彼得森經(jīng)濟研究所-是什么導致了美國疫情時期的通貨膨脹?(英)_第1頁
彼得森經(jīng)濟研究所-是什么導致了美國疫情時期的通貨膨脹?(英)_第2頁
彼得森經(jīng)濟研究所-是什么導致了美國疫情時期的通貨膨脹?(英)_第3頁
彼得森經(jīng)濟研究所-是什么導致了美國疫情時期的通貨膨脹?(英)_第4頁
彼得森經(jīng)濟研究所-是什么導致了美國疫情時期的通貨膨脹?(英)_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩36頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

WORKING

PAPER23-4

What

caused

the

US

pandemic-erainflation?BenBernankeandOlivierBlanchardJune2023ABSTRACTWe

answerthequestionposedby

thetitleby

specifyingandestimatingasimpledynamicmodelofprices,wages,andshort-runandlong-runinflationexpectations.Theestimatedmodelallowsusto

analyzethedirectandindirecteffectsofproduct-marketandlabor-marketshocksonpricesandnominalwagesandto

quantifythesourcesofUSpandemic-erainflationandwage

growth.

We

findthat,contraryto

earlyconcernsthatinflationwouldbespurredby

overheatedlabormarkets,mostoftheinflationsurgethatbeganin2021wastheresultofshocksto

pricesgivenwages.Theseshocksincludedsharpincreasesincommodityprices,reflectingstrongaggregatedemand,andsectoralpricespikes,resultingfromchangesinthelevelandsectoralcompositionofdemandtogetherwithconstraintsonsectoralsupply.

However,

althoughtightlabormarketshave

thusfarnotbeentheprimarydriverofinflation,we

findthattheeffectsofoverheatedlabormarketsonnominalwage

growthandinflationare

morepersistentthantheeffectsofproduct-marketshocks.Controllinginflationwillthusultimatelyrequireachievingabetterbalancebetweenlabordemandandlaborsupply.BenBernankeisDistinguishedSeniorFellowattheHutchinsCenteronFiscalandMonetaryPolicyattheBrookingsInstitution.OlivierBlanchardistheC.FredBergstenSeniorFellowatthePetersonInstituteforInternationalEconomics.JELCodes:

E31,

E37,

E52,

E6,E24Keywords:

inflation,monetarypolicy,

aggregate

demand,

Beveridge

curve,commodity

prices,

shortages,

inflation

expectationsThe

BrookingsInstitutionisfinancedthrough

thesupportofa

diverse

array

offoundations,corporations,

governments,individuals,aswell

asanendowment.A

listofdonorscanbefoundintheirannualreports

publishedonlinehere.The

findings,interpretations,andconclusionsinthisreportare

solelythoseofitsauthor(s)andare

notinfluencedbyany

donation.Note:Thispaperwaspreparedforaconference

on

the

recent

inflationheldattheHutchinsCenteronFiscalandMonetaryPolicyattheBrookingsInstitutiononMay23,2023.IthasbeenpublishedasHutchinsCenterWorkingPaper#86here.TheauthorsthankDavidReifschneiderandElaineBuckbergforhelpfulinformation,andPeterDiamond,JasonFurman,JosephGagnon,PatrickHonohan,EgorGornostay,

DanielLeigh,MauriceObstfeld,LawrenceH.Summers,RichardClarida,ángelUbide,DavidVines,andDavidWilcox

fordiscussions.Excellentresearchassistancewasprovidedby

JamesLeeandAthianaTettaravou.

TheauthorsthanktheHutchinsCenter,

theBrookingsInstitution,andthePetersonInstituteforInternationalEconomics(PIIE)forsupport.Thispaperhasbeensubjectedto

aPIIEpre-publicationdatareplicabilityreview.?

