版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
WORKING
PAPER23-4
What
caused
the
US
pandemic-erainflation?BenBernankeandOlivierBlanchardJune2023ABSTRACTWe
answerthequestionposedby
thetitleby
specifyingandestimatingasimpledynamicmodelofprices,wages,andshort-runandlong-runinflationexpectations.Theestimatedmodelallowsusto
analyzethedirectandindirecteffectsofproduct-marketandlabor-marketshocksonpricesandnominalwagesandto
quantifythesourcesofUSpandemic-erainflationandwage
growth.
We
findthat,contraryto
earlyconcernsthatinflationwouldbespurredby
overheatedlabormarkets,mostoftheinflationsurgethatbeganin2021wastheresultofshocksto
pricesgivenwages.Theseshocksincludedsharpincreasesincommodityprices,reflectingstrongaggregatedemand,andsectoralpricespikes,resultingfromchangesinthelevelandsectoralcompositionofdemandtogetherwithconstraintsonsectoralsupply.
However,
althoughtightlabormarketshave
thusfarnotbeentheprimarydriverofinflation,we
findthattheeffectsofoverheatedlabormarketsonnominalwage
growthandinflationare
morepersistentthantheeffectsofproduct-marketshocks.Controllinginflationwillthusultimatelyrequireachievingabetterbalancebetweenlabordemandandlaborsupply.BenBernankeisDistinguishedSeniorFellowattheHutchinsCenteronFiscalandMonetaryPolicyattheBrookingsInstitution.OlivierBlanchardistheC.FredBergstenSeniorFellowatthePetersonInstituteforInternationalEconomics.JELCodes:
E31,
E37,
E52,
E6,E24Keywords:
inflation,monetarypolicy,
aggregate
demand,
Beveridge
curve,commodity
prices,
shortages,
inflation
expectationsThe
BrookingsInstitutionisfinancedthrough
thesupportofa
diverse
array
offoundations,corporations,
governments,individuals,aswell
asanendowment.A
listofdonorscanbefoundintheirannualreports
publishedonlinehere.The
findings,interpretations,andconclusionsinthisreportare
solelythoseofitsauthor(s)andare
notinfluencedbyany
donation.Note:Thispaperwaspreparedforaconference
on
the
recent
inflationheldattheHutchinsCenteronFiscalandMonetaryPolicyattheBrookingsInstitutiononMay23,2023.IthasbeenpublishedasHutchinsCenterWorkingPaper#86here.TheauthorsthankDavidReifschneiderandElaineBuckbergforhelpfulinformation,andPeterDiamond,JasonFurman,JosephGagnon,PatrickHonohan,EgorGornostay,
DanielLeigh,MauriceObstfeld,LawrenceH.Summers,RichardClarida,ángelUbide,DavidVines,andDavidWilcox
fordiscussions.Excellentresearchassistancewasprovidedby
JamesLeeandAthianaTettaravou.
TheauthorsthanktheHutchinsCenter,
theBrookingsInstitution,andthePetersonInstituteforInternationalEconomics(PIIE)forsupport.Thispaperhasbeensubjectedto
aPIIEpre-publicationdatareplicabilityreview.?
2023
The
Brookings
Institution.Allrightsreserved.IntroductionCentralbankersand
mostoutsideeconomistsfailedto
predictthesharprisein
inflationthatbegan
in2021,andpolicymakers,bothintheUnitedStatesandinotheradvancedeconomies,wereaccordinglyslowtoreact.Actionwas
furtherdelayedbytheviewthattheinflationburstwouldbetemporary.Misjudgmentsoftheeconomiceffectsofcovid-erafiscalprogramsareonepotentialexplanationofthefailuretoforecastthesubsequentinflation.FederalOpenMarketCommittee(FOMC)forecastsofinflationchangedlittlebetweentheSeptember2020andJune2021iterationsoftheSurvey
ofEconomicProjections,andtheCommitteecontinuedtoexpectthatinflationwouldreturnclosetotheFed’s2percenttargetby2023,despitecongressionalpassageofabillinDecember2020thatincluded$900billionforcovidreliefandthe$1.9trillionAmericanRescuePlansignedbyPresidentBidenin
March2021.Thesetwoprograms
cameontop
ofthe$2.2
trillionCARESAct,passedinMarch2020andsignedbyPresidentTrump,whichhadalreadystrengthenedfirms’andhouseholds’balancesheetsand
increasedfutureabilitytospend.Overall,asashareofGDP,theheadlinecostsofthesethreecovid-erafiscalpackageswereabout4-1/2timesthesizeof
theAmericanRecoveryandReinvestmentAct(ARRA),enactedinresponseto
the2008financialcrisisandtheensuingrecession.1Accordingtoconventional
economictheory,expansionaryfiscalpoliciescanstokeinflationiftheycauselabormarketstobecomeoverheatedandoutputtoexceedtheeconomy’s
potential.
