福特8D報(bào)告ppt課件_第1頁(yè)
福特8D報(bào)告ppt課件_第2頁(yè)
福特8D報(bào)告ppt課件_第3頁(yè)
福特8D報(bào)告ppt課件_第4頁(yè)
福特8D報(bào)告ppt課件_第5頁(yè)
已閱讀5頁(yè),還剩25頁(yè)未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

1、1FORD 8D Methodology / DMAIC Approach & PDCA.2PDCA introduction8D introduction DMAIC brief introductionCIT introduction.3PDCAPDCA Cycle: Plan 方案 Do 執(zhí)行 Check 檢查 Action 糾正活動(dòng).4PDCA 改良方式C-Check檢查A-Action糾正活動(dòng)D-Do執(zhí)行P-Plan方案Continuous ImprovementPDCA是一個(gè)繼續(xù)的質(zhì)量改善的螺旋上升循環(huán).5優(yōu)質(zhì)企業(yè)客戶稱心PDCAPDCAPDCAPDCA 繼續(xù)改良PDCA不是一個(gè)平

2、面環(huán),它是階梯式上升的,這個(gè)循環(huán)走完一遍應(yīng)該就曾經(jīng)處理一部分問(wèn)題,獲得一部分成果,到了循環(huán)的下一個(gè)周期,在范圍上就應(yīng)該產(chǎn)生了變化,所以說(shuō)它不是一個(gè)平面環(huán)。.6Ford-8D PracticeFollow this template!.7運(yùn)用 Ford 8D 的時(shí)機(jī) Consequences identified因果關(guān)系的鑒別 Cause unknown緣由不明時(shí)用8D來(lái)找緣由 Resources for problem solution & recurrence prevention management-approved 處理問(wèn)題的資源和防止再發(fā)生措施的同意 Single-person ca

3、pacity for problem-solving exceeded不是一個(gè)人能處理的,需求經(jīng)過(guò)腦力激蕩和團(tuán)隊(duì)協(xié)作來(lái)處理 Symptoms defined異常情況曾經(jīng)出現(xiàn),并很明顯 Symptom quantified with measurement異常情況可量化.8Ford-8D WorkflowDescribe the ProblemD1: 主題選定及小組成立D2: 問(wèn)題描畫(huà)及緣由確認(rèn)D3: 展開(kāi)暫時(shí)防堵措施D4: 定義及驗(yàn)證真因D5: 列出, 選定及驗(yàn)證永久對(duì)策D6: 執(zhí)行永久對(duì)策及效果確認(rèn)D7: 預(yù)防再發(fā)及規(guī)范化D8: 恭賀團(tuán)隊(duì)及未來(lái)方向Prevent RecurrenceImpl

4、ement Permanent Corrective ActionRecognize Team & Individual ContributionsYNEstablish a TeamDevelop Interim Containment ActionDefine & Verify Root CauseChoose & Verify Permanent Corrective Actions.9D1: Team BuildingEstablish a team with people:與此project 或任務(wù)相關(guān)的人有cross function的人一同參與有相關(guān)的knowledge expe

5、rience定期每周/每月review進(jìn)度.10D2: Problem Description What is wrong with what? How can the problem be quantified? What? When? Where? How much? Cause & Effect? Something changed / never been successful?.11D3: Development of ICAICA = Interim Containment Action (暫時(shí)防堵措施) Quick fixes Temporary detective action

6、s Isolation from harmful effects. Short-term action before PCA are taken.PCA = Permanent Corrective Action.12D4: Definition & Verification of Root Cause Identify “real problem- 5 why Test each possible cause. Systematic use of resources. Ideality (What it is in best way)NO?YES?.13 Root Cause Identif

7、ication - SamplingProblem: Bipolar transistor gain in BiCMOS process out-of-spec high at e-test (WAT). 在WAT測(cè)試中發(fā)現(xiàn)BiCMOS工藝中的雙極晶體管增益高出規(guī) 范的要求 Why#1 Why was the bipolar transistor gain too high? 為什么這個(gè)雙極晶體管的增益太高?Answer#1: Emitter junction was too deep. 發(fā)謝極太深How do you know when you have found the true roo

8、t cause? there must be some element of human decision. .14Why#2: Why was the emitter junction too deep? 為什么發(fā)謝極太深?Answer#2: Actual furnace temperature was slightly high. (confirmed by manual profiling) 爐管的實(shí)踐溫度偏高了一點(diǎn)Why#3: Why was the actual furnace temperature slightly high? 為什么實(shí)踐的溫度會(huì)偏高一點(diǎn)?Answer#3: Fu

9、rnace controller spike thermocouples (T/Cs) did not extend far enough into the heat zone. 爐管的熱電偶控制器不可以控制到爐管加熱的整個(gè)區(qū)域 Root Cause Identification - Sampling.15 Root Cause Identification - SamplingWhy#4: Why didnt the spike thermocouples not extend far enough into the heat zone? 為什么爐管的熱電偶控制器不可以控制到爐管加熱的整個(gè)區(qū)

