含生物質(zhì)炭城市污泥堆肥中溶解性有機質(zhì)的光譜特征

1、中國環(huán)境科學(xué) 2014,34(2:459465 China Environmental Science 含生物質(zhì)炭城市污泥堆肥中溶解性有機質(zhì)的光譜特征閆金龍1,江韜1,2,*,趙秀蘭1,2,魏世強1,2,王定勇1,2,李璐璐1,郭念1,孫文彬1 (1.西南大學(xué)資源環(huán)境學(xué)院,重慶 400716;2.重慶市農(nóng)業(yè)資源與環(huán)境研究重點實驗室,重慶 400716摘要:以外源添加生物質(zhì)炭的城市污泥堆肥過程中溶解性有機質(zhì)(DOM為研究對象,討論了其紫外-可見和熒光光譜特征變化.結(jié)果表明:與對照組相比,外源添加生物質(zhì)炭的處理其堆肥DOM的芳香性和腐殖化程度更高,有利于提高堆肥的腐熟度,且外源添加花生殼炭的處理較

2、添加小麥秸稈炭的處理更有利于堆肥腐熟度的提高.外源添加花生殼炭的處理在堆肥21d后,其堆肥腐熟度可能達到峰值,而外源添加小麥秸稈炭的處理其堆肥腐熟度則隨著堆肥時間的進行而增加.對照組和處理組堆肥DOM的FI0.7,BIX0.8,表明其來源為自生源,可能與微生物對有機物的降解有關(guān).因此,通過對城市污泥堆肥過程中DOM的光譜特征分析,能較好地評估城市污泥堆肥腐熟度的情況.關(guān)鍵詞:生物質(zhì)炭;堆肥;溶解性有機質(zhì)(DOM;紫外光譜;熒光光譜中圖分類號:X705 文獻標識碼:A 文章編號:1000-6923(201402-0459-07Spectral characteristics of dissolv

3、ed organic matter in co-composting process of municipal sludge with biochar. YAN Jin-long1, JIANG Tao1,2*, ZHAO Xiu-lan1,2, WEI Shi-qiang1,2, WANG Ding-yong1,2, LI Lu-lu1, GUO Nian1, SUN Wen-bin1 (1.College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, China;2.Chongqing Key L

4、aboratory of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Chongqing 400716, China. China Environmental Science, 2014,34(2:459465Abstract:Changes in the UV-visible and fluorescence characteristics of DO M from the co-composting process of municipal sludge with two types of biochars were discussed. The res

5、ults showed the aromaticity and humification of DOM from the co-composting with biochars significantly increased compared with control, which indicated in favor of improving the maturity of compost. The treatment with biochar from peanut shell showed the highest maturity, followed by wheat straw bio

6、char. After 21days, compost treated with biochar from peanut shell reached its maximum maturity, while that treated with biochar from wheat straw continued to increase over the whole time. Meanwhile, the DOM from the compost with or without treatment was found to be autochthonous, FI0.7, BIX0.8, mai

7、nly attributed to the microbial decomposition of compost. Thus, the spectral characteristics of DOM are capable of assessing the degree of maturity of compost during the co-composting process with biochars from different source.Key words:biochar;compost;dissolved organic matter (DOM;UV-visible spect

8、rum;fluorescence spectrum隨著我國城市經(jīng)濟的高速發(fā)展,城市污水處理帶來的城市污泥產(chǎn)量急劇增加1.城市污泥是潛在的有機肥原料,同時污泥中還含有病原微生物、重金屬等污染物,極易造成二次污染,因此,對污泥的處置一直是研究的熱點2-3.其中,堆肥是污泥處置及實現(xiàn)無害化、資源化利用的重要方法之一4-5.近年來,為提高堆肥效率,常采用外源添加生物質(zhì)炭的方式改善堆體條件(例如C/N比,含水率,孔隙度,堆肥養(yǎng)分等,提升堆體有機質(zhì)穩(wěn)定性和腐殖化程度6-7.堆肥中有機質(zhì)轉(zhuǎn)化是評估堆肥腐熟程度和環(huán)境安全性的重要基礎(chǔ).堆肥過程中溶解性有機質(zhì)(DOM的變化被認為是能靈敏反映堆肥腐熟狀況的重要指標

