3種角度為你帶來精品解析GRE閱讀

3種角度為你帶來精品解析GRE閱讀如何戰(zhàn)勝GRE閱讀中的攔路虎?3種角度為你帶來精品解析,我們來看看吧，下面就和大家分享，來欣賞一下吧。如何戰(zhàn)勝GRE閱讀中的攔路虎?3種角度為你帶來精品解析在新GRE考試中，GRE閱讀的難度明顯增加，考生在備考及考試過程中，通常會遇到哪些障礙呢?都有什么辦法可以解決呢?將為大家分析一下GRE閱讀中常見的攔路虎及應對策略，希望對大家GRE備考有所幫助。障礙一：單詞不認識嚴重的單詞障礙使得閱讀學習進展艱難，有時候雖然單詞也背了幾遍，但是看到閱讀文章時仍是滿眼生詞，一頭霧水，文章根本就讀不下去。針對這種情況，可以在讀閱讀文章的時候試著忽略復雜專業(yè)名詞的具體含義，因為有些專業(yè)名詞很少見。雖然忽略掉，在做題的時候也會沒有影響，例如一種叫rhinoviruses的病毒可以抽象為“R”病毒。另外，還可以積累一些單詞。例如，閱讀一篇文章過后，可以挑出一些你認為比較重要的詞進行累積，后來你會發(fā)現(xiàn)進步是很大的。障礙二：句子讀不懂有時候句子中的單詞都認識，但是這個句子就是讀不懂，不知道在講什么，甚至連句子的主謂賓都找不到。這就說明GRE的長難句是一個問題。針對這種情況，需要對句子的結構有一個透徹的了解，其中句子中的幾個難點是：修飾成分繁多，倒裝，插入語，多重否定等，這是需要采用集中突破的方法。另外，還需要不畏懼困難，多對句子做一些分析和研究，找句子的主干，分析讀不懂的原因。考場上基本上是要求16-17分鐘做完閱讀題的部分，而實際情況是現(xiàn)在的做題速度慢極了，根本達不到要求。這是多數(shù)考生會遇到的問題。其主要原因是花在讀原文的時間太長了，所以讀一篇文章要達到兩個目的即可：1.主旨題和作者觀點題要做對;2.關注、標記一些?？伎键c為定位使用。障礙三：文章讀完沒有印象讀過文章之后什么也不記得，又重新認認真真地讀完一篇，結果是后面看完了前面的也忘記，根本不知道文章在講些什么。這其中是有一定的原因的，就是想要記住的太多，搞得什么也沒記住。針對這種情況可以只記住比較重要的話，例如文章的主旨句，首段、每段首句，全文末句等，作者的態(tài)度等。還有一點就是平時需要積累哪些是需要記住的，哪些是不需要記住的。以上就是為大家整理的GRE閱讀中常見的攔路虎及應對策略，相信大家結合自己的具體情況，用心準備，有針對性的復習提高，一定會戰(zhàn)勝它們，抵達夢想的彼岸!GRE考試閱讀理解模擬題及答案解析P1Itisapopularmisconceptionthatnuclearfusionpowerisfreeofradioactivity;infact,thedeuterium-tritiumreactionthatnuclearscientistsarecurrentlyexploringwithsuchzealproducesbothalphaparticlesandneutrons.(Theneutronsareusedtoproducetritiumfromalithiumblanketsurroundingthereactor.)Anothercommonmisconceptionisthatnuclearfusionpowerisavirtuallyunlimitedsourceofenergybecauseoftheenormousquantityofdeuteriuminthesea.Actually,itslimitsaresetbytheamountofavailablelithium,whichisaboutasplentifulasuraniumintheEarth‘scrust.Researchshouldcertainlycontinueoncontrollednuclearfusion,butnoenergyprogramshouldbepremisedonitsexistenceuntilithas(been)provenpractical.(122words)Itcanbeinferredfromthepassagethattheauthorbelieveswhichofthefollowingaboutthecurrentstateofpublicawarenessconcerningnuclearfusionpower?Thepublichasbeendeliberatelymisinformedabouttheadvantagesanddisadvantagesofnuclearfusionpower.Thepublicisunawareoftheprincipaladvantageofnuclearfusionovernuclearfussionasanenergysource.Thepublic‘sawarenessofthescientificfactsconcerningnuclearfusionpowerissomewhatdistortedandincomplete.Thepublicisnotinterestedinincreasingitsawarenessoftheadvantagesanddisadvantagesofnuclearfusionpower.Thepublicisawareofthedisadvantagesofnuclearfusionpowerbutnotofitsadvantages.Forthefollowingquestion,considereachofthechoicesseparatelyandselectallthatapplyThepassageprovidesinformationthatwouldanswerwhichofthefollowingquestionsEXCEPT?□AHowmuchincidentalradiationisproducedinthedeuteriumtritiumfusionreaction?□BWhatislikelytobetheprincipalsourceofdeuteriumfornuclearfusionpower?