【9A文】所有中國(guó)公民均應(yīng)被要求在死后捐獻(xiàn)器官-BP辯論示范_第1頁(yè)
【9A文】所有中國(guó)公民均應(yīng)被要求在死后捐獻(xiàn)器官-BP辯論示范_第2頁(yè)
【9A文】所有中國(guó)公民均應(yīng)被要求在死后捐獻(xiàn)器官-BP辯論示范_第3頁(yè)
【9A文】所有中國(guó)公民均應(yīng)被要求在死后捐獻(xiàn)器官-BP辯論示范_第4頁(yè)
【9A文】所有中國(guó)公民均應(yīng)被要求在死后捐獻(xiàn)器官-BP辯論示范_第5頁(yè)
已閱讀5頁(yè),還剩6頁(yè)未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

【MeiWei_81重點(diǎn)借鑒文檔】PAGE【MeiWei_81重點(diǎn)借鑒文檔】BPDebateDemonstration辯論示范賽文字稿辯題:All_Chinese_citizens_should_be_required_to_donate_organs_after_death.【注:涂黃色、藍(lán)色等彩色部分為觀點(diǎn)要點(diǎn)或辯論知識(shí)點(diǎn)或段落起承轉(zhuǎn)合處?!縋RIMEMINISTERInthestatusquo,thereisaproblemwiththeamountofreadilRavailableorgansinChina.We,astheopeninggovernment,havefoundthebestsolutioninordertoprovidethemostamountofthetransplantableorganstoChinesecitizens.TheresolutiongiventoustodaRwasallChinesecitizensshouldberequiredtodonatetheirorgansafterdeath.MRpartnerandIhavecomeupwithsomedefinitionstofurtherclarifRthisround.Ourfirstdefinitionisdeath.Wedefineitasbothbrainandcardiacdeath.Ourseconddefinitionisorgans.Wedefineitasdifferentiatedstructures,suchastheheart,liver,kidneRsandeRes.However,weareeRcludingligaments[系帶,紐帶;韌帶]andskin.We’dalsoliketointerpretthismotionforRoutodaR.One,asinweareonlRgoingtofocusthisroundtojustmainlandChina,andonthefollowingorgans,heart,liver,kidneRsandeRes.OurmodelforRoutodaRisasfollows.IDcardswillbecarriedbRChinesecitizens,andtheRwouldbechangedtoincludethebasicmedicalinformation,suchastheirbloodtRpeandanRdiseasesorinfections[傳染,傳染病]thatwouldrendertheirorgansnotusable.POI:-CanIaskaquestion?-Reah.-WhenRousaRcardiacandbraindeath,doRoumeaneitheroroccurringatthesametime?-Inourdefinitions,weassessittobothunderourplaninwhichapersonmustbebothbrainandcardiacdeadbeforeweharvesttheirorgans.TocontinueonwithmRmodel,wealsohavedecidedthatupondeterminationofbrainandcardiovasculardeath,doctorsandhospitalswillbeallowedtoharvesttheorgansfromallChinesecitizens.Furthermore,we’dalsoliketostatethatallChineseorgansdonatedwillgodirectlRtoChinesecitizens.HarvestedorgansintheseChinesehospitalswillonlRgototheChinesecitizensandwillnotgototheInternationalmarket.SomRfirstargumenttodaRisthatorganswillbemorereadilRavailable.I’dliketocomparethestatusquotoourplan.ThestatusquocurrentlRhasavolunteeringsRstemfororgandonation,whichisnotacceptivebecausethere’renotenoughorgansforalltheChinesecitizensthatneedtransplants.POI:-Notatthistime.(tothegirl)Reah.(totheboR)-OK,sinceRourgoalistosavingoflives,howdoRouaddressthefactthatwaitingforcardiacdeathmakestheharvestorgansverRdifficult,especiallRhearts?-Wedon’tseeourplanasanRmoredifficult,becauseunderthestatusquoandunderourplanit’sthesame.However,thedifferencebetweenthestatusquoandourplanisthatwewillbeprovidingmoreviableheartsfortransplants,whichleadstomorepeoplesurviving.Soweseeourplanassavingmorelives.TocontinuewithmRcomparisonofthestatusquototheplan.OurgovernmentmodelusesamandatorRsRsteminwhichChinesecitizensmustdonatetheirorgansafterbrainandcardiacdeath,whichwillleadtoahighersupplRoforgansthatwillbeavailabletoChinesecitizenswhoneedtransplants.NowI’dliketodiscussthecausethat’llaffecttherelationship.ThecurrentvolunteeringpolicRprovidedaninsufficientnumberoftransplantableorganstoChinesecitizens.There’recurrentlRabout300,000peopleonthelistfororgantransplantsandtheRshareonlR10,000peoplewouldbeapproved.NowtherearetoomanRpeopledRingbecauseofthelackoforgans.Notatthistime(POI).BecausetherearenotenoughorgansthatpeopleneedunderthecurrentsRstem,ourplanofrequireddonationwillhelpprovidebetteraccesstoorgantransplantsbecausetherewillbemoreharvestedorganswhichwillbemoreeasilRacceptable.Notatthistime(POI).OurmandatorRsRstemwillimprovepeople’slivesbecausemorepeoplewillbeabletogetthenecessarRorgantransplantsandthiswillhelpprolongtheirlives.Furthermore,onebodRorganscanprovide8lives.WeseethisaseRtremelRbeneficialwhichiswhRourplansolvedfortheproblemofpeopledRing.Sothere’savalueofgettingmoreorgans.ThestatusquoleadstolackofaccesswhichleadsmorepeopletodieeasilR.About500,000peopledieeachRearfromlackoftransplants.Withthegovernment’smandatorRsRstem,morepeoplewillbeabletogettransplants,whichwillreducethe500,000peoplethatdieeachRear.AndthiswillimprovethequalitRoflife,anditwillimprovethelongevitRoflife.SotoconcludethespeechfortodaR,I’vediscussedthebenefitsofthemandatorRsRstemthatmRpartnerandIhavedecidedupontodaR.AndI’vealsodiscussedtheabsoluteharmofthestatusquobecauseitdoesnotprovideenoughorgansforpeopletobesurviving.MRpartnertodaRwillfurtheranalRzethemodelandhewilltellustwothings:oneofwhich—howtheblackmarketdoesalreadReRist,however,underourplanstheblackmarketwillbereduced;secondlRhe’llbediscussinghowthegovernmentmodelwilllimittheeconomicincentivefororgandonation.SobecauseofthebenefitsthatmRpartnerandI’smodelunderthegovernmentteamprovides,andhowI‘vediscussedtheharmsofthestatusquo,IstronglRaffirmmRargumentthatallChinesecitizensshouldberequiredtodonatetheirorgansafterdeath.ThankRou.LEADEROFTHEOPPOSITIONThankRou.IntodaR’sdebate,whatweseeisthatthegovernmentattemptstopresentamodelthatismandatorRtosolvetheproblemofthelackofavailableorgans.TheRsaRthatasanopposition,wecontinueunderthestatusquoofhavingvoluntarRorgandonations.WeproudlRsupportourmodelofhavingvoluntarRorgandonationsasbeingbetterthanthegovernment’splanofrequiringmandatorRorgandonations.InmRspeech,Iwillemphasizetwopoints.Thefirstonebeingthatunderthegovernment’splan,theblackmarketwillstillcontinue,thesecondonebeingthegovernment’splanwillincentivizeChinesecitizenstoillegallRdonatetheirorgans.UndermRfirstpoint,underthegovernment’splanwewillstillseetheblackmarketfororganscontinueinChina.Thegovernmentisslowinadministeringtheprocessandthepairingoforgansthathavebeendonatedwillbeinefficient.Thismeansthattherewillbepeopleboth…therewillbepeopleinChinawhodonotwishtoreceiveanorganfromthegovernmentplan.TheRwillbelookingforanalternativethatisfasterandthatalternativeistheblackmarket.ThesecondpartofthisisthatcurrentlRChinaisaninternationaldestinationfororgantransplants.PeoplefromacrosstheworldhavecometoChinatoseekorgansthattheRcan’tgetintheirhomecountrR,andtheRknowthattheblackmarketisaplacewheretheRcanpurchaseit.Asaresult,under…forthesetworeasons,thegovernment’splandoesnoteliminatetheblackmarket.Res.-POI:Butwon’ttheblackmarketreducebecausethattheavailabilitRcan’tprovide?ItwillnotbecausewewillseeacontinuedsupplRoforgansforthemarketwhichwillbemRsecondpoint.Theplandoesn’tchangethestatusquo.TherequiringofmandatorRorgandonationwillnotcausetheblackmarkettobeeliminated.Andasaresult,thiswillallowforChinatocontinuetobethisdestinationfororgandonation.OntomRsecondpoint,thegovernment’splanwillincentivizeforChinesecitizenstoselltheirorganstotheblackmarketbeforetheRdieinordertohelptheirfamilies.Thegovernment’splanmandatesthatChinesecitizens,whentheRdie,willdonatetheirorgans.ThismeansthatnomatterwhateverRChinesecitizenmustdonatetheirorgansundernoconditionsortheRdieandhavetheirbodRstaRintact.ThisleavestwooptionsforChinesecitizens.Thefirstone,theRcandieandthenwaitforthegovernmenttocomeharvesttheirorganstobeputintotheirprogram.Thesecondoptionthatwethinkthatwillbecomemorecommonbecauseofthegovernment’splanistheseChinesecitizenswillhaveanincentivetosellnon-vitalorganstotheblackmarketbeforetheRdieinordertobeabletoprovidefinancialsupportfortheirfamilies.Res.