2023

The

Brookings

Institution.Allrightsreserved.IntroductionCentralbankersand

mostoutsideeconomistsfailedto

predictthesharprisein

inflationthatbegan

in2021,andpolicymakers,bothintheUnitedStatesandinotheradvancedeconomies,wereaccordinglyslowtoreact.Actionwas

furtherdelayedbytheviewthattheinflationburstwouldbetemporary.Misjudgmentsoftheeconomiceffectsofcovid-erafiscalprogramsareonepotentialexplanationofthefailuretoforecastthesubsequentinflation.FederalOpenMarketCommittee(FOMC)forecastsofinflationchangedlittlebetweentheSeptember2020andJune2021iterationsoftheSurvey

ofEconomicProjections,andtheCommitteecontinuedtoexpectthatinflationwouldreturnclosetotheFed’s2percenttargetby2023,despitecongressionalpassageofabillinDecember2020thatincluded$900billionforcovidreliefandthe$1.9trillionAmericanRescuePlansignedbyPresidentBidenin

March2021.Thesetwoprograms

cameontop

ofthe$2.2

trillionCARESAct,passedinMarch2020andsignedbyPresidentTrump,whichhadalreadystrengthenedfirms’andhouseholds’balancesheetsand

increasedfutureabilitytospend.Overall,asashareofGDP,theheadlinecostsofthesethreecovid-erafiscalpackageswereabout4-1/2timesthesizeof

theAmericanRecoveryandReinvestmentAct(ARRA),enactedinresponseto

the2008financialcrisisandtheensuingrecession.1Accordingtoconventional

economictheory,expansionaryfiscalpoliciescanstokeinflationiftheycauselabormarketstobecomeoverheatedandoutputtoexceedtheeconomy’s

potential.

Indeed,someearlyanalysesoftheAmericanRescuePlanusingstandardfiscalmultipliersconcludedthattheadditionalfederalspendingwouldindeedoverheattheeconomy,possiblyleadingtohigherinflation(Blanchard,2021;

EdelbergandSheiner,2021).Thesestudies

acknowledgeduncertaintyaboutmagnitudes,asthefiscalimpactsonemployment,output,and

inflationwoulddependonmanyfactors,includingtheeffectsofthepandemiconpotentialoutput,thesizeoftheinitialoutputgap,households’propensitiestoconsumeoutoftheone-timechecksauthorizedbythebill,

andtherelationbetweenlabormarkettightness

andinflation.Inflationoptimists(ReifschneiderandWilcox

2022)arguedthat,evenifthenewfiscalspendingweretodrivedownunemploymentbymorethan

expected,a

largeburstofinflationwas

still

unlikely,asmanystudieshadconcludedthat

thePhillipscurveis

quiteflat(thatis,

inflationisrelativelyinsensitivetolabormarkettightness),and—inlightofmorethanthreedecadesoflowinflationin

theUnitedStates—inflationexpectations

werelikelytoremain

wellanchored.Incontrast,someeconomists(includingoneoftheauthors)arguedthatwageinflation,andconsequently

price

inflation,couldrise

muchmorethanpredictedbyconventionalcalculationspredicatedonaflatPhillipscurve(Summers,2021;

Blanchard,2021).Theirconcernswerethattheincreaseinaggregatedemandlikelytoresultfromtheunprecedentedlylargefiscaltransfers,togetherwiththecumulativeeffectsoftheeasing

ofmonetary

policybeguninMarch2020,could

causemoreoverheatingofanalready-tightlabormarketthan

theoptimistsexpected.AnextremelylowunemploymentratemightinturncausethePhillipscurvetosteepen.Moreover,higherand,consequently,morepsychologically...1.

Theheadlinecost

of

theCARESActandthe

December

supplementalappropriationspackagetogethertotaledabout15percent

ofgross

domestic

product(GDP)in2020,andtheAmerican

RescuePlanwas

roughly

8percent

of2021GDP.Bycomparison,theARRAof

2009wasslightlymorethan5percentofthatyear’sGDP.________________________________________________________________________What

Caused

the

U.S.

