




版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
YusanSupplyChain
RedesignandImprovementHKUST&StanfordYusanIndustriesLimitedFinalPresentationMarch27,2006YusanSupplyChain
RedesignanObjectiveEnhanceYusan’sProfitabilitybyRe-designingandImprovingSupplyChain2ObjectiveEnhanceYusan’sProfiFacingProblemExtraSupplyChainCostAirshipmentcostin2005:2MHKD(0.5%oftotalrevenue)HighreworkcostLowOn-Time-DeliveryRateThomson:28%3FacingProblem3MethodologyIdentifyInvestigateRecommendObjective4MethodologyIdentifyInvestigateScopeThomson’sProductsin2005(7)
2005Products(3)Pre-2005Products(4)CS190CS86RCD147BTM9235TM9237TM9245RCD1475InvestigateRecommendIdentifyScopeoftheanalysis:ThomsonproductsScopeThomson’sProductsin200IdentifiedProblemFocusonProduction6InvestigateRecommendIdentifyIdentifiedProblemFocusonProOrderProcessSalesProductionPlanningPurchasingProduction123456Customer78CustomerOrdersJobOrdersJobOrdersProductionScheduleRecommendIdentifyInvestigateweek7OrderProcessSalesProductionPInvestigationofProductionProductionPartSupplyCapacityPlanningRework8RecommendIdentifyInvestigateInvestigationofProductionProPartSupply44%ofthepartsupplylate:ConsequencesandCauses?Source:ProductionPlanning
Report(Jan–May2005)9InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkPartSupply44%ofthepartsupCriticalPartDelayCriticalParts:LongLeadtime-Expensive-NosubstituteNon-CriticalParts:ShortLeadtime-CommodityCriticalPartsNon-CriticalPartsPercentageofcriticalpartlateOctober95414%November81296%December2921012%Total4639310%Source:MeetingMinutesOct-Dec2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningRework10CriticalPartDelayCriticalPa330Suppliersin2005131(40%)averagequality<99.8%48RegularSuppliersNo
onecanachieve99.8%QAstandardUnreliableRegularSuppliersQualityPerformanceSuppliersAnalysisSummary11InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkPotentialtoimprovesupplierperformance330Suppliersin2005SuppliersRegularSuppliersQualityPerformancein200512QualityPassRate(%)MakesuresupplierskeepahighlevelofqualitySource:IQC2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkRegularSuppliersQualityPerfPartSupplyQualityCriticalpartsalsoarelessreliableQualityPassRate%13Source:IQC2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkCriticalpartsPartSupplyQualityCriticalpaCapacityEvaluationInvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkSource:ProductionPlanSept-Dec2005ProbleminallocatingthecapacitytoeachcustomerCapacityEvaluationInvestigateOvertimeEmployed15Source:WorkshopDailyReport,Feb2006InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningRework16%22%19%29%26%12%27%21%0%21%Inanon-peakseason,overtimeisstillhighOvertimeEmployed15Source:WorProductivity16Source:WorkshopDailyReport,Feb2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkRealProductivityisloworexpectedoneisnotappropriate?Productivity16Source:WorkshopWorkforceDistribution17LineCLineDWorkers*allocatedperline(average)8361Whereasdirectlylineworkers5737Source:WorkshopDailyReport,Feb2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkMoreattentionhastobepaidtoValue-addedproceduresWorkforceDistribution17LineCFinishedProductReworkRate18Source:QualityAssurance2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningRework89%11%FinishedProductReworkRate18ReworkRatebyCustomers19Source:QA,2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkReworkRatebyCustomers19SourReworkRateonProductionLines20VerydifferentreworkratesamongthelinesSource:QCDailyReport,Feb2006InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkAveragerework
rate:17.4%ReworkRateonProductionLineCausesandEffect21ReworkCapacityPlanningPartSupplyLowProfitabilityCausesandEffect21ReworkCapacRecommendations22IdentifyInvestigateRecommend123MakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleRecommendations22IdentifyInvesMetricIndustrialBenchmark(Median)*Yusan’sPerformanceDeliveryRatebyCommitDate91.5%40%OrderFulfillTime(days)29.5>39.0InventoryDaysofSupply(days)68.172.5Cash-to-CashCycleTime(days)73.330.5
