五、論文(設(shè)計(jì))成績評定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)vacademicdissertation

1、五、論文（設(shè)計(jì)）成績評定標(biāo)準(zhǔn) /V. Academic Dissertatio nGradi ng Sta ndards指導(dǎo)教師對論文(設(shè)計(jì))評價(jià)的指標(biāo)、評價(jià)等級及對應(yīng)的得分/(l)Academic Dissertatio n Gradi ng by Supervisor評價(jià)指標(biāo)/Standards評價(jià)等級及對應(yīng)得分 /Levels and Grades優(yōu)秀/Dist in ction良好/Merit中等/Satisfactory合格/Pass不合 格/Fail1.選題與研究主旨 / Topic Choosi ng & Research Purpose19-2017-1815-1612

2、-14122.寫作過程 /Writing Progress19-2017-1815-1612-14123.總體結(jié)構(gòu)及邏輯性 / Structures and Logicality19-2017-1815-1612-14124.能力水平 /Research Ability19-2017-1815-1612-14125.成果質(zhì)量 / Overall Quality19-2017-1815-1612-1412五、論文（設(shè)計(jì)）成績評定標(biāo)準(zhǔn) /V. Academic Dissertatio nGradi ng Sta ndards評價(jià)指標(biāo)的含義/Details of Standards1.選題與研究主旨

3、：選題需符合本專業(yè)培養(yǎng)目標(biāo)，體現(xiàn)綜合訓(xùn)練的基本要求，運(yùn)用一手資料或經(jīng)過本人統(tǒng)計(jì)分 析的二手?jǐn)?shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行實(shí)證研究。研究主旨明確，具有較強(qiáng)的文獻(xiàn)基礎(chǔ)和理論支撐，應(yīng)用了問卷調(diào)查或案例分析等適當(dāng)?shù)难芯糠椒ǎ⑦M(jìn)行假設(shè)檢驗(yàn)，內(nèi)容難易程度適中，預(yù)期結(jié)論具有一定的理論意義和學(xué)術(shù)價(jià)值。/1. TopicChoosing & Research Purpose: Thetopic is well li nked with student usriculum education target, and shows the stude ntomprehe nsive study, the first -ha nd

4、 materials or sec on d-ha nd data an alyzed by stude nt should be used in research. Theresearch problem is clear and has strongtheoretical base, the survey, case study or other appropriate methodologywithhypothesis testing is chosen and well designed. The expected research result needs to show the a

5、cademic meaning.2.寫作過程：學(xué)生寫作態(tài)度認(rèn)真，通過面談、電子郵件、電話等方式與教師及時(shí)溝通，且應(yīng)當(dāng)有兩次以上的面談指導(dǎo)。在規(guī)定時(shí)間提交選題、大綱、初稿等，按照導(dǎo)師要求修改論文，不得未經(jīng)教師冋意擅自改題。/2. WritingProgress: Students should have serious attitude, communicate with supervisor via meeting, email, telephone positively,including at least twice face to face meetings. Submit topic,

6、 outline, draft and other material on time. Modify academicdissertation according to the suggestions. Do not change topics without supervisor s permi;3.總體結(jié)構(gòu)及邏輯性： 論文遵循學(xué)術(shù)研究的總體思路，結(jié)構(gòu)清晰，邏輯性強(qiáng)，具有明確的觀點(diǎn)與學(xué)術(shù)貢獻(xiàn)。文獻(xiàn) 綜述全面并與研究問題一致，論證充分并具有較強(qiáng)的理論基礎(chǔ)，研究方法的選取與使用合理，應(yīng)用了一定的量化統(tǒng)計(jì)工具，研究結(jié)論針對頭證研究結(jié)果進(jìn)仃詳細(xì)討論，政策建議具有一疋的可仃性、操作性。/3. Stru

7、ctures andLogicality: The research n eeds to follow the procedure of academic research, has clear structures and strong sense oflogicality. The literature review is comprehe nsive and related to research problems, the an alysis has strong theoretical base,the research methodology is well desig ned a

8、nd used, data an alysis and empirical study is adequately effective, researchresult links the empirical study and provides detailed discussion, the policy suggestion could be more applicable andfeasibility. and highlight data an alysis part4.能力水平： 杜絕抄襲， 反抄襲軟件檢測重復(fù)率（扣除引用部分）低于20%。具有實(shí)地調(diào)研、查閱二手文獻(xiàn)資 料能力，具有一

9、定的一手?jǐn)?shù)據(jù)調(diào)研能力，具有理論與方法的綜合運(yùn)用能力，具有對學(xué)術(shù)研究問題的判斷、分析與解決能力，具有英文應(yīng)用能力。/4.Research Ability: No plagiarism problem, and copy rate of content should bebelow 20% （exclude cit ing parts）. The stude nts have good ability to in vestigate, collect first-ha nd or sec on d-ha nd data,use theory into practice, identify, ana

