國(guó)際私法第七章

1、第七章第七章 準(zhǔn)據(jù)法的選擇與適用準(zhǔn)據(jù)法的選擇與適用 7-1 準(zhǔn)據(jù)法的概念與特征 7-2 準(zhǔn)據(jù)法的選擇方法 7-3 確定準(zhǔn)據(jù)法的幾個(gè)特殊問題 發(fā)生時(shí)際沖突、區(qū)際沖突、人際沖突時(shí)準(zhǔn)據(jù)法的確定及先決問題的準(zhǔn)據(jù)法 7-4 準(zhǔn)據(jù)法的查明7-1 準(zhǔn)據(jù)法的概念與特征Applicable Law 6-1-1 準(zhǔn)據(jù)法的概念 the Definition 6-1-2 準(zhǔn)據(jù)法的特征 the Characteristics Substance Law Guidance by Conflict Rule Particular Rules not the logic part of Conflict Rules 7-2

2、準(zhǔn)據(jù)法的選擇方法Choice-of-law Approaches 6-2-1 choice by nature of Statutes 6-2-2 choice by nature of legal relationship 6-2-3 choice by the most significant relationship 6-2-4 choice by the analyses of governmental interests 6-2-5 choice by rule-selecting 6-2-6 choice by depecage 6-2-7 choice by the partie

3、s autonomy 6-2-8 choice by favor to enforcement of judgment 6-2-9 choice by comparative-impairment approach 6-2-10 choice by Kentucky Approach (enough contacts) 6-2-11 choice by functional analysis approach7-3 確定準(zhǔn)據(jù)法的幾個(gè)特殊問題Several Special Issues in Determining Applicable Law 7-3-1 發(fā)生時(shí)際沖突時(shí)準(zhǔn)據(jù)法的確定 7-3-2

4、 發(fā)生區(qū)際沖突時(shí)準(zhǔn)據(jù)法的確定 7-3-3 發(fā)生人際沖突時(shí)準(zhǔn)據(jù)法的確定 7-3-4 先決問題的準(zhǔn)據(jù)法7-4 準(zhǔn)據(jù)法的查明Proof of Applicable Law 7-4-1 外國(guó)法內(nèi)容的查明 Proof of Foreign Law 7-4-2 內(nèi)國(guó)法內(nèi)容的查明 Proof of Domestic Law 7-4-3 國(guó)際條約內(nèi)容的查明 Proof of International Convention 7-4-4 國(guó)際慣例內(nèi)容的查明 Proof of International UsageTraditional “Vested Rights” Approach the “vested r

5、ights” approach to choice of law directs the forum in every case to apply the law of the state in which the rights of the parties vest. Rights are deemed to “vest” in the place where they are “created”i.e., the states in which the particular act occurred or particular relationship was created. The l

6、aw of that state governs all substance issues in the case, wherever suit is brought. In a tort action, for example, the rights and liabilities of the parties “vest” in the jurisdiction where plaintiffs injury occurred, and the law of that state would be applied by all other jurisdictions.Proof of Fo

7、reign Law At common law, the only law a court would recognize was that of its own state. The law of all other states and countries was but a fact. Thus, when choice-of-law rules referred to the law of another state or country, that law had to be pleaded and proved like any other fact. Its determinat

8、ion was for the trier of fact, and the determination was not appealable. Statutory changes in the United States have modified the common law rule. A large number of states have provisions for judicial notice of sister state law, and in a few instance this has been extended to include foreign-country

9、 law.Proof of Foreign Law The Uniform Interstate and International Procedure Act (1962) requires that a party intending to rely on foreign law give reasonable written notice, provides that the issue of foreign law is one for the court and not for the jury, permits the court to consider and relevant

10、materials without being bound by the usual rules of evidence, requires the party to assist the court in determination of the foreign law, and makes the courts decision subject to review on appeal. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 44.1 is modeled after the Uniform Act, and its provisions are essential

11、ly identical with those of the act案例7-1 何內(nèi)特婚姻案（1971年） 本案男方當(dāng)事人住所在英格蘭，于1919年與一個(gè)婚前住所在法國(guó)的女子結(jié)婚。夫妻二人在法國(guó)和英格蘭居住到1924年。是年，妻子在法國(guó)法院獲得離婚，丈夫在1925年得知此事，二人后來(lái)在英格蘭恢復(fù)同居，直到1936年分開；同居期間未生育子女。1969年，丈夫在英格蘭請(qǐng)求宣告離婚。如果按照1967 年以前的沖突規(guī)則，該離婚不能得到承認(rèn)；但按照1967年上議院確定的新沖突規(guī)則，該離婚可以得到承認(rèn)。法院應(yīng)該適用何時(shí)的沖突規(guī)則？7-2內(nèi)地公司與香港公司合同糾紛案 一個(gè)內(nèi)地公司與一個(gè)香港公司在1998年1

12、0月通過電話達(dá)成一批貨物的買賣合同，交貨期限為2000年3月。雙方約定：如果發(fā)生糾紛適用中國(guó)內(nèi)地法律解決。到2000年4月1日，因賣方?jīng)]有交貨，雙方發(fā)生糾紛起訴到內(nèi)地法院。請(qǐng)問：內(nèi)地法院應(yīng)如何適用法律？案例案例7-3 7-3 廣州某法院廣州某法院19861986年關(guān)于李伯年關(guān)于李伯康房產(chǎn)繼承案康房產(chǎn)繼承案 李伯康于1938年在家鄉(xiāng)廣東臺(tái)山與范素賢結(jié)婚，婚后一直無(wú)子女。1943年李伯康前往美國(guó)定居，住在加利福尼亞州洛杉磯。1967年11月，李伯康與周樂蒂在美國(guó)內(nèi)華達(dá)州結(jié)婚。1981年7月，李伯康在美國(guó)洛杉磯去世。在李伯康的遺產(chǎn)中，有一棟位于廣州的四層樓房。1986年5月，已離開廣東臺(tái)山到香港定居多年的范素賢得知李伯康在美國(guó)去世后，到廣州某公證處辦理了繼承上述房產(chǎn)的有關(guān)證明，同年7月領(lǐng)得房屋產(chǎn)權(quán)證。周樂蒂在美國(guó)得知這一情況