




版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
YusanSupplyChain
RedesignandImprovementHKUST&StanfordYusanIndustriesLimitedFinalPresentationMarch27,2006YusanSupplyChain
RedesignanObjectiveEnhanceYusan’sProfitabilitybyRe-designingandImprovingSupplyChain2ObjectiveEnhanceYusan’sProfiFacingProblemExtraSupplyChainCostAirshipmentcostin2005:2MHKD(0.5%oftotalrevenue)HighreworkcostLowOn-Time-DeliveryRateThomson:28%3FacingProblem3MethodologyIdentifyInvestigateRecommendObjective4MethodologyIdentifyInvestigateScopeThomson’sProductsin2005(7)
2005Products(3)Pre-2005Products(4)CS190CS86RCD147BTM9235TM9237TM9245RCD1475InvestigateRecommendIdentifyScopeoftheanalysis:ThomsonproductsScopeThomson’sProductsin200IdentifiedProblemFocusonProduction6InvestigateRecommendIdentifyIdentifiedProblemFocusonProOrderProcessSalesProductionPlanningPurchasingProduction123456Customer78CustomerOrdersJobOrdersJobOrdersProductionScheduleRecommendIdentifyInvestigateweek7OrderProcessSalesProductionPInvestigationofProductionProductionPartSupplyCapacityPlanningRework8RecommendIdentifyInvestigateInvestigationofProductionProPartSupply44%ofthepartsupplylate:ConsequencesandCauses?Source:ProductionPlanning
Report(Jan–May2005)9InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkPartSupply44%ofthepartsupCriticalPartDelayCriticalParts:LongLeadtime-Expensive-NosubstituteNon-CriticalParts:ShortLeadtime-CommodityCriticalPartsNon-CriticalPartsPercentageofcriticalpartlateOctober95414%November81296%December2921012%Total4639310%Source:MeetingMinutesOct-Dec2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningRework10CriticalPartDelayCriticalPa330Suppliersin2005131(40%)averagequality<99.8%48RegularSuppliersNo
onecanachieve99.8%QAstandardUnreliableRegularSuppliersQualityPerformanceSuppliersAnalysisSummary11InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkPotentialtoimprovesupplierperformance330Suppliersin2005SuppliersRegularSuppliersQualityPerformancein200512QualityPassRate(%)MakesuresupplierskeepahighlevelofqualitySource:IQC2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkRegularSuppliersQualityPerfPartSupplyQualityCriticalpartsalsoarelessreliableQualityPassRate%13Source:IQC2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkCriticalpartsPartSupplyQualityCriticalpaCapacityEvaluationInvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkSource:ProductionPlanSept-Dec2005ProbleminallocatingthecapacitytoeachcustomerCapacityEvaluationInvestigateOvertimeEmployed15Source:WorkshopDailyReport,Feb2006InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningRework16%22%19%29%26%12%27%21%0%21%Inanon-peakseason,overtimeisstillhighOvertimeEmployed15Source:WorProductivity16Source:WorkshopDailyReport,Feb2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkRealProductivityisloworexpectedoneisnotappropriate?Productivity16Source:WorkshopWorkforceDistribution17LineCLineDWorkers*allocatedperline(average)8361Whereasdirectlylineworkers5737Source:WorkshopDailyReport,Feb2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkMoreattentionhastobepaidtoValue-addedproceduresWorkforceDistribution17LineCFinishedProductReworkRate18Source:QualityAssurance2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningRework89%11%FinishedProductReworkRate18ReworkRatebyCustomers19Source:QA,2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkReworkRatebyCustomers19SourReworkRateonProductionLines20VerydifferentreworkratesamongthelinesSource:QCDailyReport,Feb2006InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkAveragerework
rate:17.4%ReworkRateonProductionLineCausesandEffect21ReworkCapacityPlanningPartSupplyLowProfitabilityCausesandEffect21ReworkCapacRecommendations22IdentifyInvestigateRecommend123MakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleRecommendations22IdentifyInvesMetricIndustrialBenchmark(Median)*Yusan’sPerformanceDeliveryRatebyCommitDate91.5%40%OrderFulfillTime(days)29.5>39.0InventoryDaysofSupply(days)68.172.5Cash-to-CashCycleTime(days)73.330.5
