2006年考研英語一真題及答案詳細(xì)解析

Readthefollowingtext.Choosethebestword(s)foreachnumberedblankandmark[A],[B],[C]or[D]onANSWERSHEET1.(10points)ThehomelessmakeupagrowingpercentageofAmerica’s homelessnesshasreachedsuchproportionsthat ernmentscan’t .Tohelphomeless independence,the mustsupportjobtrainingprograms, theminimumwage,andfundmorelow-costhousing. everyoneagreesonthenumberofAmericanswhoare anywherefrom600,000to3million. thefiguremayvary,ystsdoagreeonanothermatter:thatthenumberofthehomeless .Oneofthefederal ernment’sstudies thatthenumberofthehomelesswillreachnearly19millionbytheendofthisdecade.Findingwaysto thisgrowinghomelesspopulationhas increasingly whenhomelessindividualsmanagetofinda thatwillgivethemthreemealsadayand cetosleepatnight,anumberstillspendthebulkofeachday thestreet.Partoftheproblemisthatmanyhomelessadultsareaddictedtoalcoholordrugs.Andasignificantofthehomelesshaveseriousmentaldisorders.Many notormentallyill,simplylacktheeveryday15skillsneededtoturntheir16.BostonGlobereporterChrisReidynotesthatthesituationwillimproveonlywhenthereare17 programsthataddressthemanyneedsofthehomeless.18EdwardZlotkowski,directorofcommunityserviceatBentleyCollegeinMassachusetts,19it,“Therehastobe20ofprograms.What’sneededisapackagedeal.”[A][A][A][A][A][A][A]NowExcept[A][A]dis[A][A][A][A][A][A][A][A][A][A][A] PartReadthefollowingfourtexts.Answerthequestionsbeloweachtextbychoosing[A],[B],[C],or[D].MarkyouranswersonANSWERSHEET1.(40points)Text1Inspiteof“endlesstalkofdifference,”Americansocietyisanamazingmachineforhomogenizingpeople.Thereis“thedemocratizinguniformityofdressanddiscourse,andthecasualnessandabsenceofdeference”characteristicofpopularculture.Peopleareabsorbedinto“acultureofconsumption”launchedbythe19th-centurydepartmentstoresthatoffered“vastarraysofgoodsinanelegantatmosphere.Insteadofintimateshopscateringtoaknowledgeableelite,”thesewerestores“anyonecouldenter,regardlessofclassorbackground.Thisturnedshopintoapublicanddemocraticact.”Themassmedia,advertisingandsportsaresforImmigrantsarequicklyfittingintothiscommonculture,whichmaynotbealtogetherelevatingbutishardlypoisonous.WritingfortheNationalImmigrationForum,GregoryRodriguezreportsthattoday’simmigrationisneitheratunprecedentedlevelsnorresistanttoassimilation.In1998immigrantswere9.8percentofpopulation;in1900,13.6percent.Inthe10yearspriorto1990,3.1immigrantsarrivedforevery1,000residents;inthe10yearspriorto1890,9.2forevery1,000.Now,considerthreeindicesofassimilation--language,homeownershipandintermarriage.The1990Censusrevealedthat“amajorityofimmigrantsfromeachofthefifteenmostcommoncountriesoforiginspokeEnglish‘well’or‘verywell’aftertenyearsofresidence.”ThechildrenofimmigrantstendtobebilingualandproficientinEnglish.“Bythethirdgeneration,theoriginallanguageislostinthemajorityofimmigrantfamilies.”HencethedescriptionofAmericaasa“graveyard”forlanguages.By1996foreign-bornimmigrantswhohadarrivedbefore1970hadahomeownershiprateof75.6percent,higherthanthe69.8percentrateamongnative-bornAmericans.Foreign-bornAsiansandHispanics“havehigherratesofintermarriagethandoU.S.