




版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內容提供方,若內容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領
文檔簡介
YusanSupplyChain
RedesignandImprovementHKUST&StanfordYusanIndustriesLimitedFinalPresentationMarch27,2006YusanSupplyChain
RedesignanObjectiveEnhanceYusan’sProfitabilitybyRe-designingandImprovingSupplyChain2ObjectiveEnhanceYusan’sProfiFacingProblemExtraSupplyChainCostAirshipmentcostin2005:2MHKD(0.5%oftotalrevenue)HighreworkcostLowOn-Time-DeliveryRateThomson:28%3FacingProblem3MethodologyIdentifyInvestigateRecommendObjective4MethodologyIdentifyInvestigateScopeThomson’sProductsin2005(7)
2005Products(3)Pre-2005Products(4)CS190CS86RCD147BTM9235TM9237TM9245RCD1475InvestigateRecommendIdentifyScopeoftheanalysis:ThomsonproductsScopeThomson’sProductsin200IdentifiedProblemFocusonProduction6InvestigateRecommendIdentifyIdentifiedProblemFocusonProOrderProcessSalesProductionPlanningPurchasingProduction123456Customer78CustomerOrdersJobOrdersJobOrdersProductionScheduleRecommendIdentifyInvestigateweek7OrderProcessSalesProductionPInvestigationofProductionProductionPartSupplyCapacityPlanningRework8RecommendIdentifyInvestigateInvestigationofProductionProPartSupply44%ofthepartsupplylate:ConsequencesandCauses?Source:ProductionPlanning
Report(Jan–May2005)9InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkPartSupply44%ofthepartsupCriticalPartDelayCriticalParts:LongLeadtime-Expensive-NosubstituteNon-CriticalParts:ShortLeadtime-CommodityCriticalPartsNon-CriticalPartsPercentageofcriticalpartlateOctober95414%November81296%December2921012%Total4639310%Source:MeetingMinutesOct-Dec2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningRework10CriticalPartDelayCriticalPa330Suppliersin2005131(40%)averagequality<99.8%48RegularSuppliersNo
onecanachieve99.8%QAstandardUnreliableRegularSuppliersQualityPerformanceSuppliersAnalysisSummary11InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkPotentialtoimprovesupplierperformance330Suppliersin2005SuppliersRegularSuppliersQualityPerformancein200512QualityPassRate(%)MakesuresupplierskeepahighlevelofqualitySource:IQC2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkRegularSuppliersQualityPerfPartSupplyQualityCriticalpartsalsoarelessreliableQualityPassRate%13Source:IQC2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkCriticalpartsPartSupplyQualityCriticalpaCapacityEvaluationInvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkSource:ProductionPlanSept-Dec2005ProbleminallocatingthecapacitytoeachcustomerCapacityEvaluationInvestigateOvertimeEmployed15Source:WorkshopDailyReport,Feb2006InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningRework16%22%19%29%26%12%27%21%0%21%Inanon-peakseason,overtimeisstillhighOvertimeEmployed15Source:WorProductivity16Source:WorkshopDailyReport,Feb2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkRealProductivityisloworexpectedoneisnotappropriate?Productivity16Source:WorkshopWorkforceDistribution17LineCLineDWorkers*allocatedperline(average)8361Whereasdirectlylineworkers5737Source:WorkshopDailyReport,Feb2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkMoreattentionhastobepaidtoValue-addedproceduresWorkforceDistribution17LineCFinishedProductReworkRate18Source:QualityAssurance2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningRework89%11%FinishedProductReworkRate18ReworkRatebyCustomers19Source:QA,2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkReworkRatebyCustomers19SourReworkRateonProductionLines20VerydifferentreworkratesamongthelinesSource:QCDailyReport,Feb2006InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkAveragerework
rate:17.4%ReworkRateonProductionLineCausesandEffect21ReworkCapacityPlanningPartSupplyLowProfitabilityCausesandEffect21ReworkCapacRecommendations22IdentifyInvestigateRecommend123MakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleRecommendations22IdentifyInvesMetricIndustrialBenchmark(Median)*Yusan’sPerformanceDeliveryRatebyCommitDate91.5%40%OrderFulfillTime(days)29.5>39.0InventoryDaysofSupply(days)68.172.5Cash-to-CashCycleTime(days)73.330.5