Indeed,someearlyanalysesoftheAmericanRescuePlanusingstandardfiscalmultipliersconcludedthattheadditionalfederalspendingwouldindeedoverheattheeconomy,possiblyleadingtohigherinflation(Blanchard,2021;
EdelbergandSheiner,2021).Thesestudies
acknowledgeduncertaintyaboutmagnitudes,asthefiscalimpactsonemployment,output,and
inflationwoulddependonmanyfactors,includingtheeffectsofthepandemiconpotentialoutput,thesizeoftheinitialoutputgap,households’propensitiestoconsumeoutoftheone-timechecksauthorizedbythebill,
andtherelationbetweenlabormarkettightness
andinflation.Inflationoptimists(ReifschneiderandWilcox
2022)arguedthat,evenifthenewfiscalspendingweretodrivedownunemploymentbymorethan
expected,a
largeburstofinflationwas
still
unlikely,asmanystudieshadconcludedthat
thePhillipscurveis
quiteflat(thatis,
inflationisrelativelyinsensitivetolabormarkettightness),and—inlightofmorethanthreedecadesoflowinflationin
theUnitedStates—inflationexpectations
werelikelytoremain
wellanchored.Incontrast,someeconomists(includingoneoftheauthors)arguedthatwageinflation,andconsequently
price
inflation,couldrise
muchmorethanpredictedbyconventionalcalculationspredicatedonaflatPhillipscurve(Summers,2021;
Blanchard,2021).Theirconcernswerethattheincreaseinaggregatedemandlikelytoresultfromtheunprecedentedlylargefiscaltransfers,togetherwiththecumulativeeffectsoftheeasing
ofmonetary
policybeguninMarch2020,could
causemoreoverheatingofanalready-tightlabormarketthan
theoptimistsexpected.AnextremelylowunemploymentratemightinturncausethePhillipscurvetosteepen.Moreover,higherand,consequently,morepsychologically...1.
Theheadlinecost
of
theCARESActandthe
December
supplementalappropriationspackagetogethertotaledabout15percent
ofgross
domestic
product(GDP)in2020,andtheAmerican
RescuePlanwas
roughly
8percent
of2021GDP.Bycomparison,theARRAof
2009wasslightlymorethan5percentofthatyear’sGDP.________________________________________________________________________What
Caused
the
U.S.
Pandemic
-Era
Inflation?1HUTCHINS
CENTER
ON
FISCAL
&
MONETARY
POLICYsalientlevelsofinflationmightleadinflationexpectationstode-anchor,raisingthe
potentialforawage-pricespiral.Thecritics’forecastsofhigherinflationwouldprovetobecorrect—indeed,eventoooptimistic—but,insubstantialpart,thesourcesoftheinflation,atleastinitsearlystages,wouldprovetobedifferentfromthosethey
warnedabout.Thelabormarketdidtightensignificantlyin
2021and
2022,asreflectedinseveralindicators,includingunsustainablyhigh
ratesofjobcreation,an
increasingratioofjob
openings2tounemployed
workers,and
lowlevelsofquits.