□CWhyarescientistsexploringthedeuterium-tritiumfusionreactionwithsuchzeal?P2RogerRosenblatt‘sbookBlackFiction,inattemptingtoapplyliteraryratherthansociopoliticalcriteriatoitssubject,successfullyalterstheapproachtakenbymostpreviousstudies.AsRosenblattnotes,criticismofBlackwritinghasoftenservedasapretextforexpoundingonBlackhistory.AddisonGayle‘srecentwork,forexample,judgesthevalueofBlackfictionbyovertlypoliticalstandards,ratingeachworkaccordingtothenotionsofBlackidentitywhichitpropounds.Althoughfictionassuredlyspringsfrompoliticalcircumstances,itsauthorsreacttothosecircumstancesinwaysotherthanideological,andtalkingaboutnovelsandstoriesprimarilyasinstrumentsofideologycircumventsmuchofthefictionalenterprise.Rosenblatt‘sliteraryanalysisdisclosesaffinitiesandconnectionsamongworksofBlackfictionwhichsolelypoliticalstudieshaveoverlookedorignored.WritingacceptablecriticismofBlackfiction,however,presupposesgivingsatisfactoryanswerstoanumberofquestions.Firstofall,isthereasufficientreason,otherthantheracialidentityoftheauthors,togrouptogetherworksbyBlackauthors?Second,howdoesBlackfictionmakeitselfdistinctfromothermodernfictionwithwhichitislargelycontemporaneous?RosenblattshowsthatBlackfictionconstitutesadistinctbodyofwritingthathasanidentifiable,coherentliterarytradition.LookingatnovelswrittenbyBlacksoverthelasteightyyears,hediscoversrecurringconcernsanddesignsindependentofchronology.Thesestructuresarethematic,andtheyspring,notsurprisingly,fromthecentralfactthattheBlackcharactersinthesenovelsexistinapredominantlyWhiteculture,whethertheytrytoconformtothatcultureorrebelagainstit.BlackFictiondoesleavesomeaestheticquestionsopen.Rosenblatt‘sthematicanalysispermitsconsiderableobjectivity;heevenexplicitlystatesthatitisnothisintentiontojudgethemeritofthevariousworks—yethisreluctanceseemsmisplaced,especiallysinceanattempttoappraisemighthaveledtointerestingresults.Forinstance,someofthenovelsappeartobestructurallydiffuse.Isthisadefect,oraretheauthorsworkingoutof,ortryingtoforge,adifferentkindofaesthetic?Inaddition,thestyleofsomeBlacknovels,likeJeanToomer‘sCane,vergesonexpressionismorsurrealism;doesthistechniqueprovideacounterpointtotheprevalentthemethatportraysthefateagainstwhichBlackheroesarepitted,athemeusuallyconveyedbymorenaturalisticmodesofexpression?Inspiteofsuchomissions,whatRosenblattdoesincludeinhisdiscussionmakesforanastuteandworthwhilestudy.BlackFictionsurveysawidevarietyofnovels,bringingtoourattentionintheprocesssomefascinatingandlittle-knownworkslikeJamesWeldonJohnson‘sAutobiographyofanEx-ColoredMan.Itsargumentistightlyconstructed,anditsforthright,lucidstyleexemplifieslevelheadedandpenetratingcriticism.TheauthorofthepassageobjectstocriticismofBlackfictionlikethatbyAddisonGaylebecauseitemphasizespurelyliteraryaspectsofsuchfictionmisinterpretstheideologicalcontentofsuchfictionmisunderstandsthenotionsofBlackidentitycontainedinsuchfictionsubstitutespoliticalforliterarycriteriainevaluatingsuchfictionignorestheinterplaybetweenBlackhistoryandBlackidentitydisplayedinsuchfictionTheauthorofthepassageisprimarilyconcernedwithevaluatingthesoundnessofaworkofcriticismcomparingvariouscriticalapproachestoasubjectdiscussingthelimitationsofaparticularkindofcriticismsummarizingthemajorpointsmadeinaworkofcriticismexplainingthetheoreticalbackgroundofacertainkindofcriticismTheauthorofthepassagebelievesthatBlackFictionwouldhavebeenimprovedhadRosenblattevaluatedmorecarefullytheideologicalandhistoricalaspectsofBlackfictionattemptedtobemoreobjectiveinhisapproachtonovelsandstoriesbyBlackauthorsexploredingreaterdetailtherecurrentthematicconcernsofBlackfictionthroughoutitshistoryestablishedabasisforplacingBlackfictionwithinitsownuniqueliterarytraditionassessedtherelativeliterarymeritofthenovelsheanalyzesthematicallyTheauthorofthepassagereferstoJamesWeldonJohnson‘sAutobiographyofanEx-ColoredManmostprobablyinordertopointoutaffinitiesbetweenRosenblatt‘smethodofthematicanalysisandearliercriticismclarifythepointaboutexpressionisticstylemadeearlierinthepassagequalifytheassessmentofRosenblatt‘sbookmadeinthefirstparagraphofthepassageillustratetheaffinitiesamongBlacknovelsdisclosedbyRosenblatt‘sliteraryanalysisgiveaspecificexampleofoneoftheaccomplishmentsofRosenblatt‘sworkP3Thetransferofheatandwatervaporfromtheoceantotheairaboveitdependsonadisequilibriumattheinterfaceofthewaterandtheair.Withinaboutamillimeterofthewater,airtemperatureisclosetothatofthesurfacewater,andtheairisnearlysaturatedwithwatervapor.Butthedifferences,howeversmall,arecrucial,andthedisequilibriumismaintainedbyairnearthesurfacemixingwithairhigherup,whichistypicallyappreciablycoolerandlowerinwater-vaporcontent.Theairismixedbymeansofturbulencethatdependsonthewindforitsenergy.Aswindspeedincreases,sodoesturbulence,andthustherateofheatandmoisturetransfer.Detailedunderstandingofthisphenomenonawaitsfurtherstudy.(127words)Forthefollowingquestion,considereachofthechoicesseparatelyandselectallthatapplyAccordingtothepassage,windovertheoceangenerallydoeswhichofthefollowing?□ACausesrelativelycool,dryairtocomeintoproximitywiththeoceansurface.□BMaintainsasteadyrateofheatandmoisturetransferbetweentheoceanandtheair.