-bornwhitesandblacks.”Bythethirdgeneration,onethirdofHispanicwomenaremarriedtonon-Hispanics,and41percentofAsian-Americanwomenaremarriedtonon-Asians.RodrigueznotesthatchildreninremotevillagesaroundtheworldarefansofsuperstarslikeArnoldSchwarzeneggerandGarthBrooks,yet“someAmericansfearthatimmigrantslivingwithintheUnitedStatesremainsomehowimmunetothenation’sassimilativepower.”AretheredivisiveissuesandpocketsofseethingangerinAmerica?Indeed.Itisbigenoughtohaveabitofeverything.ButparticularlywhenviewedagainstAmerica’sturbulentpast,today’ssocialindiceshardlysuggestadarkanddeterioratingsocialenvironment.Theword“homogenizing”(Line2,Paragraph1)mostprobably.Accordingtotheauthor,thedepartmentstoresofthe19th [A]yedaroleinthespreadofpopularbecameintimateshopsforcommonsatisfiedtheneedsofaknowledgeableoweditsemergencetothecultureofThetextsuggeststhatimmigrantsnowinthe areresistanttoexertagreatinfluenceonAmericanarehardlyathreattothecommonconstitutethemajorityoftheWhyareArnoldSchwarzeneggerandGarthBrooksmentionedinParagraphToprovetheirpopularityaroundtheTorevealthepublic’sfearofTogiveexamplesofsuccessfulToshowthepowerfulinfluenceofAmericanIntheauthor’sopinion,theabsorptionofimmigrantsintoAmericansociety.Stratford-on-Avon,asweallknow,hasonlyoneindustry--William--buttherearetwodistinctlyseparateandincreasinglyhostilebranches.ThereistheRoyalShakespeare(RSC),whichpresentssuperbproductionsoftheysattheShakespeareMemorialTheatreontheAvon.Andtherearethetownsfolkwholargelyliveoffthetouristswhocome,nottoseetheys,buttolookatAnneHathaway’sCottage,Shakespeare’sbirthceandtheothersights.TheworthyresidentsofStratforddoubtthatthetheatreaddsapennytotheirrevenue.TheyfranklydisliketheRSC’sactors,themwiththeirlonghairandbeardsandsandalsandnoisiness.It’salldeliciouslyironicwhenyouconsiderthatShakespeare,whoearnstheirliving,washimselfanactor(withabeard)anddidhisshareofnoise-making.Thetouriststreamsarenotentirelyseparate.Thesightseerswhocomebybus--andoftentakeinWarwickCastleandBlenheimPalaceontheside--don’tusuallyseetheys,andsomeofthemareevensurprisedtofindatheatreinStratford.However,theygoersdomanagealittlesight-seeingalongwiththeirygoing.Itistheygoers,theRSCcontends,whobringinmuchofthetown’srevenuebecausetheyspendthenight(someofthemfourorfivenights)pouringcashintothehosandrestaurants.Thesightseerscantakeineverythingandgetoutoftownbynightfall.Thetownsfolkdon’tseeitthiswayandlocalcouncildoesnotcontributedirectlytothesubsidyoftheRoyalShakespeare.Stratfordcriespoortraditionally.Neverthelesseveryhointownseemstobeaddinganewwingorcocktaillounge.Hiltonisbuildingitsownhothere,whichyoumaybesurewillbedecoratedwithHamletHamburgerBars,theLearLounge,theBanquoBanquetingRoom,andsoforth,andwillbeveryexpensive.Anyway,thetownsfolkcan’tunderstandwhytheRoyalShakespeareneedsasubsidy.