But,as
this
paperwillshow,thebehaviorof
nominalwages
in
2021and
2022wasbroadlyconsistentwiththerelationstheFedhad
reliedon,andmedium-terminflationexpectations
rosemodestly
bysomemeasuresbutdidnotde-anchor.Labormarketoverheatingwouldindeedultimatelyprovetobeasourceofpersistentinflation,as
thecritics
hadexpected,butthetraditionalwagePhillipscurvemechanismwasnotthemainevent,atleastnotuntilrecently.Inretrospect,thefailuretoforecasttheinflationburst
reflectedinlargepartthefactthat,infocusingonthelabormarket,boththeFedand
itscriticsunderestimatedtheinflationarypotentialofdevelopmentsin
goodsmarkets,thatis,
fromincreasesinprices
givenwages.Theshockstopricescamefromseveralsources.First,likeotherforecasters(includingparticipantsin
commodityfuturesmarkets),mosteconomistsdid
notanticipateeitherthemagnitudeorthedurationof
theriseincommodity
pricesthatbeganin
2021.Beyond
themore-familiar(butunexpectedlylargeandsustained)shocks
tofoodandenergyprices,thepandemicitselfledtounusualdistortionsinkey
productmarkets,suchasthosefornewandusedvehicles.Strongaggregatedemandandshifts
inthecompositionofconsumerspending(e.g.,fromservicestodurablegoods)duringthepandemiccombinedwithconstraintson
supplyinsomesectorstocreateshortages
andsectoralprice
increasesnotoffsetbydecreasesin
othersectors
(Guerrierietal.,2022;diGiovanniet
al.,2023).Thesesectoralmismatchesbetweendemand
andsupply
provedmoreintractableandlonger-lastingthanmany
hadexpected.Together,theseshockstopricesgivenwageswouldprove
tobethecriticaltriggersoftherise
in
inflation.This
isthestorywedevelopinthispaper.Westartwithasimpleanalyticalmodel,focusingonthebehaviorofwages,prices,
andshortandlong-runinflationexpectations,takinglabormarketslackandshockstopricesas
given.We
showtheverydifferentdynamiceffectson
wageandpriceinflationof
overheatinginthelabormarketand
price
shocksingoodsmarkets.Appreciatingthesedifferencesisessentialforunderstandingthe
changingrelativeimportanceofthetwosourcesofinflation,andbyimplication,theevolutionofinflationovertime.Wethenestimateanempiricalversionofthemodel,allowingforagenerouslag
structuretoaccommodateflexibledynamicsandestimatingitonthepre-covidperiod.Weexaminethestabilityofthewage,price,andshortandlong-runinflationexpectationsrelationsbetweenthepre-covidandcovidperiods,takingintoaccount
therolesoflabormarkettightness,energyandfoodpriceshocks,andsectoralshortages.Weusetheestimatedmodeltodecomposethesourcesofthepandemic-erainflationintotheeffectsofthevariousshocks.Ourdecompositioncapturesgeneral
equilibriumeffects,lags,andlinkagesamongalternativesourcesofinflationoperating
throughinflationexpectationsandotherchannels.Weconcludethat
labormarkettightnessmadeatmostamodestcontributiontoinflationearlyon,resolvingthepuzzleof
howinflationcouldrise
so
muchdespiteaflat
wagePhillipscurve.Instead,mostoftheearlyactionin
inflationcamefromthegoodsmarket,in
theformofsharp
increases
insome...2.
Bycontrast,theunemployment
rate,
whichremainedclosetoFOMCprojections,showedfewersigns
of
labor
markettightening.________________________________________________________________________What
Caused
the
U.S.
Pandemic
-Era
Inflation?2HUTCHINS
CENTER
ON
FISCAL
&
MONETARY
POLICYrelativeprices,includingcommoditypricesandpricesin
sectorsinwhichstrongdemandconfrontedlimitsonsupply.Totheextentthatcommodity
pricesstabilizeandsectoralshortagesmoderate—processesthatbothseemwelladvancedasofthiswriting(June2023)—thegoods
marketcomponentofinflationis
likelytodecreasein
importance,
andthelabormarketcomponenttobecomemoredominant.Lookingforward,withlabormarket
slackstillbelowsustainablelevelsand
inflationexpectationsmodestlyhigher,weconcludethattheFed
hastoslowtheeconomytoreturninflationtotarget.Theextentofthatslowingwilldepend
howeveron
theevolutionofcertainstructuralfeatures
ofthelabormarket,notablytheefficiencyoftheprocessofmatchingworkerswithjobs.1.