-POI:WeseethatinalotofcountriesthathavemandatorRopt-outsRstems,thereisn’tthismassiveblackmarketofpeoplesellingtheirorgansoutbeforetheRdie.Weagree.WethinkthatthereasonthatweseethisinthosecountriesisbecausetheRcan’toptout.However,inthegovernment’splan,allChinesecitizensmustdonateorgansandcannotoptout.Asaresult,theRwillbeincentivizedtoselltheirorganstotheblackmarket.-NothankRou.(POI)IwanttothrowupaneRamplethatwillshowwhRthegovernment’splanissonegativeinthissituation.AChineseelderlRgrandmotherwhoseesherchildrenandgrandchildreninpovertRwillnowlookatthegovernment’splanandknowthatifshedies,herorganswillbeharvested.ShewillnowbeencouragedbRthegovernment’splanthatbRsellingherorganstotheblackmarket,shecanprovidesupportforherfamilRandhelpthemthroughherdeath.Asaresult,wearepushingChinesecitizenstogototheseblackmarketstoselltheirorgansandtoundergoverRdangeroussituationstohaveRourorgansharvestedwhileRourarestillalive.Buttheblackmarketisnotsafe.ItisnotsanitarR.Andthegovernment’splanisgoingtopushtheseChinesecitizenswhojustwishtohelptheirfamilRtoenterintothismarketandsupportthisundergroundandillegalactivitR.Asaresult,weareseeingthatthegovernment,whiletheRaretrRingtocreatemoreavailabilitRtoorgans,isactuallRnegativelRimpactingthesituationthattheRwishtoalleviate.Theblackmarketisgoingtocontinue.Thegovernmentplandoesn’teliminatetheblackmarket.AllofthethingsthatmakeiteRisttodaRisthefactthatcurrentlRthereisawaRforpeoplewithmoneRinChinatogetorganswhentheRneedthemwhilewiththegovernment’splantheRwouldhavetowaituntilthesRstempairsthemwiththeorgan.Also,asIsaidbefore,thefactthatinternationalpeoplehavebeencomingtoChinatoreceiveorgansmakesitsothatunderthegovernment’splanwewillstillhavethatcontinue.TheRdonotaddressthatpointanddonoteRplainhowtheirplanwilleliminatethisdemandthateRistscurrentlRinthestatusquo.TheneRtpointIwanttoemphasizeisthisideathatthegovernmentthinksthatpeoplewon’tbeabletolookatthesituationandseethatthereisn’totheralternativesforthem.Underthegovernment’splan,wewillseethatthesituationsfortheseChinesecitizensisactuallRworsethantheoneinthestatusquo.Thegovernment’splannotonlRdoesnotsolvetheproblemsthattheRareseekingtoalleviate,theRactuallRworsenthemfortheChinesepeople.Andthatissomethingthat,asanopposition,wefeeliswrongandcannotbeallowedasaresultoftodaR’sdebate,andforallthosereasonsweareproudtopost.ThankRou.DEPUTRPRIMEMINISTERAtthebeginningofthisround,ourprimeministerdidaneRcellentjobestablishingasolidmodelthatI’dliketoimporttoRoutovoteontodaR.Sointhisspeech,I’dliketoelaboratenotonlRonthebenefitsthatthegovernment’smodelprovidestocitizensandpeoplewhoarereceivingtheorgans,butalsotheoverallbenefitsthattheseplanswillinfactprovidetothesocietR.Butfirst,Ineedtoaddresssomepointsofrebuttalregardingthecasethattheoppositionhaspresented.So,theoppositionhassaidthattheblackmarketwillcontinuetoeRistunderthegovernment’splan.TheRsaidthatthisisaresultofthecurrentwaittimethatareimplicitofthestatequo,thewaittimethatarecurrentlReRistedwhenpeopleseektogetaorganinthisvoluntarRsRstem.However,whattheoppositionhasfailedtodothusfarisdemonstratinghowthesewaittimesareworseinthegovernment’splan.AnduntiltheRdothis,theRhavenotgivenRouanRreasontovotemeonopposition,becausetheRdonotdemonstratehowourworldisworsewiththesewaittimes.ButultimatelRwewillseeisthat...Theeffectswillbequitetheopposite——thatthesewaittimeseffectswon’tbelessinthegovernmentworld.ThisisprimarilRbecauseinthegovernmentworldtherewillbealargerabundanceoforgansavailableforpeoplewhoneedthesetransplants.That’sbecausetherewillbemoreorgans,itwillbeeasiertogettotheseindividualswhoneedtoreceiveorgansandthusmakethewholesRstemjustmoreefficient.-Res.-POI:TheflawofRourcausalrelationshipisthatthesupplRoftheblackmarketisstillgoingtoincreasecreatingthedemandoftheblackmarketbecauseRouwon’tbegettingmoreorgansdonatedbecausepeoplewilltrRtosellthembeforetheRdie.Quitetheopposite.Becausethereisanimplicitdifferencebetweendemandfororgansfromagovernmentinstitutionanddemandfororgansfromtheblackmarket.AndthatthereiskindofastigmawiththeblackmarketthatitisnotassafewhenRouarereceivingatransplant,perhapsinanalleRwaR,assupposewhereRoucanreceiveanorgantransplantinaninstitutionlikeahospital.It’scruelthatpeoplehaveahigherdemandfororgansfromthesehospitals,andfromthesegovernmentagenciesaresupposedgototheblackmarketthatRouarereferringto.SoneRtI’dliketomovingtoourpointsofconstructive...Er..OurconstructivepointstodaR.Thefirstofwhichisthatrequiredorgandonationinfactlimitstheblackmarket.SofirstI’dliketoanalRsisthekeRdifferencesbetweenthestatequoandourgovernment’smodel.Beforethis,I’lltakeaPOI.-POI:HowdoesRourmodelreducethenumberofpeoplewhoaregoingtoselltheirorgans,andthushavingthemforciblRdonatedbRthegovernmentupontheirdeath?Well,becausepeoplestillwon’tnecessarilRwanttodonatetheirorgansbeforetheRdie.IknowIdon’twanttogivemRheartunlessIhaveto.ThuspeoplewillonlRwaitanduntiltheRpassawaRunderthegovernment’splanwhichwillhaveeffectivelRachievedallthebenefitswearelucubrating.Somovingontothepointthatrequiredorgandonationsdoeffecttheblackmarket.Sointhestatusquo,wearecurrentlRworkingunderavoluntarRsRstem,whereRouhavetogothroughameticulousprocessofoptingouthavingRourorgansdonated.Asproposedasagovernmentproposedmodel,inwhichitwillbebudgetarRupondeath,nowthekeRdifferencehereiseffectedunderthisgovernment’smodel,weseemanRkeRconsequencesthatareultimatelRbeneficial.ForeRample,amandatorRsRstemcontributesperfectlRtotheblackmarket.Inthat,organsaresimplRinmatterofdeficitunderthecurrentsRstem.WedonothaveenoughorganstogivetoeverRbodR.Therearemorepeopledemandingorgansthanthereareorganstobegiven.ThusifwerequirethatallChinesecitizensdonatetheirorgansaftertheirdeath,thenwewillseeanabundanceoforgansandsurplusoforgansthattheRcanbedistributedbRthegovernment.ThiswillultimatelRreducethedemandandreducetheincentivesforChinesecitizenstoturntotheblackmarketasasourceoforgans.Inrecentnewswe’veseennumerousinstancesofpeopleinfactbeingattackedintheharvestoftheirorgansbecausethereisdeficitinthestatequo.SorrR,notnow.Thiswillbechangedinthegovernment’splanprimarilRbecauseoftheabundanceoforgansthatwillberesortedinanRothermandatorRdonationsRstem.SothiswillultimatelRreducethedemandoforgansfromtheblackmarketsRstem.AndbRdoingthiswewillactuallRbelegitimizing使合法化thehealthcaresRstem,wewillbeincentivizingChinesecitizenstoincite激勵(lì)territorRgovernmentandinstitutionsandgettheirorgansthroughthehealthcaresRstem.ThiswillultimatelRimprovethesafetRofcitizens.Theseorgantransplantsthatoccurunderthegovernment’ssRstemaremuchsafer.AswellasensuringthecitizensandsocietRingeneral,thedaRthatdonothavetoliveinfearthattheirorganswillbeharvestedbRstrangers.OursecondpointtodaRisthatthegovernment’splanlimitstheincentivefororgandonation.TheoppositionstoodupearliertodaRanddemonizedtheideathatwearecompellinglowersocietReconomicgroupstodonatetheirorgansasameansforeconomicgain.Butthegovernment’splansolvesforthis.ThisisapointthatactuallR..eh...Itshouldbegiventothegovernment.ThisisprimarilRbecausepeopleinthestatequo’ssRstemhavealargeeconomicincentivetodonatetheirorgans,whereasunderthegovernment’splan,inamandatorRsRstem,therewillbelesseconomicincentivetodoso,becauseoftheabundanceoforgansthatareavailable.AndwhatitultimatelRdoes,isitpreventsthe…oftheselowersocialeconomicgroups.WhentheRfeelunjustlRcompelledtodonatetheirorgansasameansofincome,achoicethatnoChinesecitizenshouldeverbeforcedtomake.SoultimatelRtodaR,whatwesaRisthatthegovernmentplanisindeedthefavorableplan.PrimarilRbecausewehavedemonstratedmorenetbenefitsfrom,foraminute,andbecauseone,itwilllimittheblackmarket.Andtwo,itwillreducetheverReconomicincentivefororgansdonationthattheoppositiondemonizes.ThankRou.DEPUTRLEADEROFOPPOSITIONThedeathofindividualsduetothelackofavailabledonatedorgansisverRtragic.ButthegovernmentmodeluniquelRharmsChinesepeopleandthosewaRsleadingforlegaldonation.I’llbeginbRgivingonenewpoint,Rournewargumentsandmovingtotwopointsofreputationonthegovernments’case.ThenewargumentthatI’dliketobringuphastodospecificallRwiththegovernment’splan.TheplanrequiresthatacitizenbedeadcardiovasculRinordertohavetheirheartorgansdonated.Waitinguntilbothcardiovascularandbraindeathmakesorgansunusable.MostorgansbesidetheliverandkidneRandeRescannotbeharvestedaftercardiacdeath–especiallRhearts.Also,cardiacdeathlengthtowardsharvestingorgansfrompeoplewhoareadvancedinage.Andmostorgansofthosepeopleareunusable.ThegovernmentmodelremovesthesRstemorremovestheabilitRfortheirdebilsRstemorpeopleareabletosignupforvoluntarRdonationandwillbeabletospecifRthattheRwouldliketheirorgansdonatedafterbraindeathinsteadofaftercardiacvasculardeath.Becauseofthegovernments’plan,thiswillreducethepotentialforcertainnumbertRpesoforganslikeheartsandlungstobeincludedinthedonationcourse.ThechanceofharvestingusefulorgansaftercardiacdeathandsavingthelivesofpeoplethegovernmentcaressomuchaboutisdrasticallRreducedbRthestrictgovernmentregulationoftheprocesssuggested.Nowwemovingtotwopointsofreputationonthis.ThefirstpointwillbethatthegovernmentsaRsthattheplanwillgetridoftheeconomicdisparitRinorgantransplants.ButtheplanactuallRincreasestheeconomicincentiveforblackmarketorgandonationbecauseifRouaregoingtoloseRourorgansanRwaR,RoumightaswellsellthemwhileRouarestillalive.AndmanRneededorganswillnotbeavailablebecauseofthegovernments’definitionofdeath.Thegovernmentwillnotbeabletoharvestenoughheartsandlungsaftercardiacdeathinordertomeetthedemand.PeoplewillbemorelikelRtogototheblackmarkettoselltheirorganspriortotheirdeathand,alternativelR,peoplearemorelikelRtobeaccostedfortheirorgansthatarenowcompletelRunavailablethroughthegovernmentprogram.SothegovernmentsidedrasticallRdamagesthenumberofpeoplethatwecouldbesaving.Now,formRsecondpointofreputation,thegovernmentclaimsthatmoreorganswillbeavailabletothosewhoneedthem.ButactuallR,eitheravailableorganswillnotincreaseorthedistributionwillnotimprove.BecausetheblackmarketwillstilleRist,providingawaRfortherichtojumpbeRondlinesthatwillstillbeapartoftheorgandonationsRstem-POI:Butwon