版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
CHAMBERSGLOBALPRACTICEGUIDES
PrivateEquity2024
Definitivegloballawguidesoffering
comparativeanalysisfromtop-rankedlawyers
China:TrendsandDevelopments
StevenYuandEvanSunGlobalLawOffice
CHINATrendsanddevelopmenTs
TrendsandDevelopments
Contributedby:
StevenYuandEvanSun
GlobalLawOffice
GlobalLawOffice(GLO)datesbackto1979,enceinrepresentinginvestors,butithasalso
whenitbecamethefirstlawfirminthePRCtoextensivelyrepresentedfinancingenterprises
haveaninternationalperspective,fullyembrac-andfounders.Withadeepunderstandingofthe
ingtheoutsideworld.Withmorethan600law-bestlegalpracticesanddevelopmenttrendsof
yerspractisinginitsBeijing,Shanghai,Shenz-investmentterms,theteamatGLOknowshow
henandChengduoffices,GLOistodayknowntofindthemosteffectivebalanceofinterests
asaleadingChineselawfirmandcontinuestointermsofnegotiationsoastorealiseall-win
setthepaceasoneofthePRC’smostinno-results.Vastpracticalexperienceandindustrial
vativeandprogressivelegalpractitioners,in-backgroundknowledgeenableGLOtoenhance
cludingintheprivateequityandventurecapitalvalueineverystepoftheclientinvestmentcy-
sector.NotonlydoesGLOhavevastexperi-cle.
Authors
StevenYuisapartnerofGlobal
LawOfficebasedinShanghai.With20yearsofexperienceinleadinginternationaland
Chinesefirms,Stevenhas
focusedhispracticeonprivate
equity/venturecapital,M&A,fundformation
andcapitalmarkettransactionsacrossawidespectrumofindustries,includingthe
manufacturing,auto,chemical,cleanenergy,logistics,TMT,fintech,consumerstaple,
pharmaceutical/healthcare,commercial
property,entertainmentandsports,and
educationsectors.Stevenhaslongbeen
recognisedasaleadingorhighlyranked/recommendedlawyerintheprivateequity/venturecapitalareasbyChambers,amongseveralotherlegaldirectories.
EvanSunisapartnerofGlobalLawOfficebasedinShanghaiwithextensiveexperiencein
foreigndirectinvestment,
generalcorporatelaw,M&A,
privateequityfundformation
andinvestment,andcapitalmarkets.EvanhasadvisedleadingVC/privateequityinstitutionssuchasMorningsideVentures,Trustbridge
Partners,CICCCapital,Tencent,ByteDance,
SenseTimeandQimingVenturePartners,as
wellasmanystart-upcompanies,onlegal
issuesintheirdailyoperations,financings,andemployeestockownershipplandesignand
implementation.Evan’spracticecoversa
varietyofindustries,includinglifesciences,
renewableenergy,automobiles,education,
food,chemicals,manufacturing,finance,
telecommunications,theinternet,cultureandentertainment.
2CHAMBERS.COM
CHINATrendsanddevelopmenTs
Contributedby:StevenYuandEvanSun,GlobalLawOffice
GlobalLawOffice
35&36/FShanghaiOneICCNo.999MiddleHuaiHaiRoad
XuhuiDistrictShanghai200031
China
Tel:+862123108288
Fax:+862123108299
Email:global@Web:
China’sNewCompanyLawisSignificantlyImpactingPrivateEquityTransactions
InvolvingChineseCompanies
TheStandingCommitteeofthePRCNationalPeople’sCongressadoptedtheamendedCom-panyLawofthePeople’sRepublicofChina(“NewCompanyLaw”)on29December2023.TheNewCompanyLaw,whichcameintoforceon1July2024,hassubstantivechangesrela-tivetothepreviousversion(the“2018Compa-nyLaw”,lastamendedin2018)inareassuchascapitalcontribution,equitytransfer,capitalreductionandcorporategovernancerules.Thesechangesarehaving,andwillcontinuetohave,asignificantimpactonprivateequitytransactionsinvolvingChinesecompanies.
CapitalContribution
OneofthemajorchangesintroducedbytheNewCompanyLawisastrengtheningofthecapitalcontributionobligationsofshareholders,withaviewtoprotectingthecompanyanditscreditorsfromtheabusiveuseofthepreviouscapitalcontributionscheme.