ABriefLiteratureReviewMuchrecent
workhas
providedempiricalanalysesofthepandemic-erainflation.Balletal(2022)istheclosesttoours,andwelearnedfromit.They
proposea
decompositionofinflationintoweightedmedianinflation(insteadoftheconventionalcoremeasureofinflation)andaresidual,equaltoheadlineinflationlessmedian
inflation.Their
useofmedianinflationratherthemoreconventional
measureofcoreinflationis
intendedtoremovelargepricespikes,duenotonlytothepricesofenergyandfood,whichcoreinflationdoes,butalsothoseduetosectoralshortages,whichhavemadethis
inflationepisodedifferentfromearlierones.They
findthattheincreaseinoverall
inflationresultedprimarilyfromshockstotheresidual(headlinelessmedian
inflation)butthatlabormarkettightnesshas
beenanimportantandincreasingcontributortomedianinflation.Theseconclusions
arebroadlyconsistentwithours,butdifferencesinsampleperiodandmodelspecification(e.g.,theirspecificationimpliesthattheeffectsoflabormarkettightness
arefeltonlygradually)leadthemtobegenerallymorepessimisticthanwe
areaboutthecostsofreversingtheinflationsurge.Cecchettietal(2023)studytherecentinflationandtheprospectsfordisinflationinahistoricalcontext.Aswedo,
they
provideastripped-downmodeloftheinflationprocess.However,incontrasttothelargelyunconstraineddynamicsthat
weallowintheempiricalmodelpresentedbelow,they
imposeatightNewKeynesianstructure.Theyarguethatnonlinearities
inthePhillipscurveareimportantforexplaininginflation(seealsoBenignoand
Eggertsson2023,
GagnonandSarsenbayev2022).Incontrast,wefindthatalinearrelationbetweenlabormarkettightnessand
wages,estimatedonpre-coviddata,fitsthecovid-eradatareasonablywellandisadequatetoexplaintherecentbehaviorofwages.Cecchettiet
alalsoconcludethat,basedonthehistoricalrecord,disinflationislikelytobecostly,andthey
faulttheFedforfailingtotightenpolicy
pre-emptively.GagliardoneandGertler(2023)focusonthemonetary-policyoriginsoftheinflation.UsingacalibratedDSGEmodeltostructuretheiranalysis,theyarguethattheFed’scommitmenttohighemploymentinthefaceofinflationaryoil
priceshocks
explainsthesharp
rise
inthe
paceof
priceincreases.GagliardoneandGertler’sattentiontooilpriceshocks
parallelsourownfocusonfactorsdirectlyaffectingpricesgivenwages.Their
main
contributionsconcerntheroleof
theFed’sreactionfunctionandpolicyframework
in
theover-expansionof
aggregatedemandduringtherecoveryfromthepandemic—animportanttopicbutnotthefocusofourownpaper.KochandNoureldin(2023)oftheInternational
MonetaryFundconductapost-mortemoftheirinstitution’sfailuretoforecastthe(global)inflation.Likeotherpapers
intheliterature,theirwork
findsanimportantrolefor
increasedaggregatedemandand,
especially,pandemic-inducedsupplyconstraintsinsettingofftheinflation.Theyalso
pointtoover-estimationofoutputgapsasa
factorleadingtoexcessivestimulus.However,they
paylimitedattentiontodynamics,andin
particulartheyplaceless________________________________________________________________________What
Caused
the
U.S.
Pandemic
-Era
Inflation?3HUTCHINS
CENTER
ON
FISCAL
&
MONETARY
POLICYweightthan
wewouldoncommodity
priceshocksandtheir
effectsonotherprices
andinflationexpectationsovertime.2.