(Thetheatrehasbrokenattendancerecordsforthreeyearsinarow.Lastyearits1,431seatswere94percentoccupiedallyearlongandthisyearthey’lldobetter.)Thereason,ofcourse,isthatcostshave edandticketpriceshavestayedlow.ItwouldbeashametoraisepricestoomuchbecauseitwoulddriveawaytheyoungpeoplewhoareStratford’smostattractiveele.Theycomeentirelyfortheys,notthesights.Theyallseemtolookalike(thoughtheycomefromallover)--lean,pointed,dedicatedfaces,wearingnsandsandals,eatingtheirbunsandbeddingdownforthenightontheflagstonesoutsidethetheatretobuythe20seatsand80standing-roomticketsheldforthesleepersandsoldtothemwhentheboxofficeopensat10:30a.m.Fromthefirsttwoparagraphs,welearn thetownsfolkdenytheRSC’scontributiontothetown’stheactorsoftheRSCimitateShakespeareonandoffthetwobranchesoftheRSCarenotongoodthetownsfolkearnlittlefromItcanbeinferredfromParagraph3 thesightseerscannotvisittheCastleandthePalaceseparatheygoersspendmoremoneythanthethesightseersdomoreshopthanthetheygoersgotonoothercesintownthantheBysaying“Stratfordcriespoortraditionally”(Line2-3,Paragraph4),theauthorimpliesthat StratfordcannotaffordtheexpansionStratfordhaslongbeeninfinancialthetownisnotreallyshortofthetownsfolkusedtobepoorlyAccordingtothetownsfolk,theRSCdeservesnosubsidy ticketpricescanberaisedtocoverthe isfinanciallyill-thebehavioroftheactorsisnotsociallythetheatreattendanceisontheFromthetextwecanconcludethatthe issupportiveofbothfavorsthetownsfolk’stakesadetachedissympathetictotheWhenprehistoricmanarrivedinnewpartsoftheworld,somethingstrangehappenedtothelargeanimals.Theysuddenlybecameextinct.Smallerspeciessurvived.Thelarge,slow-growinganimalswereeasygame,andwerequicklyhuntedtoextinction.Nowsomethingsimilarcouldbehappeningintheoceans.Thattheseasarebeingoverfishedhasbeenknownforyears.WhatresearcherssuchasRansomMyersandBorisWormhaveshownisjusthowfastthingsarechanging.Theyhavelookedathalfacenturyofdatafromfisheriesaroundtheworld.Theirmethodsdonotattempttoestimatetheactualbiomass(theamountoflivingbiologicalmatter)offishspeciesinparticularpartsoftheocean,butratherchangesinthatbiomassovertime.AccordingtotheirlatestpaperpublishedinNature,thebiomassoflargepredators(animalsthatkillandeatotheranimals)inanewfisheryisreducedonaverageby80%within15yearsofthestartofexploitation.Insomelong-fishedareas,ithashalvedagainsincethen.Dr.Wormacknowledgesthatthesefiguresareconservative.Onereasonforthisisthatfishingtechnologyhasimproved.Today’svesselscanfindtheirpreyusingsalitesandsonar,whichwerenotavailable50yearsago.Thatmeansahigherproportionofwhatisintheseaisbeingcaught,sotherealdifferencebetweenpresentandpastislikelytobeworsethantheonerecordedbychangesincatchsizes.Intheearlydays,too,longlineswouldhavebeenmoresaturatedwithfish.Someindividualswouldthereforenothavebeencaught,sincenobaitedhookswouldhavebeenavailabletotrapthem,leadingtoanunderestimateoffishstocksinthepast.Furthermore,intheearlydaysoflonglinefishing,alotoffishwerelosttosharksaftertheyhadbeenhooked.Thatisnolongeraproblem,becausetherearefewersharksaroundnow.Dr.MyersandDr.Wormarguethattheirworkgivesacorrectbaseline,whichfuturemanagementeffortsmusttakeintoaccount.Theybelievethedatasupportanideacurrentamongmarinebiologists,thatofthe“shiftingbaseline.”Thenotionisthatpeoplehavefailedtodetectthemassivechangeswhichhavehappenedintheoceanbecausetheyhavebeenlookingbackonlyarelativelyshorttimeintothepast.Thatmattersbecausetheorysuggeststhattheumsustainableyieldthatcanbecroppedfromafisherycomeswhenthebiomassofatargetspeciesisabout50%ofitsoriginallevels.Mostfisheriesarewellbelowthat,whichisabadwaytodobusiness.Theextinctionoflargeprehistoricanimalsisnotedtosuggest largeanimalwerevulnerabletothechangingsmallspeciessurvivedaslargeanimalslargeseaanimalsmayfacethesamethreatslow-growingfishoutlivefast-growingWecaninferfromDr.MyersandDr.Worm’spaper thestockoflargepredatorsinsomeoldfisherieshasreducedbythereareonlyhalfasmanyfisheriesastherewere15yearsthecatchsizesinnewfisheriesareonly20%oftheoriginalthenumberoflargerpredatorsdroppedfasterinnewfisheriesthanintheBysaying"thesefiguresareconservative"(Line1,paragraph3),Dr.Wormmeansthat fishingtechnologyhasimprovedthecatch-sizesareactuallysmallerthanthemarinebiomasshassufferedagreaterthedatacollectedsofarareoutofDr.Myersandotherresearchershold peopleshouldlookforabaselinethatcanworkforalongerfisheriesshouldkeeptheiryieldsbelow50%ofthetheoceanbiomassshouldberestoredtoitsoriginalpeopleshouldadjustthefishingbaselinetothechangingTheauthorseemstobemainlyconcernedwithmost managementbiomasscatch-sizetechnologicalManythingsmakepeoplethinksareweird.Buttheweirdestmaybethis:s’onlyjobistoexploreemotions,andyettheychoosetofocusontheonesfeelThiswasn’talwaysso.Theearliestformsofart,likepaintingandmusic,arethosebestsuitedforexpressingjoy.Butsomewherefromthe19thcenturyonward,moresbeganseeinghappinessasmeaningless,phonyor,worstofall,boring,aswewentfromWordsworth’sdaffodilstoBaudelaire’sflowersofevil.Youcouldarguethatartbecamemoreskepticalofhappinessbecausemoderntimeshaveseensomuchmisery.Butit’snotasifearliertimesdidn’tknowperpetualwar,disasterandthemassacreofinnocents.Thereason,infact,maybejusttheopposite:thereistoomuchdamnhappinessintheworldtoday.Afterall,whatistheonemodernformofexpressionalmostcompleydedicatedtodepictinghappiness?Advertising.Theriseofanti-happyartalmostexactlytrackstheemergenceofmassmedia,andwithit,acommercialcultureinwhichhappinessisnotjustanidealbutanideology.Peopleinearliererasweresurroundedbyremindersofmisery.Theyworkeduntilexhausted,livedwithfewprotectionsanddiedyoung.IntheWest,beforemasscommunicationandlicy,themostpowerfulmassmediumwasthechurch,whichremindedworshippersthattheirsoulswereindangerandthattheywouldsomedaybemeatforworms.Givenallthis,theydidnotexactlyneedtheirarttobeabummertoo.TodaythemessagestheaverageWesternerissurroundedwitharenotreligiousbutcommercial,andforeverhappy.Fast-foodeaters,newsanchors,textmessengers,allsmiling,smiling,smiling.Ourmagazinesfeaturebeamingcelebritiesandhappyfamiliesinperfecthomes.Andsincethesemessageshaveanagenda--tolureustoopenourwallets--theymaketheveryideaofhappinessseemunreliable.