Timelimitforcapitalcontribution
ThePRCCompanyLaw(2028Revision)(“2018CompanyLaw”)hadnostatutorytimelineforshareholderstopaytheircommittedcapitalcon-tributionstoacompanyinfull.Asaresult,manycompanieswereestablishedwithalargeamountofregisteredcapital,whiletheactualpaid-incapitalwasminimalornilthroughoutthelifespanofthesecompanies.Incontrast,theNewCom-panyLawnowrequiresshareholdersofalimitedliabilitycompanytomakecapitalcontributionsinfullwithinfiveyearsfromtheestablishmentofthecompany.
Graceperiod
Companiesestablishedbefore1July2024haveathree-yeartransitionperiodtoadjusttheircapitalcontributionschedulestomeetthenewtimelinerequirement.ThisgraceperiodisgrantedbytheProvisionsoftheStateCouncilontheImplementationoftheCompanyLawofthePeople’sRepublicofChinaontheRegistra-tionofRegisteredCapitalManagementSystem,promogulatedon1July2024.
3CHAMBERS.COM
CHINATrendsanddevelopmenTs
Contributedby:StevenYuandEvanSun,GlobalLawOffice
Consequencesoffailuretopayontime
Shareholdersofacompanycanagreeonamoredetailedcapitalcontributionscheduleinthearticlesofassociation(“AoA”)ofthecom-pany,providedthatthetimescheduleiswithinthestatutorytimelimitforcapitalcontribution.IfashareholderfailstopayitssubscribedcapitalpursuanttotheNewCompanyLaworthetimeschedulesetoutintheAoA,thenthesharehold-erindefaultmayberequiredto:
?indemnifythecompanyagainstlossescausedbysuchfailure;and
?forfeititsrighttotheportionoftheunpaidequityinterestuponboardresolutionafterthelapseofagraceperiodprovidedbythecompany.
Iftheforfeitedequityhasnotbeentransferredorcancelledwithinsixmonthsfromtheforfeiture,thenothershareholdersofthecompanywillberequiredtomakeuptheoutstandingcapitalcon-tributioninfullinproportiontotheirrespectivecapitalcontributionstothecompany.Ifashare-holderfailstopayitssubscribedcapitalwithinthestatutorytimelimit,thentheshareholderinviolationmayalsobesubjecttoafinebythegovernmentauthorityofuptoCNY200,000,andinmoreseriouscases,afineofupto15%oftheunpaidamount.
Jointandseveralliabilityforoutstandingcapital
TheNewCompanyLawprovidesthatifafound-ingshareholderofacompany(ie,ashareholderupontheestablishmentofthecompany)failstopaythecapitalcontributionaccordingtotheAoAofthecompany,orwherethefound-ingshareholdermakesitscapitalcontributioninkindandtheactualvalueofthein-kindcapitalcontributionissignificantlylowerthanthecapi-talcontributionsubscribedtobythisfoundingshareholder,thentheotherfoundingsharehold-
ersofthecompanyarejointlyandseverallyliablefortheoutstandingcapitalcontribution.
Inlightoftheabove,foundersofstart-upcom-paniesandearly-stageinvestorsshouldcare-fullyconsideranddeterminetheamountofreg-isteredcapitalofacompanytoensurethatallshareholdersareabletofulfiltheircapitalcom-mitmentstothecompanyontime.Inaddition,partiestoaprivateequityinvestmenttransac-tionmayalsowishtoclarifyinthetransactiondocumentstheirrightsandobligationswhenaforfeitureofequityinterestoradefaultincapitalcontributionbyashareholderoccurs.Forexam-ple,thepartiesmaywishtosetoutinthetrans-actiondocumentsprovisionsrelatingtoinves-tor’srightoffirstrefusaltopurchasetheforfeitedequity,andthedefaultingshareholder’sliabilitytoindemnifytheothershareholdersifthelatterareforcedtomakeuptheunderpaidcapitalasrequiredbylaw.
EquityTransfer
TheNewCompanyLawhasseveralkeychang-esthatmayaffectequitytransfertransactions,asfollows.
