研究設(shè)計(jì)之測(cè)量_第1頁(yè)
研究設(shè)計(jì)之測(cè)量_第2頁(yè)
研究設(shè)計(jì)之測(cè)量_第3頁(yè)
研究設(shè)計(jì)之測(cè)量_第4頁(yè)
研究設(shè)計(jì)之測(cè)量_第5頁(yè)
已閱讀5頁(yè),還剩35頁(yè)未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

研究設(shè)計(jì)之

測(cè)量SchoolofPublicAdministration&PolicyDr.KaifengYangIssues概念操作化概念化指標(biāo)化測(cè)量旳層次復(fù)合指數(shù)測(cè)量測(cè)量旳好壞:效度與信度提升效度與信度旳途徑概念操作化

溝通績(jī)效?目的清楚度?例子溝通績(jī)效?目的清楚度?從名義/概念定義到操作定義Nominal(Conceptual)Definition

Adefinitionthatissimplyassignedtoatermwithoutanyclaimthatthedefinitionrepresentsa“real”entity.ItisA)definedbyothers;b)whatitisvs.whatitisnot;c)shared;d)realisticandsensible.Operational(Working)Definition

Specifiespreciselyhowaconceptwillbemeasured菜譜概念化 Theprocess…wespecifywhatwemeanwhenweuseparticularterms.Itinvolvesdescribingtheessentialfeaturesoftheterms.Sometimes,itinvolvesindicatorswe’llbeusingtomeasureourconceptandthedifferentaspectsoftheconcept(dimensions).

Indicator(指標(biāo)):

asignofthepresenceorabsenceoftheconceptDimension(緯度/變量):

aspecifiableaspectofaconcept愛(ài)?指標(biāo)化:PoliticalAlienationConceptualizationDefiningtheconceptNominalDefinition(Variables)OperationalDefinition(Indicators)InstrumentationPoliticaldistrust,powerlessness,andmeaninglessnessPoliticalDistrust:thegeneralfeelingthatgovernmentisnolongerofthepeople,bythepeople,andforthepeopleIndicatorsareresponsestothefollowingquestions:Doyouthinkthatquiteafewofthepeoplerunningthegovernmentarealittlecrooked,notverymanyare,ordoyouthinkthathardlyanyarecrookatall?Howmuchofthetimedoyouthinkyoucantrust thegovernmenttodowhatisright?Wouldyousaythatthegovernmentisprettymuch runbyafewbiginterestslookingoutforthemselves orthatitisrunforthebenefitofallpeople?GeneralSocialSurvey,2023,NationalOpinionResearchTheoryabstractDataConcrete指標(biāo)化:OtherExamplesLiteracy:ThecompletionofsixyearsofformaleducationThosenationsinwhichatleast50percentofthepopulationhashadsixyearsofformaleducation,asindicatedinapublicationoftheUnitedNationsDemocracy:AsystemofgovernmentinwhichpublicofficialsareselectedincompetitiveelectionsThosecountriesinwhichthesecond-placefinishersinelectionsforthechiefexecutiveofficehasreceivedatleast25percentofthevoteatleastonceinthepasteightyearsTooperationalizeyourconceptsisarbitrary,butyouhavetomakesomejustificationifnotbasedoncommonliteratureorpolicy.指標(biāo)化:例子SocialStatusEducationIncomeOccupationNumbersofschoolyearscompletedCrossfamilyincomelastyearBluecollar,whitecollar,orprofessionalPoliticalParticipationVotingCampaigncontributionAttendpoliticalrally“Didyouvoteinthelast…”“Didyoucontributeto…”“Haveyouattendeda…”ConceptVariableOperationalDefinitionInthesamplearticle?

CommunicationPerformanceConceptualizationNominalDefinition(Variables)OperationalDefinition(Indicators)InstrumentationExternalCommunicationPerformancep.49Reverse:從問(wèn)題/數(shù)據(jù)到概念?“Howmanytimesaweekdoyoudrinkanalcoholicbeverage?”1.None 2.1~2 3.3~54.5~75.7~106.>10Percentageofanation’spopulationthatisliterate“Ioftenfeellonely”

1.agree 2.disagree“numberofhoursofsleepeachnight”“numberoftripstakenabroadeachyearbypresidents”指標(biāo)與概念旳不完全契合概念指標(biāo)2指標(biāo)3指標(biāo)5指標(biāo)4指標(biāo)1LevelofMeasurement“Howmanytimesaweekdoyoudrinkanalcoholicbeverage?”1.None 2.1~2 3.3~54.5~75.7~106.>10“Howmanytimesaweekdoyoudrinkanalcoholicbeverage?”_____“Doyouthinkyouareaddictedtoalcohol?

1.Yes 2.No“Iamalcoholic.”

