GMAT考試閱讀題三大難點(diǎn)及練習(xí)_第1頁
GMAT考試閱讀題三大難點(diǎn)及練習(xí)_第2頁
GMAT考試閱讀題三大難點(diǎn)及練習(xí)_第3頁
GMAT考試閱讀題三大難點(diǎn)及練習(xí)_第4頁
GMAT考試閱讀題三大難點(diǎn)及練習(xí)_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩5頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

1、第 第 頁GMAT考試閱讀題三大難點(diǎn)及練習(xí)閱讀題三大難點(diǎn):一、時(shí)間問題許多同學(xué)在面對(duì)GMAT閱讀考試時(shí),都會(huì)感嘆時(shí)間不夠,常會(huì)有考生來不及看完整篇閱讀文章。其中做題速度無法達(dá)到要求的緣由有許多,詞匯量,閱讀方法,做題技巧無一不是。此外,還有一個(gè)很重要的因素:不會(huì)取舍,不會(huì)衡量做題的優(yōu)先性。鑒于GMAT考試開弓沒有回頭箭的考試模式,假如在做閱讀題時(shí)遇到了難度很高,估計(jì)會(huì)花費(fèi)大量時(shí)間定位解析也難以保證正確率的題目,建議大家徑直猜想答案后進(jìn)入下一題,不要在這些題目上花費(fèi)太多時(shí)間。學(xué)會(huì)取舍才能保證后續(xù)題目的解題時(shí)間,從而彌補(bǔ)損失,取得更好的成果。二、理解問題許多考生在平常的練習(xí)和考場上面對(duì)需要找關(guān)鍵詞

2、和中心句的.題目時(shí)總是跟著感覺走, 完全失了方向和重點(diǎn),徑直導(dǎo)致面對(duì)題目時(shí)難以回到原文中定位。所以,考生應(yīng)學(xué)會(huì)在閱讀過程中徑直發(fā)覺題目的線索,也就是關(guān)鍵詞中心句。建議大家在平常的課堂和練習(xí)中,多加總結(jié)考點(diǎn)詞的特點(diǎn),以達(dá)到用一到兩個(gè)詞就涵蓋整個(gè)題目的效果。利用關(guān)鍵詞定位答案,更集中目標(biāo),更有方向性。三、生詞問題GMAT閱讀考試文章許多來源于國外原版的期刊或雜志,話題掩蓋面廣,科技,自然,環(huán)保,社會(huì),文化,工作,生物,地理等無不涉及,所以遇到生詞在情理之中。但一部分考生遇到生詞后就信心全失,慌亂至極,打破了自己原有的閱讀節(jié)奏和速度,做題時(shí)也由于生詞被卡殼,結(jié)果題目不僅沒有解出,還影響了后面的做題速

3、度和時(shí)間,可謂一發(fā)動(dòng)而遷全身。對(duì)此,專家認(rèn)為,生詞的涌現(xiàn)在所難免,只要大家有基本的詞匯量,完全可以將生詞的問題逐一擊破。1. 有時(shí)候生詞屬于比較專業(yè)的詞匯,它們的涌現(xiàn)不是為了考察考生的詞匯量,更多的是檢閱大家的應(yīng)變和判斷技能。尤其在題目中涌現(xiàn)的所謂生詞,更是可以壞事變好事,成為考生定位答案的線索詞。2. 有時(shí)候生詞的含義可以在上下文中徑直得到。在GMAT閱讀文章時(shí)遇到的生詞,有相當(dāng)一部分的含義可以通過多種猜想單詞的方法得到,所以,在生詞的四周或上下文查找其說明不失為有效途徑。閱讀練習(xí):Since Would War II considerable advances have been made

4、 in the area of health-care services. These include better access to health care (particularly for the poor and minorities), improvements in physical plants, and increased numbers of physicians and other health personnel. All have played a part in the recent improvement in life e*pectancy (life e*pe

5、ctancy: n.平均壽命(=e*pectation of life). But there is mounting criticism of the large remaining gaps in access, unbridled cost inflation, the further fragmentation of service, e*cessive indulgence in wasteful high-technology gadgeteering, and a breakdown in doctor-patient relationships. In recent years

6、 (in recent years: 最近幾年中) proposed panaceas and new programs, small and large, have proliferated at a feverish pace and disappointments multiply at almost the same rate. This has led to an increased pessimismeverything has been tried and nothing workswhich sometimes borders on cynicism or even nihil