Pandemic

-Era

Inflation?1HUTCHINS

CENTER

ON

FISCAL

&

MONETARY

POLICYsalientlevelsofinflationmightleadinflationexpectationstode-anchor,raisingthe

potentialforawage-pricespiral.Thecritics’forecastsofhigherinflationwouldprovetobecorrect—indeed,eventoooptimistic—but,insubstantialpart,thesourcesoftheinflation,atleastinitsearlystages,wouldprovetobedifferentfromthosethey

warnedabout.Thelabormarketdidtightensignificantlyin

2021and

2022,asreflectedinseveralindicators,includingunsustainablyhigh

ratesofjobcreation,an

increasingratioofjob

openings2tounemployed

workers,and

lowlevelsofquits.

But,as

this

paperwillshow,thebehaviorof

nominalwages

in

2021and

2022wasbroadlyconsistentwiththerelationstheFedhad

reliedon,andmedium-terminflationexpectations

rosemodestly

bysomemeasuresbutdidnotde-anchor.Labormarketoverheatingwouldindeedultimatelyprovetobeasourceofpersistentinflation,as

thecritics

hadexpected,butthetraditionalwagePhillipscurvemechanismwasnotthemainevent,atleastnotuntilrecently.Inretrospect,thefailuretoforecasttheinflationburst

reflectedinlargepartthefactthat,infocusingonthelabormarket,boththeFedand

itscriticsunderestimatedtheinflationarypotentialofdevelopmentsin

goodsmarkets,thatis,

fromincreasesinprices

givenwages.Theshockstopricescamefromseveralsources.First,likeotherforecasters(includingparticipantsin

commodityfuturesmarkets),mosteconomistsdid

notanticipateeitherthemagnitudeorthedurationof

theriseincommodity

pricesthatbeganin

2021.Beyond

themore-familiar(butunexpectedlylargeandsustained)shocks

tofoodandenergyprices,thepandemicitselfledtounusualdistortionsinkey

productmarkets,suchasthosefornewandusedvehicles.Strongaggregatedemandandshifts

inthecompositionofconsumerspending(e.g.,fromservicestodurablegoods)duringthepandemiccombinedwithconstraintson

supplyinsomesectorstocreateshortages

andsectoralprice

increasesnotoffsetbydecreasesin

othersectors

(Guerrierietal.,2022;diGiovanniet

al.,2023).Thesesectoralmismatchesbetweendemand

andsupply

provedmoreintractableandlonger-lastingthanmany

hadexpected.Together,theseshockstopricesgivenwageswouldprove

tobethecriticaltriggersoftherise

in

inflation.This

isthestorywedevelopinthispaper.Westartwithasimpleanalyticalmodel,focusingonthebehaviorofwages,prices,

andshortandlong-runinflationexpectations,takinglabormarketslackandshockstopricesas

given.We

showtheverydifferentdynamiceffectson

wageandpriceinflationof

overheatinginthelabormarketand

price

shocksingoodsmarkets.Appreciatingthesedifferencesisessentialforunderstandingthe

changingrelativeimportanceofthetwosourcesofinflation,andbyimplication,theevolutionofinflationovertime.Wethenestimateanempiricalversionofthemodel,allowingforagenerouslag

structuretoaccommodateflexibledynamicsandestimatingitonthepre-covidperiod.Weexaminethestabilityofthewage,price,andshortandlong-runinflationexpectationsrelationsbetweenthepre-covidandcovidperiods,takingintoaccount

therolesoflabormarkettightness,energyandfoodpriceshocks,andsectoralshortages.Weusetheestimatedmodeltodecomposethesourcesofthepandemic-erainflationintotheeffectsofthevariousshocks.Ourdecompositioncapturesgeneral

equilibriumeffects,lags,andlinkagesamongalternativesourcesofinflationoperating

throughinflationexpectationsandotherchannels.Weconcludethat

labormarkettightnessmadeatmostamodestcontributiontoinflationearlyon,resolvingthepuzzleof

howinflationcouldrise

so

muchdespiteaflat

wagePhillipscurve.Instead,mostoftheearlyactionin

inflationcamefromthegoodsmarket,in

theformofsharp

increases

insome...2.