9、,且較堆肥的固相組分更具代表性8-9.目前,針對DOM定性研究,應(yīng)用較多的是紫外-可見光譜和同步熒光技術(shù),因其靈敏度高和收稿日期:2013-05-10基金項目:中國博士后科學(xué)基金資助項目(2013M542238;中央高?；究蒲袠I(yè)務(wù)費(XDJK2013C151;西南大學(xué)博士基金(SWU112098;重慶市科委科技攻關(guān)項目(CSTC-2008AC7013460 中國環(huán)境科學(xué) 34卷分析便捷,被廣泛應(yīng)用于自然有機質(zhì)(NOM研究中,尤其是水體DOM歸趨10.相比之下,針對堆肥DOM性質(zhì)的研究較少11-12.目前,已有報道表明添加外源生物質(zhì)炭有利于堆肥固炭,而高C/N比下堆肥腐熟度也相應(yīng)提高13-14

10、,而在該過程中對DOM的探討還相對不足,且以前研究的結(jié)論也并不一致15-16,尤其是對不同調(diào)理劑處理方式下堆肥DOM的性質(zhì)光譜表征缺少關(guān)注17-18.基于此,本研究采用紫外-可見光譜及三維熒光光譜對添加不同生物質(zhì)炭的城市污泥堆肥過程中DOM的光譜特征進行表征,并通過特征參數(shù)的計算,進一步了解不同處理堆肥在堆肥過程中的差異,為進一步提高堆肥效率、正確評估堆肥腐熟程度和環(huán)境安全性提供一定的理論依據(jù).1 材料與方法1.1不同堆肥處理及樣品采集 圖1 堆肥試驗示意Fig.1 The sketch map of compost表1不同處理堆肥的初始物料基本性質(zhì)Table 1 Basic characte

11、ristics of different compostingtreatments堆肥處理全碳(g/kg全氮(g/kg全磷(g/kg pH值CK 182.17 15.85 8.25 7.98 +麥 177.15 15.55 6.54 7.67 +花 210.16 13.92 6.68 7.981.2堆肥DOM提取采用去離子水提取堆肥DOM19.將所采集的堆肥樣品自然風(fēng)干后,磨細,過2mm篩.按土:水=1:6(W/V,采用去離子水與堆肥固體混合后, 25下200r/min振蕩16h,然后400r/min下離心20min,上清液過0.45m濾膜后,濾液即為堆肥DOM樣品.DOM測定TOC和TON(

12、德國,Yena Multi N/C 3000后,濃度以DOC(mg/L計.所有樣品在進行光譜測定前,均稀釋相同倍數(shù)(0.6mLDOM定容到100mL棕色容量瓶.1.3光譜測定紫外-可見光譜在Hitachi U-1800紫外-可見分光光度計上進行測定.掃描波長為200 800nm,程序自動繪制掃描曲線.根據(jù)光譜數(shù)據(jù),計算特征紫外吸光系數(shù)SUV A254nmSUV A254nm= A254/(bc、SUV A280nmSUV A280nm=A280/(bc,單位:L/(mg Cm; A254為波長254nm時吸光度;b為石英吸收池厚度(0.01m;c為DOM濃度(mg/L.同時計算E2/E3(25

13、0nm及365nm時吸光度比值和E4/E6(465nm和665nm時吸光度比值.采用Hitachi F-7000熒光光譜儀對DOM樣品進行三維熒光掃描.激光光源150W氙弧燈, PMT電壓為700V,信噪比110;狹縫寬度E x=5nm, E m=2nm;響應(yīng)時間為自動.掃描范圍:E x=200 450nm,E m=200600nm,掃描速度1200nm/min.測定前,保持樣品溫度恒定,以去離子水做熒光測定2期 閆金龍等:含生物質(zhì)炭城市污泥堆肥中溶解性有機質(zhì)的光譜特征 461熒光強度比值20-21;BIX 為E x =310nm 時,E m 波長分別為380和430nm 時的熒光強度比值22

