data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4c65/f4c6587bc5677692a614a479eeb5222126753d4e" alt="扎根理論——一種避免偏見調(diào)查方法_第1頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bde7/1bde71dc69f97c8c6af18b7f308cbeecb5a54d52" alt="扎根理論——一種避免偏見調(diào)查方法_第2頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef206/ef2064f4062e9349d6fa653317ab2b2060702be8" alt="扎根理論——一種避免偏見調(diào)查方法_第3頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a212/2a21235e278c27847138a6747c091bcb6637a501" alt="扎根理論——一種避免偏見調(diào)查方法_第4頁"
下載本文檔
版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
1、扎根理論種避免偏見調(diào)查方法【摘要】在大多數(shù)社會(huì)科學(xué),研究人員可以使用 定量或定性的方法,這是沒有爭(zhēng)議的。與定量研究相比,定 性研究帶有更強(qiáng)的文學(xué)風(fēng)格和個(gè)人的特點(diǎn),這是不可避免 的,因此定性研究被認(rèn)為傾向于引進(jìn)研究員的偏見。像其他 定性研究方法,扎根理論最反映利用定性研究一一調(diào)查過程 中避免偏差。扎根理論具有特定程序是靈活的,而且在最寬 泛的意義上內(nèi)給予許可信度和效度?!娟P(guān)鍵詞】定量研究;定性研究;扎根理論quantitative research is always compared with qualitative research, which is the exam, analysis
2、and explanation of researchers for finding implied meanings and combining forms of relationships , including classifications of different kinds of phenomena and activities,in a way that does notinclude mathematical methods.in most social sciences, the researcher can use either quantitative or qualit
3、ative methods, which is uncontroversial, and each can be used when there is the need compared with quantitative research , qualitative research is of more literary style and inmore personal voice, which is inevitable to be thought the study which is made under this methology has a tendency to bring
4、in researcher" s bias as in other qualitative approaches, the grounded theory maybe one of them can most reflect the advantage of qualitative research 一 avoid ing bias in the process of investigating. grounded theory has specific procedures and associated canons which is flexible but within lim
5、its, which give permit to reliability and validity in the broadest senseuformal reliability andvalidity assessments for grounded theory products, conducted in that order, are consistent with the tenets of this inductive methodology and with measurement theory; they are essential for efficient"(
6、atwood,hinds, benoliel, &artinian, 1986) here are 2 points i got after reading the materials:1. the concepts we deal with is always discovered from data ( induced ) , systemically abtained and analyzed (glaser&strauss, 1967) in grounded theory, analysis is assisted with data collection, the
7、analysis begins as soon as the first a few data is collec ted. comparing with ot her research met hods, it' s more scientific , for once the original analysis starts,it can provide mat erials for the nex t int erview or observations, on one hand, it won,t miss anything since the first data will
8、be analyzed in details on the other hand, no matter how the investigators are in favor of a particular concept, if it shows no relevenee to the to pic in the contin ued st udy, it mus t be discarded the traditional understanding of reliability focuses on standardizing data collection instruments(mas
9、on, 1996) however, this is premised on the assumption that methods of data generation can be conceptualised as tools, and can be standardised, neutral and non-biasedv (mason, 1996) while this may be acceptable for quantitative methods, but in qualitative research, abviously, the data collection proc
10、ess is more rigorously and patiently treated. in contrast to quantitative research , in which the researcher systematically applies a pre-existing set of codes to the data” , the qualitative research is udatadrivedv (sandelowski, 2000) 2.team work in the grounded theory is an important approach, sha
11、ring the experience with colleagues who haveexperience in the same area gives helps to guard against bias. out initial concern with subjectivity , reflexivity, and interpretation began a series of questions that took us from the lone researcher to concerns about the methodological issues specific to
12、 the work of teams of qualitative researchers (bresler, wasser, hertzog, & lemons, 1996) researchers in a team are not necessarily all agree on the result got from the data. alt hough we were all collaborators, our roles were not the same, and this difference meant that allegiances and approache
13、s to fieldwork were also asymmetrical ( wasser & bresler ,1996 ) .after thecomparison and analysis, researcher can sift though the usless data and the concepts which are not helpful to the core concept. team work plays an nonnegligible role in qualitative research that it' s necessary for the group to have a periodic discussion or data exchange.so these are two procedures in the grou
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 供應(yīng)材料解除合同范本
- 化妝合同范本
- 代理雨鞋采購合同范本
- 獸藥委托加工合同范本
- 公租房出售合同范本
- 代理工程合同范本
- 買新房認(rèn)購合同范例
- 2024年洛陽市新安縣龍?zhí)洞髰{谷荊紫仙山景區(qū)招聘考試真題
- 農(nóng)業(yè)技術(shù)人員服務(wù)合同范本
- 2024年菏澤市勞信就業(yè)服務(wù)有限公司招聘制醫(yī)院人員考試真題
- Q∕GDW 11612.41-2018 低壓電力線高速載波通信互聯(lián)互通技術(shù)規(guī)范 第4-1部分:物理層通信協(xié)議
- 2006 年全國(guó)高校俄語專業(yè)四級(jí)水平測(cè)試試卷
- 浙江省勞動(dòng)保障監(jiān)察員培訓(xùn)監(jiān)察執(zhí)法程序(林琳)
- 新人教版數(shù)學(xué)四年級(jí)下冊(cè)全冊(cè)表格式教案
- 疫情期間離市外出審批表
- (完整版)全身體格檢查評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)(表)
- 裝飾裝修工程施工合理化建議和降低成本措施提要:完整
- (改)提高地下室側(cè)墻剛性防水施工合格率_圖文
- 電芯品質(zhì)協(xié)議版本(標(biāo)準(zhǔn)版)
- 食管癌化療臨床路徑(最全版)
- 食品銷售經(jīng)營(yíng)者食品安全管理制度(零售)
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論