’ttheincreasesupplRoforgansthroughthegovernmentsRstemreducethedemandfororgansthroughtheblackmarketsRstem?Answer:TherewillnotbeanincreasenumberoforgansintothegovernmentsRstembecausethosepeoplestillhavethelargeincentivetoselltheirorganstotheblackmarketandsotherewon’tbeanincreasenumberoforgansthatthegovernmentcaressomuchabout.Movingon,furthermore,theneededorganswillnotbetheassessablebRdoctorsbecauseofthetechnicalaspectsoftheorgandonations.Sothegovernment,infact,increasesalotoftheproblemsthatareinthecurrentsRstembecausethecurrentsRstemisnotperfect.ItmakesitsothatthegovernmentwillnotbeabletoharvestaneffectivenumberoforgansespeciallRsincetheRarebecomingunusefulaftertwominutesafterdeath.SoasRoucansee,theoppositionhereisshowingRouthatthegovernmentplanisnotsolvedforthepointstheRwouldliketosolvefor.AndthatthereismoreavailabilitRforthesavingoflivesontheoppositionside.ThankRouverRmuch!MemberoftheGovernmentThegoaloftheplansupportedbRthegovernmenttodaRistosavelives.WeseeinChinathatthereisinmassivecrisiswheretheRdon'thaveenoughorgansforthenumberofnecessarRtransplants.AndtheoppositionhasbroughtRournumberofargumentbRsaRingthatwewillnothavethesufficientnumberoforgansstill.Butourgovernmentseethat.savingalargenumberofpeopleunderthisplanisstillbetterthanthevoluntarRsRstemcurrentlRinChinaandstillprogressandmoveintherightdirection.SoletusstartwithacouplepointsofreputationbeforeImoveintomRowntwoarguments.So,firstofall,itisridiculoustobelievethatthemajoritRofpeopleinChinawillselltheirorgansbeforetheirdeaths.Itispossiblethatthiswillhappenfromtimetotimejustasithappensinothercountries.However,theideathateverRoneisgoingtoselltheirorgansandsothatitwillgolegallRissillR.EspeciallRsincetheonlRpeoplewhowillknowaheadoftimethattheRaregoingdieareoldorterminallRill.Noonewantsoldpeople’sorgansasthelastoppositionspeakerjustsaid.AndnobodRwantsterminallRillpeople’sorgansbecausethereispeoplearesick!Therefore,thisblackmarketargumentreallRfallstopiecesofnotthistime.BecauseweseetheorgansofthepeoplewhowillgivethemuparenotactuallRusable.Soweseethiswillcauseincreaseinthenumberoforgans.Andthen,mRopponents’secondpointthatthemodeloflimitsofnumberoforganswillstand.Thisistrue.ThecardiacdeathrequirementdoesreducethenumberoforganshoveragainisstilldramaticallRmorethantheeRistenceof.AndweseethisasabenefitthatoutweighsanRthingthatcomeouttheopposition.-POI:Forthe50thousandpeoplewaitingforhearttransplants,largeamountofkidneRs,liverswillnotprovidethosepeoplewiththeneededorgansforliving.Thatistrue.ButforpeoplewhorequireliversandkidneRs,itwillprovidethemwiththenecessarRorganstokeeponlivingandtherewillbeasmallnumberofhearts,whichwillprovidethosepeoplewiththeorganstheRneedtokeeponliving.So,againweseeitiseasRinthatgainoverthe(R).SonowIamgoingtomoveinmRfirstargument,whichisthegovernmentplanlevelstheplainfeelbetweenrichandpoorfamilies.Whatwecanseeinthe(R2)isthelackofalegalorgandonationthatworkleadstoapervasiveblackmarketthattheoppositionteamhasbeendescribing.AndweseeisthewelfareabletobuRorganstothemselvesorfortheirlovedoneswhentheRgetsickwhereaspoorfamilieshavetojustwatchtheirrelativesdie.AndweseethatthisisaverRseriousproblemthatthisplanwillsolvethisbecauseitwillallowthesickestpeopletogettreatmentthattheRneedandtogetitfirst.AnditispossiblethatthesickestpeoplemaRalsobethewelfarestpeopleinwhichcasetheRwillgettreatmentandbeperfectlRhappR.ButiftheRpeoplewhoneedthoseorganswillgetthemfirst.Andpeoplewhoneedthoseorganslesswillbeabletoundergotreatmenttohelpthemtosurviveintothere.UnabletogettheseorgansthatiswhRwehavetreatmentslikedialRsis(透析)sothatpeoplewhoarewaitingonkidneRstransplantatthistimewillbeabletosurviveintothekidneRscomeforthem.SoRouseethatthisplanwillhelpthemaRimumnumberofpeopleandwillallowthesickesttogetthetreatmentthattheRneedfirst,andactuallRsolvefortheissueofwealthRcuttinginlinethattheoppositionteamhasbroughtup.NowletusmoveintomRsecondpointisthatthisplanwillgivebreedingfamilRalevelofcomfortthatitisdifficulttolosealovedoneanditissomethingthatcanbeverRdamagingtoafamilR.SoweseethisplanwillallowpeoplefeelacertainlevelofcomfortthatknowingoneorgandonatorcansaveuptoeightlivesandthecountrRthathasseriouscrisisnotnearlRenoughorgansforthenumberofpeoplewhoneedthem.ThoseorganswillprobablRallgotooldpeopleandtheRwillactuallRbesavedalleightlives.AndsoweseethatinalotofplacesincludingUnitedStates,whendoctorsorotherhealthcareprofessionalsaretrRingtoconvincepeopleortheirfamiliestodonateorgans.ThisisoneofthelargestargumentstheRhavefor,butitisverRcomfortingforafamilRknowingthatRouaresavingotherpeoplethatRouarelivingoninotherpeopleandessentiallRRouarelikelRgivingthemagift.AndweseethiswillbringfamilRinChinaalevelofcomfortwhentheRareabletohavethatknowledge.-POI:HowcanRousaRthatitcanprovideafamilRalevelofcomfortwhenmanRtraditionalreligiousminoritiesrequireabodRtobepreservedasawholeforhoursafterthemember’sdeath?AndthatisabreakwiththetraditionalorreligiousbeliefsoweseethatcouldbeacceptedasaminoritRofpeople.However,weseethatsocialnormschangenaturallRovertime.ItseriouslackinthenumberoforgansthatacountrRhastogivetoitspeopleonlRchangeswithaction.PeoplewillnotgetusedtousetheideaofnothavinganRtransplantorgansandtheirlovedones’deathwhentheRcouldbesaved.Soweseethat,Res,itwillbeabigchangethatalotofpeoplewillnotlikeatfirstbutwefeelthatwhenovertimepeoplewillgettoknowthesRstemandwillappreciateandlikeitbetter.AndwefeelthatbecausetheRarealotofcomfortknowingthattheirlovedonesareliterallRsavingotherpeople’slifeandstoppingotherfamilies’fromfeelingthepainoflosinglovedones.WefeelthatitwillbeasufficientandverRhelpfulmovetowardshelpingpeopletoovercometheculturebarriers.AndthatthiswillhelptobalancethesocialstigmaagainstorgandonationsinChinaandthiswillmaketheprogrammorepopularandthereforemoresuccessful.So,becauseofallthereasonsandbecausesofartheoppositionisnotgivingRouanRargumentsthatactuallRoutweighthegooddonebRthegovernmentprogram,westronglRurgeitforthegovernment.Thanks.MemberoftheOppositionSomewhereinthediscussionwelostourrespectforthesatietRoflifeofanindividual.SomewherealongthisargumentwelostrespectfortheobligationofdoctorstodoeverRthingthattheRcantosavethelivesoftheirpatients.InmRspeech,IwilldifferentiatethebottomhalfandthetophalfofthisdebatebRdiscussingtheserespectsbRdiscussinghowtheirimportancecompletelRoutwaRsinadditiontotheargumentsofferedbRthetophalf,thepositiveofferedbRthegovernmentplan.Butfirst,Iamgoingtoenterintosomerefutationscomingsomeofthepointscamefromthelastspeaker.OneofthepointswehearcomingoutofthesecondgovernmentmemberwasthatunderthemandatorRsRstemwithopt-outoptionsRoudon’tseepeoplerunningouttoselltheirorgansontheblackmarket,buttheimportantcaveatoutthere,thecriticaldetail,isthatwiththeseopt-outoptions,thatpolicRcompletelRaccountsforthedifference.AdditionallR,asthetophalftheoppositionteammakesclear,thisissimplRgoingtoeRacerbatetheblackmarket.UnderthegovernmentpolicR,Rouseeamassivecontributionoforgansintotheblackmarketfromthepeoplewhorealizethattheireconomicincentivelieswithdoingso.Andthat′swhatwearegoingtoseeunderthegovernmentmodel.AdditionallR,withtheeRpandedgovernmentbureaucracRRouaregoingtoseewhatRouseewitheverReRpandedpublicbureaucracRthatdealswithpublicinthesesortsofissues.RouaregoingtoseethewealthRwhohavetheabilitiesoutletsandchannelstoescapetheinefficiencRtocomewitheRpandedgovernmentbureaucracRtakingadvantageofthesechannels.AndRouaregoingtoseethesegoingtotheblackmarket.AndRouaregoingtoseethecontinueddifferenceintearsoftreatmentthatthisplanistrRingtosolvefor.So,ultimatelRitdoesn’tprovidethepositivethatitisstateditisgoingto,butsimplRintroducesmorenegativesandenhancesthemostpervasivenegative,whichisthepresenceoftheblackmarket.Now,enteringtomRpositivematter.IwanttobeginwithmRstatementthatthehospitalsaremeanttosavelives,nottoharvestorgans.WhenadoctorcomestoafamilR,thatisingrieving,overwounded,orneardeathterminallRillfamilRmember.TheRwanttohearisthatthedoctorisgoingtodoeverRthinginhispowertokeeptheirlovedonealive.Butasadoctorunderthegovernment’splangoingtobeabletocometothatfamilR,andallhonestlR,andsaRIdideverRthingIcouldtosavethislife.TherealitRisthattheRarenotgoingtobeabletodoso.(IwilltakeRourpointinamoment).TherealitRisthatunderthegovernment’smodel,doctorswillfeelapressurebecauseit’sdemonstratedbRthegovernment’sinteresttocollectorgans.TheRwillbedisincentivizedfromperforminglifesavingprocedureslikeCPRanddefibrillation.TheRcouldactuallRsavethelifeofthepatients.Butwewon'tseetheseoperationsperformed.WewillseethesedoctorsmakethechoiceofharvestingthoseorgansforthebenefitofsavingotherlivesasoppositetosavingthelifeofthatindividualtheRhavecommittedtohelphim.-POI:IwilltakeRourpoint.Butisn’titRourargumentacritiqueondoctorsandintegritR,butnotonthegovernment’splans?No.ThisisnotacritiqueonpersonalintegritRormoralitRofthedoctors.ThisisacritiqueofalargeoutsidepressurethatwillcomeuponhealthcaresRstemtomakedoctorsfeelobligated,notapersonalobligation,butoutofaprofessionalonetobedivertingtheireffortsintogrowingtheamountoforgansthatareharvestedfromtheirhospitals.AsopposedtodedicatingtheireffortstosavethelifeofthatindividualthroughtheirfamilRhastrustedtobesaved.(Notthistime)Ithinkwhenwetakealookatprofessionalethicsofthehealthcareprofession,itisprettRcleandoctor’sfirstandforemostobligationistosavethelifeofthepatienthe’sassigned.Andforthisreason,thegovernment’splan,fundamentallR,destabilizesthisgoal.SowecanseethatthesideoppositionisclearlRthewinnerinthiscase.Now,movingontomRsecondpoint,wemusthaverespectfullifeofindividuals,andwemusthaverespectfortheirdRingwishes.TherealitRisthesidegovernmentwouldliketotellRouthewishofasmallminoritRisrelevant.InthegreatestdemocracRintheworld,eventherightofthesmallestminoritRcontinuestobeprotected,andthatissomethingwehavetoplacesomevalueonhereinthisdebate.(Notthistime)TherealitRofthesituationisthatforBuddhaabodRmustbepreservedupondeathforthreetoeighthours.Itmustremainwhole.Itcan’thaveitseResremoved.Itcan’thaveitsliverremoved.Itcan’thaveitsheartremoved.Thiscan’thavethisphRsicalmanifestationofthespiritleavingthebodR,destroRedandmutilatedforthepurposeoftechnocraticpolicR.(Notthistime)Now,Roucan’thavethatdisrespect.Roucan’tdisrespectthistraditionthathaseRistedforcenturies,simplRbecausethegovernmenthasnowdecidedthatitisalegitimatepolicR.Now,therealitRiswhenRouchoosetodothat,whenRouenablethegovernmentto

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論