□CCausesfrequentchangesinthetemperatureofthewaterattheocean‘ssurface.Thepassagesuggeststhatifonacertaindaythewindweretodecreaseuntiltherewasnowindatallwhichofthefollowingwouldoccur?Theairclosesttotheoceansurfacewouldbecomesaturatedwithwatervapor.Theairclosesttotheoceansurfacewouldbewarmerthanthewater.Theamountofmoistureintheairclosesttotheoceansurfacewoulddecrease.Therateofheatandmoisturetransferwouldincrease.Theairclosesttotheoceanwouldbeatthesametemperatureasairhigherup.P4“Iwanttocriticizethesocialsystem,andtoshowitatwork,atitsmostintense.”VirginiaWoolf‘sprovocativestatementaboutherintentionsinwritingMrs.Dallowayhasregularlybeenignoredbythecritics,sinceithighlightsanaspectofherliteraryinterestsverydifferentfromthetraditionalpictureofthe“poeticno”velistconcernedwithexaminingstatesofreverieandvisionandwithfollowingtheintricatepathwaysofindividualconsciousness.ButVirginiaWoolfwasarealistaswellasapoeticnovelist,asatiristandsocialcriticaswellasavisionary:literarycritics‘cavalierdismissalofWoolf‘ssocialvisionwillnotwithstandscrutiny.Inhernovels,Woolfisdeeplyengagedbythequestionsofhowindividualsareshaped(ordeformed)bytheirsocialenvironments,howhistoricalforcesimpingeonpeople‘slives,howclass,wealth,andgenderhelptodeterminepeople‘sfates.Mostofhernovelsarerootedinarealisticallyrenderedsocialsettingandinaprecisehistoricaltime.(163words)Inthefirstparagraphofthepassage,theautho‘rsattitudetowardtheliterarycriticsmentionedcanbestbedescribedasdisparagingironicfacetiousskepticalbutresigneddisappointedbuthopefulItcanbeinferredfromthepassagethatthemostprobablereasonWoolfrealisticallydescribedthesocialsettinginthemajorityofhernovelswasthatshewasawarethatcontemporaryliterarycriticsconsideredthenoveltobethemostrealisticofliterarygenreswasinterestedintheeffectofaperson‘ssocialmilieuonhisorhercharacterandactionsneededtobeasattentivetodetailaspossibleinhernovelsinordertosupporttheargumentssheadvancedinthemwantedtoshowthatapainstakingfidelityintherepresentationofrealitydidnotinanywayhampertheartistwishedtopreventcriticsfromchargingthathernovelswerewritteninanambiguousandinexactstyleInthecontextofthepassage, “poetic”isclosestinmeaningtosocioeconomicrealisticpoliticalvisionaryliteraryP11Itisapopularmisconceptionthatnuclearfusionpowerisfreeofradioactivity;infact,thedeuterium-tritiumreactionthatnuclearscientistsarecurrentlyexploringwithsuchzealproducesbothalphaparticlesandneutrons.(Theneutronsareusedtoproducetritiumfromalithiumblanketsurroundingthereactor.)一個廣為流傳的誤解，是核聚變能源不具備放射性;實際上，當下核科學的熱門研究領域氘氚反應，會同時釋放阿爾法粒子和中子。(中子來自于包裹核反應堆的鋰層，用于制取氘)2Anothercommonmisconceptionisthatnuclearfusionpowerisavirtuallyunlimitedsourceofenergybecauseoftheenormousquantityofdeuteriuminthesea.核聚變能源取之不盡，這是另一個普遍的誤解，理由是海洋中蘊含了不可計數(shù)量的氘。3Actually,itslimitsaresetbytheamountofavailablelithium,whichisaboutasplentifulasuraniumintheEarth‘scrust.其實，限制在于我們能獲得多少鋰，鋰的含量大致與地殼中的鈾含量相當。4Researchshouldcertainlycontinueoncontrollednuclearfusion,butnoenergyprogramshouldbepremisedonitsexistenceuntilithas(been)provenpractical.