版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
Chapter9
WorkTeam&Groups
StrategiesforSuccessfulTeamsGroups&TeamsGroup-twoormorepeoplewithcommoninterestsorobjectives
Team-asmallnumberofpeoplewithcomplementaryskillswhoarecommittedtoacommonmission,performancegoals,andapproachforwhichtheyholdthemselvesmutuallyaccountableCharacteristicsofaWell-Functioning,EffectiveGroupRelaxed,comfortable,informalatmosphereTaskwellunderstood&acceptedConsensusdecisionmakingPeopleexpressfeelings&ideasConflict&disagreementcenteraroundideasormethodsClearassignmentsmade&acceptedMemberslistenwell&participateGroupawareofitsoperation&functionGroupBehaviorNormsofbehavior-thestandardsthataworkgroupusestoevaluatethebehaviorofitsmembersGroupcohesion-the“interpersonalglue”thatmakesmembersofagroupsticktogetherSocialloafing-thefailureofagroupmembertocontributepersonaltime,effort,thoughts,orotherresourcestothegroupLossofindividuality-asocialprocessinwhichindividualgroupmembersloseself-awareness&itsaccompanyingsenseofaccountability,inhibition,andresponsibilityforindividualbehaviorGroupFormationFormalgroups-officialorassignedgroupsgatheredtoperformvarioustasksneedethnic,gender,cultural,andinterpersonaldiversityneedprofessionalandgeographicaldiversityInformalgroups-unofficialoremergentgroupsthatevolveintheworksettingtogratifyavarietyofmemberneedsnotmetbyformalgroupsStagesofGroupFormationMutualacceptanceFocusisontheinterpersonalrelationsamongthemembersDecisionmakingFocusisondecisionmakingactivitiesrelatedtotasksMotivation&commitmentFocusonself-andgroup-motivation,execution,achievementControl&sanctionsFocusoneffective,efficientunitJoiningGroupsSecurityStatusSelf-EsteemAffiliationPowerGoalAchievementPrestage1StageIFormingStageIIStormingStageIIINormingStageIVPerformingStageVAdjourningStagesofGroupDevelopmentGroupBehaviorModel
ExternalConditionsImposedontheGroupGroupMemberResourcesGroupStructureGroupProcessGroupTaskPerformanceandSatisfactionExternalConditionsImposedontheGroupOrganizationalStrategyAuthorityStructuresFormalRegulationsOrganizationalResourcesPersonnelSelectionsProcessOrganizationalCulturePhysicalWorkSettingGroupLeadersDepartmentManagerSupervisorsForemanProjectLeadersTaskForceHeadChairpersonChiefExecutiveOfficer(CEO)GroupRolesDefinition:Setofexpectedbehaviorpattern,attributedtosomeoneoccupyingagivenpositioninasocialunitRoleIdentityRolePerceptionRoleExpectationsRoleConflictTypesofTeamsProblemsolving-qualitycircleSelf-managedworkteams-mayresultinreductionofmanagerialpositionsCross-functional-samelevelbutdifferentworkareas?Cross-functionalProblem-SolvingSelf-managedTypesofTeamsWorkGroupsWorkTeamsShareInformationNeutral(sometimesNegative)IndividualRandom&VariedCollectivePerformancePositiveIndividual&MutualComplementaryGoalSynergyAccountabilitySkillsComparingWorkGroupsandWorkTeamsGroupsPassThroughTask-OrientedandRelationship-OrientedStages.SomeGroupsGetStuckatCertainStagesandBecomeDysfunctionalOrientationtoTaskTestingandDependenceIntragroupConflictEmotionalResponsetotheDemandsoftheTaskOpenExchangeofRelevantInformationEmergenceofaSolutionDevelopmentofGroupCohesionFunctionalRolesEmergeDissolutionofGroupSTAGE1Orientation(Forming)STAGE5Termination(Adjourning)STAGE2Redefinition(Storming)STAGE3Coordination