7、ism.It is true that the automatic pass through of rapidly spiraling costs (spiraling costs: 螺旋式上升的費(fèi)用) to government and insurance carriers, which was set in a publicized environment of the richest nation in the world, produced for a time (for a time: adv.臨時(shí), 一度) a sense of unlimited resources and al

8、lowed to develop a mood whereby every practitioner and institution could do his own thing without undue concern for the Medical Commons. The practice of full-cost reimbursement encouraged capital investment and now the industry is overcapitalized. Many cities have hundreds of e*cess hospital beds; h

9、ospitals have proliferated a superabundance of high-technology equipment; and structural ostentation and lu*ury were the order of the day (order of the day: 議程,口流行的事物,風(fēng)尚). In any given day, one-fourth of all community beds are vacant; e*pensive equipment is underused or, worse, used unnecessarily. C

10、apital investment brings rapidly rising operating costs (operating costs: 生產(chǎn)費(fèi)用,營業(yè)成本).Yet, in part, this pessimism derives from e*pecting too much of health care. It must be realized that care is, for most people, a painful e*perience, often accompanied by fear and unwelcome results. Although there i

11、s vast room for improvement, health care will always retain some unpleasantness and frustration. Moreover, the capacities of medical science are limited. Humpty Dumpty (一經(jīng)損壞無法修復(fù)的東西) cannot always be put back together again. Too many physicians are reluctant to admit their limitations to patients; to

12、o many patients and families are unwilling to accept such realities. Nor is it true that everything has been tried and nothing works, as shown by the prepaid group practice plans of the Kaiser Foundation and at Puget Sound. In the main (in the main: adv.大體上), however, such undertakings have been dro

13、wned by a veritable flood of public and private moneys which have supported and encouraged the continuation of conventional practices and subsidized their shortcomings on a massive, almost unrestricted scale. E*cept for the most idealistic and dedicated, there were no incentives to seek change or to

14、 practice self-restraint or frugality. In this atmosphere, it is not fair to condemn as failures all attempted e*periments; it may be more accurate to say many never had a fair trial.1. The author implies that the Kaiser Foundation and Puget Sound plans (lines 47-48) differed from other plans by(A)

15、encouraging capital investment(B) requiring physicians to treat the poor(C) providing incentives for cost control(D) employing only dedicated and idealistic doctors(C)(E) relying primarily on public funding2. The author mentions all of the following as consequences of full-cost reimbursement E*CEPT(

16、A) rising operating costs(B) underused hospital facilities(C) overcapitalization(D) overreliance on e*pensive equipment(E)(E) lack of services for minorities3. The tone of the passage can best be described as(A) light-hearted and amused(B) objective but concerned(C) detached and unconcerned(D) cauti

17、ous but sincere(B)(E) enthusiastic and enlightened4. According to the author, the pessimism mentioned at line 35 is partly attributable to the fact that(A) there has been little real improvement in health-care services(B) e*pectations about health-care services are sometimes unrealistic(C) large seg

18、ments of the population find it impossible to get access to health-care services(D) advances in technology have made health care service unaffordable(B)(E) doctors are now less concerned with patient care5. The author cites the prepaid plans in lines 46-48 as(A) countere*amples to the claim that not

19、hing has worked(B) e*amples of health-care plans that were over-funded(C) evidence that health-care services are fragmented(D) proof of the theory that no plan has been successful(A)(E) e*periments that yielded disappointing results6. It can be inferred that the sentence Humpty Dumpty cannot always

20、be put back together again means that(A) the cost of health-care services will not decline(B) some people should not become doctors(C) medical care is not really essential to good health(D) illness is often unpleasant and even painful(E)(E) medical science cannot cure every ill7. With which of the f

21、ollowing descriptions of the system for the delivery of health-care services would the author most likely agree?(A) It is biased in favor of doctors and against patients.(B) It is highly fragmented and completely ineffective(C) It has not embraced new technology rapidly enough(D) It is generally eff

22、ective but can be improved(D)(E) It discourages people from seeking medical care8. Which of the following best describes the logical structure of the selection?(A) The third paragraph is intended as a refutation of the first and second paragraphs.(B) The second and third paragraphs e*plain and put into perspective the points made in the first paragraph.(C) The second and third paragraphs e*plain and put into perspective the points made in the first paragraph.(D) The first paragraph describes a problem, and the second and third paragraphs present two horns of a dilemma.(

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論