(122words)關于可控核聚變的研究當然該繼續(xù)，但任何能源項目在證實可實際操作前，都不該倉促上馬。(premise此句中做postulate假設“”解釋。practical切合實際的，此句中可以意譯地理解為“安全可行的”。比較直接的翻譯是，……沒有證明核能項目安全可行之前，任何項目都不該假設它存在我懷疑原文少了一個been，認為除非加上否則不通，雖然所有網(wǎng)上我查到的來源都沒有這個been。如果你有更好的解釋，或提出關于文本及翻譯的其他錯漏，請留言給我，愿一起努力打造一個質量更高的注釋集。)1.Itcanbeinferredfromthepassagethattheauthorbelieveswhichofthefollowingaboutthecurrentstateofpublicawarenessconcerningnuclearfusionpower?Thepublichasbeendeliberatelymisinformedabouttheadvantagesanddisadvantagesofnuclearfusionpower.Thepublicisunawareoftheprincipaladvantageofnuclearfusionovernuclearfussionasanenergysource.Thepublic‘sawarenessofthescientificfactsconcerningnuclearfusionpowerissomewhatdistortedandincomplete.Thepublicisnotinterestedinincreasingitsawarenessoftheadvantagesanddisadvantagesofnuclearfusionpower.Thepublicisawareofthedisadvantagesofnuclearfusionpowerbutnotofitsadvantages.選CA實在看不出公眾是故意去誤解的，deliberately,不選；B“公眾忽視了核聚變作為一種能源的主要優(yōu)點”，文中只說兩種誤解，沒說什么主要優(yōu)點，不選；C正確項，公眾關于核聚變能的一些科學事實的看法是扭曲和不完整的（誤解）；D有沒有interested或increasing，無從判斷，不選；E啊，讓人疲勞的瞎聊。Forthefollowingquestion,considereachofthechoicesseparatelyandselectallthatapply2.ThepassageprovidesinformationthatwouldanswerwhichofthefollowingquestionsEXCEPT?□AHowmuchincidentalradiationisproducedinthedeuteriumtritiumfusionreaction?□BWhatislikelytobetheprincipalsourceofdeuteriumfornuclearfusionpower?□CWhyarescientistsexploringthedeuterium-tritiumfusionreactionwithsuchzeal?選AC只有B項提出的問題可以用文中明確指出的信息回答，句 2，“海洋中的氘”。所以選AC。P21RogerRosenblatt‘sbookBlackFiction,inattemptingtoapplyliteraryratherthansociopoliticalcriteriatoitssubject,successfullyalterstheapproachtakenbymostpreviousstudies.RR的書《BF》，試圖運用文學標準而不是社會政治的標準去評價它的研究對象，成功地改變了之前的研究方法。2AsRosenblattnotes,criticismofBlackwritinghasoftenservedasapretextforexpoundingonBlackhistory.R表示，許多所謂的關于黑人寫作的評論，實際上關注的是黑人歷史。（Black大寫做形容詞時，“黑人（人種）的”，可以指非洲黑人，或移居北美的非洲黑人及其后代組成的黑人群體。pretext借口，托詞。對于黑人寫作的評論，經(jīng)常作為詳述黑人歷史的借口，意譯一下，有些研究表面上是在討論黑人寫作，其實黑人寫作只是幌子（借口，pretext），真正要探討的問題是關于黑人歷史的。）3AddisonGayle‘srecentwork,forexample,judgesthevalueofBlackfictionbyovertlypoliticalstandards,ratingeachworkaccordingtothenotionsofBlackidentitywhichitpropounds.比如說，AG最近的研究，用過度政治化的標準評判黑人小說的價值，根據(jù)每部作品所討論的黑人身份概念來評價其價值。4Althoughfictionassuredlyspringsfrompoliticalcircumstances,itsauthorsreacttothosecircumstancesinwaysotherthanideological,andtalkingaboutnovelsandstoriesprimarilyasinstrumentsofideologycircumventsmuchofthefictionalenterprise.小說當然脫胎于政治環(huán)境，但作者回應環(huán)境卻并非遵循意識形態(tài)化的方式，一旦講述新奇故事成為意識形態(tài)宣傳的工具，就制約了小說的發(fā)展。5Rosenblatt‘sliteraryanalysisdisclosesaffinitiesandconnectionsamongworksofBlackfictionwhichsolelypoliticalstudieshaveoverlookedorignored.R的文學分析解釋了黑人小說作品間的相似與聯(lián)系，單純的政治研究往往忽略這些內容。