“Celebrate!”commandedtheadsforthearthritisdrugCelebrex,beforewefoundoutitcouldincreasetheriskofheartattacks.Butwhatweforget--whatoureconomydependsonusforgetting--isthathappinessismorethanpleasurewithoutpain.Thethingsthatbringthegreatestjoycarrythegreatestpotentialforlossanddisappointment.Today,surroundedbypromisesofeasyhappiness,weneedarttolus,asreligiononcedid,Mementomori:rememberthatyouwilldie,thateverythingends,andthathappinesscomesnotindenyingthisbutinlivingwithit.It’samessageevenmorebitterthanaclovecigarette,yet,somehow,abreathoffreshair.BycitingtheexamplesofpoetsWordsworthandBaudelaire,theauthorintendstoshowthat poetryisnotasexpressiveofjoyaspaintingorartgrowsoutofbothpositiveandnegativepoetstodayarelessskepticalofshavechangedtheirfocusofTheword“bummer”(Line5,paragraph5)mostprobablymeans.Intheauthor’sopinion, emergesinthewakeoftheanti-happyisacauseofdisappointmentforthegeneralrecesthechurchasamajorsourceofcreatesanillusionofhappinessratherthanhappinessWecanlearnfromthelastparagraphthattheauthor happinessmoreoftenthannotendsintheanti-happyartisdistastefulbutmiseryshouldbeenjoyedratherthantheanti-happyartflourisheswheneconomyWhichofthefollowingistrueoftheReligiononcefunctionedasareminderofArtprovidesabalancebetweenexpectationandPeoplefeeldisappointedattherealitiesofmodernMassmediaareinclinedtocoverdisastersandPartInthefollowingarticle,somesentenceshavebeenremoved.ForQuestions41-45,choosethemostsuitableonefromthelistA-Gtofitintoeachofthenumberedgaps.Therearetwoextrachoices,whichyoudonotneedtouseinanyoftheblanks.MarkyouranswersonANSWERSHEET1.(10points)OnthenorthbankoftheOhioriversitsEvansville,Ind.,homeofDavidWilliams,52,andofariverboatcasino(acewheregamblinggamesareyed).Duringseveralyearsofgamblinginthatcasino,Williams,astateauditorearning$35,000ayear,lostapproximay$175,000.Hehadnevergambledbeforethecasinosenthimacouponfor$20worthofgambling.Hevisitedthecasino,lostthe$20andleft.Onhissecondvisithelost$800.Thecasinoissuedtohim,asagoodcustomer,a"FunCard",whichwhenusedinthecasinoearnspointsformealsanddrinks,andenablesthecasinototracktheuser’sgamblingactivities.ForWilliams,those ewhathecalls.In1997helost$21,000tooneslotmachineintwodays.InMarch1997helost$72,186.Hesometimesyedtwoslotmachinesatatime,allnight,untiltheboatdockedat5a.m.,thenwentbackaboardwhenthecasinoopenedat9a.m.Nowheissuingthecasino,chargingthatitshouldhaverefusedhispatronagebecauseitknewhewasaddicted.ItdidknowhehadaInMarch1998afriendofWilliams’sgothiminvoluntarilyconfinedtoatreatmentcenterforaddictions,andwrotetoinformthecasinoofWilliams’sgamblingproblem.ThecasinoincludedaphotoofWilliamsamongthoseofbannedgamblers,andwrotetohima“ceaseadmissions”letter.Notingthemedical/psychologicalnatureofproblemgamblingbehavior,thelettersaidthatbeforebeingreadmittedtothecasinohewouldhavetopresentmedical/psychologicalinformationdemonstratingthatpatronizingthecasinowouldposenothreattohissafetyorwell-being..TheWalStreetJournalreportsthatthecasinohas24signswarning:“Enjoythefun...andalwaysbetwithyourhead,notoverit.”Everyentranceticketlistsatoll-numberforcounselingfromthenaDepartmentofMentalHealth.Nevertheless,Williams’ssuitchargesthatthecasino,knowinghewas“helplesslyaddictedtogambling,”intentionallyworkedto“l(fā)ure”himto“engageinconductagainsthiswill.”