Buyerandseller’sjointandseveralliability
Underthe2018CompanyLaw,becausetherewasnostatutorytimelimitforcapitalcontribu-tions,unpaidequitywasgenerallynotaseriousconcerntothepartieswhennegotiatinganequi-tytransfertransaction.TheNewCompanyLaw,however,providesthatifashareholderofalimit-edliabilitycompanydelaysacapitalcontributioninviolationoftheAoAandtransfersitsunpaidequityinterestafteritscapitalcontributionobli-gationfallsdue,thenthebuyerandthesellerarejointlyandseverallyliablefortheoutstandingcapital.Thebuyercanbeexemptedfromthisliabilityonlyifitisabletoprovethatitwasnotaware,andshouldnothavebeenaware,thatthe
4CHAMBERS.COM
CHINATrendsanddevelopmenTs
Contributedby:StevenYuandEvanSun,GlobalLawOffice
transferredequitywasunpaidwhenthetransac-tionoccurred.Assuch,thebuyerinanequitytransfertransactionshouldperformathoroughinvestigationofthecapitalcontributionstatusofthetargetcompany,inadditiontorequiringthesellertomakefullrepresentationsandwarran-tieswithrespecttothesame.Iftheequitytobetransferredisunpaid,thebuyermayrequirethesellertoeithercompletethecapitalcontributionbeforethetransferordeducttheunpaidamountfromtheequitytransferprice.
Simplifiedprocess
Underthe2018CompanyLaw,thetransferofequityinterestbyashareholdertoanon-share-holderthirdpartyissubjecttotheapprovalofamajorityoftheothershareholdersofthecom-panyandtheothershareholders’rightoffirstrefusal.TheNewCompanyLawnolongerhasthisrequirementforapproval.UndertheNewCompanyLaw,thesellerisrequiredtoserveawrittennoticeontheothershareholdersofthekeytermsandconditionsoftheintendedtrans-fer,suchasthequantity,price,paymentmethodandperiodoftimeforthetransfer,andtheothershareholdershavetherightoffirstrefusaltopur-chasetheequityunderthesametermsandcon-
ditions.Shareholderswhofailtorespondwithin30daysfromthereceiptofthewrittennoticewilllosetheirrightoffirstrefusal.
CapitalReduction
Redemptionrightisakeypreferencerightofinvestorsinprivateequitytransactions,andcapitalreductionisoneofthemajorwaysforcompaniestofulfiltheirredemptionobligations.
The2018CompanyLawwassilentonwhetheracompanymayreduceitscapitaldisproportion-atelyamongstitsshareholders.Incontrast,theNewCompanyLawprovidesthatacompanyshouldreducethecapitalcontributioninpro-
portiontothecapitalcontributionsmadebyitsshareholders,exceptwhen:
?providedbylaw;
?agreeduponbyalltheshareholdersofalim-itedliabilitycompany;or
?providedbytheAoAofajointstockcom-pany.
Assuch,althoughtheNewCompanyLawcon-firmsthatcapitalreductionscanbemadedis-proportionatelyamongstitsshareholders,suchreductionissubjecttothefollowingrestrictions/requirements:
?foralimitedliabilitycompany,theredemptionrightofinvestorsneedstobereflectedina
shareholders’agreemententeredintobyallshareholdersofthecompany;
?andforajointstockcompany,investors
shouldmakesurethatredemptionrightsaresetoutintheAoAofthecompany.
CorporateGovernance
Corporategovernancestructure
TheNewCompanyLawmakessomesignificantadjustmentstothestructureandpowersofacompany’scorporategovernancebodies.
I)Companywithoutsupervisor
The2018CompanyLawrequiredacompanytohaveaboardofsupervisors,oronetotwosupervisors,tosupervisethefinancialsofthecompanyandtheperformanceofdutiesofthedirectorsandseniormanagement.TheNewCompanyLawprovidesthat,ifunanimouslyapprovedbyitsshareholders,alimitedliabilitycompanyofsmallscaleorwithasmallnumberofshareholdersmayoperatewithoutasupervi-sor.
sCHAMBERS.COM
CHINATrendsanddevelopmenTs
Contributedby:StevenYuandEvanSun,GlobalLawOffice
II)Auditcommittee
TheNewCompanyLawprovidesthatacom-panymaysetupanauditcommitteeundertheboardofdirectorstofunctioninlieuofasupervi-sorortheboardofsupervisors.Theauditcom-mitteeintroducedbytheNewCompanyLawmayvestsupervisorypowersinthedirectors.Assuch,aninvestormaywishtohavetorighttonominateamemberoftheauditcommitteeinitsportfoliocompanies.