6WritingacceptablecriticismofBlackfiction,however,presupposesgivingsatisfactoryanswerstoanumberofquestions.然而，想要寫出令人滿意的黑人小說評論，意味著針對一系列問題給出令人滿意的答案。7Firstofall,isthereasufficientreason,otherthantheracialidentityoftheauthors,togrouptogetherworksbyBlackauthors?首先，拋開作者們相同的種族，有其他充分的理由將黑人小說歸為一類嗎?8Second,howdoesBlackfictionmakeitselfdistinctfromothermodernfictionwithwhichitislargelycontemporaneous?第二，相較于其他同時代的現(xiàn)代小說類型，黑人小說的獨特之處是什么?9RosenblattshowsthatBlackfictionconstitutesadistinctbodyofwritingthathasanidentifiable,coherentliterarytradition.R展示了黑人小說所組成的一個特別的文學體系，該體系具有的一種可識別的，條理分明的文學傳統(tǒng)。10LookingatnovelswrittenbyBlacksoverthelasteightyyears,hediscoversrecurringconcernsanddesignsindependentofchronology.仔細研究了過去80年的黑人小說，R發(fā)現(xiàn)了一些與年代無關的反復出現(xiàn)的關注點和設計。11Thesestructuresarethematic,andtheyspring,notsurprisingly,fromthecentralfactthattheBlackcharactersinthesenovelsexistinapredominantlyWhiteculture,whethertheytrytoconformtothatcultureorrebelagainstit.這些結構是關乎主題的，而且都不出人意料地，發(fā)端于這樣一個核心事實，小說中的黑人角色都出現(xiàn)在一個白人主導的文化中，無論他們嘗試適應這種文化或與之對抗。12BlackFictiondoesleavesomeaestheticquestionsopen.《BF》還有一些美學問題沒有回答。13Rosenblatt‘sthematicanalysispermitsconsiderableobjectivity;heevenexplicitlystatesthatitisnothisintentiontojudgethemeritofthevariousworks—yethisreluctanceseemsmisplaced,especiallysinceanattempttoappraisemighthaveledtointerestingresults.R的主題分析表現(xiàn)出相當?shù)目陀^性;他甚至明確表示他無意評判不同作品的價值——盡管他的保留似乎沒有必要，特別是既然評價的嘗試可能引發(fā)有趣的結果。14Forinstance,someofthenovelsappeartobestructurallydiffuse.Isthisadefect,oraretheauthorsworkingoutof,ortryingtoforge,adifferentkindofaesthetic?比如說，某些小說的看似結構散亂。這是一種缺陷嗎，還是作者刻意為之，抑或嘗試偽造一種不同的美學標準?15Inaddition,thestyleofsomeBlacknovels,likeJeanToomer‘sCane,vergesonexpressionismorsurrealism;doesthistechniqueprovideacounterpointtotheprevalentthemethatportraysthefateagainstwhichBlackheroesarepitted,athemeusuallyconveyedbymorenaturalisticmodesofexpression?另外，一些黑人小說的風格，比如JTC，非常接近表現(xiàn)主義或超自然主義;該技巧是否提供了一種對照，相較于最流行的描述黑人英雄對抗命運的主題，一種經(jīng)常通過更自然主義的表達方式傳遞的主題?16Inspiteofsuchomissions,whatRosenblattdoesincludeinhisdiscussionmakesforanastuteandworthwhilestudy.盡管存在諸如此類的種種遺漏，R已完成的討論確實是敏銳的又有價值的研究。17BlackFictionsurveysawidevarietyofnovels,bringingtoourattentionintheprocesssomefascinatingandlittle-knownworkslikeJamesWeldonJohnson‘sAutobiographyofanEx-ColoredMan.《BF》全面研究了相當多的小說，討論過程中使我們注意到一些少有問津的迷人作品，比如JWJ的《AoaECM》。18Itsargumentistightlyconstructed,anditsforthright,lucidstyleexemplifieslevelheadedandpenetratingcriticism.它的觀點結構嚴密，作者直截了當、簡明易讀的風格，堪稱條理清晰，深刻敏銳的典范。TheauthorofthepassageobjectstocriticismofBlackfictionlikethatbyAddisonGaylebecauseitemphasizespurelyliteraryaspectsofsuchfictionmisinterpretstheideologicalcontentofsuchfi