Source:SCOR(Feb2005)23IdentifyInvestigateRecommendUseKeyIndicatorstocontrolSCimprovementsMakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleMetricIndustrialBenchmarkYusaMakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleCostMHKDAs%ofRevenueInventoryCarrying10.62.3%Backlog28.16.0%Rework&Scrap19.54.2%Total58.212.5%24IdentifyInvestigateRecommendKeeptrackofSupplyChainExtraCostsMakeSupplyChainPerformanceRecommendations25IdentifyInvestigateRecommend123MakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleEnhanceSupplierPerformanceRecommendations25IdentifyInvesEnhanceSupplierPerformanceCreateaCrossFunctionTeamPurchasing,QualityAssurance,Engineering,ProductionDetermineCriticalPerformanceMetricsDeliveryLeadTime,QualityDetermineMinimumPerformanceStandardMinimumQualityStandard,MinimumLeadTimeReduceSupplierBaseEliminateNon-qualifiedSuppliersAssessSupplierPerformanceRefineSupplierBaseQuarterly26IdentifyInvestigateRecommendEnhanceSupplierPerformanceCrRecommendations27IdentifyInvestigateRecommend123MakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleBettermanageordersEnhanceSupplierPerformanceRecommendations27IdentifyInvesBettermanageordersProductionPlanning:PlanforalltheexistingordersPlanforboththeassemblyandPCBAlinesPurchasingUnreliablesuppliers/Criticalparts:PurchaseAsSoonAsPossibleReliablesuppliers:PurchasebasedonProductionPlanningscheduleCommonparts:KeepSafetyStockBettermanageordersProductionUnaddressedProblemCommittedOrderOrderDeliveryProductionStart042LTLT-6-101PartorderPlacementLTForecastedOrderweeksUnaddressedProblemCommittedOTheEndTheEndBackUpSlidesBackUpSlidesSuppliersAnalysisSup.RegularSuppliers–Yusanpurchasedpartsfromthissuppliersmorethan10monthsAssumeoneproductuses50differentsuppliersX^50=FinalproductpassrateToachieve95%finalproductpassrate,eachsuppliersshouldprovidepartsat99.98%QualityToachieve90%finalproductpassrate,eachsuppliersshouldprovidepartsat99.79%QualitySuppliersAnalysisSup.RegularCalculationandAssumptions:InventoryCalculationInventory*YearlyInterestRateCalculationandAssumptions:ICalculationandAssumptions:BacklogCalculationIfDelayedLength>ThresholdUrgentDeliveryUnitUrgentDeliveryCost*NumofUnitsIfDelayedLength≤ThresholdCustomerSatisfactionDepreciationCostUnitBacklogCost*NumofUnits*DelayedLengthAssumptionUnitBacklogCost=10UnitHoldingCostCalculationandAssumptions:BCalculationandAssumptions:ReworkCalculationFinishedProductReworkCostUnitProductionCost*NumofUnitsSemi-FinishedProductReworkCostUnitIn-LineProductionCost*NumofUnitsScrapALotReworkedMorethanNTimesAssumptionUnitProductionCost=UnitCost*25%UnitIn-LineProductionCost=UnitCost*5%N=2CalculationandAssumptions:RYusanSupplyChain
RedesignandImprovementHKUST&StanfordYusanIndustriesLimitedFinalPresentationMarch27,2006YusanSupplyChain
RedesignanObjectiveEnhanceYusan’sProfitabilitybyRe-designingandImprovingSupplyChain37ObjectiveEnhanceYusan’sProfiFacingProblemExtraSupplyChainCostAirshipmentcostin2005:2MHKD(0.5%oftotalrevenue)HighreworkcostLowOn-Time-DeliveryRateThomson:28%38FacingProblem3MethodologyIdentifyInvestigateRecommendObjective39MethodologyIdentifyInvestigateScopeThomson’sProductsin2005(7)
2005Products(3)Pre-2005Products(4)CS190CS86RCD147BTM9235TM9237TM9245RCD14740InvestigateRecommendIdentifyScopeoftheanalysis:ThomsonproductsScopeThomson’sProductsin200IdentifiedProblemFocusonProduction41InvestigateRecommendIdentifyIdentifiedProblemFocusonProOrderProcessSalesProductionPlanningPurchasingProduction123456Customer78CustomerOrdersJobOrdersJobOrdersProductionScheduleRecommendIdentifyInvestigateweek42OrderProcessSalesProductionPInvestigationofProductionProductionPartSupplyCapacityPlanningRework43RecommendIdentifyInvestigateInvestigationofProductionProPartSupply44%ofthepartsupplylate:ConsequencesandCauses?Source:ProductionPlanning
Report(Jan–May2005)44InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkPartSupply44%ofthepartsupCriticalPartDelayCriticalParts:LongLeadtime-Expensive-NosubstituteNon-CriticalParts:ShortLeadtime-CommodityCriticalPartsNon-CriticalPartsPercentageofcriticalpartlateOctober95414%November81296%December2921012%Total4639310%Source:MeetingMinutesOct-Dec2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningRework45CriticalPartDelayCriticalPa330Suppliersin2005131(40%)averagequality<99.8%48RegularSuppliersNo
