世界銀行-不平等的稅負是否會導致女性擁有的企業(yè)脫離稅網(wǎng)？（英）

Policy

Research

Working

Paper10712D

oes

Unequal

Tax

Burden

Contributeto

Wom

en-

O

w

ned

B

u

sinesses

L

eav

ingt

he

Ta

xNet

?AlemayehuAmbelFirew

Bekele

WoldeyesDevelop

ment

E

conom

icsDevelop

ment

Data

Grou

pFeb

ru

ary

2024A

verified

reproducibility

package

for

this

paper

isavailable

at

,clickhere

for

direct

access.Policy

Research

Working

Paper

1712Abstractis

study

investigates

gender

disp

arities

in

the

tax

burdenin

Addis

Ababa,

Ethiopia,

using

data

on

2,320

taxpay-e

rs

for

2011

and

2012.

A

quantile

regression

analy

sis

isemp

loyed

to

control

for

?rm

charact

erist

ics

such

as

sect

or,size,

and

age.

e

resu

lt

s

show

that

women-owned

busi-nesses

a

re

m

ore

likely

to

op

erate

in

low-p

ro?t

sect

ors

andrep

ort

lower

sales

and

tax

liabilities

than

men-owned

busi-nesses.

However,

women-owned

businesses

p

ay

as

muchas

men-owned

businesses

in

taxes,

suggesting

that

they

aresubject

to

a

highere?ective

tax

rat

e.

is,

in

turn,

may

leadto

women-owned

businesses

exiting

the

tax

net

at

a

higherrat

e.

ese

?ndings

suggest

that

gender

disp

arities

in

taxcomp

liance

are

not

simp

ly

due

to

d

i?

erences

in

?

rm

char-acteristics

butmay

alsobe

due

to

biases

in

tax

d

eclarat

ionand

enforcement

p

rocesses.is

paper

is

ap

roduct

of

the

Develop

ment

Data

Group

,

Develop

ment

Economics.

It

is

p

art

of

alarger

e?

ort

by

theWorld

Bank

to

provide

op

en

accessto

its

research

and

make

a

contribution

to

develop

mentp

olicy

discussions

arou

nd

thew

orld

.

Poli

cy

Research

Working

Pap

ersa

re

also

p

osted

on

the

Web

at

http

:///p

rwp

.

e

au

t

hors

maybe

contacted

at

aambel@

;

w.?rew@.A

veri?ed

rep

roducibilityp

ackage

for

this

p

ap

eris

availab

leat

http

://rep

,

cli

ck

here

for

direct

access.TRANSPARENTANALYSISGe

Policy

Research

Working

Paper

Series

disseminates

the

?ndings

of

work

in

progress

to

encourage

the

exchange

of

ideas

about

developmentissues.

An

objective

of

the

series

is

to

get

the

?ndings

out

quickly,

even

if

the

presentations

are

less

than

fully

polished.

e

papers

carry

thenames

of

the

authors

and

should

be

cited

accordingly.

e

?ndings,

interpretations,

and

conclusions

expressed

in

this

paper

are

entirely

thoseoftheauthors.eydonotnecessarilyrepresenttheviewsoftheInternationalBankforReconstructionandDevelopment/WorldBankanditsa?liatedorganizations,orthoseoftheExecutiveDirectorsofthe

World

Bankorthegovernmentstheyrepresent.ProducedbytheResearchSupport

TeamDoes

Unequal

Ta

x

Burden

Contribute

toWomen-Owned

Businesses

Leaving

the

Ta

x

Net??Alemayehu

Ambel,

Firew

Bekele

WoldeyesKeywords:

Gender,

Tax

Burden,

EthiopiaJEL:

H22,

J16?This

study

is

supported

by

the

World

Bank’s

Global

Tax

Program.

We

thank

HitomiKomatsu,

Giulia

Mascagni,

Andualem

Mengistu

and

Seid

Yimam

for

valuable

commentson

earlier

drafts.

Any

error

or

omission

is

our

responsibility

alone.Email

addresses:

aambel@

(Alemayehu

Ambel),firew.woldeyes@

(Firew

Bekele

Woldeyes)1.