. editionoftheDiagnosticandStatisticalManualofMentalDisorderssays“pathologicalgambling”involvespersistent,recurringanduncontrollablepursuitlessofmoneythanofthrilloftakingrisksinquestofawindfall..Pushedbyscience,orwhatclaimstobescience,societyisreclassifyingwhatoncewereconsideredcharacterflawsormoralfailingsasalitydisordersakintophysical.Forty-fourstateshavelotteries,29havecasinos,andmostofthesestatesaretovaryingdegreesdependenton--youmightsayaddictedto--revenuesfromwagering.AndsincethefirstInternetgamblingsitewascreatedin1995,competitionforgamblers’dollarshas eintense.TheOct.28issueofNewsweekreportedthat2milliongamblerspatronize1,800virtualcasinoseveryweek.With$3.5billionbeinglostonInternetwagersthisyear,gamblinghaspassedographyastheWeb’smostprofitablebusiness.Althoughnosuchevidencewaspresented,thecasino’smarketingdepartmenttopepperhimwithmailings.AndheenteredthecasinoandusedhisFunCardwithoutbeingdetected.Itisunclearwhatluringwasrequired,givenhiscompulsivebehavior.Andinwhatsensewashiswilloperative?Bythetimehehadlost$5,000hesaidtohimselfthatifhecouldgetbacktoeven,hewouldquit.Onenighthewon$5,500,buthedidnotquit.GamblinghasbeenacommonfeatureofAmericanlifeforever,butforalongtimeitwasbroadlyconsideredasin,orasocialdisease.Nowitisasocial:themostimportantandaggressivepromoterofgamblinginAmericaistheDavidWilliams’ssuitshouldtroublethisgamblingnation.Butdon’tbetonItisworrisomethatsocietyismedicalizingmoreandmorebehavioralproblems,oftendefiningasaddictionswhatearlier,sternergenerationsexinedasweaknessofwill.Theanonymous,lonely,undistractednatureofonlinegamblingisespeciallyconducivetocompulsivebehavior.ButeveniftheernmentknewhowtomoveagainstInternetgambling,whatwouldbeitsgroundsforngso?PartReadthefollowingtextcarefullyandthentranslatetheunderlinedsegments.YourtranslationshouldbewrittenclearlyonANSWERSHEET2.IsittruethattheAmericaninlectualisrejectedandconsideredofnoaccountinhissociety?Iamgoingtosuggestthatitisnottrue.FatherBruckbergertoldpartofthestorywhenheobservedthatitistheinlectualswhohaverejectedAmerica.Buttheyhavedonemorethanthat.Theyhavegrowndissatisfiedwiththeroleofinlectual.Itisthey,notAmerica,whohave eanti-inlectual.First,theobjectofourstudypleadsfordefinition.Whatisanin lectual?46)IshalldefinehimasanindividualwhohaselectedashisprimarydutyandpleasureinlifetheactivityofthinkinginaSocratic()wayaboutmoralproblems.Heexploressuchproblemsconsciously,articula y,andfrankly,firstbyaskingfactualquestions,thenbyaskingmoralquestions,finallybysuggestingactionwhichseemsappropriateinthelightofthefactualandmoralinformationwhichhehasobtained.47)Hisfunctionisogoustothatofajudge,whomustaccepttheobligationofrevealinginasobviousamanneraspossiblethecourseofreasoningwhichledhimtohisdecision.Thisdefinitionexcludesmanyindividualsusuallyreferredtoasin