專題二32佳達再保險經(jīng)紀有限公司Guy-Carpen匯總課件_第1頁
專題二32佳達再保險經(jīng)紀有限公司Guy-Carpen匯總課件_第2頁
專題二32佳達再保險經(jīng)紀有限公司Guy-Carpen匯總課件_第3頁
專題二32佳達再保險經(jīng)紀有限公司Guy-Carpen匯總課件_第4頁
專題二32佳達再保險經(jīng)紀有限公司Guy-Carpen匯總課件_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩33頁未讀 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

1、專題二32佳達再保險經(jīng)紀有限公司Guy_Carpen匯總專題二32佳達再保險經(jīng)紀有限公司Guy_Carpen匯總量化與管理中國巨災風險2008年9月26日David Lightfoot 佳達再保險經(jīng)紀 西雅圖分部量化與管理中國巨災風險2008年9月26日David LigDiscussion TopicsGlobal Evolution of Cat Models2008 Cat EventsRising Expectations in Cat Risk Measurement and ManagementRegulatory viewRating agency viewManaging Ca

2、tastrophe riskEvent monitoringi-aXsDiscussion TopicsGlobal Evolut討論議題巨災模型的全球演進2008年巨災事件對巨災風險評估和管理的新期望從監(jiān)管的角度從評級機構(gòu)的角度巨災風險管理事件監(jiān)測i-aXs討論議題巨災模型的全球演進Evolution of Catastrophe Models19802008Significant Natural Catastrophes (and insured losses)1989 Hugo US$4.5b1991 Mirellie US$5.2b1990 Vivian US3b1992 Andrew

3、 US$18b1994 Northridge US$12b1995 Kobe US$3b2001 WTC US20b2004 Charley, Frances, Ivan Jeanne US28b2005 Katrina US$50bCat Model EvolutionCat models largely ignored(cat loading based on experience rating)The rise of the CAT ModelIncreased worldwide coverageCatastrophe casualty modelling emergesModels

4、feel the strain losses exceed modelled resultsEvolution of Catastrophe Model巨災模型的演進19802008重大自然巨災事件 (以及保險損失)1989 颶風Hugo 45億美元1991 颶風Mirellie 52億美元1990 颶風Vivian 30億美元 1992 颶風Andrew 180億美元1994 Northridge地震 120億美元1995 Kobe地震 30億美元2001 911事件 200億美元2004 颶風Charley, Frances, Ivan Jeanne 280億美元2005 颶風Katrin

5、a 500億美元巨災模型演進巨災模型很大程度上被忽視 (巨災附加費率建立在經(jīng)驗值上)巨災模型的出現(xiàn)和發(fā)展世界范圍的覆蓋面不斷擴大巨災傷亡模型出現(xiàn)模型面臨壓力 - 實際損失超過模型結(jié)果巨災模型的演進19802008重大自然巨災事件 1989 Value of Cat Models1st Layer2nd Layer3rd LayerNon-workingLayerWorkingLayerExperience RatingExposure Rating / Cat ModelingLossValue of Cat Models1st Layer2n巨災模型的價值第一層第二層第三層非工作層(有理賠的

6、概率較低)工作層(有理賠的概率較高)根據(jù)經(jīng)驗值定價根據(jù)風險 / 模型定價理賠額巨災模型的價值第一層第二層第三層非工作層工作層(有理賠的概率The Simple Method to Exposure RatingEarthquake ExampleThe largest magnitude earthquake you might expect near Beijing is 8.0The probability of this event could be about 1 in 500 years (based on historical data)1 such event in the la

7、st 500 years (1679)A PML estimate for this could range from 5% to 15% of Beijing total sums insured Probability of a 6.0 to 7.9 magnitude earthquake near Beijing is about 2.00%About 10 events in the last 500 years. the damage in these events could range from 1% to 10%A significant level of uncertain

8、ty is associated with these methodsThe Simple Method to Exposure 風險定價的簡單方法以地震為例在北京附近發(fā)生的可以預見的最大震級地震是8.0級可能的最大損失將達到大約北京地區(qū)總保額的15%根據(jù)歷史數(shù)據(jù),該事件發(fā)生的可能性大約是500年一遇這樣的事件在過去500年中只發(fā)生過1次(1679年)在北京周圍發(fā)生6.0 至7.9級地震的可能性大約是2.00% (50年1遇)在過去500年中發(fā)生過大約10次. 這些事件可能造成的損失介于北京地區(qū)總保額的1%至10%如果具備北京地區(qū)的風險累計數(shù)字,就可以得到這些事件的大約損失估計這些方法存在很大

9、的不確定性風險定價的簡單方法以地震為例在北京附近發(fā)生的可以預見的最大China Catastrophe ModelsAvailable Models“Detailed” and “Aggregate” models licensed from key global vendors:AIR Worldwide Corporation (AIR)CLASIC/2 (Detailed) & CATRADER versions 10.0 (Aggregate)Perils: Earthquake & TyphoonRisk: PropertyEQECAT (EQE) WORLDCATenterpris