IntroductionFairness

in

a

tax

system

is

a

fundamental

principle

(see

OECD,

2014).When

examining

the

tax

burden

through

a

gender

lens,

it

becomes

evidentthat

gender

bias

can

give

rise

to

inequitable

tax

burdens

among

taxpayersof

di?erent

genders.

Surprisingly,

this

issue

has

received

limited

attentionfrom

researchers

and

policymakers

in

developing

countries,

thereby

a?ectingthe

core

principles

of

taxation.

Moreover,

ensuring

a

just

distribution

of

thetax

burden

is

critical

in

optimizing

the

allocation

of

factors

of

production,including

labor,

capital,

and

land,

ultimately

enhancing

productivity

and

taxcollection.

Societal

factors

such

as

social

roles

and

norms

can

wield

in?uenceon

how

men

and

women

interact

with

the

tax

system,

as

driving

forces

ofthe

unequal

tax

burdens.Gender

bias

in

the

tax

system

can

result

in

adverse

consequences,

includ-ing

discouraging

women’s

participation

in

the

formal

economy,

and

hinderinge?ective

economic

involvement,

in

so

doing,

reducing

the

tax

base.

Againstthis

backdrop,

the

paper

examines

gender

disparities

in

the

tax

burden

ofself-employed

individuals

in

Ethiopia,

placing

emphasis

on

reported

businessincome,

income

tax

declarations

and

payments,

and

their

implications

forexisting

the

formal

economy.Existing

literature

on

taxation

and

gender

identi?es

explicit

and

implicitbiases

in

the

tax

system

(i.e.,

the

tax

policy

and

administration)

that

can

ei-ther

exacerbate

or

mitigate

gender

di?erences.

Explicit

gender

biases

emergewhen

the

tax

code

contains

gender-based

provisions

(see

OECD,

2022).

Ex-amples

of

such

biases

that

contribute

to

gender

disparities

include

requiringthe

husband’s

signature

on

a

family

return,

providing

tax

credits

for

men,and

imposing

a

higher

tax

burden

on

married

women.

Explicit

bias

is

nowless

common,

as

most

countries

have

reformed

their

tax

system.

In

fact,

somecountries

use

explicit

tax

policies

to

reduce

gender

distortions

and

promotethe

inclusion

of

women

in

the

economy

(see

OECD,

2022).Implicit

gender

bias,

on

the

other

hand,

may

appear

neutral

on

the

sur-2face

and

does

not

use

speci?c

gendered

language

in

the

tax

system.

However,it

arises

when

a

tax

policy

or

administration

interacts

with

social

arrange-ments,

economic

conditions,

or

behavioral

di?erences

between

genders,

in-advertently

leading

to

a

gender-biased

tax

system

(see

Barnett

and

Grown,2004).

Therefore,

addressing

implicit

gender

bias

is

an

important

area

thatnecessitates

further

investigation

and

correction

in

order

to

realize

the

Sus-tainable

Development

Goal

of

gender

equality

and

women’s

empowerment.Some

examples

of

implicit

gender

bias

in

tax

systems

are

higher

taxationon

goods

and

services

used

primarily

by

women,

higher

tax

rates

on

second-income

earners,

and

lower

capital

taxation

(see

OECD,

2022).

Given

thatgender

biases

in

the

tax

systems,

whether

explicit

or

implicit,

runs

counterto

the

fundamental

principle

of

taxation

(i.e.,

fairness),

it

is

important

toidentify

and

address

them.The

tax

burden

literature

underscores

the

di?culty

in

precisely

identi-fying

how

the

pro?t

tax

burden

is

distributed.

There

is

a

notion

that

itoften

impacts

employees,

leading

to

a

probable

decrease

in

real

wages.

Thistrend

is

attributed

to

the

mobility

of

capital,

allowing

it

to

relocate

fromcountries

with

higher

pro?t

tax

burdens

(see

Smith,

2015).

However,

thisassumption

relies

on

the

presence

of

near-perfect

factor

markets

for

capitalwhere

it

can

easily

cross

borders

while

labor

movement

is

restricted.

In

prac-tice,

gender-based

disparities

in

tax

burden

can

be

traced

to

variations

intax

compliance,

divergent

enforcement

measures

within

tax

administration,and

tax

structures

that

disproportionately

a?ect

one

gender,

among

otherfactors.

