供應鏈管理案例課件_第1頁
供應鏈管理案例課件_第2頁
供應鏈管理案例課件_第3頁
供應鏈管理案例課件_第4頁
供應鏈管理案例課件_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩65頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

YusanSupplyChain

RedesignandImprovementHKUST&StanfordYusanIndustriesLimitedFinalPresentationMarch27,2006YusanSupplyChain

RedesignanObjectiveEnhanceYusan’sProfitabilitybyRe-designingandImprovingSupplyChain2ObjectiveEnhanceYusan’sProfiFacingProblemExtraSupplyChainCostAirshipmentcostin2005:2MHKD(0.5%oftotalrevenue)HighreworkcostLowOn-Time-DeliveryRateThomson:28%3FacingProblem3MethodologyIdentifyInvestigateRecommendObjective4MethodologyIdentifyInvestigateScopeThomson’sProductsin2005(7)

2005Products(3)Pre-2005Products(4)CS190CS86RCD147BTM9235TM9237TM9245RCD1475InvestigateRecommendIdentifyScopeoftheanalysis:ThomsonproductsScopeThomson’sProductsin200IdentifiedProblemFocusonProduction6InvestigateRecommendIdentifyIdentifiedProblemFocusonProOrderProcessSalesProductionPlanningPurchasingProduction123456Customer78CustomerOrdersJobOrdersJobOrdersProductionScheduleRecommendIdentifyInvestigateweek7OrderProcessSalesProductionPInvestigationofProductionProductionPartSupplyCapacityPlanningRework8RecommendIdentifyInvestigateInvestigationofProductionProPartSupply44%ofthepartsupplylate:ConsequencesandCauses?Source:ProductionPlanning

Report(Jan–May2005)9InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkPartSupply44%ofthepartsupCriticalPartDelayCriticalParts:LongLeadtime-Expensive-NosubstituteNon-CriticalParts:ShortLeadtime-CommodityCriticalPartsNon-CriticalPartsPercentageofcriticalpartlateOctober95414%November81296%December2921012%Total4639310%Source:MeetingMinutesOct-Dec2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningRework10CriticalPartDelayCriticalPa330Suppliersin2005131(40%)averagequality<99.8%48RegularSuppliersNo

onecanachieve99.8%QAstandardUnreliableRegularSuppliersQualityPerformanceSuppliersAnalysisSummary11InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkPotentialtoimprovesupplierperformance330Suppliersin2005SuppliersRegularSuppliersQualityPerformancein200512QualityPassRate(%)MakesuresupplierskeepahighlevelofqualitySource:IQC2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkRegularSuppliersQualityPerfPartSupplyQualityCriticalpartsalsoarelessreliableQualityPassRate%13Source:IQC2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkCriticalpartsPartSupplyQualityCriticalpaCapacityEvaluationInvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkSource:ProductionPlanSept-Dec2005ProbleminallocatingthecapacitytoeachcustomerCapacityEvaluationInvestigateOvertimeEmployed15Source:WorkshopDailyReport,Feb2006InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningRework16%22%19%29%26%12%27%21%0%21%Inanon-peakseason,overtimeisstillhighOvertimeEmployed15Source:WorProductivity16Source:WorkshopDailyReport,Feb2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkRealProductivityisloworexpectedoneisnotappropriate?Productivity16Source:WorkshopWorkforceDistribution17LineCLineDWorkers*allocatedperline(average)8361Whereasdirectlylineworkers5737Source:WorkshopDailyReport,Feb2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkMoreattentionhastobepaidtoValue-addedproceduresWorkforceDistribution17LineCFinishedProductReworkRate18Source:QualityAssurance2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningRework89%11%FinishedProductReworkRate18ReworkRatebyCustomers19Source:QA,2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkReworkRatebyCustomers19SourReworkRateonProductionLines20VerydifferentreworkratesamongthelinesSource:QCDailyReport,Feb2006InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkAveragerework

rate:17.4%ReworkRateonProductionLineCausesandEffect21ReworkCapacityPlanningPartSupplyLowProfitabilityCausesandEffect21ReworkCapacRecommendations22IdentifyInvestigateRecommend123MakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleRecommendations22IdentifyInvesMetricIndustrialBenchmark(Median)*Yusan’sPerformanceDeliveryRatebyCommitDate91.5%40%OrderFulfillTime(days)29.5>39.0InventoryDaysofSupply(days)68.172.5Cash-to-CashCycleTime(days)73.330.5