onecanachieve99.8%QAstandardUnreliableRegularSuppliersQualityPerformanceSuppliersAnalysisSummary46InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkPotentialtoimprovesupplierperformance330Suppliersin2005SuppliersRegularSuppliersQualityPerformancein200547QualityPassRate(%)MakesuresupplierskeepahighlevelofqualitySource:IQC2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkRegularSuppliersQualityPerfPartSupplyQualityCriticalpartsalsoarelessreliableQualityPassRate%48Source:IQC2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkCriticalpartsPartSupplyQualityCriticalpaCapacityEvaluationInvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkSource:ProductionPlanSept-Dec2005ProbleminallocatingthecapacitytoeachcustomerCapacityEvaluationInvestigateOvertimeEmployed50Source:WorkshopDailyReport,Feb2006InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningRework16%22%19%29%26%12%27%21%0%21%Inanon-peakseason,overtimeisstillhighOvertimeEmployed15Source:WorProductivity51Source:WorkshopDailyReport,Feb2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkRealProductivityisloworexpectedoneisnotappropriate?Productivity16Source:WorkshopWorkforceDistribution52LineCLineDWorkers*allocatedperline(average)8361Whereasdirectlylineworkers5737Source:WorkshopDailyReport,Feb2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkMoreattentionhastobepaidtoValue-addedproceduresWorkforceDistribution17LineCFinishedProductReworkRate53Source:QualityAssurance2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningRework89%11%FinishedProductReworkRate18ReworkRatebyCustomers54Source:QA,2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkReworkRatebyCustomers19SourReworkRateonProductionLines55VerydifferentreworkratesamongthelinesSource:QCDailyReport,Feb2006InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkAveragerework
rate:17.4%ReworkRateonProductionLineCausesandEffect56ReworkCapacityPlanningPartSupplyLowProfitabilityCausesandEffect21ReworkCapacRecommendations57IdentifyInvestigateRecommend123MakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleRecommendations22IdentifyInvesMetricIndustrialBenchmark(Median)*Yusan’sPerformanceDeliveryRatebyCommitDate91.5%40%OrderFulfillTime(days)29.5>39.0InventoryDaysofSupply(days)68.172.5Cash-to-CashCycleTime(days)73.330.5
Source:SCOR(Feb2005)58IdentifyInvestigateRecommendUseKeyIndicatorstocontrolSCimprovementsMakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleMetricIndustrialBenchmarkYusaMakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleCostMHKDAs%ofRevenueInventoryCarrying10.62.3%Backlog28.16.0%Rework&Scrap19.54.2%Total58.212.5%59IdentifyInvestigateRecommendKeeptrackofSupplyChainExtraCostsMakeSupplyChainPerformanceRecommendations60IdentifyInvestigateRecommend123MakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleEnhanceSupplierPerformanceRecommendations25IdentifyInvesEnhanceSupplierPerformanceCreateaCrossFunctionTeamPurchasing,QualityAssurance,Engineering,ProductionDetermineCriticalPerformanceMetricsDeliveryLeadTime,QualityDetermineMinimumPerformanceStandardMinimumQualityStandard,MinimumLeadTimeReduceSupplierBaseEliminateNon-qualifiedSuppliersAssessSupplierPerformanceRefineSupplierBaseQuarterly61IdentifyInvestigateRecommendEnhanceSupplierPerformanceCrRecommendations62IdentifyInvestigateRecommend123MakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleBettermanageordersEnhanceSupplierPerformanceRecommendations27IdentifyInvesBettermanageordersProductionPlanning:PlanforalltheexistingordersPlanforboththeassemblyandPCBAlinesPurchasingUnreliablesuppliers/Criticalparts:PurchaseAsSoonAsPossibleReliablesuppliers:PurchasebasedonProductionPlanningscheduleCommonparts:KeepS
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 四川雅安中學2025屆高三下學期期末學習能力診斷數(shù)學試題含解析
- 內(nèi)蒙巴彥淖爾市2025年高三畢業(yè)班3月教學質(zhì)量檢查語文試題含解析
- 山東省日照市五蓮二中學2025屆初三化學試題下學期期末考試試題含解析
- 武夷山職業(yè)學院《建筑與裝飾工程計量與計價課程設(shè)計》2023-2024學年第二學期期末試卷
- 山東省濟南市歷城區(qū)2025屆初三4月模擬(二模)考試生物試題理試題含解析
- 遼寧中醫(yī)藥大學《藥學綜合實驗》2023-2024學年第二學期期末試卷
- 六盤水幼兒師范高等專科學?!度照Z文學》2023-2024學年第二學期期末試卷
- 山西林業(yè)職業(yè)技術(shù)學院《遙感原理與方法》2023-2024學年第一學期期末試卷
- 二零二五房屋及土地租賃協(xié)議
- 智能駕駛之路
- 高中數(shù)學集合練習題160題-包含所有題型-附答案
- 計算機程序設(shè)計語言(Python)學習通超星期末考試答案章節(jié)答案2024年
- 創(chuàng)新創(chuàng)業(yè)教育課程體系建設(shè)方案
- 期中 (試題) -2024-2025學年人教精通版(2024)英語三年級上冊
- 鐵路客車車輛電氣系統(tǒng)維護考核試卷
- DB34∕T 4235-2022 濃香窖泥檢測操作規(guī)程
- 統(tǒng)編版高中語文必修下:辨識媒介信息
- 2024年東南亞紙巾商銷(AFH)市場深度研究及預測報告
- 服務質(zhì)量保障措施及進度保障措施
- 七層垂直循環(huán)式立體車庫
- 中國子宮內(nèi)膜增生管理指南(2022)解讀
評論
0/150
提交評論