These

discrepancies

may

stem

from

di?erences

in

income

reporting,disparities

in

deductions

claimed,

and

variances

in

eligibility

for

tax

cred-its,

all

of

which

may

be

in?uenced

by

gender-related

factors.

Furthermore,tax

administration

practices,

such

as

the

frequency

of

audits

and

collectione?orts,

may

inadvertently

impact

one

gender

more

than

the

other.

Recogniz-ing

and

rectifying

these

gender-based

inequities

in

tax

burden

is

imperativefor

advancing

both

tax

fairness

and

gender

equality.3Understanding

these

gender

di?erences

in

tax

burdens

and

the

roles

oftax

compliance,

tax

enforcement

measures

and

tax

structure

in

either

ex-acerbating

or

mitigating

gender

bias

is

key

to

bridging

the

knowledge

gapsurrounding

gender

and

taxation.

Tax

compliance

and

administration

arecritical

for

a

robust

tax

system

and

have

been

areas

of

concern

in

devel-oping

countries

(see

Slemrod,

2019).

The

discussion

above

underscores

theimportance

of

data

collection

to

monitor

patterns

of

gender

di?erences

intax

compliance

and

administration.

This

data

can

inform

e?orts

to

correctbiases

within

the

tax

system

and

promote

a

more

equitable

distribution

ofthe

tax

burden.Prior

research

has

shown

that

women

tend

to

exhibit

higher

levels

oftax

compliance

compared

to

men

(see

Bruner

et

al.,

2017;

Cabral

et

al.,2021;

D’Attoma

et

al.,

2017;

D’Attoma

et

al.,

2020;

Kastlunger

et

al.,

2010).Grosch

and

Rau

(2017)

argue

that

these

gender

di?erences

in

honesty

are

in-?uenced

by

the

prosocial

behavior

of

women.

Their

primary

?nding

suggestsa

correlation

between

concern

for

others

and

honesty,

with

women

generallydisplaying

greater

prosocial

tendencies

(i.e.,

showing

concern

for

others)

andhonesty.

Expanding

on

this,

D’Attoma

et

al.

(2020)

conducted

a

labora-tory

experiment

to

investigate

the

role

of

social

values

in

explaining

genderdisparities

in

tax

compliance.

They

found

that,

while

women

tend

to

bemore

tax-compliant

than

men,

the

impact

of

social

values

on

tax

compliancevaries

from

one

country

to

another.

They

also

posited

that

di?erences

inrisk

aversion

between

men

and

women

might

be

another

contributing

factorto

these

gender

disparities

in

tax

compliance.1

Most

studies

use

laboratoryexperiments

to

study

gender

di?erences

in

tax

compliance.

Laboratory

ex-periments

are

well-suited

for

designing

complex

scenarios

and

are

thereforeundertaken

in

controlled

environments.

However,

Kangave

et

al.

(2021)

ar-gue

that

it

is

important

to

complement

the

results

of

laboratory

experiments1D’Attoma

et

al.

(2020)

found

that

women,

on

average,

report

73%

of

their

incomewhereas

men

report

only

48%.4with

data

from

real-world

settings.

Cabral

et

al.

(2021)

used

both

survey

andadministrative

data

to

conclude

that

self-employed

people

in

New

Zealandunderreport

their

income

by

around

20%.

They

also

found

that

men

aremore

likely

to

underreport

their

income

than

women.In

the

context

of

developing

countries,

there

may

be

implicit

gender

bi-ases

in

tax

administration

that

a?ect

how

tax

administrators

interact

withwomen-owned

businesses.

These

biases

can

lead

to

di?erential

treatment,such

as

intense

scrutiny

in

assessment

or

women-owned

business

may

facechallenges

in

accessing

tax

incentives.

Moreover,

a

well-established

patternsuggests

that

women

are

less

likely

to

resort

to

bribery

when

dealing

withgovernment

employees

to

in?uence

their

decisions,

according

to

Agerberg(2014).

This

will

likely

be

the

case

even

in

tax-related

a?airs.