10、e version 3.10 (Aggregate)Perils: Earthquake & TyphoonRisk: PropertyRisk Management Solutions (RMS) RiskLink version 8.0 (Detailed)Perils: EarthquakeRisk: Property & Casualty* Images supplied by Guy Carpenters China Catastrophe ModelsAvail中國巨災模型可用的模型經(jīng)世界主要模型公司授權(quán)的“具體” 和 “累計” 模型 AIR Worldwide Corporati

11、on (AIR)CLASIC/2 (具體) & CATRADER versions 10.0 (累計)模擬災害: 地震 & 臺風風險類別: 財產(chǎn)EQECAT (EQE) WORLDCATenterprise version 3.10 (累計)模擬災害: 地震 & 臺風風險類別: 財產(chǎn)Risk Management Solutions (RMS) RiskLink version 8.0 (具體)模擬災害: 地震風險類別: 財產(chǎn),傷亡* Images supplied by Guy Carpenters 中國巨災模型可用的模型經(jīng)世界主要模型公司授權(quán)的“具體” 和Rising Expectatio

12、ns in Catastrophic Risk ManagementRegulatory ViewCIRCCircular No. 402 (April 2007), in response to increased catastrophic risk, companies are encouraged to (among other things):Appropriately purchase catastrophic reinsurance to leverage international reinsurance sourcesLeverage tools developed by th

13、ird parties to gradually improve the state of catastrophic risk modeling in ChinaGlobally move to define appropriate capital levels through risk-based capital measuresEuropean Union through Solvency 2 regulation is setting target capital to be 99.5% VaR (1 in 200 year worst outcome)Scenarios would g

14、enerally involve a catRising Expectations in Catastr對巨災風險管理的日益提升的期望從監(jiān)管的角度中國保監(jiān)會2007年4月第402號通知用以應對日益頻繁的巨災風險,鼓勵保險公司 (但不限于):妥善安排巨災再保險,充分利用再保險資源利用外界開發(fā)的工具, 來逐步改進中國的巨災風險模型 從全球來講,對資本充足性的判定已逐步轉(zhuǎn)向以利用風險資本的測量為依據(jù)歐盟通過的Solvency 2 監(jiān)管規(guī)定,將資本標準設定在99.5%的在險價值水平(換言之就是200年一遇的水平)不同的狀況通常都考量了巨災的因素對巨災風險管理的日益提升的期望從監(jiān)管的角度中國保監(jiān)會Ris

15、ing Expectations in Catastrophic Risk ManagementRating Agency ViewCatastrophic risk a key element in capital solvency calculationA.M. Best uses greater of 1/100 year wind or 1/250 year earthquake net cat loss amount as a benchmarkS&P uses 1 in 250 year aggregate net loss amount as a benchmarkA.M. Be

16、st view of a strong cat risk management programEmphasis on data quality Monitoring exposure throughUsing one or more catastrophe modeling toolsReviewing aggregate loss exposure accumulationConsidering potential loss exposure scenarios in addition to modeled outputManaging to realistic loss scenarios

17、, not the lowest case loss estimatesImplementing controls, including:Establishing specific aggregate limits using a reasonable and defensible basisPurchasing an appropriate reinsurance program Integration of catastrophe management into the underwriting processRising Expectations in Catastr對巨災風險管理的日益

18、提升的期望值從監(jiān)管的角度巨災風險是測算資本及償付能力的關(guān)鍵要素A.M. Best 利用100年一遇風災或者250年一遇地震可能產(chǎn)生的凈自留損失,兩者取高者為準,來作為衡量的標準S&P 利用250年1遇累計凈自留損失金額來作為衡量的標準A.M. Best 判斷一個好的巨災風險管理項目時強調(diào)數(shù)據(jù)質(zhì)量監(jiān)測風險的方法包括:使用一個或一個以上的巨災模型工具監(jiān)測風險累積情況在模型結(jié)果的基礎上,考慮其他可能的損失情境考察真實可能的損失狀況, 而不是最低的損失評估監(jiān)控, 包括:利用合理和站得住腳的方法建立詳細的累積限額購買適當?shù)脑俦kU保障將巨災管理整合于核保流程當中對巨災風險管理的日益提升的期望值從監(jiān)管的角度

19、巨災風險是測算Data QualityRequirements for Earthquake Location dataAIRs analysis is run at district level (approximately 2,900 districts)The RMS model can be run at any level (down to postal code) (approximately 33,000)Data QualityRequirements for 數(shù)據(jù)質(zhì)量以地震模型數(shù)據(jù)要求為例地址信息:AIR的分析可以達到區(qū)一級的水平 (全國大約 2,900 個區(qū))RMS則可以達