1.Stronglyagree2.Agree3.Neutral4.Disagree5.StronglyDisagreePrecision/LevelofMeasurementNominalMeasures(定類(lèi)) exhaustiveandmutualexclusivecategories;noneismoreorlessthananotherOrdinalMeasures(定序) canlogicallyrank-order:withmoreorlessofparticularattributeIntervalMeasures(定距) Howmuchsmallerorlarger;thedistancebetweeneachunitonthescalemustbethesame;RatiosMeasures(定比) Intervalmeasures;thezeropointhasatruemeaning(absenceofthecharacteristicbeingmeasured)LevelofMeasurementLevelofMeasurement選擇測(cè)量層次假如可能,選擇定比/定距受其他原因影響變量本身旳特點(diǎn)敏感性(如收入)信度與效度PracticesYouhavedataontheannualsalaryof200employeesofanorganization.Howthedatacanbepresentedasratio,interval,ordinal,andnominaldata?復(fù)合指數(shù)測(cè)量:什么是?復(fù)合指數(shù)測(cè)量:為何?概念指標(biāo)2指標(biāo)3指標(biāo)5指標(biāo)4指標(biāo)1例子:怎么測(cè)量國(guó)家旳“自由”程度?(Country)12345Privatelyownednewspapers10001Legalrighttoformpoliticalparties11000Contestedelectionsforpublicoffices11000Votingrightsformostoftheadults11010Limitationsongovernment’sabilitytoincarceratecitizens10001Indexscore530121=Yes;0=No.李克特量表LikertFormat(forotherformats,refertothetextbook)SD1D2U3A4SA5PrivatelyownednewspapersLegalrighttoformpoliticalpartiesContestedelectionsforpublicofficesIndexscoreforObservationx15or15/3=5測(cè)量旳好壞? Howdoyoumeasureindividuals’alcoholaddiction?“Howmanytimesaweekdoyoudrinkanalcoholicbeverage?”1.None 2.1~2 3.3~54.5~75.7~106.>10“Howmanytimesaweekdoyoudrinkanalcoholicbeverage?”_____“Doyouthinkyouareaddictedtoalcohol?

1.Yes 2.No“Iamalcoholic.”

1.Stronglyagree2.Agree3.Neutral4.Disagree5.StronglyDisagreeHowmanybottlesofalcoholdoyounormallydrinkforaweek?____Howmanybottlesofalcoholdoyounormallydrinkforaday?測(cè)量旳精確度Towhatextentareyoumeasuringwhatyouintendedtomeasure?Ideal:Measurementerroris0Measurement=Intendedcharacteristic+Systematicerror+RandomerrorSystematicerrorisdurableRandomerroristemporaryPre-test=MathAbility+____+_____

精確度:信度Reliability:producesameresultsoverrepeatedapplications.StabilityandConsistencyTest-Retestmethod再測(cè)信度 *Twotimes *maturation *sensitivityAlternativeformat復(fù)本信度 *twotimes *maturationSplit-Halvesmethod(multiplemeasures,oneconcept)折半信度Sub-samplemethod

亞樣本信度Split-Halves MeasuringPerformancemeasurement(PM)effectivenessOurPMinformationcanbetrustedOurPMhelpsmanagerialdecisionsOurPMimprovescommunicationbetweencityhallandusOurPMhelpelectedofficialsformulatebudgetOurPMindictorsreflectourmanagementeffectivenessOurPMindictorsarereliableOurinvestmentinPMisworthwhileOurPMimprovesproductivityOurPMmotivatesemployeesOurPMhelpsadjustingstrategicplanning精確度:效度Validity:theextenttowhichanempiricalmeasureadequatelyreflectstherealmeaningoftheconceptunderconsideration.Facevalidity表面效度:Doesitappear…?Judgment!Contentvalidity內(nèi)容效度:Goteverythingin?Consensualvalidity共識(shí)效度:Everybodyagrees!Constructvalidity—Criterion-relatedvalidity *Predictivevalidity *ConcurrentvalidityInteritemassociationDiscriminantvalidity測(cè)量誤差與信度、效度Measurement=Intendedcharacteristic+Systematicerror+RandomerrorSystematicerrorisdurable,affectingvalidityRandomerroristemporary,affectingmoreonreliabilityWhichofthefollowingquestionsconcernsreliability?WhatdoestheScholasticAptitudeTest(SAT)reallymeasure?

Doattitudescalesreallytappersonalfeelingsorjustwhatpeoplethinkinvestigatorswanttohear?Ispovertybestrepresentedbymeasuresoflowabsoluteincome(aminimumsubsistence)orlowrelativeincome(e.g.,50%ofnationalmedianincome)?Howcloselydoesself-reportedchurchattendancecorrespondtoactualchurchattendance?Arescoresontheeven-numberedandodd-numbereditemsonthistesthighlycorrelated? Researchindicatesthatinrecentyearsrespondents’answerstosurveyquestionsmeasuringracialprejudiceunderestimateactualracialprejudice.Thisunderestimateisanexampleof__________measurementerror,whichaffectsmeasurement__________.random;reliabilityrandom;reliabilityandvaliditysystematic;validitysystematic;reliabilityandvalidity Systematicerrorwouldbeleastlikelytooccurwithwhichofthefollowingmeasures?amiscalibratedyardstickthatisaninchshortanIQtestdeve

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論