Source:SCOR(Feb2005)23IdentifyInvestigateRecommendUseKeyIndicatorstocontrolSCimprovementsMakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleMetricIndustrialBenchmarkYusaMakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleCostMHKDAs%ofRevenueInventoryCarrying10.62.3%Backlog28.16.0%Rework&Scrap19.54.2%Total58.212.5%24IdentifyInvestigateRecommendKeeptrackofSupplyChainExtraCostsMakeSupplyChainPerformanceRecommendations25IdentifyInvestigateRecommend123MakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleEnhanceSupplierPerformanceRecommendations25IdentifyInvesEnhanceSupplierPerformanceCreateaCrossFunctionTeamPurchasing,QualityAssurance,Engineering,ProductionDetermineCriticalPerformanceMetricsDeliveryLeadTime,QualityDetermineMinimumPerformanceStandardMinimumQualityStandard,MinimumLeadTimeReduceSupplierBaseEliminateNon-qualifiedSuppliersAssessSupplierPerformanceRefineSupplierBaseQuarterly26IdentifyInvestigateRecommendEnhanceSupplierPerformanceCrRecommendations27IdentifyInvestigateRecommend123MakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleBettermanageordersEnhanceSupplierPerformanceRecommendations27IdentifyInvesBettermanageordersProductionPlanning:PlanforalltheexistingordersPlanforboththeassemblyandPCBAlinesPurchasingUnreliablesuppliers/Criticalparts:PurchaseAsSoonAsPossibleReliablesuppliers:PurchasebasedonProductionPlanningscheduleCommonparts:KeepSafetyStockBettermanageordersProductionUnaddressedProblemCommittedOrderOrderDeliveryProductionStart042LTLT-6-101PartorderPlacementLTForecastedOrderweeksUnaddressedProblemCommittedOTheEndTheEndBackUpSlidesBackUpSlidesSuppliersAnalysisSup.RegularSuppliers–Yusanpurchasedpartsfromthissuppliersmorethan10monthsAssumeoneproductuses50differentsuppliersX^50=FinalproductpassrateToachieve95%finalproductpassrate,eachsuppliersshouldprovidepartsat99.98%QualityToachieve90%finalproductpassrate,eachsuppliersshouldprovidepartsat99.79%QualitySuppliersAnalysisSup.RegularCalculationandAssumptions:InventoryCalculationInventory*YearlyInterestRateCalculationandAssumptions:ICalculationandAssumptions:BacklogCalculationIfDelayedLength>ThresholdUrgentDeliveryUnitUrgentDeliveryCost*NumofUnitsIfDelayedLength≤ThresholdCustomerSatisfactionDepreciationCostUnitBacklogCost*NumofUnits*DelayedLengthAssumptionUnitBacklogCost=10UnitHoldingCostCalculationandAssumptions:BCalculationandAssumptions:ReworkCalculationFinishedProductReworkCostUnitProductionCost*NumofUnitsSemi-FinishedProductReworkCostUnitIn-LineProductionCost*NumofUnitsScrapALotReworkedMorethanNTimesAssumptionUnitProductionCost=UnitCost*25%UnitIn-LineProductionCost=UnitCost*5%N=2CalculationandAssumptions:RYusanSupplyChain
RedesignandImprovementHKUST&StanfordYusanIndustriesLimitedFinalPresentationMarch27,2006YusanSupplyChain
RedesignanObjectiveEnhanceYusan’sProfitabilitybyRe-designingandImprovingSupplyChain37ObjectiveEnhanceYusan’sProfiFacingProblemExtraSupplyChainCostAirshipmentcostin2005:2MHKD(0.5%oftotalrevenue)HighreworkcostLowOn-Time-DeliveryRateThomson:28%38FacingProblem3MethodologyIdentifyInvestigateRecommendObjective39MethodologyIdentifyInvestigateScopeThomson’sProductsin2005(7)
2005Products(3)Pre-2005Products(4)CS190CS86RCD147BTM9235TM9237TM9245RCD14740InvestigateRecommendIdentifyScopeoftheanalysis:ThomsonproductsScopeThomson’sProductsin200IdentifiedProblemFocusonProduction41InvestigateRecommendIdentifyIdentifiedProblemFocusonProOrderProcessSalesProductionPlanningPurchasingProduction123456Customer78CustomerOrdersJobOrdersJobOrdersProductionScheduleRecommendIdentifyInvestigateweek42OrderProcessSalesProductionPInvestigationofProductionProductionPartSupplyCapacityPlanningRework43RecommendIdentifyInvestigateInvestigationofProductionProPartSupply44%ofthepartsupplylate:ConsequencesandCauses?Source:ProductionPlanning
Report(Jan–May2005)44InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkPartSupply44%ofthepartsupCriticalPartDelayCriticalParts:LongLeadtime-Expensive-NosubstituteNon-CriticalParts:ShortLeadtime-CommodityCriticalPartsNon-CriticalPartsPercentageofcriticalpartlateOctober95414%November81296%December2921012%Total4639310%Source:MeetingMinutesOct-Dec2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningRework45CriticalPartDelayCriticalPa330Suppliersin2005131(40%)averagequality<99.8%48RegularSuppliersNo