Bycontrast,theunemployment

rate,

whichremainedclosetoFOMCprojections,showedfewersigns

of

labor

markettightening.________________________________________________________________________What

Caused

the

U.S.

Pandemic

-Era

Inflation?2HUTCHINS

CENTER

ON

FISCAL

&

MONETARY

POLICYrelativeprices,includingcommoditypricesandpricesin

sectorsinwhichstrongdemandconfrontedlimitsonsupply.Totheextentthatcommodity

pricesstabilizeandsectoralshortagesmoderate—processesthatbothseemwelladvancedasofthiswriting(June2023)—thegoods

marketcomponentofinflationis

likelytodecreasein

importance,

andthelabormarketcomponenttobecomemoredominant.Lookingforward,withlabormarket

slackstillbelowsustainablelevelsand

inflationexpectationsmodestlyhigher,weconcludethattheFed

hastoslowtheeconomytoreturninflationtotarget.Theextentofthatslowingwilldepend

howeveron

theevolutionofcertainstructuralfeatures

ofthelabormarket,notablytheefficiencyoftheprocessofmatchingworkerswithjobs.1.

ABriefLiteratureReviewMuchrecent

workhas

providedempiricalanalysesofthepandemic-erainflation.Balletal(2022)istheclosesttoours,andwelearnedfromit.They

proposea

decompositionofinflationintoweightedmedianinflation(insteadoftheconventionalcoremeasureofinflation)andaresidual,equaltoheadlineinflationlessmedian

inflation.Their

useofmedianinflationratherthemoreconventional

measureofcoreinflationis

intendedtoremovelargepricespikes,duenotonlytothepricesofenergyandfood,whichcoreinflationdoes,butalsothoseduetosectoralshortages,whichhavemadethis

inflationepisodedifferentfromearlierones.They

findthattheincreaseinoverall

inflationresultedprimarilyfromshockstotheresidual(headlinelessmedian

inflation)butthatlabormarkettightnesshas

beenanimportantandincreasingcontributortomedianinflation.Theseconclusions

arebroadlyconsistentwithours,butdifferencesinsampleperiodandmodelspecification(e.g.,theirspecificationimpliesthattheeffectsoflabormarkettightness

arefeltonlygradually)leadthemtobegenerallymorepessimisticthanwe

areaboutthecostsofreversingtheinflationsurge.Cecchettietal(2023)studytherecentinflationandtheprospectsfordisinflationinahistoricalcontext.Aswedo,

they

provideastripped-downmodeloftheinflationprocess.However,incontrasttothelargelyunconstraineddynamicsthat

weallowintheempiricalmodelpresentedbelow,they

imposeatightNewKeynesianstructure.Theyarguethatnonlinearities

inthePhillipscurveareimportantforexplaininginflation(seealsoBenignoand

Eggertsson2023,

GagnonandSarsenbayev2022).Incontrast,wefindthatalinearrelationbetweenlabormarkettightnessand

wages,estimatedonpre-coviddata,fitsthecovid-eradatareasonablywellandisadequatetoexplaintherecentbehaviorofwages.Cecchettiet

alalsoconcludethat,basedonthehistoricalrecord,disinflationislikelytobecostly,andthey

faulttheFedforfailingtotightenpolicy

pre-emptively.GagliardoneandGertler(2023)focusonthemonetary-policyoriginsoftheinflation.UsingacalibratedDSGEmodeltostructuretheiranalysis,theyarguethattheFed’scommitmenttohighemploymentinthefaceofinflationaryoil

priceshocks

explainsthesharp

rise

inthe

paceof

priceincreases.GagliardoneandGertler’sattentiontooilpriceshocks

parallelsourownfocusonfactorsdirectlyaffectingpricesgivenwages.Their

main

contributionsconcerntheroleof

theFed’sreactionfunctionandpolicyframework

in

theover-expansionof

aggregatedemandduringtherecoveryfromthepandemic—animportanttopicbutnotthefocusofourownpaper.KochandNoureldin(2023)oftheInternational