III)Employeedirector
The2018CompanyLawonlyrequiredstate-ownedcompaniestohaveanemployeedirec-torontheboardofdirectors.Incontrast,theNewCompanyLawprovidesthatanycom-panywithmorethan300employeesneedstohaveemployeerepresentationonitsboardofdirectorsunlessthecompanyalreadyhasanemployeerepresentative(s)asasupervisor.Theemployeedirectormustbeelectedbythecom-pany’semployeesthroughemployees’meetingsoranotherdemocraticprocess.
IV)Legalrepresentative
The2018CompanyLawprovidedthatthechairpersonoftheboardofdirectors,executivedirectororgeneralmanagerofacompanymayactasthecompany’slegalrepresentative.Incontrast,theNewCompanyLawprovidesthatadirectororgeneralmanagerwhocarriesoutthebusinessesofthecompanymayactasthelegalrepresentative.The2018CompanyLawwassilentonthedutiesandpowersofthelegalrepresentative.TheNewCompanyLawprovidesthatacompanybearsthelegalconsequencesofitslegalrepresentativeactingonthecompany’sbehalf,andthatthecompanymayrequestcom-pensationfromitslegalrepresentativeforlosses
incurredduetoactsofthelegalrepresentativeinviolationoflawsortheAoAofthecompany.Inlightoftheimportanceofthepositionoflegalrepresentative,investorsandfoundersofcom-paniesshouldcarefullyconsideranddeterminethecandidateforthispositionanddesignapropergovernancestructuretostrikeabalancebetween:
?allowingalegalrepresentativetoperformhisorherdutiesandexercisehisorherpowers;and
?reducingrisktothecompanyrelatingtoanyunauthorisedactsofthelegalrepresentative.
Dutiesandliabilitiesofdirectors,supervisorsandseniormanagement
Incomparisonwiththe2018CompanyLaw,theNewCompanyLawfurtherelaboratesonthefiduciarydutyofdirectors,supervisorsandsen-iormanagers.
I)Fiduciaryduties
TheNewCompanyLawprovidesthatdirectors,supervisorsandseniormanagementpersonnel:
?owefiduciarydutiestothecompany;
?shouldtakemeasurestoavoidconflicts
betweentheirowninterestsandthoseofthecompany;and
?shouldnotusetheirpowerstoseekimproperbenefits.
TheNewCompanyLawfurtherrequiresdirec-torstoreporttotheboardofdirectorsortoashareholders’meeting,andtoobtainaresolu-tioninaccordancewiththecompany’sAoA,beforetheycandirectlyorindirectlyengageinbusinessessimilartothatofthecompany.
II)Dutiesofdiligence
6CHAMBERS.COM
CHINATrendsanddevelopmenTs
Contributedby:StevenYuandEvanSun,GlobalLawOffice
TheNewCompanyLawalsoprovidesthatdirec-tors,supervisorsandseniormanagementper-sonnelowedutiesofdiligencetothecompany,andmustexercisethereasonablecarenormallyexpectedofmanagementpersonnelinthebestinterestsofthecompanywhenperformingtheirduties.
Inlightofthesechanges,directors,supervisorsandseniormanagementpersonnelnominatedbyinvestorsorfoundersneedtofamiliarisethemselveswiththeseenhancedrequirementsregardingtheirdutiesandobligations.Inaddi-tiontoperformingtheirdutiesinafaithfulanddiligentmanneraslegallyrequired,investorsandtheirnominateddirectors,supervisorsandseniormanagementpersonnelmaywishtotakeothermeasurestoprotectthemselvesfrompotentialliabilities,suchas:
?requiringthecompanytopurchasedirectorandofficerliabilityinsurance,enteringintoadirectorindemnificationagreementwiththecompany;and
?keepingfullrecordsofboardmeetingminutesandothercommunicationmaterialsasevi-
denceforhis/herdueperformanceofdutiesandobligations.