This

ob-servation

highlights

the

importance

of

looking

deeper

into

the

gender-baseddynamics

at

play

in

such

contexts.

We

could

not

?nd

studies

that

investigatethe

presence

of

di?erential

treatment

by

tax

administrators

of

women-ownedbusinesses

in

tax

enforcement,

but

we

consider

it

as

a

potential

source

ofdistortion

in

the

tax

burden.In

the

context

of

Ethiopia,

Yimam

and

Asmare

(2020)

found

that

women-owned

businesses

are

less

likely

to

be

penalized

for

tax

evasion

after

auditthan

male-owned

businesses,

indicating

that

women

are

more

tax

compliant.On

the

other

hand,

Ambel

et

al.

(2021)

conducted

the

?rst

gender

disag-gregated

business

income

taxation

survey

on

households

in

Ethiopia.

Theyfound

that

women

pay

lower

business

income

tax

than

men,

but

the

studydid

not

distinguish

between

taxpayers

whose

tax

liability

is

determined

bythe

authority

and

those

who

self-report

their

income

and

tax

liabilities.

Incontrast,

Mascagni

and

Mengistu

(2016)

and

Bachas

et

al.

(2022)

focus

onthe

tax

burden

without

considering

gender.A

signi?cant

gap

remains

in

understanding

the

distribution

of

tax

burdenby

gender.

This

paper

addresses

the

under-explored

issue

of

gender

bias

inbusiness

taxation

for

self-employed

individuals,

which

is

particularly

relevant5in

developing

countries.

The

paper

makes

two

contributions

to

the

literatureon

gender

and

taxation.

First,

it

provides

a

more

comprehensive

analysis

ofgender

di?erences

in

business

income

tax

burden

by

focusing

on

a

broaderset

of

indicators,

including

taxpayer

behavior

(declarations)

and

payments.This

is

made

possible

because

of

a

rich

set

of

administrative

data

on

busi-ness

characteristics,

reported

income

and

liabilities,

and

tax

payments.

Thisallows

the

paper

to

answer

the

question

of

whether

the

business

income

taxburden

di?ers

for

men

and

women

due

to

their

own

choices

(as

shown

intheir

declarations)

or

as

a

result

of

tax

enforcement

decisions.

Second,

thepaper

examines

gender

di?erences

in

exiting

the

tax

net

for

the

?rst

time,which

can

be

linked

to

the

tax

burden.

Future

research

can

?ll

the

gap

byexplaining

the

reasons

for

the

di?erences

in

tax

declarations

and

payments.The

paper

is

organized

as

follows.

Section

2

reviews

the

structure

ofEthiopia’s

tax

policy

and

its

implication

for

gender

di?erences

relying

on

theliterature

on

gender

and

taxation.

Section

3

discusses

the

data.

Section

4presents

multivariate

analysis

results.

Section

5

concludes.2.

The

Structure

of

the

Tax

System

and

Its

Implications

for

Gen-derAccording

to

Ethiopian

law,

the

business

income

tax

applies

to

self-employed

individuals.

As

per

the

law,

businesses

generate

income

fromconducting

business,

operation,

stock

disposal,

and

services

provision

(seeFDRE,

2016a).

Self-employed

individuals

are

liable

to

pay

income

tax

onpro?ts,

which

is

the

income

left

after

deducting

the

cost

of

goods

and

ser-vices

sold,

as

well

as

other

expenses.An

important

aspect

of

the

Ethiopian

business

income

tax

administrationis

segmentation,

a

common

approach

to

simplify

tax

administration

in

manycountries

(see

Cleary

et

al.,

2017

).

In

Ethiopia,

taxpayers

are

categorizedinto

three

groups,

known

as

registration

categories

A,

B,

and

C,

based

ontheir

expected

annual

gross

income

(turnover)

when

they

start

their

busi-nesses.

These

categories

are

updated

as

new

data

becomes

available:6?

Category-A

taxpayers

are

businesses

with

an

annual

gross

income

of1,000,

000

ETB

(Ethiopian

birr)

and

above.?

Category-B

taxpayers

have

an

annual

gross

income

between

1,000,000and

500,000

ETB.?