Source:SCOR(Feb2005)23IdentifyInvestigateRecommendUseKeyIndicatorstocontrolSCimprovementsMakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleMetricIndustrialBenchmarkYusaMakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleCostMHKDAs%ofRevenueInventoryCarrying10.62.3%Backlog28.16.0%Rework&Scrap19.54.2%Total58.212.5%24IdentifyInvestigateRecommendKeeptrackofSupplyChainExtraCostsMakeSupplyChainPerformanceRecommendations25IdentifyInvestigateRecommend123MakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleEnhanceSupplierPerformanceRecommendations25IdentifyInvesEnhanceSupplierPerformanceCreateaCrossFunctionTeamPurchasing,QualityAssurance,Engineering,ProductionDetermineCriticalPerformanceMetricsDeliveryLeadTime,QualityDetermineMinimumPerformanceStandardMinimumQualityStandard,MinimumLeadTimeReduceSupplierBaseEliminateNon-qualifiedSuppliersAssessSupplierPerformanceRefineSupplierBaseQuarterly26IdentifyInvestigateRecommendEnhanceSupplierPerformanceCrRecommendations27IdentifyInvestigateRecommend123MakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleBettermanageordersEnhanceSupplierPerformanceRecommendations27IdentifyInvesBettermanageordersProductionPlanning:PlanforalltheexistingordersPlanforboththeassemblyandPCBAlinesPurchasingUnreliablesuppliers/Criticalparts:PurchaseAsSoonAsPossibleReliablesuppliers:PurchasebasedonProductionPlanningscheduleCommonparts:KeepSafetyStockBettermanageordersProductionUnaddressedProblemCommittedOrderOrderDeliveryProductionStart042LTLT-6-101PartorderPlacementLTForecastedOrderweeksUnaddressedProblemCommittedOTheEndTheEndBackUpSlidesBackUpSlidesSuppliersAnalysisSup.RegularSuppliers–Yusanpurchasedpartsfromthissuppliersmorethan10monthsAssumeoneproductuses50differentsuppliersX^50=FinalproductpassrateToachieve95%finalproductpassrate,eachsuppliersshouldprovidepartsat99.98%QualityToachieve90%finalproductpassrate,eachsuppliersshouldprovidepartsat99.79%QualitySuppliersAnalysisSup.RegularCalculationandAssumptions:InventoryCalculationInventory*YearlyInterestRateCalculationandAssumptions:ICalculationandAssumptions:BacklogCalculationIfDelayedLength>ThresholdUrgentDeliveryUnitUrgentDeliveryCost*NumofUnitsIfDelayedLength≤ThresholdCustomerSatisfactionDepreciationCostUnitBacklogCost*NumofUnits*DelayedLengthAssumptionUnitBacklogCost=10UnitHoldingCostCalculationandAssumptions:BCalculationandAssumptions:ReworkCalculationFinishedProductReworkCostUnitProductionCost*NumofUnitsSemi-FinishedProductReworkCostUnitIn-LineProductionCost*NumofUnitsScrapALotReworkedMorethanNTimesAssumptionUnitProductionCost=UnitCost*25%UnitIn-LineProductionCost=UnitCost*5%N=2CalculationandAssumptions:RYusanSupplyChain

RedesignandImprovementHKUST&StanfordYusanIndustriesLimitedFinalPresentationMarch27,2006YusanSupplyChain

RedesignanObjectiveEnhanceYusan’sProfitabilitybyRe-designingandImprovingSupplyChain37ObjectiveEnhanceYusan’sProfiFacingProblemExtraSupplyChainCostAirshipmentcostin2005:2MHKD(0.5%oftotalrevenue)HighreworkcostLowOn-Time-DeliveryRateThomson:28%38FacingProblem3MethodologyIdentifyInvestigateRecommendObjective39MethodologyIdentifyInvestigateScopeThomson’sProductsin2005(7)

2005Products(3)Pre-2005Products(4)CS190CS86RCD147BTM9235TM9237TM9245RCD14740InvestigateRecommendIdentifyScopeoftheanalysis:ThomsonproductsScopeThomson’sProductsin200IdentifiedProblemFocusonProduction41InvestigateRecommendIdentifyIdentifiedProblemFocusonProOrderProcessSalesProductionPlanningPurchasingProduction123456Customer78CustomerOrdersJobOrdersJobOrdersProductionScheduleRecommendIdentifyInvestigateweek42OrderProcessSalesProductionPInvestigationofProductionProductionPartSupplyCapacityPlanningRework43RecommendIdentifyInvestigateInvestigationofProductionProPartSupply44%ofthepartsupplylate:ConsequencesandCauses?Source:ProductionPlanning