China’sNewRegulationsforOverseasListingFiling–theFirstAnniversaryReviewand
Outlook
Ithasbeenoveroneyearsince31March2023,whentheChinaSecuritiesRegulatoryCommis-sion(CSRC)promulgatedtheTrialMeasuresfortheAdministrationofOverseasSecuritiesOfferingandListingofDomesticEnterprises(the“TrialMeasures”),andfivesupportingrulesforregulatoryguidance(collectively,the“NewFilingRegulations”)cameintoeffect.Basedonmarketobservations,theNewFilingRegulationshavereshapedChina’sregulatorylandscape
withrespecttotheofferingandlistingofover-seassecuritiesbydomesticenterprisesintheshort-to-mediumrunandareexpectedtohaveaprofoundinfluenceonChina’sprivateequityandVCmarket.
OverviewofimplementationpracticeoftheNewFilingRegulations
AccordingtoinformationpublicisedbytheCSRC,duringtheperiodfrom31March2023to30June2024,272applicants(excludingthoseissuerswhoappliedfor“fullcirculation”oftheirexistingnon-tradablesharesinoverseascapitalmarkets)wereknowntosubmitfilingapplica-tionstotheCSRC.Amongtheseapplicants,158haveobtainedthefilingnoticefromtheCSRC,accountingfornearly60%ofthetotalapplicants.Duringthefirsthalfof2024,about100applicantsobtainedfilingnoticesfromtheCSRC(thenumberofpassingapplicantswas57in2023),indicatingthattheCSRChasexpe-diteditsstepstowardsgivingthegreenlighttoapplicants.
AccordingtoGLO’sroughcalculationbasedonpubliclyavailableinformationfromtheCSRC,duringtheperiodfrom31March2023to30June2024:
?about170applicantschosetheHongKong
StockExchangeasthelistingexchange,andabout100applicantschosetolistonUScap-italmarkets(includingNasdaq,theNewYorkStockExchangeandotherUSexchangesnotspecificallydisclosed);
?about68applicantschoseoverseasdirectlistingasthelistingmodel,andabout204
applicantschoseoverseasindirectlistingasthelistingmodel;and
?amongthe204applicantswhochoseindirectlisting,55areissuersoperatingwithavari-
ableinterestentity(VIE)structure,andatotal
7CHAMBERS.COM
CHINATrendsanddevelopmenTs
Contributedby:StevenYuandEvanSun,GlobalLawOffice
of20applicantswiththeVIEstructurehaveobtainedfilingnoticesfromtheCSRC.
BasedonGLO’sroughestimate,amongappli-cantswhohavereceivedafilingnoticefromtheCSRCsincetheimplementationoftheNewFil-ingRegulations,theaveragetimefromreceiptofthefilingapplicationbytheCSRCtotheissu-anceofthefilingnoticeisapproximatelyfivemonths,withtheminimumandmaximumreviewperiodbeinglessthanthreemonthsandmorethantenmonths,respectively.Applicationsforoverseasdirectlistingappeartohaveapromi-nentadvantageoverapplicationsforoverseasindirectlistingintermsoftheaveragelengthoftimerequired(fourmonthsandsixmonths,respectively).Inaddition,althoughtheCSRCrelaxeditsscrutinyoffilingsbyapplicantswiththeVIEstructureinthefirsthalfof2024,com-paredwiththefilingtimeofapplicantswithouttheVIEstructure,itwouldtakeonaveragetwiceaslongforthoseapplicantswiththeVIEstruc-ture(four-and-a-halfmonthsandninemonths,respectively).
Giventheaboveobservations,itcanbeseenthatCSRCfilingundertheNewFilingRegula-tionshasbeenrunningsmoothlyasaroutineprocedureformorethanoneyear,andthatdomesticandoverseasregulatoryprocesseshavebeeneffectivelyconnectedtoeachother,improvingthetransparencyavailabletoappli-cantsandpotentialapplicants.KeyelementsthatmayinfluencethespeedoftheCSRC’sreviewprocessinclude,amongothers,whetheranissuerhasadoptedorusedtheVIEstructureforoverseaslisting.