onecanachieve99.8%QAstandardUnreliableRegularSuppliersQualityPerformanceSuppliersAnalysisSummary46InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkPotentialtoimprovesupplierperformance330Suppliersin2005SuppliersRegularSuppliersQualityPerformancein200547QualityPassRate(%)MakesuresupplierskeepahighlevelofqualitySource:IQC2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkRegularSuppliersQualityPerfPartSupplyQualityCriticalpartsalsoarelessreliableQualityPassRate%48Source:IQC2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkCriticalpartsPartSupplyQualityCriticalpaCapacityEvaluationInvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkSource:ProductionPlanSept-Dec2005ProbleminallocatingthecapacitytoeachcustomerCapacityEvaluationInvestigateOvertimeEmployed50Source:WorkshopDailyReport,Feb2006InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningRework16%22%19%29%26%12%27%21%0%21%Inanon-peakseason,overtimeisstillhighOvertimeEmployed15Source:WorProductivity51Source:WorkshopDailyReport,Feb2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkRealProductivityisloworexpectedoneisnotappropriate?Productivity16Source:WorkshopWorkforceDistribution52LineCLineDWorkers*allocatedperline(average)8361Whereasdirectlylineworkers5737Source:WorkshopDailyReport,Feb2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkMoreattentionhastobepaidtoValue-addedproceduresWorkforceDistribution17LineCFinishedProductReworkRate53Source:QualityAssurance2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningRework89%11%FinishedProductReworkRate18ReworkRatebyCustomers54Source:QA,2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkReworkRatebyCustomers19SourReworkRateonProductionLines55VerydifferentreworkratesamongthelinesSource:QCDailyReport,Feb2006InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkAveragerework
rate:17.4%ReworkRateonProductionLineCausesandEffect56ReworkCapacityPlanningPartSupplyLowProfitabilityCausesandEffect21ReworkCapacRecommendations57IdentifyInvestigateRecommend123MakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleRecommendations22IdentifyInvesMetricIndustrialBenchmark(Median)*Yusan’sPerformanceDeliveryRatebyCommitDate91.5%40%OrderFulfillTime(days)29.5>39.0InventoryDaysofSupply(days)68.172.5Cash-to-CashCycleTime(days)73.330.5
Source:SCOR(Feb2005)58IdentifyInvestigateRecommendUseKeyIndicatorstocontrolSCimprovementsMakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleMetricIndustrialBenchmarkYusaMakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleCostMHKDAs%ofRevenueInventoryCarrying10.62.3%Backlog28.16.0%Rework&Scrap19.54.2%Total58.212.5%59IdentifyInvestigateRecommendKeeptrackofSupplyChainExtraCostsMakeSupplyChainPerformanceRecommendations60IdentifyInvestigateRecommend123MakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleEnhanceSupplierPerformanceRecommendations25IdentifyInvesEnhanceSupplierPerformanceCreateaCrossFunctionTeamPurchasing,QualityAssurance,Engineering,ProductionDetermineCriticalPerformanceMetricsDeliveryLeadTime,QualityDetermineMinimumPerformanceStandardMinimumQualityStandard,MinimumLeadTimeReduceSupplierBaseEliminateNon-qualifiedSuppliersAssessSupplierPerformanceRefineSupplierBaseQuarterly61IdentifyInvestigateRecommendEnhanceSupplierPerformanceCrRecommendations62IdentifyInvestigateRecommend123MakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleBettermanageordersEnhanceSupplierPerformanceRecommendations27IdentifyInvesBettermanageordersProductionPlanning:PlanforalltheexistingordersPlanforboththeassemblyandPCBAlinesPurchasingUnreliablesuppliers/Criticalparts:PurchaseAsSoonAsPossibleReliablesuppliers:PurchasebasedonProductionPlanningscheduleCommonparts:KeepS
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 培訓(xùn)機(jī)構(gòu)校園招聘宣講會(huì)
- 路塹邊坡試題帶答案
- 人教部編小學(xué)五年級(jí)語(yǔ)文思維訓(xùn)練教學(xué)計(jì)劃
- 小學(xué)班干部班級(jí)宣傳職責(zé)他
- 動(dòng)火作業(yè)安全操作規(guī)程
- 市政道路管網(wǎng)施工安全文明施工措施
- 2025年金融產(chǎn)品推廣投資者教育工作計(jì)劃
- 班組安全培訓(xùn)總結(jié)
- 2025年精神科護(hù)理工作計(jì)劃范文
- 安全生產(chǎn)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化管理體系企業(yè)創(chuàng)建情況
- 2024年安徽中醫(yī)藥高等專科學(xué)校招聘考試真題
- 2025年變電站春季安全生產(chǎn)自查報(bào)告
- 充電樁充電服務(wù)與充電站安全保障合同
- 個(gè)人信息保護(hù)合規(guī)審計(jì)師CCRC-PIPCA含答案
- 2025鄂爾多斯達(dá)拉特旗智杰教育投資有限責(zé)任公司面向社會(huì)招聘10名工作人員筆試參考題庫(kù)附帶答案詳解析集合
- 小型引調(diào)水工程可行性研究報(bào)告
- GB 9706.283-2022醫(yī)用電氣設(shè)備第2-83部分:家用光治療設(shè)備的基本安全和基本性能專用要求
- 放棄房產(chǎn)貸款協(xié)議書
- 2025年兒童心理學(xué)基礎(chǔ)知識(shí)考試卷及答案
- 2024年內(nèi)蒙古公安廳招聘警務(wù)輔助人員真題
- 顧問(wèn)框架合同協(xié)議
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論