lectuals--theaveragescientist,forone.48)Ihaveexcludedhimbecause,whilehisplishmentsmaycontributetothesolutionofmoralproblems,hehasnotbeenchargedwiththetaskofapproachinganybutthefactualaspectsofthoseproblems.Likeotherhumanbeings,heencountersmoralissuesevenintheeverydayperformanceofhisroutineduties--heisnotsupposedtocookhisexperiments,manufactureevidence,ordoctorhisreports.49)Buthisprimarytaskisnottothinkaboutthemoralcodewhich ernshisactivity,anymorethanabusinessmanisexpectedtodedicatehisenergiestoanexplorationofrulesofconductinbusiness.Duringmostofhiswakinglifehewilltakehiscodeforgranted,asthebusinessmantakeshisThedefinitionalsoexcludesthemajorityofteachers,despitethefactthatteachinghastraditionallybeenthemethodwherebymanyinlectualsearntheirliving.50)Theymayteachverywellandmorethanearntheirsalaries,butmostofthemmakelittleornoindependentreflectionsonhumanproblemswhichinvolvemoraljudgment.Thisdescriptionevenfitsthemajorityofeminentscholars.Beinglearnedinsomebranchofhumanknowledgeisonething,livingin"publicandillustriousthoughts,”asEmersonwouldsay,issomethingelse.PartYouwanttocontributetoProjectHopebyofferingfinancialaidtoachildinaremotearea.Writealettertothedepartmentconcerned,askingthemtohelpfindacandidate.Youshouldspecifywhatkindofchildyouwanttohelpandhowyouwillcarryoutyourn.Writeyourletterinnolessthan100words.WriteitneatlyonANSWERSHEET2.Donotsignyourownnameattheendoftheletter;use“LiMing”Donotwritetheaddress.(10PartStudythefollowingphotoscarefullyandwriteanessayinwhichyoudescribethephotosinterpretthesocialphenomenonreflectedbythem,giveyourpointofYoushouldwrite160-200wordsneatlyonANSWERSHEET2.(20有兩幅，圖1把寫在臉上；圖2花300元做“頭”注：Beckham是英國有兩張，一張上有一位男士臉上寫著的名字，另一張【分析】邏輯關(guān)系題，前后兩句的邏輯關(guān)系決定答案。根據(jù)前一句“makingupagrowingpercentage”與后一句“reachsuchproportionthat”確定后者是對前者的例證強調(diào)。選項［A］選項［C］therefore因此，強調(diào)結(jié)果；選項［D］furthermore進一步說，表示遞進。.““【分析】詞匯辨析題，選擇介詞與句子中的動詞有直接關(guān)系。句子中“helphomelesspeopleindependence”提供信息確定選擇“幫助……向某個方向發(fā)展”之意。選項[A]in構(gòu)helpsbinng；選項[B]for；選項[C]withhelpsbwithsth譯為“幫助…做事”選項[D]toward構(gòu)成helpsbtoward譯為“幫助……向某個方向發(fā)展”【分析】詞匯辨析題，所在句子的主語、賓語決定所選擇的動詞。句子中“theminimum拿來；選項[D]keep保留。6、76題所在的語境句意為“”7題又說“”DNo，本句意思為“關(guān)于無家可歸者的數(shù)量，眾說不一”。選項Agnay一般來說；選項[aothadyDnot，譯為anywherefrom600,000to3million.”提供信息確定選擇“在……范圍”之意。選項[A]cover覆蓋、包括；選項[B]change改變、變化；選項[C]range在某范圍中變化；選項[D]differ不同。range常與from…to搭配，符合題意。varydoagree互為反義，確定二者為轉(zhuǎn)折關(guān)系。選項[A]Nowthathomelessis”提供信息確定選擇增加，膨脹之意。選項[A]inflating膨脹；選項【分析】詞匯辨析題，句子中的主語、賓語決定所選擇的動詞。句子中“oneofthefederalernment’s that…”提供信息確定選擇“預(yù)測”之意。選項[A]predicts預(yù)測、計；選項[B]disys展示；選項[C]proves證明；選項[D]discovers發(fā)現(xiàn)。由于本句話說的是將來的事情（bytheendofthisdecadepredicts一詞。全句意為“【分析】詞匯辨析題，句子中的賓語決定所選擇的動詞。句子中“Findingwaystothisgrowinghomelesspopulationhas eincreasinglydifficult.”提供信息確定選擇“幫助”之a(chǎn)ssist與help同義，因此[A]應(yīng)為答案?！痉治觥窟壿嬯P(guān)系題，前后兩句的邏輯關(guān)系決定答案。根據(jù)前一句“Findingwaysto growinghomelesspopulationhas eincreasinglydifficult.”