ScopeofDomesticEnterprisesSubjecttoFilingRequirementUndertheNewFilingRegulations
StatutorycriteriaundertheTrialMeasures
Article15oftheTrialMeasuresprovidesthat,ifanissuersimultaneouslymeetsthefollow-ingcriteria,itshallbeidentifiedasadomesticenterpriseindirectlyofferingsecuritiesandlist-ingoverseas:
?intermsoftheoperatingincome,totalprof-its,totalassetsornetassetsofdomestic
enterprise(s)inthemostrecentfiscalyear,
anyindicatorthereofaccountsformorethan50%oftherelevantdataintheauditedcon-solidatedfinancialstatementsoftheissuerinthesameperiod;and
?themainlinksregardingthebusinessactivi-
tiesareinChina,thebusinessactivitiesare
mainlycarriedoutinChina,ormostofthe
seniormanagementpersonnelresponsibleforbusinessmanagementareChinesecitizensorhavetheirmainresidenceinChina.
Furthermore,theTrialMeasuresemphasiseapplyingthe“substanceoverform”principleinparticularcases.
DespitethetestbeingstipulatedintheTrialMeasures,therestillremainssomeambiguityregardingitsinterpretationorthediscretionalapplicationofthe“substanceoverform”prin-ciplebytheCSRC(eg,howtoidentifythemainlinksregardingthebusinessactivitiesofanissuer).
Observationofmarketpractice
GLOnotesthatdifferentissuerswithhighsimi-larityintermsoftheproportionsofdomes-ticenterprises’financial(andother)indicatorsmadedifferentchoicesintheirapplicationfortheCSRCfiling.
8CHAMBERS.COM
CHINATrendsanddevelopmenTs
Contributedby:StevenYuandEvanSun,GlobalLawOffice
Inonecase,anissuerdisclosedinitsfilingmate-rialsforpubliclistingthat,althoughitsrevenueinthelasttwofiscalyearsaccountedformorethan50%ofitsrevenuefromoverseas,sincemostofitsassetsandbusinessactivitiesarelocatedinmainlandChina,ittooktheinitiativetosubmitanapplicationtotheCSRC,andshortlythereafteritwasinformedinwritingbytheCSRCthatitwasnotcurrentlycoveredbythefilingrequirement.Incontrast,anotherissuerwithnoessentialdiffer-encesfromtheabove-mentionedissuerbelievesthatitdidnotneedtofilewiththeCSRC(asdis-closedinitspubliclylistedfilingmaterials),andGLO’sfollow-uppublicsearchindicatedthatthisissuerhascompleteditsIPOandlistingintherelevantsecuritiesmarket.
Comparedwiththeabovetwocases,someissuerswithbusinessandoperations(eg,R&Dcentre,purchasingand/ormarketingstaff)inmainlandChinaadoptedamoreconservativestrategytoaddresstherisksofCSRCfiling,althoughstrictlyspeakingtheirfinancialandotherkeyindicatorsdonotmeetthestatutorythresholds.Toreduceregulatoryuncertainty,suchissuersconductedseveralroundsofcom-municationswiththeCSRCpriortosubmittingaformalapplicationand/orvoluntarilysubmittedafilingapplicationtotheCSRC,andtheyeachhavebeengranteda“notapplicable”clearanceorsuccessfullyobtainedafilingnotice.
Onemorenoteworthycase,occurringinMay2024,hascometoGLO’sattentionandmeritscautionforallmarketplayers.Aspubliclydis-closedbytheissuerinthiscase,itreceivedawrittennoticefromtheCSRCrequiringittoperformtheCSRCfilingwithinoneweekafteritsreceiptoftheNoticeofEffectivenessoftheUSSecuritiesandExchangeCommission(SEC)onitsshare-registrationdocuments.However,itwaspreviouslyadvisedbyitsPRCcounselthat,
sincetheissuergeneratedover50%ofitsrev-enue,netincome,totalassetsandnetassetsfromoutsidemainlandChinafortherelevantfis-calyears,theofferingandlistingofthisissuerare“unlikely”totriggerthefilingrequirement.
Inviewoftheabove-mentionedcases,itissug-gestedthatconsiderationshouldbegiventowhethertherearestrongconnectionsbetweentheissuersandmainlandChinabyapplyingthe“substanceoverform”principle,inadditiontothestatutoryindicators.Also,precautionarymeasuressuchaspre-applicationcommuni-cationswiththeCSRCwouldbenecessarytoavoidorreducetheriskofbeingunexpectedlypreventedfrommakingstepstowardsoverseassecuritiesofferingandlisting.