MonetaryFundconductapost-mortemoftheirinstitution’sfailuretoforecastthe(global)inflation.Likeotherpapers

intheliterature,theirwork

findsanimportantrolefor

increasedaggregatedemandand,

especially,pandemic-inducedsupplyconstraintsinsettingofftheinflation.Theyalso

pointtoover-estimationofoutputgapsasa

factorleadingtoexcessivestimulus.However,they

paylimitedattentiontodynamics,andin

particulartheyplaceless________________________________________________________________________What

Caused

the

U.S.

Pandemic

-Era

Inflation?3HUTCHINS

CENTER

ON

FISCAL

&

MONETARY

POLICYweightthan

wewouldoncommodity

priceshocksandtheir

effectsonotherprices

andinflationexpectationsovertime.2.

ASimpleModelofWage-PriceDeterminationTohelp

interpretrecentinflation

developmentswithoutimposingtoomucha

prioristructure,weuseabare-bonesbutflexiblemodelofaggregatewage-pricedetermination.Ourapproachtoinflationisaggregative,or“topdown”;witha

partial

exceptiondiscussedinthenextsection,wedo

notconsider

themicroeconomicdeterminantsofsectoralpricechanges,e.g.,factorsaffectingthebehaviorofrentsorthedifferentialimpactofthepandemicondifferentindustries.Ourmodelreducestofourequations,whichjointlydeterminenominal

wages,prices,andshort-runandlong-run

inflationexpectations.Asalreadynoted,whenwetakethebare-bonesmodeltothedatainthenextsectionweincorporateamoreflexiblelagstructure,toallowforricherdynamics,and

includemeasuresofkeyshockstoproductandlabormarketstoaccountmoreexplicitlyfortheforcesaffectinginflation.ThewageequationWestartwithanaggregatewage

equation.We

makethestandardassumptionsthatnominalwagesdependontheexpected

pricelevelandthedegreeoflabormarketslack.Inadeparturefromthestandardspecification,wepursuethequestionof

whetherworkersacceptlossesin

purchasingpowerresultingfromunanticipatedpriceshocks,orwhetherinstead,intheirwagebargaining,theytryto“catch

up”

withpriorinflation.3Specifically,weassumethatthenominalwage

w

ineachquarterdependsontheexpectedpriceforthatquarter

??,anaspirationrealwage

??

(seebelow),and

anindicatorofthetightnessofthelabormarket

?:(Eq1)

?

=

??

+??

+??Wages,prices,andexpectedpricesareinlog-levels,so

differencesshouldbeinterpretedas

growthrates.Weuse?

todesignatetherealaspirationwageas

areminderthatthat

variableisin

realterms,indistinctiontothenominal

wage

w.Wediscuss

empiricalmeasuresoflabormarkettightness

?

inthenextsection,onlynotingherethesignconventionthat

weinterpret

highervaluesof

?

as

correspondingtoatighterlabormarket.We

suppressthetimesubscriptforcurrent-quartervariables.Weincludetheaspirationrealwage

??

inthemodelasa

devicefor

modelinga

possiblecatch-upeffect,inwhichworkersseek

tomakeup

forpastlossesofpurchasingpower,implyingadegreeofreal-wagerigidity.Theaspirationwagemaybethoughtofas

thereal

wagethatworkersbelieveisachievable—afocalpointinwagebargaining,perhaps—givenrecentdevelopmentsinwages,prices,andotherfactors.Alternatively,theaspirationrealwagemightbethoughtofasrepresentingthelong-runequilibriumrealwage,towardwhichtheactualrealwage

graduallyadjusts.Adoptingthenotation

?(??)

tostandforthevariable

?

lagged

?

quarters,

weassumethat

theaspirationrealwageineachquarterisaweightedaverageoftheprevious

quarter’saspirationwageand

realizedreal

wage,plusa

shock

term

?