Source:SCOR(Feb2005)23IdentifyInvestigateRecommendUseKeyIndicatorstocontrolSCimprovementsMakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleMetricIndustrialBenchmarkYusaMakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleCostMHKDAs%ofRevenueInventoryCarrying10.62.3%Backlog28.16.0%Rework&Scrap19.54.2%Total58.212.5%24IdentifyInvestigateRecommendKeeptrackofSupplyChainExtraCostsMakeSupplyChainPerformanceRecommendations25IdentifyInvestigateRecommend123MakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleEnhanceSupplierPerformanceRecommendations25IdentifyInvesEnhanceSupplierPerformanceCreateaCrossFunctionTeamPurchasing,QualityAssurance,Engineering,ProductionDetermineCriticalPerformanceMetricsDeliveryLeadTime,QualityDetermineMinimumPerformanceStandardMinimumQualityStandard,MinimumLeadTimeReduceSupplierBaseEliminateNon-qualifiedSuppliersAssessSupplierPerformanceRefineSupplierBaseQuarterly26IdentifyInvestigateRecommendEnhanceSupplierPerformanceCrRecommendations27IdentifyInvestigateRecommend123MakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleBettermanageordersEnhanceSupplierPerformanceRecommendations27IdentifyInvesBettermanageordersProductionPlanning:PlanforalltheexistingordersPlanforboththeassemblyandPCBAlinesPurchasingUnreliablesuppliers/Criticalparts:PurchaseAsSoonAsPossibleReliablesuppliers:PurchasebasedonProductionPlanningscheduleCommonparts:KeepSafetyStockBettermanageordersProductionUnaddressedProblemCommittedOrderOrderDeliveryProductionStart042LTLT-6-101PartorderPlacementLTForecastedOrderweeksUnaddressedProblemCommittedOTheEndTheEndBackUpSlidesBackUpSlidesSuppliersAnalysisSup.RegularSuppliers–Yusanpurchasedpartsfromthissuppliersmorethan10monthsAssumeoneproductuses50differentsuppliersX^50=FinalproductpassrateToachieve95%finalproductpassrate,eachsuppliersshouldprovidepartsat99.98%QualityToachieve90%finalproductpassrate,eachsuppliersshouldprovidepartsat99.79%QualitySuppliersAnalysisSup.RegularCalculationandAssumptions:InventoryCalculationInventory*YearlyInterestRateCalculationandAssumptions:ICalculationandAssumptions:BacklogCalculationIfDelayedLength>ThresholdUrgentDeliveryUnitUrgentDeliveryCost*NumofUnitsIfDelayedLength≤ThresholdCustomerSatisfactionDepreciationCostUnitBacklogCost*NumofUnits*DelayedLengthAssumptionUnitBacklogCost=10UnitHoldingCostCalculationandAssumptions:BCalculationandAssumptions:ReworkCalculationFinishedProductReworkCostUnitProductionCost*NumofUnitsSemi-FinishedProductReworkCostUnitIn-LineProductionCost*NumofUnitsScrapALotReworkedMorethanNTimesAssumptionUnitProductionCost=UnitCost*25%UnitIn-LineProductionCost=UnitCost*5%N=2CalculationandAssumptions:RYusanSupplyChain
RedesignandImprovementHKUST&StanfordYusanIndustriesLimitedFinalPresentationMarch27,2006YusanSupplyChain
RedesignanObjectiveEnhanceYusan’sProfitabilitybyRe-designingandImprovingSupplyChain37ObjectiveEnhanceYusan’sProfiFacingProblemExtraSupplyChainCostAirshipmentcostin2005:2MHKD(0.5%oftotalrevenue)HighreworkcostLowOn-Time-DeliveryRateThomson:28%38FacingProblem3MethodologyIdentifyInvestigateRecommendObjective39MethodologyIdentifyInvestigateScopeThomson’sProductsin2005(7)
2005Products(3)Pre-2005Products(4)CS190CS86RCD147BTM9235TM9237TM9245RCD14740InvestigateRecommendIdentifyScopeoftheanalysis:ThomsonproductsScopeThomson’sProductsin200IdentifiedProblemFocusonProduction41InvestigateRecommendIdentifyIdentifiedProblemFocusonProOrderProcessSalesProductionPlanningPurchasingProduction123456Customer78CustomerOrdersJobOrdersJobOrdersProductionScheduleRecommendIdentifyInvestigateweek42OrderProcessSalesProductionPInvestigationofProductionProductionPartSupplyCapacityPlanningRework43RecommendIdentifyInvestigateInvestigationofProductionProPartSupply44%ofthepartsupplylate:ConsequencesandCauses?Source:ProductionPlanning
Report(Jan–May2005)44InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkPartSupply44%ofthepartsupCriticalPartDelayCriticalParts:LongLeadtime-Expensive-NosubstituteNon-CriticalParts:ShortLeadtime-CommodityCriticalPartsNon-CriticalPartsPercentageofcriticalpartlateOctober95414%November81296%December2921012%Total4639310%Source:MeetingMinutesOct-Dec2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningRework45CriticalPartDelayCriticalPa330Suppliersin2005131(40%)averagequality<99.8%48RegularSuppliersNo