Report(Jan–May2005)44InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkPartSupply44%ofthepartsupCriticalPartDelayCriticalParts:LongLeadtime-Expensive-NosubstituteNon-CriticalParts:ShortLeadtime-CommodityCriticalPartsNon-CriticalPartsPercentageofcriticalpartlateOctober95414%November81296%December2921012%Total4639310%Source:MeetingMinutesOct-Dec2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningRework45CriticalPartDelayCriticalPa330Suppliersin2005131(40%)averagequality<99.8%48RegularSuppliersNo

onecanachieve99.8%QAstandardUnreliableRegularSuppliersQualityPerformanceSuppliersAnalysisSummary46InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkPotentialtoimprovesupplierperformance330Suppliersin2005SuppliersRegularSuppliersQualityPerformancein200547QualityPassRate(%)MakesuresupplierskeepahighlevelofqualitySource:IQC2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkRegularSuppliersQualityPerfPartSupplyQualityCriticalpartsalsoarelessreliableQualityPassRate%48Source:IQC2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkCriticalpartsPartSupplyQualityCriticalpaCapacityEvaluationInvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkSource:ProductionPlanSept-Dec2005ProbleminallocatingthecapacitytoeachcustomerCapacityEvaluationInvestigateOvertimeEmployed50Source:WorkshopDailyReport,Feb2006InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningRework16%22%19%29%26%12%27%21%0%21%Inanon-peakseason,overtimeisstillhighOvertimeEmployed15Source:WorProductivity51Source:WorkshopDailyReport,Feb2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkRealProductivityisloworexpectedoneisnotappropriate?Productivity16Source:WorkshopWorkforceDistribution52LineCLineDWorkers*allocatedperline(average)8361Whereasdirectlylineworkers5737Source:WorkshopDailyReport,Feb2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkMoreattentionhastobepaidtoValue-addedproceduresWorkforceDistribution17LineCFinishedProductReworkRate53Source:QualityAssurance2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningRework89%11%FinishedProductReworkRate18ReworkRatebyCustomers54Source:QA,2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkReworkRatebyCustomers19SourReworkRateonProductionLines55VerydifferentreworkratesamongthelinesSource:QCDailyReport,Feb2006InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkAveragerework

rate:17.4%ReworkRateonProductionLineCausesandEffect56ReworkCapacityPlanningPartSupplyLowProfitabilityCausesandEffect21ReworkCapacRecommendations57IdentifyInvestigateRecommend123MakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleRecommendations22IdentifyInvesMetricIndustrialBenchmark(Median)*Yusan’sPerformanceDeliveryRatebyCommitDate91.5%40%OrderFulfillTime(days)29.5>39.0InventoryDaysofSupply(days)68.172.5Cash-to-CashCycleTime(days)73.330.5

Source:SCOR(Feb2005)58IdentifyInvestigateRecommendUseKeyIndicatorstocontrolSCimprovementsMakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleMetricIndustrialBenchmarkYusaMakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleCostMHKDAs%ofRevenueInventoryCarrying10.62.3%Backlog28.16.0%Rework&Scrap19.54.2%Total58.212.5%59IdentifyInvestigateRecommendKeeptrackofSupplyChainExtraCostsMakeSupplyChainPerformanceRecommendations60IdentifyInvestigateRecommend123MakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleEnhanceSupplierPerformanceRecommendations25IdentifyInvesEnhanceSupplierPerformanceCreateaCrossFunctionTeamPurchasing,QualityAssurance,Engineering,ProductionDetermineCriticalPerformanceMetricsDeliveryLeadTime,QualityDetermineMinimumPerformanceStandardMinimumQualityStandard,MinimumLeadTimeReduceSupplierBaseEliminateNon-qualifiedSuppliersAssessSupplierPerformanceRefineSupplierBaseQuarterly61IdentifyInvestigateRecommendEnhanceSupplierPerformanceCrRecommendations62IdentifyInvestigateRecommend123MakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleBettermanageordersEnhanceSupplierPerformanceRecommendations27IdentifyInvesBettermanageordersProductionPlanning:PlanforalltheexistingordersPlanforboththeassemblyandPCBAlinesPurchasingUnreliablesuppliers/Criticalparts:PurchaseAsSoonAsPossibleReliablesuppliers:PurchasebasedonProductionPlanningscheduleCommonparts:KeepS

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評論

0/150

提交評論