非政府組織問責論文(全英文)

PAGE

PAGE

4

ExploringtheDischargeofAccountabilityinNGOs

Introduction

1.1BackgroundofNGOs

Sincethe1980s,NGOshavebeenmorefrequentlyappearedinthepublicoccasionswithNPO,whichhasbeenwidelyrecognizedtobeincreasinglyimportantorganizationsinthefieldofpublicadministration.AccordingtothedataissuedbytheWorldBank,morethan15%ofthetotaldevelopmentaidsoverseaswascompletedbyNGOs.(Lehman,2007)Generallyspeaking,NGOsareformedbynon-profitorganizationsandnon-governmentorganizations.Theseorganizationsaresupportedbyalotofvolunteers,andtheyhaveextremelyclearanduniquepolicyaims.(Lane&Morrison,2006;Young,2000)Sofar,therearemanydifferenttypesofNGOs.Accordingtotheaimsoftheseoriginations,NGOscanbeclassifiedintocharities,socialmovements,publicinterestresearchgroupsandotherinterestsgroupswhicharedrivenbyspecificpoliticalagendasandaims,neighborhoodorganizations,andsoon.(Carson,2002)WiththecontinuouslygrowingnumberofNGOsandtheexpandedscopeofactivities,NGOsplayanincreasinglyimportantroleintheworld,suchassupervisinggovernmentalbehaviors,providingservices,arbitrationandmediation.ItcanbesaidthatNGOshavebecomeavitalpartofthepowerstructure(McGann&Johnstone,2004),involvingresourcesandgovernance(Gauri&Galef,2003),social,economicandpoliticalmanagementandaids(Naher,2010;Stiles,2002),socialdisclosures(Ahsan,etal.,2009;Jamil,1998;Momin,2013),aswellashelpingthepoortohavetheirownhouses(Rahman,2002).Inshort,therapiddevelopmentofNGOshasbroughthugebenefitstohumanbeings.

1.2DefinitionofNGOs

Asaconceptofcivilsocietyorganizations,theconceptofNGOisveryvague.Asearlyas1920s,theitemofNGOhadbeenusedinthediscussionbySophy?Sanger.(Pierre-YvesSaunier,2007)Fromabroadandbasicaspect,NGOisneitherofficialorganizations,suchaslocalgovernment,publichospitals,schoolsanduniversities,norisprivatebusinessorganizationsforprofits,suchaslocalandmultinationalcompanies.InaccordancewiththedefinitiongivenbytheUnitedNationsRuleofLaw,NGOsshouldbereferredtoas"civilsocietyorganization"or‘not-for-profitgroups,principallyindependentfromgovernment,whichisorganizedonalocal,nationalorinternationalleveltoaddressissuesinsupportofthepublicgood”.Tosumup,NGOsshouldbeautonomous,privateandnon-profit,aswellashaveclearsocialmissions.(Tuijl,2006;Jordan&Tuijl,2006)

1.3AimsandObjectivesofThisStudy

However,UnermanandO'Dwyer(2006)pointedoutthatNGOshouldbedefinedinabroadercontentofthecivilsociety.Ontheonehand,NGOsinvolvemanyfieldsthatwereoccupiedbythegovernmentpreviously.Althoughthegovernmentwithdrewfromthesefields,itstillhascloselyrelatedwiththeNGOsthathaveoccupiedthesefields.Thus,NGOscannotavoidcooperatingwiththegovernment.Ontheotherhand,moreandmoreNGOsbegantoprovideservicesoradvocacyactivities,whichleadstotheblurredboundariesbetweennon-governmentalorganizationsandcommercialorganizations.Besides,manyNGOswererevealedthescandalstheyhaddoneduetothelackofsupervision.(Gibelman&Gelman,2001)Therefore,itisnecessarytomakethepublicknowtheaccountabilityofNGOsandthensupervisethem.ThisarticleiscommittedtodiscussingtheaccountabilityofNGOsandhowNGOshavedischargedtheirownaccountability.

.