onecanachieve99.8%QAstandardUnreliableRegularSuppliersQualityPerformanceSuppliersAnalysisSummary46InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkPotentialtoimprovesupplierperformance330Suppliersin2005SuppliersRegularSuppliersQualityPerformancein200547QualityPassRate(%)MakesuresupplierskeepahighlevelofqualitySource:IQC2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkRegularSuppliersQualityPerfPartSupplyQualityCriticalpartsalsoarelessreliableQualityPassRate%48Source:IQC2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkCriticalpartsPartSupplyQualityCriticalpaCapacityEvaluationInvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkSource:ProductionPlanSept-Dec2005ProbleminallocatingthecapacitytoeachcustomerCapacityEvaluationInvestigateOvertimeEmployed50Source:WorkshopDailyReport,Feb2006InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningRework16%22%19%29%26%12%27%21%0%21%Inanon-peakseason,overtimeisstillhighOvertimeEmployed15Source:WorProductivity51Source:WorkshopDailyReport,Feb2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkRealProductivityisloworexpectedoneisnotappropriate?Productivity16Source:WorkshopWorkforceDistribution52LineCLineDWorkers*allocatedperline(average)8361Whereasdirectlylineworkers5737Source:WorkshopDailyReport,Feb2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkMoreattentionhastobepaidtoValue-addedproceduresWorkforceDistribution17LineCFinishedProductReworkRate53Source:QualityAssurance2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningRework89%11%FinishedProductReworkRate18ReworkRatebyCustomers54Source:QA,2005InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkReworkRatebyCustomers19SourReworkRateonProductionLines55VerydifferentreworkratesamongthelinesSource:QCDailyReport,Feb2006InvestigatePartSupplyCapacityPlanningReworkAveragerework
rate:17.4%ReworkRateonProductionLineCausesandEffect56ReworkCapacityPlanningPartSupplyLowProfitabilityCausesandEffect21ReworkCapacRecommendations57IdentifyInvestigateRecommend123MakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleRecommendations22IdentifyInvesMetricIndustrialBenchmark(Median)*Yusan’sPerformanceDeliveryRatebyCommitDate91.5%40%OrderFulfillTime(days)29.5>39.0InventoryDaysofSupply(days)68.172.5Cash-to-CashCycleTime(days)73.330.5
Source:SCOR(Feb2005)58IdentifyInvestigateRecommendUseKeyIndicatorstocontrolSCimprovementsMakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleMetricIndustrialBenchmarkYusaMakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleCostMHKDAs%ofRevenueInventoryCarrying10.62.3%Backlog28.16.0%Rework&Scrap19.54.2%Total58.212.5%59IdentifyInvestigateRecommendKeeptrackofSupplyChainExtraCostsMakeSupplyChainPerformanceRecommendations60IdentifyInvestigateRecommend123MakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleEnhanceSupplierPerformanceRecommendations25IdentifyInvesEnhanceSupplierPerformanceCreateaCrossFunctionTeamPurchasing,QualityAssurance,Engineering,ProductionDetermineCriticalPerformanceMetricsDeliveryLeadTime,QualityDetermineMinimumPerformanceStandardMinimumQualityStandard,MinimumLeadTimeReduceSupplierBaseEliminateNon-qualifiedSuppliersAssessSupplierPerformanceRefineSupplierBaseQuarterly61IdentifyInvestigateRecommendEnhanceSupplierPerformanceCrRecommendations62IdentifyInvestigateRecommend123MakeSupplyChainPerformanceVisibleBettermanageordersEnhanceSupplierPerformanceRecommendations27IdentifyInvesBettermanageordersProductionPlanning:PlanforalltheexistingordersPlanforboththeassemblyandPCBAlinesPurchasingUnreliablesuppliers/Criticalparts:PurchaseAsSoonAsPossibleReliablesuppliers:PurchasebasedonProductionPlanningscheduleCommonparts:KeepS
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網頁內容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內容的表現方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 預防職業(yè)病教學課件
- 新生兒肺炎表現及預防
- 《電子產品制造技術》課件-第2章 印制電路板認知
- 沖床維修培訓
- 順利消防2023課件
- 項目現場安全課件
- 《道路勘測設計》課件-第三章 平面設計
- 音樂律動介紹課件
- 汽車配套產業(yè)基地項目風險管理方案(范文)
- 城市污水管網建設工程投資估算方案(模板)
- DB64∕T 2131-2025 建筑施工非常規(guī)高處吊籃施工規(guī)程
- 醫(yī)院關于開展整治重復醫(yī)療檢查檢驗、違規(guī)收費問題工作實施方案的通知
- 孕婦營養(yǎng)管理課件大全
- 2024年湖北省普通高中學業(yè)水平合格性考試數學試題(原卷版)
- 常州市鐘樓區(qū)社區(qū)專職工作者招聘筆試真題2024
- 2024年安徽中醫(yī)藥高等??茖W校招聘考試真題
- 2025年變電站春季安全生產自查報告
- 充電樁充電服務與充電站安全保障合同
- 個人信息保護合規(guī)審計師CCRC-PIPCA含答案
- 2025鄂爾多斯達拉特旗智杰教育投資有限責任公司面向社會招聘10名工作人員筆試參考題庫附帶答案詳解析集合
- 小型引調水工程可行性研究報告
評論
0/150
提交評論