與后一句“whenhomelesspeopleindividualsmanagetofinda that…”確定二者為層進關(guān)系，強調(diào)遞進。選項[A]Hence因此；選項[B]But但是；選項[C]Even即使；選項[D]Only僅僅。注意主句中謂homelesspeopleindividualsmanagetofinda thatwillgivethemthreemealsadayandacetosleepatnight,”提供信息,尤其是定語從句“thatwillgivethemthreemealsadayandacetosleepatnight”確定選擇“庇護所或避難所”之意。選項[A]lodging寄宿處；選項[B]shelter庇護所、避難所；選項[C]dwelling住處；選項[D]house房屋。因為無家可歸者人goodnumberstillspendthebulkofeachday thestreet”提供信息確定選擇“閑逛，溜達”之意。選項[A]searching搜尋；選項[B]strolling漫步、閑逛；選項[C]crowing擁擠；選項[D]wandering游蕩、徘徊、流浪。其中，[B]和[D]比較接近，但stroll絲毫沒有無家可歸的含義，因此本題空格應(yīng)填wandering一詞。整句話的意思參考第11題的解析。others,notaddictedormentallyill,simplylacktheeveryday skillsneededtoturntheirlives.”提供信息確定選擇“盡管”之意選項[A]when選項[B]once一旦選項[C]while盡管既不吸毒，也沒有精神，他們卻缺乏使自己生活變好的日常生存技巧”。 skillsneededtoturntheirlives.”提供信息尤其是過去分詞短語“neededtoturntheirlives.”確定選擇“生存”之意。選項[A]life生活、生命；選項[B]existence存在；選項[C]survival生存、存活；選項[D]maintenance、堅持、生活費用。正句子中“toturntheir .”提供信息確定選擇“出現(xiàn)轉(zhuǎn)機”之意。選項[A]aroundon打開開關(guān)；選項[D]upturnup調(diào)大、開大、出現(xiàn)。根據(jù)題意，選[A]。語境句的意思參考第14題的解析?！痉治鲈~匯辨析題被修飾的名詞決定所選擇的定語句子中“thereare programsthataddressthemanyneedsofthehomeless.”提供信息確定選擇“復(fù)雜的”之意。選項[A]complex復(fù)雜的；選項[B]comprehensive綜合的、全面的；選項[C]complementary補充的、互補的；者的許多要求（manyneedsofthehomeless），所以要制定全方位計劃，答案應(yīng)為【分析】邏輯關(guān)系題，前后兩句的邏輯關(guān)系決定答案。根據(jù)前一句“thesituationwillimproveonlywhenthereare programsthataddressthemanyneedsofthehomeless.”與后一句 EdwardBlotkowsk it,…”確定二者為層進關(guān)系，強調(diào)遞進。選項[A]So選項[B]Since選項[C]As選項[D]Thus。第18、19兩題涉及的是一個固定表達，即as…putit，意為“正如……所說的那樣”例如：Thereis—astoday’spapersputit—nosatisfactoryexnationforhisoutrageouscomments（正如今天報紙上所說的，他何以會做出這些的批評，對此【分析】詞匯辨析題，句子中的主語和賓語決定所選擇的動詞。句子中“EdwardBlotkowskit,“Therehastobe ofprograms.Whatweneedisapackagedeal.”提供信息確定選擇“表第18題【分析】詞匯辨析題，句子中的所有格關(guān)系決定所選名詞。句子中“Therehastobeofprograms.Whatweneedisapackagedeal.”提供信息確定選擇協(xié)調(diào)之意。選項ofthehomeless（應(yīng)對無家可歸者多方面需求的綜合性計劃）apackagedeal（一攬子不難選出與此意接近的[D]項coordination。 Part【答案】聯(lián)系；使同化、吸收；獨占、?！笔拙洌凑Z境句，表達的是inspiteof引起的轉(zhuǎn)折關(guān)系。研大綱規(guī)定的必背單詞，難度較大；而所考單詞homogenizing也不完全屬于超綱詞。所以，考【答案】thedepartmentstoresofthe19thcentury，可以定位本題答案在第thecultureofconsumption是由這些百貨商店發(fā)起的，可排除最后一個選項（[D]項本末倒置。[C]與原文相反（insteadofintimateshopscateringtoaknowledgeableelite）；intimateshops（私人商店）只服務(wù)于高級（knowledgeableelite，[B]與題意不符。maynotbealtogetherelevating與選項[B]意思不符；次句中，norresistanttoassimilation與選項[A]意思相反；從含有許多數(shù)據(jù)的第三句和第四句，我們得知，一百多年來，在人口中的比例并沒有達到突飛猛進的地步，正如第二句所言“today’simmigrationisneitheratunprecedentedlevel（今天的并未達到空前的水平）”，故排除[D]。首句中的表達（thiscommonculture）ishardlypoisonous與選項[C]內(nèi)容完全吻合。使是在上偏僻農(nóng)村的孩子也著ArnoldSchwarzenegger和GarthBrooks等超【答案】納問題持肯定態(tài)度，因此首先排除[C]和[D]兩個消極選項。[A]rewarding（有益的），【答案】推斷題，從前兩段我們得知Shakespeare的故Stratford-on-Avon存在著兩個對立方：worthyresidentsofStratforddoubtthatthetheatreaddsapennytotheirrevenueStratford可敬的居民們認(rèn)為劇院沒有為他們增加任何收入）It’salldeliciouslyironic…h(huán)isshareof【答案】推斷題，從段中的句子theygoersdomanagealittlesight-seeingalongwiththeirygoing可以看出，[D]不符合題意，[A]和[C]兩