AccompanyingwiththedevelopmentofNGOs,theboundariesbetweennon-governmentalorganizationsandcommercialorganizationsisgrowingblurredinthereality.Thus,itisnecessaryforthepapertointroducethedefinitionofNGOssoastomakereadersmoreclearlyknowtheessenceofNGOs,thatis,NGOsshouldbeautonomous,privateandnon-profit,aswellashaveclearsocialmissions.Andthen,thispaperwillgivealiteraturereviewfocusingonthedefinitionofaccountabilityandrelevanttheoriesofaccountability,includingPrincipal-agentTheory,LegitimacyTheoryandStakeholderTheory.Asaresult,readerscanknowthespecificmissionsofNGOsandmeansofachievingthemissions,aswellasunderstandwhoNGOsshouldberesponsibleforandwhattheyshouldtomaintaintheinterestsoftheirstockholders.Atthesametime,theLegitimacyTheoryalsorevealsthatNGOsshouldbehaviorwiththerangepermittedbylawsandregulations.Inshort,readerscanhaveamoreclearunderstandingtowardstheaccountabilityofNGOs,soastolayatheoreticalfoundationforlatercontent.Followedbyliteraturereview,methodologywillbegiven,inordertomakereadersknowthedesignthoughtofthepaperandguidereaderstograspthefocuses.Anyhow,thispaperwillinsistontheprincipleofobjectivityandaccuracy.

3.3ExpectedFindingsandConclusions

TheresearcherisextremelyeagertofindoutwhetherNGOsareloyaltodischargetheiraccountabilityandhowtheycanachievetheirmissions.AsNGOsarenon-profitableorganizations,theyhavetocooperatewiththegovernmentandenterprise.Ingeneral,NGOswillprovidemanagementandhumanresourcesandthegovernmentusuallyofferfundswhenNGOscooperatewiththegovernment,aswhathavementionedabove.Thus,theresearcherhopestoexploretheroleofNGOsplayinginvarietiesofactivities.Takethe“LeavingNoChildBehindAnnualreport2013”forexample.TheresearcherwillbecommittedtofindoutrelevantinformationaboutthemissionofNGOsinthecourseofrescuingAfricanchildren,andinwhatwaysNGOsparticipatedinthehealthandnutritionprogramme,educationprogramme,offerlife-savingtreatment,helpingAfricanchildrentofindwaystohavebetterlifeandprotectingthemfromharmandabuse,andsoonandsoforth.Andthen,theresearchwantstoexplorewhichwaysNGOscouldgetthehighestefficiencyattheleastcostthroughdataanalysisthroughcomparingwithsimilarannualreports,suchasthe“Tacklinghunger,transforminglivesConcernWorldwide(UK)AnnualReport&Accounts2013”and“IslamicReliefWorldwide-2012AnnualReportandFinancialStatements”.Asaresult,theresearchcanfindoutwhichisthebestwaytoachievecertaingoals.Intheendofthepart,thepapershoulddeterminewhichthebetterwaysforNGOstodischargetheiraccountabilityare.Ifpossible,thispapercanputforwardsomeusefulsuggestionsinaccordancewiththefindings.Inthisway,moreNGOscangetinspirations.

Inaddition,theresearcherwantstofindoutwhetherNGOshavedoneanywrongdoings.Thereasonsformakingthisstudyarebecausethegrowingblurredboundariesbetweennon-governmentalorganizationsandcommercialorganizationsandthescandalsofNGOsduetothelackofsupervision.Thus,itisnecessaryfortheresearchtoexplorewhetherthesetworeasonsarecorrectbasedonthematerialscollected.Intheend,thispapershouldconcludewhetherNGOshaveaclearunderstandingtowardstheirownaccountabilityandmissions,andwhethertheyhavetakenactiveandefficientactionstopromotetheimplementationoftheiraccountabilityandmissions.Iftheyhavedonesomewrongdoings,whichpartstheyarewrong,andhowtheycanfurtherimproveinthefuture.

Inshort,theresearcherwillseekformoreinformationinthesetwoaspectstoanswerthequestionsthepaperiscommittedtoexplore,thatis,whattheaccountabilityofNGOsisandhowNGOshavedischargedtheirownaccountability.