20、到6位郵政編碼水平 (全國大約33,000個郵政編碼 )數(shù)據(jù)質(zhì)量以地震模型數(shù)據(jù)要求為例地址信息:Data QualityRequirements for Earthquake, ContinuedConstructionAIR has 46 construction typesRMS has 40 unique construction typesOccupancyAIR has 5 unique occupancy types given a known construction type RMS has 5 unique occupancy types given a known cons

21、truction typeYear built(reflects changing building codes)Building height / number of storiesData QualityRequirements for 數(shù)據(jù)質(zhì)量以地震模型數(shù)據(jù)要求為例(續(xù))建筑類型AIR 有46種建筑類型RMS 有40種建筑類型行業(yè)類別AIR 針對每一個建筑類型都有5個單獨的行業(yè)類別RMS針對每一個建筑類型都有5個單獨的行業(yè)類別建筑年份反映不同時期的建筑標準建筑高度/樓層數(shù)量數(shù)據(jù)質(zhì)量以地震模型數(shù)據(jù)要求為例(續(xù))建筑類型Data QualityLoss Estimates by Constr

22、uction Class and Building Age Comparisons1M RMB Buildings Exposure in Beijing, “Unknown” Occupancy Earthquake Model, Average Annual Loss30% difference because of year builtData QualityLoss Estimates by數(shù)據(jù)質(zhì)量比較不同的建筑結(jié)構(gòu)和年限下的預估理賠額在北京一百萬的大廈保額, “未知”行業(yè)地震模型,年平均損失因為年限不同,預估年平均損失相差30%數(shù)據(jù)質(zhì)量比較不同的建筑結(jié)構(gòu)和年限下的預估理賠額在北京一百

23、萬Understanding UncertaintyDamage range 1% - 90% Understanding UncertaintyDamag理解不確定性Damage range 1% - 90% 理解不確定性Damage range 1% - 90% Ratio of gross AAL to premium or TIV Explore profitability issues by product, province, city, etc., down to the location levelMonitoring Exposure and Implementing Con

24、trolsIntegration of Cat Modeling into Underwriting ProcessCat Loss Ratios ExampleRatio of gross AAL to premium 年平均損失與保費或者總保額之間的比率關(guān)系按險種,省份,市直到具體地點來考察盈利監(jiān)控風險將巨災模型整合到核保流程(以巨災損失率為例)年平均損失與保費或者總保額之間的比率關(guān)系監(jiān)控風險將巨災模型27Managing to Realistic ScenariosMetaRisk (Guy Carpenter DFA tool) Timeline Simulation29Managin

25、g to Realistic Scenar28管理現(xiàn)實情境MetaRisk (Guy Carpenter 動態(tài)財務分析工具) 時間軸模擬30管理現(xiàn)實情境MetaRisk (Guy CarpentImplementing ControlsReinsurance ExampleRisk Management CostRisk Management BenefitBreak EvenImplementing ControlsReinsura風險控制以再保險為例風險管理成本風險管理收益持平點風險控制以再保險為例風險管理成本風險管理收益持平點Event MonitoringEvent Monitorin

26、g事件監(jiān)測事件監(jiān)測Video DemonstrationVideo DemonstrationofVideo DemonstrationVideo Demon視頻演示視頻演示Instrat Center of Analytical ExcellenceHistoryFirst reinsurance broker analytical unit founded 20 years agoCurrentlyOver 200 actuaries, cat modelers, financial analysts, scientists, software development20 unified

27、global locationsGrowing resource throughout Asia PacificIntellectual and technical resource for Guy CarpenterInstrat Center of Analytical EInstrat,分析優(yōu)勢中心所在歷史成立于20年前,第一個再保經(jīng)紀人獨立擁有的量化分析團隊現(xiàn)在擁有超過200名精算師,巨災模型師,財務分析師,科學家以及軟件開發(fā)人員分布于全球20個辦公室在亞太區(qū)的團隊逐步壯大是Guy Carpenter重要的智慧和技術(shù)資源Instrat,分析優(yōu)勢中心所在歷史Disclaimer for

28、PresentationThe data and analysis provided by Guy Carpenter herein or in connection herewith are provided for the participants (the Participants) of the 9th Chinese Actuarial Annual Conference “as is,” without warranty of any kind whether express or implied. The analysis is based upon data provided

29、by or obtained from external sources, the accuracy of which has not been independently verified by Guy Carpenter. Neither Guy Carpenter, its affiliates nor their officers, directors, agents, modelers, or subcontractors (collectively, “Providers”) guarantee or warrant the correctness, completeness, currentness, merchantability, or fitness for a particular purpose of such data and analysis. The data and analysis are intended to be used solely for the purpose of the Conference and Participants shall not disclose the work product to any third party, except its reinsurer

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論