohijackedmediapersuadingcustomersintoboycottingproductscooperatingwithsupportiveconsumerstakingadvantageofhijackedmediaWhichofthefollowingisthetextmainlyabout?AlternativestoconventionalpaidmediaConflictbetweenhijackedandearnedmediaDominanceofhijackedmedia[D]Popularityofownedmedia.Text3ThejournalScienceisaddinganextrasourceatPeer-reviewprocess,editor-in-chiefMarciaMcNottannouncedtoday.TheFollowssimilareffortsfromotherjournals,afterwidespreadconcernthatMistakesindataanalysisarecontributingtothePublishedresearchfindings."Readersmusthaveconfidenceintheconclusionspublishedinourjournal,"writesMcNuttinaneditorial.WorkingwiththeAmericanStatisticalAssociation,theJournalhasappointedsevenexpertstoastatisticsboardofreviewingManuscriptwillbeflaggedupforadditionalscrutinybytheJournal'seditors,orbyitsexistingBoardofReviewingEditorsorbyoutsidepeerTheSBoREpanelwillthenfindexternalstatisticianstoreviewtheseAskedwhetheranyparticularpapershadimpelledthechange,McNuttsaid,"Thecreationofthe'statisticsboard'wasmotivatedbyconcernsbroadlywiththeapplicationofstatisticsanddataanalysisinscientificresearchandispartofScience'soveralldrivetoincreasereproducibilityintheresearchwepublish."GiovanniParmigiani,abiostatisticianattheHarvardSchoolofPublicHealth,amemberoftheSBoREgroup,saysheexpectstheboardto"playprimarilyonadvisoryrole."Heagreedtojoinbecausehe"foundtheforesightbehindtheestablishmentoftheSBoREtobenovel,uniqueandlikelytohavealastingimpact.ThisimpactwillnotonlybethroughthepublicationsinScienceitself,buthopefullythroughalargergroupofpublishingplacesthatmaywanttomodeltheirapproachafterScience."31.ItcanbelearnedfromParagraphIthatScienceintendstosimplifyitspeer-reviewprocess.journalsarestrengtheningtheirstatisticalchecksfewjournalsareblamedformistakesindataanalysis.Thephrase"flaggedup"(Para.2)istheclosestinmeaningtofound.revised.markedstoredGiovanniParmigianibelievesthattheestablishmentoftheSBoREmayposeathreattoallitspeersmeetwithstrongoppositionincreaseScience'scirculation.setanexampleforotherjournalsDavidVauxholdsthatwhatScienceisdoingnowaddstoresearchers'worklosd.diminishestheroleofreviewers.hasroomforfurtherimprovement.istofailintheforeseeablefuture.Whichofthefollowingisthebesttitleofthetext?ScienceJoinsPushtoScreenStatisticsinPapersProfessionalStatisticiansDeserveMoreRespectDataAnalysisFindsItsWayontoEditors'DesksText3DeepMindhasalmostapologized.TheNHStrusthasmendeditsways.Furtherarrangements-andtheremaybemany-betweentheNHSandDeepMindwillbecarefullyscrutinisedtoensurethatallnecessarypermissionshavebeenaskedofpatientsandallunnecessarydatahasbeencleaned.Therearelessonsaboutinformedpatientconsenttolearn.Butprivacyisnottheonlyangleinthiscaseandnoteventhemostimportant.MsDenhamchosetoconcentratetheblameontheNHStrust,sinceunderexistinglawit“controlled”thedataandDeepMindmerely“processed"it.Butthisdistinctionmissesthepointthatitisprocessingandaggregation,notthemerepossessionofbits,thatgivesthedatavalue.WhaistrueoftheagreementbetweentheNHSandDeepMind?Itcausedconflictsamongtechgiants.Itfailedtopaydueattentiontopatient'srights.Itfellshortofthelatter'sexpectationsItputbothsidesintoadangeroussituation.TheNHStrustrespondedtoDenham'sverdictwithemptypromises.toughresistance.necessaryadjustments.sincereapologies.TheauthorarguesinParagraph2thatprivacyprotectionmustbesecuredatallcostsleakingpatients'dataisworsethansellingit.makingprofitsfrompatients'dataisillegal.Accordingtothelastparagraph,therealworryarisingfromthisdealistheviciousrivalryamongbigpharmas.theineffectiveenforcementofprivacylaw.theuncontrolleduseofnewsoftware.themonopolyofbigdatabytechgiants.Theauthor'sattitudetowardtheapplicationofAItohealthcareisambiguous.cautious.appreciative.contemptuous.Text3TheUS$3-millionFundamentalphysicsprizeisindeedaninterestingexperiment,asAlexanderPolyakovsaidwhenheacceptedthisyear'sawardinMarch.Anditisfarfromtheonlyoneofitstype.AsaNewsFeaturearticleinNaturediscusses,astringoflucrativeawardsforresearchershavejoinedtheNobelPrizesinrecentyears.Many,liketheFundamentalPhysicsPrize,arefundedfromthetelephone-number-sizedbankaccountsofInternetentrepreneurs.Thesebenefactorshavesucceededintheirchosenfields,theysay,andtheywanttousetheirwealthtodrawattentiontothosewhohavesucceededinscience.What'snottolike?Quitealot,accordingtoahandfulofscientistsquotedintheNewsFeature.Youcannotbuyclass,astheoldsayinggoes,andtheseupstartentrepreneurscannotbuytheirprizestheprestigeoftheNobels,Thenewawardsareanexerciseinself-promotionforthosebehindthem,sayscientists.Theycoulddistorttheachievement-basedsystemofpeer-review-ledresearch.Theycouldcementthestatusquoofpeer-reviewedresearch.Theydonotfundpeer-reviewedresearch.Theyperpetuatethemythofthelonegenius.Thegoalsoftheprize-giversseemasscatteredasthecriticism.Somewanttoshock,otherstodrawpeopleintoscience,ortobetterrewardthosewhohavemadetheircareersinresearch.真題解析:文章主題及背景知識:此篇閱讀的主題內(nèi)容為“基礎(chǔ)物理學(xué)獎”,如果對于這一背景信息有所了解,這篇文章便可輕松看懂,做題更是十拿九穩(wěn)!與2022年相比,2022考研閱讀文章同樣注重時效性,Text3便是反應(yīng)了2022年3月份的一次實時事件:基礎(chǔ)物理學(xué)基金會于3月20日晚在瑞士日內(nèi)瓦揭曉了2022年基礎(chǔ)物理學(xué)獎!所以2022考研的同學(xué)們一定要多多關(guān)注社會熱點話題,拓展視野,豐富自己的文化背景知識,這樣才能取得事半功倍的效果!TheFundamentalPhysicalPrizeisseenasasymboloftheentrepreneurs'swealth.apossiblereplacementoftheNobelPrize.anexampleofbankers'investment.ahandsomerewardforresearchers.答案:A為細(xì)節(jié)題。根據(jù)題干中的FundamentalPhysicsPrize可以定位到第一段,但除此之外就沒有其他細(xì)節(jié)提示信息了,所以我們只能根據(jù)幾個選項去定位,分別根據(jù)選項中的entrepreneursNobelPrize、investment、reward去定位,在第一段末句找到了與A選項相一致的句子,則判定A選項正確。Thephrase“tosignon”(Line3,Para.2)mostprobablymeanstheprofit-orientedscientists.thefoundersofthenewaward.theachievement-basedsystem.peer-review-ledresearch.答案:B為細(xì)節(jié)題。根據(jù)題干中的critics定位到第三段,可知第二段沒有出題,從第三段第二句可以得出本道題的正確選項,whohavemadetheircareersinresearch即為B選項中的Thefounders。Whatpromoted
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 個人古籍保護(hù)貸款還款協(xié)議
- 產(chǎn)業(yè)環(huán)境寫字樓物業(yè)管理與思考
- 人力資源合作合同書樣本
- 企業(yè)信用擔(dān)保協(xié)議書
- 企業(yè)生態(tài)管理貸款合同模板
- 人力資源合作協(xié)議書格式及樣板
- 倉庫安全管理制度專業(yè)化
- 企業(yè)收縮管理體系建設(shè)
- 舉報箱管理緊急預(yù)案
- 代理記賬委托協(xié)議
- 民政局離婚協(xié)議書范文模板標(biāo)準(zhǔn)版
- 2024年江蘇鑫郵投資發(fā)展集團(tuán)限公司(國企業(yè))公開招聘工作人員高頻難、易錯點500題模擬試題附帶答案詳解
- 二次函數(shù)專題知識點-???典型)題型-重難點題型(含詳細(xì)答案)
- 彩鋼板屋面拆除、更換屋面板施工方案改
- 《紅星照耀中國》知識點
- 醫(yī)師執(zhí)業(yè)、變更執(zhí)業(yè)、多機(jī)構(gòu)備案申請審核表
- 2024新人教版初中七年級英語上冊UnitMyschool大單元整體教學(xué)設(shè)計
- 項目建筑智能化工程施工招標(biāo)文件模板
- 輔助生殖技術(shù)并發(fā)癥的護(hù)理
- 項目經(jīng)理或管理招聘面試題及回答建議(某大型國企)
- 2023-2024學(xué)年北京東城區(qū)初二語文(上)期中考試卷附答案解析
評論
0/150
提交評論