3.4Limitations

Firstofall,itisnotenoughtocollectdatathroughannualreportsofafewofNGOs.AlthoughthedataissuedbytheseNGOsisaccuratewhichcanbechecked,theresearchercannotfirmlyensurethatthedatacancomprehensivelyandtrulyreflectthedetailedsituationsofNGOs.ThebestsolutiontogetthetruestdataandlearnthedetailedconditionsofNGOs’dischargeofaccountabilityistomakefieldresearch.However,itisnotpossibleatpresentduetothelimitationsoftimeandfunds.Thus,thispapercanonlyselectannualreportsofNGOstobethematerialsforanalyzing.Secondly,theannualreportsofNGOsIcouldgetarealllimitedtotherangeoftheUK,andmostofthemareaboutinternationalaidsinAsia,African,theMiddleEast,etc.WhetherthesefiveNGOscanrepresenttheentireNGOsandcoverthemainrangeofaccountabilityandmannersofachievingtheaccountabilityisstillaquestion.Thepapercanonlyensureanobjectiveandaccuratecontentanalysisanddataanalysisbasedonthematerialscollected.Secondly,thenumberofsamplesisnottoopersuasive.However,duetothelimitationofmultiplefactors,thispaperchoosestoonlyselectfiveannualreportstoanalyze.Iftheconditionpermittedinthefuture,theresearchcanfurtherimproveinthesethreeaspects.

References:

Ahsan,D.A.,DelValls,T.A.,&Blasco,J.(2010).TheRelationshipofNationalandInternationalEnvironmentalNGOsinBangladeshandTheirRoleinWetlandConservation.

Berelson,B.(1952).Contentanalysisincommunicationresearch.

Bogdan,R.C.,&Biklen,S.K.(1998).

Qualitativeresearchineducation.Anintroductiontotheoryandmethods.Allyn&Bacon,AViacomCompany,160GouldSt.,NeedhamHeights,MA02194;Internet:www.abacon.com.

Carson,E.D.(2002).Publicexpectationsandnonprofitsectorrealities:Agrowingdividewithdisastrousconsequences.

NonprofitandVoluntarySectorQuarterly,

31(3),429-436.

Connolly,C.,&Dhanani,A.(2009).NarrativereportingbyUKcharities.

Gibelman,M.,&Gelman,S.R.(2001).Verypublicscandals:Nongovernmentalorganizationsintrouble.

Voluntas:InternationalJournalofVoluntaryandNonprofitOrganizations,

12(1),49-66.

Glaeser,E.L.,&Gyourko,J.(2003).Theimpactofbuildingrestrictionsonhousingaffordability.

EconomicPolicyReview,

9(2).

Holsti,O.R.(1968).Contentanalysis.

Thehandbookofsocialpsychology,2,596-692.

Jamil,I.(1998).

Administrativecultureinpublicadministration:FiveessaysonBangladesh.NorwegianResearchCenterinOrganizationandManagement.

Jepson,P.(2005).GovernanceandaccountabilityofenvironmentalNGOs.EnvironmentalScience&Policy,

8(5),515-524.

Jordan,L.,&vanTuijl,P.(Eds.).(2006).

NGOaccountability:Politics,principlesandinnovations.Routledge.

Krippendorff,K.(2012).

Contentanalysis:Anintroductiontoitsmethodology.Sage.

Lane,M.B.,&Morrison,T.H.(2006).Publicinterestorprivateagenda?:AmeditationontheroleofNGOsinenvironmentalpolicyandmanagementinAustralia.

Journalofruralstudies,

22(2),232-242.

Lehman,G.(2007).TheaccountabilityofNGOsincivilsocietyanditspublicspheres.

CriticalPerspectivesonAccounting,

18(6),645-669.

McGann,J.,&Johnstone,M.(2004).PowerShiftandtheNGOCredibilityCrisis,The.

BrownJ.WorldAff.,

11,159.

Momin,M.A.(2013,June).SocialandenvironmentalNGOs’perceptionsofcorporatesocialdisclosures:thecaseof