14、-23; HIX=I434480/(I300344+I434480,式中Ixy 表示在E x =255nm 時,連續(xù)發(fā)射波長范圍熒光強度的積分面積21,23-24.2 結(jié)果與討論2.1 不同處理堆肥過程中DOM 的紫外-可見光譜特征變化 200 400 6008000.00.10.2 0.3 吸光度CK0CK21CK42對照組200 400 600800 0.0 0.10.20.30.4 0.5 0.60.7 吸光度 +麥0+麥21+麥42添加小麥秸稈炭200 400 6008000.00.10.20.30.4 0.50.6吸光度 波長(nm +花0+花21+花42添加花生殼炭圖2 不同堆肥處

15、理過程中DOM 的紫外-可見吸收光譜曲線Fig.2 UV -VIS spectrum of DOM extracted fromdifferent composting treatment progresses譜發(fā)生了明顯的紅移現(xiàn)象,且隨著堆肥時間的進行其紅移現(xiàn)象越來越明顯.造成這種現(xiàn)象的原因可能是在堆肥過程中,處理組堆肥的腐熟度較對照組有大幅度的提高,DOM 共軛結(jié)構(gòu)和芳香結(jié)構(gòu)增多,腐殖化程度增強.其次,表明添加小麥秸稈和花生殼外源生物有機質(zhì)炭后,有利于提高城市污泥堆肥的腐熟度.數(shù),其大小可間接表征有機質(zhì)的芳香性程度, SUV A 254nm 越高,有機質(zhì)芳香度越高26-27.從表2可知,對

16、照組和添加小麥秸稈炭的處理組隨堆肥時間進行,其SUV A 254nm 值不斷增加,表明隨著堆肥的進行,污泥堆肥的腐熟度不斷增加,芳香性結(jié)構(gòu)不斷增多.而添加花生殼炭的處理組在42d 后其值小于堆肥21d 后的SUV A 254nm 值,可能是由于添加花生殼炭的污泥在堆肥21d 達到了腐熟的峰值,之后有機質(zhì)在微生物的作用下開始分解.另外,各堆肥過程中對照組的SUV A 254nm 值總體上小于處理組的值,進一步說明了添加小麥秸稈和花生殼的外源有機質(zhì)炭有利于提高城市污泥堆肥的腐熟度.此外,DOM 在280nm 摩爾吸光系數(shù)(SUV A 280nm 與相對分子質(zhì)量存在顯著正相關(guān)26,28.由表2可知,

17、處理組和對照組的SUV A 280和SUV A 254的變化趨勢基本一致,反映了不同處理堆肥過程中DOM 芳香性增強可能與大分子物質(zhì)的增加有關(guān). Dorado 等29研究表明E 2/E 3與E 4/E 6和有機質(zhì)的腐殖化程度、芳香性及相對分子質(zhì)量成負相關(guān),其值越高,腐殖化程度越低.本試驗中,堆肥過462 中 國 環(huán) 境 科 學(xué) 34卷表2 不同處理堆肥過程中DOM 的紫外-可見光譜特征參數(shù)Table 2 Specific UV -Vis parameters of DOM extracted from different composting treatment processes 樣品 SU

18、V A 254nm L/(mg Cm SUV A 280nmL/(mg CmE 2/E 3 E 4/E 6CK0 1.03 0.87 2.9 1.83CK21 2.68 2.33 2.86 2.50CK42 3.79 3.25 2.68 2.20+麥0 1.49 1.29 2.14 1.42+麥21 3.18 2.69 3.15 2.20 +麥42 3.47 2.95 3.14 2.11+花0 0.60 0.48 3.70 4.00+花21 4.55 3.83 2.74 1.64+花42 3.07 2.49 2.73 1.83 2.2 不同處理堆肥過程中DOM 熒光光譜特征變化及堆肥中DOM

19、的熒光特征和自然水體的DOM 并沒有本質(zhì)區(qū)別,因此,可采用水體DOM 的熒光峰鑒別范圍對堆肥DOM 進行劃分30-32,具體為紫外區(qū)類腐殖酸峰A(230250nm/426466nm;可見光區(qū)類腐殖酸峰C(300305nm/408456nm;類蛋白熒光峰B(270280/326348nm及類蛋白質(zhì)熒光峰D(225230/320360nm.數(shù) 熒光A 峰和熒光C 峰強度的比值r (A,C是一個與有機質(zhì)結(jié)構(gòu)和腐殖化程度相關(guān)的指標.由表3可知,堆肥21d 后,對照組和添加小麥秸稈炭的處理組均隨著堆肥過程的進行,r (A,C值逐漸減小,而添加花生殼炭的處理組r (A,C值逐漸增大,說明在堆肥21d 左右

20、添加花生殼炭的堆肥腐熟度可能達到了峰值,且處理組在堆肥過程中r (A,C值基本上小于對照組.而有研究報道,大分子量、相對穩(wěn)定的芳香性結(jié)構(gòu)是C 峰的主要貢獻者,而A 峰的主要來源是低分子量但熒光效率高的物質(zhì)33,本研究熒光圖譜也發(fā)現(xiàn)隨著堆肥時間的進行,C 峰強度逐漸增大,r (A,C值減小.說明隨著堆肥時間的進行,堆肥腐殖化程度增加,添加外源有機質(zhì)炭有利于堆肥的腐殖化提高,進一步形成穩(wěn)定的腐殖質(zhì).腐殖化指數(shù)(HIX是評價DOM 腐殖化程度的重要指標34-35.由于有機質(zhì)芳香性越強,熒光發(fā)射出現(xiàn)紅移(向長波方向轉(zhuǎn)移,因此HIX 值范圍在01之間,HIX 越高意味著DOM 中碳氫化合物組分越少,腐殖

21、化程度越高.間接水提取或直接抽濾的土壤間隙水DOM 的HIX 在0.60.921,36;而自然水體中DOM 的HIX 一般為:0.7(淡水.不同處理堆肥過程中DOM 的HIX 和海水DOM 的值更為接近,這可能和兩種來源的DOM 都有著明顯的自生源特征有關(guān).研究認為BIX 在0.60.7之間時,DOM主要為陸源輸入,外源輸入特征明顯22,而本研究中BIX 均0.8,進一步證明了堆肥過程中DOM 主要來源為自生源23.2期閆金龍等:含生物質(zhì)炭城市污泥堆肥中溶解性有機質(zhì)的光譜特征 463 200 250 300 350400450500 550600E M (nmE X (n m 0 150 30

22、0 450 600 700CK0200250300350400450500550 600200250300350400450E M (nmE X(n m +麥21E M (nmE X (n m 0 150 300 450 600700CK21200250300350400450500550 600200250300350400450E M (nmE X(n m 0 150 300 450 600 700+麥42E M (nmE X (n m 0 150 300 450 600 700CK42200250300350400450500550 600200250300350400450E M (n

23、m E X(n m 0 150 300 450 600700+花0200 250 300 350400450500550 600E M (nmE X (n m 200250300350400450500550 600E M (nmE X(n m 150300 450 600 700+花21200250300 350 400450500550600E M (nmE X(n m +花42圖3 不同處理堆肥過程中DOM 的三維熒光圖譜Fig.3 3D -EEMs of DOM extracted from different composting treatment processes464 中 國

24、 環(huán) 境 科 學(xué) 34 卷 進一步 ,FI 是評價 DOM 來源的依據(jù) :FI= 1.72.0 時來自于微生物分解,芳香度不高;FI1.7,同時 BIX 均0.8,表明其來源以自生源為 主,可能與微生物對有機物的降解有關(guān). 3.2 外源添加小麥秸稈炭的處理隨堆肥時間的 進行,堆肥 DOM 的 SUVA254nm、SUVA280nm 以及 carbon/nitrogen ratios J. Waste Management and Research, 2013,31(2:203-211. 12 占新華 , 周立祥 ,黃煥忠 . 城市污泥堆肥中水溶性有機物的理化 特性變化 J. 中國環(huán)境科學(xué), 2

25、003,23(4:390-394. 2期 閆金龍等：含生物質(zhì)炭城市污泥堆肥中溶解性有機質(zhì)的光譜特征 Analytica Chimica Acta, 1997,337(2:133-149. 465 13 Bolan N S, Kunhikrishnan A, Choppala G K, et al. Stabilization of carbon in composts and biochars in relation to carbon sequestration and soil fertility J. Sci. Total Environ., 2012,424:264-270. 14 秦