IssuersWiththeVIEStructure
Overview
AsoftheendofJune2024,atotalof20issu-ersusingtheVIEstructurehavesuccessfullyobtainedfilingnoticesfromtheCSRC;18ofthesewereobtainedin2024,accountingforabout13%ofthetotalof158issuerswhohavecompletedfilingwiththeCSRC.
IssuerswhoadopttheVIEstructureusuallyusecontractualarrangementstoholdinterestsinindustrialsectors/areasrestrictedforforeigninvestors.However,sofar,therehavebeennospecificPRClawsandregulationsclarifyingthelegalityoftheVIEstructure,andthestabilityandpotentialrisksofthestructurehavebeenhotlydebatedinthemarket.Withtheimple-mentationoftheNewFilingRegulations,the20casespassingthefilingindicatethattheCSRCisbecomingincreasinglypositiveandtoleranttowardstheVIEstructure,aslongastheredlinesetbylawisnotcrossed.
9CHAMBERS.COM
CHINATrendsanddevelopmenTs
Contributedby:StevenYuandEvanSun,GlobalLawOffice
BasedonGLO’sobservation,issuerswiththeVIEstructurethathavecompletedtheCSRCfilingaremainlyconcentratedintheinternet,insurance,travel,education,logisticsandmedi-calindustries,amongothers.Themainbusinessareasthatmayinvolveforeigncapitalprohibi-tionorrestrictionincludevalue-addedtelecom-munications,networkculture,networkpublish-ing,radioandtelevisionprogrammeproductionandoperation,surveyingandmapping,medicalinstitutionsanddomesticmaildelivery.
FocusonexaminingissuerswiththeVIEstructure
TheNewFilingRegulationsrequireapplicantswiththeVIEstructuretodiscloseandclarifythefollowinginthefilingdocuments:
?thereasonsforusinganddetailedcomposi-tionoftheVIEstructure;
?legalandcompliancerisksassociatedwiththeVIEstructure,aswellasrisktreatmentmeasures;
?whetherforeigninvestorsareparticipatingintheoperationandmanagementoftheissuer;
?whethertherearePRClawsandregulationsexplicitlyprohibitinganissuerintheinvolvedindustries/businessareasfromusingtheVIEstructure;and
?whetherforeignparticipationintheinvolved
industries/businessareasissubjecttonation-alsecurityreview,andwhethertheissueris
involvedinindustries/businessareasinwhichforeigninvestmentisrestrictedorprohibited.
Accordingtoth
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 2024高考地理一輪復(fù)習(xí)第五章第1講自然地理環(huán)境的整體性教案含解析新人教版
- 校長在寒假散學(xué)典禮上講話:擁抱寒假開啟多元成長之旅
- 小學(xué)一年級美術(shù)教學(xué)計劃
- 《在細(xì)雨中呼喊》
- 施工防火安全控制措施
- 2024年湄洲灣職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院高職單招語文歷年參考題庫含答案解析
- 二零二五年度施工單位與監(jiān)理人員勞動合同范本3篇
- 二零二五版二手汽車買賣合同附帶保險及保養(yǎng)服務(wù)樣本3篇
- 《科幻小說賞析與寫作》 課件 第5、6章 “反烏托邦”的警示與預(yù)言-《一九八四》;“外星文明”的善意與惡行-《安德的游戲》
- 二零二五年度船員勞動合同與船舶航行安全應(yīng)急演練服務(wù)合同3篇
- 網(wǎng)吧企業(yè)章程范本
- 安徽省書法家協(xié)會會員登記表
- 阿特拉斯基本擰緊技術(shù)ppt課件
- 五格數(shù)理解釋及吉兇對照
- 婚姻狀況聲明書
- 新課程理念下的班主任工作藝術(shù)
- (完整版)企業(yè)破產(chǎn)流程圖(四張)
- 領(lǐng)導(dǎo)激勵藝術(shù)教材
- 化肥對土壤的影響
- 水泥罐抗傾覆驗(yàn)算7頁
- 可行性研究報告 范文“母親水窖”建設(shè)項(xiàng)目可行性研究報告
評論
0/150
提交評論