Category-C

taxpayers

have

an

annual

gross

income

of

less

than

500,000ETB.Each

category

is

subject

to

varying

reporting

and

tax

payment

require-ments.

For

example,

Category

A

taxpayers

must

maintain

detailed

account-ing

records

following

?nancial

reporting

standards.

They

are

required

torecord

business

assets

and

liabilities,

including

acquisition

date,

costs,

andcurrent

book

values.

They

must

also

keep

records

of

daily

income

and

ex-penditure,

sales

and

purchases

of

goods

and

services

with

names

and

TaxIdenti?cation

Number

(TIN),

and

relevant

documents.

Category

B

taxpay-ers

have

less

stringent

reporting

requirements,

primarily

maintaining

recordsof

daily

revenue

and

expenses,

as

well

as

purchase

and

sale

records.

Cate-gory

C

taxpayers

may

maintain

records

of

gross

income

and

other

necessaryinformation.

In

most

cases,

the

information

for

Category

C

taxpayers

willnot

be

su?cient

to

determine

the

liabilities

based

on

the

documents

kept

bythe

taxpayer,

hence,

they

are

liable

to

presumptive

income

tax.A

taxpayer

is

required

to

submit

their

income

tax

self-assessment

decla-rations

within

a

speci?ed

time-frame

as

outlined

by

the

tax

authority.2

Thedeadlines

for

tax

declarations

vary:

four

months

from

the

end

of

the

taxyear

for

category

A

and

two

months

for

category

B.

The

tax

o?ce

has

theauthority

to

modify

assessments

based

on

available

information,

at

any

timein

cases

of

fraud

and

willful

neglect,

and

within

?ve

years

for

other

instances.Another

aspect

of

the

business

tax

structure

with

implications

for

genderequality

is

the

progressivity

of

the

tax

code.

A

progressive

tax

system

is2This

directive

is

in

accordance

with

the

Federal

Tax

Administration

Proclamation

No.983/2016

(see

FDRE,

2016b)

and

the

Income

Tax

Proclamation

(see

FDRE,

2016a).7recognized

for

its

potential

to

mitigate

gender

bias

in

taxation

(see

Coelhoet

al.,2022).

Table

1

outlines

the

business

income

tax

rates

applicable

toindividuals

based

on

their

income

levels.

The

statutory

tax

system

exhibitsprogressivity

by

requiring

individuals

with

higher

taxable

income

to

con-tribute

a

larger

portion

of

their

earnings.

However,

it

is

important

to

notethat

the

actual

tax

paid

as

a

percentage

of

revenue

may

deviate

from

whatis

anticipated

under

tax

policy.

Our

dataset

provides

the

opportunity

toexamine

whether

the

tax

paid

as

a

percentage

of

sales

revenue

aligns

withthe

progressive

tax

structure,

and

this

will

be

explored

in

detail

later

in

thestudy.Table

1:

Individual

Business

Income

Tax

rates

in

EthiopiaTaxable

Income

(Per

Year)

Income

Ta

x

Rate0%0-7,2007,201-19,80010%15%20%25%30%35%19,801-38,40038,401-63,00063,001-93,60093,601-130,800Over

130,8000Source:

FDRE

(2016a)Another

gender-relevant

structural

aspect

of

the

business

tax

system

per-tains

to

whether

the

tax

system

is

global

or

schedular.

In

a

global

system,taxpayers

aggregate

their

income

from

all

sources

and

apply

a

uniform

set

oftax

rates.

For

instance,

if

a

taxpayer

has

income

from

two

di?erent

businesssources,

that

income

is

combined,

and

a

uniform

tax

rate

is

applied.

Conse-quently,

this

approach

may

result

in

a

higher

tax

rate

if

there

are

exemptionsat

lower

income

levels.

In

contrast,

a

schedular

system

taxes

various

incomesources

separately

or

at

distinct

rates.

Both

systems

have

their

own

advan-tages

and

disadvantages.8The

global

system

ensures

improved

horizontal

equity

because

individualswith

one

or

multiple

income

sources

are

treated

equally.

However,

it

presentschallenges

in

administration,

particularly

in

developing

countries

with

limitedthird-party

reporting.