26、 莉,沈玉君,李國學(xué),等.不同 C/N 比對堆肥腐熟度和含氮氣 體 排 放 變 化 的 影 響 J. 農(nóng) 業(yè) 環(huán) 境 科 學(xué) 學(xué) 報 , 2009,28(12: 2668-2673. 15 趙 越,何小松,席北斗,等.雞糞堆肥有機質(zhì)轉(zhuǎn)化的熒光定量化 表征 J. 光譜學(xué)與光譜分析, 2010,30:1555-1560. 16 Spaccini R, Piccolo A. Spectroscopic characterization of compost at different maturity stages J. Clean Soil Air Water, 2008,36:152-157. 1

27、7 Chen W, Westerhoff P, Leenheer J A, et al. Fluorescence excitationemission matrix regional integration to quantify spectra for dissolved organic matter J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2003,37:5701-5710. 18 Smidt E, Meissl K. The applicability of fourier transforms infrared(FT-IR spectroscopy in waste m

28、anagement J. Waste Management, 2007,27(2:268-276. 19 Nierop K G, Jansen B, Verstraten J M. Dissolved organic matter, aluminum and iron interactions: Precipitation induced by metal/carbon ratio, pH and competition J. Sci. Total Environ., 2002,300:201-211. 20 Mcknight D M, Boyer E W, Westerhoff P K, e

29、t al. Spectrofluorometric characterization of dissolved organic matter for indication of precursor organic material and aromaticity J. Limnology and Oceanography, 2001,46(1:38-48. 21 Wickland K P, Neff J C, Aiken G R. Dissolved organic carbon in Alaskan boreal forest: Sources, chemical characteristi

30、cs, and biodegradability J. Ecosystems, 2007,10:1323-1340. 22 Huguet A, Vacher L, Relexans S, et al. Properties of fluorescent dissolved organic matter in the Gironde Estuary J. Organic Geochemistry, 2009,40:706-719. 23 Birdwell J E, Engel A S. Characterization of dissolved organic matter in cave an

31、d spring waters using UV-Vis absorbance and fluorescence spectroscopy J. Organic Geochemistry, 2010,41:270-280. 24 Chen H, Zheng B, Song Y, et al. Correlation between molecular absorption spectral slope ratios and fluorescence humification indices in characterizing CDOM J. Aquatic Science, 2011,73:1

32、03-112. 25 吳豐昌.天然有機質(zhì)及其與污染物的相互作用 M. 北京:科學(xué) 出版社, 2010. 26 Chin Y P, Aiken G R, OLoughlin E. Molecular weight, polydispersity and spectroscopic properties of aquatic humic substances J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 1994,28:1853-1858. 27 Weishaar J L, Aiken G R, Berganmaschi B A, et al. Evaluation of specific

33、 ultraviolet absorbance as an indicator of the chemical composition and reactivity of dissolved organic carbon J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2003,37:4702-4708. 28 Peuravuori J, Pihlaja K. Molecular size distribution and spectroscopic properties of aquatic humic substances J. 29 Dorado J, Gonzlez-Vila F

34、 J, Zancada M C. Pryolytic descriptors responsive to changes in humic acid characteristics after long-term sustainable management of dryland farming systems in Central Spain J. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2003,28:89-97. 30 Ohno T, Cronan C S. Comparative effects of ionic- and nonion

35、ic-resin purification treatments on the chemistry of dissolved organic matter J. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 1997,66(2:119-136. 31 Ohno T, First R. Assessment of the Folin and Ciocalteus method for determining soil phenolic carbon J. Journal of Environmental Quality,

36、 1998,27(4:776-782. 32 Merritt K A, Erich M S. Influence of organic matter decomposition on soluble carbon and its copper-binding capacity J. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2003,32(6:2122-2131. 33 Bakera A, Spencer R G M. Characterization of dissolved organic matter from source to sea using fluor

37、escence and absorbance spectroscopy J. Sci. Total Environ., 2004, 333(1-3:217-232. 34 Zsolnay A, Baigar E, Jimenez M, et al. Differentiating with fluorescence spectroscopy the sources of dissolved organic matter in soils subjected to drying J. Chemosphere, 1999,38(1:45-50. 35 Ohno T, Bro R. Dissolved organic matter characterization using multiway spectral decomposition of fluores