10、lyze, and solve academic problems. The research contents and conclusions show thegood En glish ability of stude nts.5.成果質(zhì)量：論文結(jié)論需要說明全部研究問題，提出的建議具有邏輯性、可行性和創(chuàng)新性，針對研究問題提出 未來研究方向。文題相符，格式與體例規(guī)范，內(nèi)容摘要、注釋、參考資料等組成部分齊全，字?jǐn)?shù)合乎要求，圖1 / 3表豐富、數(shù)據(jù)充實(shí)，沒有錯(cuò)別子，語言流暢。15. Overall Quality: The con elusion needs to address all of

11、the researchquestio ns, the suggestio ns are logical, applicable and creative, recomme nds the reas on able future study. Compl ying withthe topic, sta ndard format and structures, in cludi ng abstract, no tes, referen ces. Eno ugh tables, figures, and data. Withoutspell ing mistake, without awkward

12、 Ian guage.答辯機(jī)構(gòu)對論文(設(shè)計(jì))評價(jià)的指標(biāo)、評價(jià)等級及對應(yīng)的得分/(2)Academic Dissertati on Grad ing by the Oral Defense Committee評價(jià)指標(biāo)/Standards評價(jià)等級及對應(yīng)得分 /Levels and Grades優(yōu)秀/Dist inction良好/Merit中等/Satisfactory合格/Pass不合 格/Fail1.選題與研究主旨 / Topic Choosi ng & Research Purpose19-2017-1815-1612-14122.總體結(jié)構(gòu)及邏輯性 / Structures and L

13、ogicality19-2017-1815-1612-14123.能力水平 /Research Ability19-2017-1815-1612-14124.成果質(zhì)量 / Overall Quality19-2017-1815-1612-14125.答辯質(zhì)量 /Oral Defe nse Quality19-2017-1815-1612-1412評價(jià)指標(biāo)的含義/Details of Standards1.選題與研究主旨：選題需符合本專業(yè)培養(yǎng)目標(biāo)，體現(xiàn)綜合訓(xùn)練的基本要求，運(yùn)用一手資料或經(jīng)過本人統(tǒng)計(jì)分 析的二手?jǐn)?shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行實(shí)證研究。研究主旨明確，具有較強(qiáng)的文獻(xiàn)基礎(chǔ)和理論支撐，應(yīng)用了問卷調(diào)查或案例分析等

14、2 / 3適當(dāng)?shù)难芯糠椒?，并進(jìn)行假設(shè)檢驗(yàn)，內(nèi)容難易程度和適中，預(yù)期結(jié)論具有一定的理論意義和學(xué)術(shù)價(jià)值。/1. TopicChoosing & Research Purpose: The topic is well linked with student scurriculieducation target, and shows the stude ntcosnprehe nsive study, the first-ha nd materials or sec on d-ha nd data an alyzed by stude nt should be used in research

15、. Theresearch problem is clear and has strong theoretical base, the survey, case study or other appropriate methodologywithhypothesis testing is chosen and well designed. The expected research result needs to show the academic meaning.2.總體結(jié)構(gòu)及邏輯性：論文遵循學(xué)術(shù)研究的總體思路，結(jié)構(gòu)清晰，邏輯性強(qiáng)，數(shù)據(jù)分析部分突出，具有明確的觀 點(diǎn)與學(xué)術(shù)貢獻(xiàn)。文獻(xiàn)綜述全面并

16、與研究問題一致，論證充分并具有較強(qiáng)的理論基礎(chǔ)，研究方法的選取與使用合理，數(shù)據(jù)分析與實(shí)證研究深入，研究結(jié)論針對實(shí)證研究結(jié)果進(jìn)行詳細(xì)討論，政策建議具有一定的可行性、操作性。/3. Structures and Logicality: The research needs to follow the procedure of academic research, has clear structures andstrong sense of logicality, and highlight data an alysis part. The literature review is comprehe

17、 nsive and related to researchproblems, the an alysis has strong theoretical base, the research methodology is well desig ned and used, data analysis andempirical study is adequately effective, research result links the empirical study and provides detailed discussi on, the policysuggestio n could b

18、e more applicable and feasibility.3.能力水平：杜絕抄襲，反抄襲軟件檢測重復(fù)率(扣除引用部分)低于20%。 具有實(shí)地調(diào)研、 查閱二手文獻(xiàn)資 料能力，具有一定的一手?jǐn)?shù)據(jù)調(diào)研能力，具有理論與方法的綜合運(yùn)用能力，具有對學(xué)術(shù)研究問題的判斷、分析與解決能力，具有英文應(yīng)用能力。 /4.Research Ability: No plagiarism problem, and copy rate of content should be below 20%(exclude cit ing parts). The stude nts have good ability to i

19、n vestigate, collect first-ha nd or sec on d-ha nd data, use theory intopractice, ide ntify, an alyze, and solve academic problems. The research contents and con clusi ons show the good En glishability of stude nts.4. 成果質(zhì)量：論文結(jié)論需要說明全部研究問題，提出的建議具有邏輯性、可行性和創(chuàng)新性，針對研究問題提出 未來研究方向。文題相符，格式與體例規(guī)范，內(nèi)容摘要、注釋、參考資料等組成部分齊全，字?jǐn)?shù)合乎要求，圖表豐富、數(shù)據(jù)充實(shí)，沒有錯(cuò)別字，語言流暢。/5. Overall Quality: The con clusion needs to address all of the researchquestio ns, the suggestio ns ar