,standing?foralltheotherfactorsthataffectwage

determination:...3.

KaminandRoberts(2023)analyzehowalternativeforms

of

real-wagecatch-upmightaffectthe

courseoftheeconomy.________________________________________________________________________What

Caused

the

U.S.

Pandemic

-Era

Inflation?4HUTCHINS

CENTER

ON

FISCAL

&

MONETARY

POLICY(Eq2)

??

=

???(?1)+(1

??)(?(?1)??(?1))

+??When

estimatingthemodel,wealsoallowwagegrowthtodependonan

exogenous

trendinproductivitygrowth.Forsimplicityofexposition,weignorethattermhere.Puttingthetwo

equationsabovetogethertoeliminate

??

yields:(Eq3)

?

??(?1)

=

(??

??(?1))

+?(?(?1)???(?1))

+?(?

???(?1))

+??Examinationoftheseequationssuggeststwocasesofinterest,dependingon

thevalueofthe“catch-up”parameter

?.If?

=

0

then,from(Eq2),theaspirationrealwage

ineach

quarteris

justtherealwageintheprevious

quarter(adjustedfortrendproductivity

growth,intheempiricalversionofthemodellater)plusanerrorterm.Further,from(Eq

3),inthespecialcaseof

?

=

0,thechangeinthenominalwage

equalstheexpectedrateofinflationinthe

previousquarter,

??

??(?1),

plusatermthat

dependsonthedegreeoflabor-market

tightness

?—inshort,astandardexpectations-augmentedwagePhillipscurve.If

?

0,ontheotherhand,then(Eq3)

impliesthatamongthefactorsdeterminingnominal

wagegrowthisthedifferenceinthepreviousperiod’s

pricelevelandthepricelevelthat

hadbeenexpectedforthatperiod,

?(?1)???(?1).Wecallthistermthecatch-up

term.Theexistenceofa

catch-up

termimpliesthat,intheirbargainingwithemployers,workersseektobecompensatedforlastperiod’sunexpected

inflation.Inotherwords,totheextentthat

workers’expectationsorfocalpoints(orthoseoftheir

institutionalrepresentatives)influence

thewagebargainingprocess,theeconomyexhibitsadegreeofreal-wagerigidity.Notealsofrom(Eq

3)that,if

?

0,thetermrelatingtolabor-markettightnesscanberewrittenas

(1

??)?

+?(?

??(?1)),implyingthatwagespotentiallydependonboththelevelandchangeof

labor-markettightness.The

priceequationGivenwages,weassumethatthepricelevel

?

dependson

thelevelofnominal

wagesplusashock

term?

thatcapturestherelativecostsofnonlaborinputs,variationsinmarkups,andotherfactorsaffecting?price-setting:?

=

?

+??Or,in

firstdifferences:(Eq4)

?

??(?1)

=

(?

??(?1))+(??

?

?

(?1))?Intheempiricalmodel,wewillfleshouttheshock

termbyincludingvariablessuchascommodity

priceshocksandsupply-chainproblemsthatincreaseprices

givenwages.Sincepricesshoulddependon

unitlaborcostsratherthanwagesper

se,intheestimationwealsoincludetheproductivitytrendinthepriceequation.We

willnottreat

producermarkupsasanindependentvariablebutnotethatmarkups

willendogenously

increase

inourmodelwhenstrongsectoraldemandconfrontslimitedsupply

(seebelow).Inflationexpectations

equationsThe

modelisclosedbyequationsthatdescribethebehaviorofthepublic’sshort-runandlong-runinflationexpectations.Short-runinflationexpectationsareaweightedaverageof

long-runinflationexpectations,

??,

andlastperiod’sinflation:________________________________________________________________________What

Caused

the

U.S.

Pandemic

-Era

Inflation?5HUTCHINS

CENTER

ON

FISCAL

&

MONETARY

POLICY(Eq5)

??

??(?1)

=

???

+(1

??)(?(?1)??(?2))Long-run

inflationexpectationsinturnevolveasa

weightedaverageoflastperiod’slong-runinflationexpectationsandactualinflation:(Eq6)

??

=

???(?1)+(1

??)(?(?1)??(?2))The

parameters

?

and

?

capturethedegreeofanchoring

ofshortandlong-runinflationexpectations.Ifboth?

and

?

arecloseto1,expectationsarewellanchored.

Both

?

and

?

playimportantthoughdifferentrolesindeterminingthedynamic

effectsofshocksoninflation.Theparameter

?

affectsshortrundynamics,andthedegreetowhichpriceinflationaffectswageinflation:

thelower

?,themorepersistentthedynamiceffectsofapriceshock.Theparameter

?

affectslongrundynamics,andinparticulartheeffectoftransitoryshockson

longruninflation.Inspectionoftheequations

aboveshowsthat,inthelong-runsteadystate,bothinflationexpectationsandtheinflationrateconsistentwithfullemployment

areindeterminate.Foranyvalueoflong-runexpected

inflation

??,assumingthat

?

=

0,themodelsolutionimpliesthatshort-runinflationexpectations,wageinflation,and

price

inflationall

equalthearbitrarilychosenvalueof

??.Putanotherway,thevalueof

??

atanypointintimeisdeterminedbythehistoryofinflation.Anepisodeof

higherinflationleadstohighersteady-stateinflation;thelongertheepisode,orthelower

?,

thestrongertheeffectonsteady-stateinflation.Onecanthinkofthe“de-anchoring”thatpessimistsworriedaboutatthestartoftheinflationepisodeasdecreases

ineither

?

or?.Otherthings

equal,suchde-anchoringwouldleadtostrongerand

more

persistentinflationfollowinganinflationaryshock.Whentheaspirationwageissubstitutedout,asabove,themodeldeterminestheevolutionoffourendogenous

variables:

??,??,

?

,and

?.Despiteitssimplicity,thebasicmodeldisplays

interestingdynamicproperties.Toillustrate,Figure1belowshows,foralternativeparameterassumptions,themodel-implieddynamicresponses

ofinflationtoaone-timeshock

totheprice

equation.Specifically,wesimulatethefullmodelundertheassumptionthattheprice

shock

?

rises

permanentlybyoneunitin

period1.

(Notethat?apermanentshock

tothepricelevelisaone-periodshock

topriceinflation).Weconsidertwocases:

Inthefirst,weassumealimitedcatch-up

effectandstableinflationexpectations(?

=

0.2,

?

=

0.9,

?

=

0.95).4Inthiscase,asFigure1shows,theshock

totheprice

levelleadstoasharp

increasein

inflationthat

isalmostcompletelyreversedafterafewperiods(seethecurvemarked“weak

feedback”).

Thelowpersistenceofinflationinthiscasereflectsthe

weak

catch-up

effect(workersareunabletorecouptheeffectsofunexpectedinflationontheirreal

wages)and

well-anchoredinflationexpectations.Becauseofthe(small)effectoftheinflationshockon

long-runexpectations,however,inflationendsup

permanentlyslightlyhigher,by0.06percentinthisexample.Withalimitedcatch-up

effectandwell-anchoredexpectations,theconventionalwisdomthatmonetary

policymakerscan“l(fā)ookthrough”temporary

supplyshocksisjustified.The

responseofinflationtoaone-timepriceshockisquitedifferentwhenthecatch-upeffectisstrongerand

inflationexpectationsarelesswellanchored(say,

?

=

0.6,

?

=

0.7,

?

=

0.9).

Inthissecondcasetheinflationresponse

toaone-timepriceshock

diesdownonlyslowly

(seethe

curvemarked“strong...4.

Wedonotneedto

assignavalueto?

as

doing

so

wouldnotaffectthesesimulations.______________________________________________________________________

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論