ASimpleModelofWage-PriceDeterminationTohelp
interpretrecentinflation
developmentswithoutimposingtoomucha
prioristructure,weuseabare-bonesbutflexiblemodelofaggregatewage-pricedetermination.Ourapproachtoinflationisaggregative,or“topdown”;witha
partial
exceptiondiscussedinthenextsection,wedo
notconsider
themicroeconomicdeterminantsofsectoralpricechanges,e.g.,factorsaffectingthebehaviorofrentsorthedifferentialimpactofthepandemicondifferentindustries.Ourmodelreducestofourequations,whichjointlydeterminenominal
wages,prices,andshort-runandlong-run
inflationexpectations.Asalreadynoted,whenwetakethebare-bonesmodeltothedatainthenextsectionweincorporateamoreflexiblelagstructure,toallowforricherdynamics,and
includemeasuresofkeyshockstoproductandlabormarketstoaccountmoreexplicitlyfortheforcesaffectinginflation.ThewageequationWestartwithanaggregatewage
equation.We
makethestandardassumptionsthatnominalwagesdependontheexpected
pricelevelandthedegreeoflabormarketslack.Inadeparturefromthestandardspecification,wepursuethequestionof
whetherworkersacceptlossesin
purchasingpowerresultingfromunanticipatedpriceshocks,orwhetherinstead,intheirwagebargaining,theytryto“catch
up”
withpriorinflation.3Specifically,weassumethatthenominalwage
w
ineachquarterdependsontheexpectedpriceforthatquarter
??,anaspirationrealwage
??
(seebelow),and
anindicatorofthetightnessofthelabormarket
?:(Eq1)
?
=
??
+??
+??Wages,prices,andexpectedpricesareinlog-levels,so
differencesshouldbeinterpretedas
growthrates.Weuse?
todesignatetherealaspirationwageas
areminderthatthat
variableisin
realterms,indistinctiontothenominal
wage
w.Wediscuss
empiricalmeasuresoflabormarkettightness
?
inthenextsection,onlynotingherethesignconventionthat
weinterpret
highervaluesof
?
as
correspondingtoatighterlabormarket.We
suppressthetimesubscriptforcurrent-quartervariables.Weincludetheaspirationrealwage
??
inthemodelasa
devicefor
modelinga
possiblecatch-upeffect,inwhichworkersseek
tomakeup
forpastlossesofpurchasingpower,implyingadegreeofreal-wagerigidity.Theaspirationwagemaybethoughtofas
thereal
wagethatworkersbelieveisachievable—afocalpointinwagebargaining,perhaps—givenrecentdevelopmentsinwages,prices,andotherfactors.Alternatively,theaspirationrealwagemightbethoughtofasrepresentingthelong-runequilibriumrealwage,towardwhichtheactualrealwage
graduallyadjusts.Adoptingthenotation
?(??)
tostandforthevariable
?
lagged
?
quarters,
weassumethat
theaspirationrealwageineachquarterisaweightedaverageoftheprevious
quarter’saspirationwageand
realizedreal
wage,plusa
shock
term
?
,standing?foralltheotherfactorsthataffectwage
determination:...3.
KaminandRoberts(2023)analyzehowalternativeforms
of
real-wagecatch-upmightaffectthe
courseoftheeconomy.________________________________________________________________________What
Caused
the
U.S.
Pandemic
-Era
Inflation?4HUTCHINS
CENTER
ON
FISCAL
&
MONETARY
POLICY(Eq2)
??
=
???(?1)+(1
??)(?(?1)??(?1))
+??When
estimatingthemodel,wealsoallowwagegrowthtodependonan
exogenous
trendinproductivitygrowth.Forsimplicityofexposition,weignorethattermhere.Puttingthetwo
equationsabovetogethertoeliminate
??
yields:(Eq3)
?
??(?1)
=
(??
??(?1))
+?(?(?1)???(?1))
+?(?
???(?1))
+??Examinationoftheseequationssuggeststwocasesofinterest,dependingon
thevalueofthe“catch-up”parameter
?.If?
=
0
then,from(Eq2),theaspirationrealwage
ineach
quarteris
justtherealwageintheprevious
quarter(adjustedfortrendproductivity
growth,intheempiricalversionofthemodellater)plusanerrorterm.Further,from(Eq
3),inthespecialcaseof
?
=
0,thechangeinthenominalwage
equalstheexpectedrateofinflationinthe
previousquarter,
??
??(?1),
plusatermthat
dependsonthedegreeoflabor-market
tightness
?—inshort,astandardexpectations-augmentedwagePhillipscurve.If
?
≠
0,ontheotherhand,then(Eq3)
impliesthatamongthefactorsdeterminingnominal
wagegrowthisthedifferenceinthepreviousperiod’s
pricelevelandthepricelevelthat
hadbeenexpectedforthatperiod,
?(?1)???(?1).Wecallthistermthecatch-up
term.Theexistenceofa
catch-up
termimpliesthat,intheirbargainingwithemployers,workersseektobecompensatedforlastperiod’sunexpected
inflation.Inotherwords,totheextentthat
workers’expectationsorfocalpoints(orthoseoftheir
institutionalrepresentatives)influence
thewagebargainingprocess,theeconomyexhibitsadegreeofreal-wagerigidity.Notealsofrom(Eq
3)that,if
?
≠
0,thetermrelatingtolabor-markettightnesscanberewrittenas
(1
??)?
+?(?
??(?1)),implyingthatwagespotentiallydependonboththelevelandchangeof
labor-markettightness.The
priceequationGivenwages,weassumethatthepricelevel
?
dependson
thelevelofnominal
wagesplusashock
term?
thatcapturestherelativecostsofnonlaborinputs,variationsinmarkups,andotherfactorsaffecting?price-setting:?
=
?
+??Or,in
firstdifferences:(Eq4)
?
??(?1)
=
(?
??(?1))+(??
?
?
(?1))?Intheempiricalmodel,wewillfleshouttheshock
termbyincludingvariablessuchascommodity
priceshocksandsupply-chainproblemsthatincreaseprices
givenwages.Sincepricesshoulddependon
unitlaborcostsratherthanwagesper
se,intheestimationwealsoincludetheproductivitytrendinthepriceequation.We
willnottreat
producermarkupsasanindependentvariablebutnotethatmarkups
willendogenously
increase
inourmodelwhenstrongsectoraldemandconfrontslimitedsupply
(seebelow).Inflationexpectations
equationsThe
modelisclosedbyequationsthatdescribethebehaviorofthepublic’sshort-runandlong-runinflationexpectations.Short-runinflationexpectationsareaweightedaverageof
long-runinflationexpectations,
??,
andlastperiod’sinflation:________________________________________________________________________What
Caused
the
U.S.
Pandemic
-Era
Inflation?5HUTCHINS
CENTER
ON
FISCAL
&
MONETARY
POLICY(Eq5)
??
??(?1)
=
???
+(1
??)(?(?1)??(?2))Long-run
inflationexpectationsinturnevolveasa
weightedaverageoflastperiod’slong-runinflationexpectationsandactualinflation:(Eq6)
??
=
???(?1)+(1
??)(?(?1)??(?2))The
parameters
?
and
?
capturethedegreeofanchoring
ofshortandlong-runinflationexpectations.Ifboth?
and
?
arecloseto1,expectationsarewellanchored.
Both
?
and
?
playimportantthoughdifferentrolesindeterminingthedynamic
effectsofshocksoninflation.Theparameter
?
affectsshortrundynamics,andthedegreetowhichpriceinflationaffectswageinflation:
thelower
?,themorepersistentthedynamiceffectsofapriceshock.Theparameter
?
affectslongrundynamics,andinparticulartheeffectoftransitoryshockson
longruninflation.Inspectionoftheequations
aboveshowsthat,inthelong-runsteadystate,bothinflationexpectationsandtheinflationrateconsistentwithfullemployment
areindeterminate.Foranyvalueoflong-runexpected
inflation
??,assumingthat
?
=
0,themodelsolutionimpliesthatshort-runinflationexpectations,wageinflation,and
price
inflationall
equalthearbitrarilychosenvalueof
??.Putanotherway,thevalueof
??
atanypointintimeisdeterminedbythehistoryofinflation.Anepisodeof
higherinflationleadstohighersteady-stateinflation;thelongertheepisode,orthelower
?,
thestrongertheeffectonsteady-stateinflation.Onecanthinkofthe“de-anchoring”thatpessimistsworriedaboutatthestartoftheinflationepisodeasdecreases
ineither
?
or?.Otherthings
equal,suchde-anchoringwouldleadtostrongerand
more
persistentinflationfollowinganinflationaryshock.Whentheaspirationwageissubstitutedout,asabove,themodeldeterminestheevolutionoffourendogenous
variables:
??,??,
?
,and
?.Despiteitssimplicity,thebasicmodeldisplays
interestingdynamicproperties.Toillustrate,Figure1belowshows,foralternativeparameterassumptions,themodel-implieddynamicresponses
ofinflationtoaone-timeshock
totheprice
equation.Specifically,wesimulatethefullmodelundertheassumptionthattheprice
shock
?
rises
permanentlybyoneunitin
period1.
(Notethat?apermanentshock
tothepricelevelisaone-periodshock
topriceinflation).Weconsidertwocases:
Inthefirst,weassumealimitedcatch-up
effectandstableinflationexpectations(?
=
0.2,
?
=
0.9,
?
=
0.95).4Inthiscase,asFigure1shows,theshock
totheprice
levelleadstoasharp
increasein
inflationthat
isalmostcompletelyreversedafterafewperiods(seethecurvemarked“weak
feedback”).
Thelowpersistenceofinflationinthiscasereflectsthe
weak
catch-up
effect(workersareunabletorecouptheeffectsofunexpectedinflationontheirreal
wages)and
well-anchoredinflationexpectations.Becauseofthe(small)effectoftheinflationshockon
long-runexpectations,however,inflationendsup
permanentlyslightlyhigher,by0.06percentinthisexample.Withalimitedcatch-up
effectandwell-anchoredexpectations,theconventionalwisdomthatmonetary
policymakerscan“l(fā)ookthrough”temporary
supplyshocksisjustified.The
responseofinflationtoaone-timepriceshockisquitedifferentwhenthecatch-upeffectisstrongerand
inflationexpectationsarelesswellanchored(say,
?
=
0.6,
?
=
0.7,
?
=
0.9).
Inthissecondcasetheinflationresponse
toaone-timepriceshock
diesdownonlyslowly
(seethe
curvemarked“strong...4.
Wedonotneedto
assignavalueto?
as
doing
so
wouldnotaffectthesesimulations.______________________________________________________________________
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 加盟超市轉(zhuǎn)讓合同范例
- 合同范例軟件測試
- 2024年云計算平臺運營維護合同
- 2024年廣告投放合同標的及宣傳策略
- 2024年安全保衛(wèi)服務(wù)采購合同
- 2024年健身器材租賃與使用協(xié)議
- 2024年合同簽訂后的履行監(jiān)控與評估
- 2024國際物流貨物運輸代理經(jīng)銷合同
- 臨摹基礎(chǔ)知識單選題100道及答案解析
- 2024勘探開發(fā)石油天然氣合同
- 中醫(yī)外科乳房疾病診療規(guī)范診療指南2023版
- 2023-2024年抖音直播行業(yè)現(xiàn)狀及發(fā)展趨勢研究報告
- 新課標-人教版數(shù)學六年級上冊第五單元《圓》單元教材解讀
- 2022湖北漢江王甫洲水力發(fā)電有限責任公司招聘試題及答案解析
- 2019新人教必修1unit2Travelling-Around整單元完整教案
- 大學生辯論賽評分標準表
- 診所污水污物糞便處理方案及周邊環(huán)境
- 江蘇開放大學2023年秋《馬克思主義基本原理 060111》形成性考核作業(yè)2-實踐性環(huán)節(jié)(占過程性考核成績的30%)參考答案
- 《我是班級的主人翁》的主題班會
- 酒店安全設(shè)施及安全制度
- 近代化的早期探索與民族危機的加劇 單元作業(yè)設(shè)計
評論
0/150
提交評論