On

the

other

hand,

a

schedular

system

treats

eachincome

source

individually,

making

it

easier

to

implement

and

administer.Nevertheless,

ensuring

horizontal

equity

can

be

challenging

in

this

system,as

taxpayers

with

multiple

income

sources

may

be

taxed

di?erently

for

thesame

level

of

income

compared

to

those

with

a

single

income

source.The

impact

of

global

and

schedular

tax

systems

on

tax

fairness

(unequaldistribuion

of

tax

burdens)

hinges

on

the

number

of

income

sources

a

tax-payer

has.

However,

it

is

essential

to

note

that

we

did

not

encounter

con-clusive

evidence

pointing

de?nitively

in

one

direction

or

the

other

in

review-ing

the

literature

with

regard

to

the

number

of

income

sources

and

gender.Furthermore,

delving

into

this

issue

would

extend

beyond

the

scope

of

ourcurrent

study,

which

centers

exclusively

on

business

income

taxes

(and

doesnot

extend

to

other

income

sources

and

how

they

are

taxed).Lastly,

when

a

country

adopts

joint

?ling

for

married

couples,

women

canface

a

higher

marginal

tax

rate

than

if

they

?led

their

tax

returns

separately.This

bias

towards

women

is

due

to

their

lower

income

in

most

cases

(seeCapraro,

2014).

Joint

?ling

is

an

aspect

that

previous

research

has

identi?edas

particularly

susceptible

to

explicit

gender

bias

(see

Barnett

and

Grown,2004;

OECD,

2022;

Stotsky,

1997).

The

Ethiopian

system

does

not

providefor

joint

?ling;

therefore,

it

is

not

expected

to

be

a?ected

by

such

bias.3.

DataThe

data

for

this

paper

comes

from

the

Ministry

of

Revenue

(formerly

theEthiopian

Revenue

and

Customs

Authority).

This

administrative

databaseo?ers

a

wealth

of

information,

encompassing

declared

sales,

costs

of

goodssold,

expenses,

pro?t,

tax

payable,

deductions

for

losses,

and

pro?t

tax

due.A

business’s

total

sales

and

other

income

contribute

to

its

overall

business9income.

From

this

income,

gross

pro?t

is

derived

by

deducting

the

cost

ofgoods

sold,

and

net

pro?t

is

calculated

by

further

deducting

allowable

depre-ciation

expenses,

interest,

and

other

expenses.

Moreover,

businesses

have

theoption

to

deduct

losses

carried

forward

or

backward

from

their

net

income

todetermine

their

taxable

income.

Subsequently,

tax

rates

are

applied

to

thistaxable

income

to

ascertain

their

tax

liabilities.

It

is

important

to

note

thateven

if

a

business

generates

substantial

revenue,

its

reported

tax

liabilitiesmay

appear

lower

if

it

reports

higher

costs

of

goods

and

services.As

an

illus-trative

example,

Cronin

et

al.

(2023)

demonstrates

that

deductible

expensescan

vary

based

on

demographic

factors

such

as

race.

Given

the

potentialfor

variation

in

reported

deductible

expenses

by

gender,

this

comprehensivedataset

enables

us

to

not

only

investigate

the

presence

of

gender

disparities

inreported

expenses

but

also

to

explore

gender

di?erences

in

reported

incomeand

costs.

Additionally,

the

data

employed

for

this

study

covers

a

span

oftwo

years

(2011

and

2012).It

is

worth

noting

that

this

administrative

data

source

does

not

explic-itly

indicate

the

gender

of

business

owners.

Instead,

gender

assignments

weremade

by

merging

this

administrative

data

with

survey

data

collected

througha

?eld

experiment,

which

collected

information

on

the

business

owner

byShimeles

et

al.

(2017).

The

study

targeted

5,400

randomly

selected

taxpay-ers

from

approximately

86,000

taxpayers

in

Addis

Ababa

for

the

?scal

year2013/2014.3

The

sampling

approach

employed

a

strati?ed

random

samplingmethod

based

on

geographic

location,

known

as

sub-city,

and

economic

sec-tors.

The

study

included

an

equal

number

of

taxpayers

from

three

majorsectors:

wholesalers,

agro-processing

and

manufacturing,

and

other

se