英語(yǔ)名詞短語(yǔ)中心成分的認(rèn)知入場(chǎng)研究的中期報(bào)告

英語(yǔ)名詞短語(yǔ)中心成分的認(rèn)知入場(chǎng)研究的中期報(bào)告Abstract摘要Thismid-termreportpresentsthecurrentprogressofaresearchprojectaimingtoinvestigatethecognitiveprocessesinvolvedinidentifyingthecenterconstituentsofEnglishnounphrases.Thestudyuseseye-trackingtechnologytomeasuretheprocessingtimeandfixationdurationonvariouspartsofatargetsentence,aswellasquestionnairesandinterviewstocollectparticipants’understandingandjudgmentsaboutthesentencestructureandmeaning.Thepreliminaryanalysisofdatasuggeststhattheidentificationofthecenterconstituentsinnounphrasesinvolvesbothtop-downandbottom-upprocessing,andthatthevariabilityincenterconstituentidentificationisinfluencedbydifferentfactors,suchassyntacticcomplexityandsemanticambiguity.Furtheranalysisandexperimentsareplannedtogainamorecomprehensiveunderstandingofthisphenomenon.本中期報(bào)告介紹了一個(gè)研究項(xiàng)目的當(dāng)前進(jìn)展，旨在探究英語(yǔ)名詞短語(yǔ)中心要素識(shí)別涉及的認(rèn)知過(guò)程。該研究使用眼動(dòng)技術(shù)來(lái)測(cè)量目標(biāo)句子不同部分的處理時(shí)間和注視持續(xù)時(shí)間，以及問(wèn)卷和訪談來(lái)收集參與者對(duì)句子結(jié)構(gòu)和含義的理解和判斷。初步的數(shù)據(jù)分析表明，名詞短語(yǔ)中心要素的識(shí)別涉及自上而下和自下而上的加工，而中心要素識(shí)別的變異性受到不同因素的影響，如語(yǔ)法復(fù)雜性和語(yǔ)義歧義性。進(jìn)一步的分析和實(shí)驗(yàn)計(jì)劃獲得更全面的了解這一現(xiàn)象。Introduction引言Nounphrases(NPs)arecommonsentenceconstituentsinEnglishsentences,consistingofanounastheheadwordandvariousmodifiersthathelptospecifythemeaningofthenoun.TheidentificationofthecenterconstituentinaNPiscrucialforunderstandingthemeaningofasentence,asitreflectsthemostimportantinformationconveyedbythesentence.However,identifyingthecenterconstituentsinNPscanbechallengingforbothnativespeakersandforeignlanguagelearnersduetothegrammaticalcomplexityandsyntacticambiguityofthelanguage(GómezGonzález,2013;Cook,2015).Inthisproject,weaimtoinvestigatethecognitiveprocessesinvolvedinidentifyingthecenterconstituentsofEnglishNPs,particularlyfocusingontheroleoftop-downandbottom-upprocessinginthistask.Top-downprocessingreferstotheuseofpriorknowledgeandexpectationstointerpretincominginformation,whilebottom-upprocessingreferstotheanalysisofindividualfeaturesandpropertiesofincominginformationtoconstructacoherentperceptualexperience(Clark,2016).WehypothesizethattheidentificationofcenterconstituentsinNPsinvolvesbothtop-downandbottom-upprocessing,andthattherelativeimportanceofthesetwoprocessesvariesdependingondifferentcontextualandlinguisticfactors.Totestourhypothesis,weuseeye-trackingtechnologytomeasureparticipants’processingtimeandfixationdurationondifferentpartsofatargetsentence,aswellasquestionnairesandinterviewstocollecttheirunderstandingandjudgmentsaboutthesentencestructureandmeaning.Eye-trackingtechnologyhasbeenwidelyusedinpreviousstudiestoinvestigatelanguageprocessingbecauseitprovidesapreciseandobjectivemeasureofcognitiveactivityduringreadingorlisteningtasks(Rayner,2009).Methodology方法ParticipantsThestudyrecruited40nativespeakersofEnglishand40ChineselearnersofEnglishasaforeignlanguage.ThenativespeakerswereundergraduatestudentsfromaBritishuniversity,andtheforeignlanguagelearnerswereundergraduatestudentsfromaChineseuniversitymajoringinEnglish.MaterialsWecreated40experimentalsentencesthatvariedinsyntacticcomplexityandsemanticambiguity.EachsentenceincludedaNPstructureandaquestionaskedaboutthesentencemeaningtoensurethatparticipantspaidattentiontothesentence.ThecenterconstituentsintheNPweremanipulatedtobeeithertheheadnoun,thefirstmodifier,thelastmodifier,oracombinationofthefirstandlastmodifiers(seeFigure1foranexample).ProcedureParticipantswereseatedinfrontofacomputerscreenandwereinstructedtoreadeachsentencepresentedonthescreenasaccuratelyandquicklyaspossiblewhiletheireyemovementswererecordedusinganeye-tracker.Afterreadingeachsentence,participantsansweredacomprehensionquestionaboutthesentencemeaning.Aftercompletingallexperimentalsentences,participantswereaskedtofilloutaquestionnaireandparticipateinasemi-structuredinterviewtoexplaintheirunderstandingandjudgmentsaboutthesentencestructures.DataanalysisTheeye-trackingdatawereanalyzedintermsofthefixationdurationondifferentpartsofthesentences,includingthebeginningofthesentence,theNPstructure,andthecenterconstituentoftheNP.Thecomprehensionquestionnaireandinterviewswereanalyzedqualitativelytoidentifyparticipants’understandingandjudgmentsofthesentencestructuresandmeanings.Results結(jié)果ThepreliminaryanalysisofdatasuggeststhattherecognitionofcenterconstituentsinNPsinvolvesbothtop-downandbottom-upprocessing.Specifically,participantstendtofocustheirattentionoverwhelminglyontheNPstructurewhenidentifyingthecenterconstituent,suggestingthattheyrelyheavilyontop-downprocessingandusetheirexpectationsaboutthesentencestructuretoguidetheirinterpretation.However,thefixationdurationsondifferentpartsoftheNPsalsovarydependingonthepositionandroleofthecenterconstituentinthesentence,indicatingtheinvolvementofbottom-upprocessingaswell.Thesyntacticcomplexityandsemanticambiguityofthesentencealsoinfluencetheprocessingtimeandfixationdurationofparticipants.Ingeneral,morecomplexandambiguoussentencestakelongertoprocessandrequiremorefixationsondifferentpartsofthesentencetoarriveatacorrectinterpretation.Thequestionnaireandinterviewdataprovideadditionalinsightintothefactorsthatinfluenceparticipants’understandingandjudgmentsofthesentencestructureandmeaning.Participants’priorknowledgeofthetopic,theirfamiliaritywiththegrammarrules,andtheirinterpretationofthemodifiersalsopla