10、 域?Answer#4a: Thermocouples were slightly shorter than previous ones. 這個(gè)熱電偶比之前的一個(gè)短Answer#4b: T/C position was not checked after installation. 安裝后熱電偶的位置沒(méi)有檢查熱電偶的位置偏移了 .16D4: Definition & Verification of Root CauseWhy#5a: Why were the spike T/Cs slightly shorter than previous ones? 為什么這個(gè)熱電偶比之前的一個(gè)短?Answ

11、er#5a: Spike T/Cs were being purchased from a new vendor. 這個(gè)熱電偶是從一個(gè)新的供應(yīng)商那里采購(gòu)的 Why#6a: Why was a new spike T/C vendor being used. 為什么要從這個(gè)新的供應(yīng)商處采購(gòu)?Answer#6a: Reduced costs. 降低本錢(qián) Why#7a: Why wasnt this problem anticipated? 為什么沒(méi)有預(yù)料到這個(gè)問(wèn)題?Answer #7a: No guidelines or procedures for such changes (no physic

12、al comparison done and no “What-could-go-wrong? analysis). 對(duì)這樣的變卦沒(méi)有程序規(guī)定沒(méi)有做對(duì)比實(shí)驗(yàn),也沒(méi)有“能夠 會(huì)引起什么樣的錯(cuò)誤的分析“沒(méi)有程序文件或檢查表是一個(gè)經(jīng)常導(dǎo)致問(wèn)題發(fā)生的根本緣由。.17D4: Definition & Verification of Root CauseWhy#5b: Why was the T/C position not checked after installation? 為什么安裝后熱電偶的位置沒(méi)有檢查Answer#5b: Equipment tech did not expect any pr

13、oblem. 設(shè)備偵探?jīng)]有預(yù)期有任何問(wèn)題。 Why#6b: Why did the Equip Tech not expect any problem. 為什么設(shè)備偵探?jīng)]有預(yù)期有任何問(wèn)題?Answer#6b: He was not informed that a new spike T/C vendor was being used. 沒(méi)有通知他運(yùn)用了新廠商的熱電偶 Why#7b: Why was Equip Tech not informed that a new spike T/C vendor was being used? 為什么沒(méi)有通知他運(yùn)用了新廠商的熱電偶Answer #7b: N

14、o procedure to do so for such material changes. 對(duì)于這個(gè)資料的變卦,沒(méi)有程序規(guī)定要這樣做?!皼](méi)有程序文件或檢查表是一個(gè)經(jīng)常導(dǎo)致問(wèn)題發(fā)生的根本緣由。.18下面列舉了一些在FAB反復(fù)發(fā)生的典型的根本緣由 沒(méi)有程序、或程序不完善、或 程序沒(méi)有文件化或沒(méi)有檢查表 文件化的程序不清楚、不明確、不完善或讓人糊涂。 騰躍式的程序以節(jié)省時(shí)間.D4: Definition & Verification of Root Cause.19D5: Choice & Verification of PCAPCA = Permanent Corrective Action

15、Elimination of root cause? Costs? Production stop? Overtime work necessary for implementation? Overtime work necessary for maintenance? .20D5: Choice & Verification of PCA針對(duì)每一“為什么的答案都應(yīng)至少有一個(gè)措施這也就意味著一個(gè)充分的預(yù)防處理方案至少有57個(gè)措施一種常犯的錯(cuò)誤是把偵測(cè)措施作為預(yù)防措施。如檢驗(yàn)、丈量、檢查、監(jiān)控、做先行批等。偵測(cè)措施是必需的,但不是充分的它們只是遏制了這個(gè)問(wèn)題。偵測(cè)措施與消費(fèi)沒(méi)有直接的關(guān)系它們不能

16、對(duì)產(chǎn)品增值只是添加了本錢(qián)。它們就象買(mǎi)“保險(xiǎn),保險(xiǎn)是有本錢(qián)的保險(xiǎn)費(fèi).21D6: Implementation & Validation of PCA ICA removed Long-term result monitored.22D7: Prevention of Recurrence System modification according to PCA Improvement standardizationFollow me!文件化的程序并進(jìn)展適當(dāng)?shù)呐嘤?xùn)才是真正的預(yù)防措施 .23預(yù)防措施可采取以下的格式進(jìn)展:建立或修正程序針對(duì)沒(méi)有程序或不完善程序程序的文件化(建立/修正文件)培訓(xùn)文件的執(zhí)

17、行消除環(huán)境要素 D7: Prevention of Recurrence.24D8: Recognition of Team & Individual ContributionsAppreciation for every members effort !.25DEFINE the customer, their CTQ (Critical to Quality) issues, and the core process involved.MEASURE the performance of the core process involved.Stage 1: 定義改善時(shí)機(jī)Stage 2: 丈

18、量運(yùn)作程度Stage 3: 分析改善時(shí)機(jī)Stage 4: 改善運(yùn)作程度Stage 5: 控制運(yùn)作程度CONTROL the Improvements to keep the process on the new course.IMPROVE the target process by designing creative solutions to fix and prevent problems.Changeoperations?Re-define the operationsNoYesANALYZE the data collected to determine root cause of

19、defects and opportunities for improvement.DMAIC Workflow.26Stage 1: Define Define who customers are, what their requirements are for products and services, and what their expectations are Define project boundaries? The stop and start of the process Define the process to be improved by mapping the process flow.27Stage 2: Measure Develop a data collection plan for the process Collect data from many sources to determine types of defects and m

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論