(Norming)STAGE4Formalization(Performing)GroupsChangeTheirWaysofWorkingatMidstream,FocusingMoreClearlyonTheirGoalandBecomingMoreEffectivePROJECTSTARTSTRANSITIONPROJECTDEADLINEPerformOriginalBehaviorsDropOldBehaviorsPerformNew,MoreEffectiveBehaviors0%50%100%TIMEEXPENDEDManagersShouldConsiderSixFactorsinChoosingGrouporIndividualDecisionMakingFactorGroupIndividualTypeofproblemortaskAcceptanceofdecisionQualityofthesolutionCharacteristicsofindividualsWhendiverseknowledgeandskillsarerequiredWhenacceptancebygroupmembersisvaluedWhentheinputofseveralgroupmemberscanim-provethesolutionWhengroupmembershaveexperiencedworkingtogetherWhenefficiencyisdesiredWhenacceptanceisnotimportantWhena““bestmember”canbeidentifiedWhenindividualscannotcollaborateManagersShouldConsiderSixFactorsinChoosingGrouporIndividualDecisionMaking(Cont.)FactorGroupIndividualOrganizationalcultureAmountoftimeavailableWhentheculturesupportsgroupproblemsolvingWhenrelativelymoretimeisavailableWhencultureiscompetitiveWhenrelativelylittletimeisavailableTable6-1bCohesiveness&ProductivityHighlycohesivegroupsaregenerallymoreproductiveCohesivenessreducestensionandprovidesasupportiveenvironmentGroupnormsplayanimportantroleincohesivenessSettingStandardsMissionValuesLogisticalArrangementsDecisionMakingConflictGroupmembershelptodevelop,follow,andenforcetherules,policies,andproceduresofthegroup.Suchrulesmayrangefromsimpleones,likebeginningontime,tomorecomplexpolicies,suchasprocedurestoarriveatconsensus.GroupCohesivenessTimeSpentTogetherSeverityofInitiationGroupSizeExternalThreatsPreviousSuccessesGroupthinkIrvingJanis’’ModelAntecedentConditions+CohesivenessGroupthinkSymptomsGroupthinkSymptomsLowProbabilityofSuccessGroupthinkCharacteristicsPowerfulSocialPressuresConcurrenceSeekingDehumanizingSolutionsSuppressionofDeviantThoughtsStressManagersShouldAvoidGroupthinkinMakingDecisionsWithGroupsSymptomDescriptionInvulnerabilityRationalizationMoralityStereotypingPressureMembersfeeltheyaresafeandprotectedfromdangers,ostracism,orineffectiveaction.Membersignorewarningsbyrationalizingtheirownorothers’’behavior.Membersbelievetheiractionsareinherentlymoralandethical.Membersviewopponentsastrulyevilorstupidandthusunworthyoforincompetentatnegotiationsarounddifferencesinbeliefsorpositions.Memberspressureallindividualsinthegrouptoconformtothegroup’sdecision;theyallownoquestioningorarguingofalternatives.ManagersShouldAvoidGroupthinkinMakingDecisionsWithGroups(Cont.)SymptomDescriptionSelf-censorshipUnanimity“Mindguarding”Membersdonotquestionthegroup’sdecision.Membersperceivethateveryoneinthegrouphasthesameview.Membersmaykeepadverseinformationfromothermembersthatmightruintheirperceptionsofconsensusandtheeffectivedecision.Table6-2bMajorChangesinLeadershipOccurasTeamsBecomeSelf-DirectedSTAGE1STAGE2STAGE3STAGE4STAGE5Start-UpSateofConfusionLeader-CenteredTeamsTightlyFormedTeamsSelf-DirectedTeamsMangersCanUseThreePointsofLeveragetoEnhanceGroupTaskPerformancePointsofLeverageProcessCriteriaofEffectivenessGroupStructureOrganizationalContextCoachingandConsultationAmpleeffortSufficientknowl-edgeandskillMotivationalstruc-tureofgrouptaskGroupcompositionOrganizationalrewardsystemOrganizationaleducationsystemRemedyingcoor-dinationproblemsandbuildinggroupcommitmentRemedyinginap-propriate““weight-ing”ofmemberinputsandfoster-ingcross-trainingMangersCanUseThreePointsofLeveragetoEnhanceGroupTaskPerformance(Cont.)PointsofLeverageProcessCriteriaofEffectivenessGroupStructureOrganizationalContextCoachingandConsultationTask-appropriateperformancestrategiesGroupnormsthatregulatememberbehaviorandfosterscanningandplan-ningOrganizationalinformationsystemRemedyingimple-mentationprob-lemsandfosteringcreativityinstrat-egydeploymentTable6-3bDiverseTeamsOfferBothAdvantagesandDisadvantagesintheWorkplaceAdvantagesDisadvantagesIncreasednumberofperspectivesMultipleinterpretationslikelyGreateropennesstonewideasIncreasedflexibilityIncreasedcreativityImprovedproblemsolvingImprovedunderstandingofforeignemployeesorcustomersIncreasedambiguityIncreasedcomplexityIncreasedconfusionIncreasedmistrustPotentialmiscommunicationDifficultyinreachingagreementsDifficultyinreconcilingdiverseperspectivesDifficultyinreachingconsensusDecreasedgroupcohesionTable6-4DifferencesthatInfluencePerceptions,Which,inTurn,InfluenceIntergoupRelationsATTITUDINALSETSCompetitiveCooperativeSTATUSDIFFERENCESPERCEPTIONSINTERGROUPRELATIONSORIENTATIONGoalsTimeSocialRelationsofTasks&ConflictINDEPENDENCEDEPENDENCEINTERDEPENDENCETASKBTASKBTASKBTASKATASKATASKAMangersShouldBewareofTheseTypesofNegotiators,WhoDeliberatelyChooseaStyleThatUsesTheseParticularTacticsTypeMethodTheaggressive-openernegotiatorThelong-pausenegotiatorThemockingnegotiatorDiscomforttheothersidebymakingcuttingremarksabouttheirpreviousperformance,theirnumbers,theirunreasonableness,oranythingthatcanbeusedtoinsinuatethattheoppositionishardlyworthspeakingto.Listentotheothersidebutdonotanswertheirprop-ositionsimmediatelybutratherappeartogivethemconsiderablethoughtwiththeresultthatlongsilencesensueforthepurposeofgettingtheothertorevealasmuchoftheircaseaspossiblewithoutrevealingyourown.Mockandsneeratyouropposition’’sproposalstogettheothersideso““uptight””thattheysaysomethingthattheywillregretlater.(Cont.)TypeMethodTheinterrogatorThecloak-of-reason-ablenessnegotiatorThedivide-and-conquernegotiatorMeetallproposalswithsearching,proddingquestionsthatarecouchedinsuchawaythattheoppositionfeelsthattheyhavenotthoroughlydonetheirhome-work.Challengeanyanswersinaconfrontingmannerandasktheoppositiontoexplainfurtherwhattheymean.Appeartobeagreeableandhelpfulwhilemakingimpossibledemandsforthepurposeofwinningthefriendshipandconfidenceoftheopposition.Producedissensionamongtheoppositionsothattheyhavetopaymoreattentiontotheirowninternaldis-agreementsratherthanthedisagreementswithyourside.Allywithonememberoftheteamandtrytoplayhimorheroffagainsttheothermembersoftheteam.(Cont.)TypeMethodTheBillyBunternegotiatorPretendtobeparticularlydenseand,bysodoing,exasperatetheoppositioninhopsthatatleastonememberoftheopposingteamwillrevealinformationashetriestofindincreasinglysimplewaystodescribeproposals,witheachproposalbeingelaboratedandamplifiedsothatBillyBuntercanunderstandit.FourCategoriesofRolesGroupTaskRoles:roleswhichfacilitatetheselectionanddefinitionofacommonproblemandsolution.GroupBuildingandMaintenance:roleswhichincreasethefunctioningofthegroupasagroup.IndividualRoles:roleswhichareorientedtowardthesatisfactionofindividual’sneeds.CreativeRoles:roleswhichinvolveusingcreativitytoidentifypossiblesolutions.GroupTaskRolesTheInitiator-ContributorSuggestsorproposesnewideasmayincludethesuggestion:foranewgroupanewwaytoviewaproblemanewwaytoaddressaproblemwithinthegroupanewprocedureforthegroupanewwaytoorganizethegroupTheInformationSeekerSeeksclarificationofsuggestionsmadeintermsoftheirfactualadequacy,forauthoritativeinformationandfacetspertinenttotheproblembeingdiscussed.TheOpinionSeekerAsksnotprimarilyforthefactsofthecasebutforaclarificationofthevaluespertinenttowhatthegroupisundertakingorofvaluesinvolvedinasuggestionmadeorinalternativesuggestions.TheInformationGiverOffersfactsorgeneralizationswhichare““authoritative”orrelateshisownexperiencepertinentlytothegroupproblem.TheOpinionGiverStateshis/herbelieforopinionpertinentlytoasuggestionmadeortoalternativesuggestions.Theemphasisisonhis/herproposalofwhatshouldbecomethegroup’sviewofpertinentvalues,notprimarilyuponrelevantfactsorinformation.TheCoordinatorShowsorclarifiestherelationshipsamongvariousideasandsuggestionsTriestopullideasandsuggestionstogetherTriestocoordinatetheactivitiesofvariousmembersTheEvaluator-CriticSubjectstheaccomplishmentsofthegrouptosomestandardorsetofstandardsofgroupfunctioninginthecontextofthegrouptask.Myevaluatethe““practicality”,“l(fā)ogic”,“Facts”,or“procedures”TheEnergizerProdsthegrouptoactionordecision.Attemptstostimulateorarousethegrouptogreaterorhigherqualitywork.TheRecorderWritesdownsuggestions.Makesarecordofgroupdecisions(maybedownviamemory).Therecorderroleisthe““groupmemory.””GroupBuildingandMaintenanceRolesTheEncouragerPraises,agreeswithandacceptsthecontributionsofothers.Indicateswarmth,solidarityinattitudetowardothers.Offerscommendationandpraiseinvariouswaysandindicatesacceptanceofothers,TheHarmonizerMediatesthedifferencesbetweenmembersAttemptstoreconciledisagreements.Relievestensioninconflictsituations.TheCompromiserOperatesfromwithinaconflictinwhichhis/herideasorpositionisinvolved.Mayoffercompromisebyyieldingstatus,admittingerror,orbycoming““halfway”inmeetinganother.TheGate-Keeper&ExpediterAttemptstokeepcommunicationopenbyfacilitatingparticipationofothers.Proposesregulationoftheflowofcommunication.TheFollowerGoesalongwiththemovementofthegroup.Passivelyacceptstheideasofothers.Servesasanaudienceforothersinthegroupaswellasforgroupdiscussionanddecision.Attemptsbyindividualstosatisfypersonalneeds.Numeroustypes-fromSociologyandPsychology.IndividualRolesTheMonopolistDef:Onewhochattersonincessantlyduetoanxietywhensilent.Effect:Groupgetsconcerned,thenfrustratedandangry.Maybeafraidtoconfrontbecausethentheymustfillthevoid.Help-RejectingComplainerDef.:requestshelpthanrejects;takesproblemininsolvabilityofproblems;blamesauthority,conflictedaboutdependencyfeelinghelplessanddistrusting.Effects:seenasgreedyanduserofgroupenergy;membersbecomebored,confused,irritatedandfrustrated.Self-RighteousMoralistDef.:strongneedtoberight.Demonstratessuperiorityviapoiseandunconcernedaboutbeingliked.Deepunderlyingshame.Effect:mobilizessomuchresentmentthatmaybeforcedoutofthegroup.CreativeGroupRolesIdeaGeneratorLookfornewwaystodothings.Tendtofocusonlyonideasandconcepts.Areresultdriven.DesignersSeethebigpicture.Provideguidanceandtools.Defineperformancestandards.Identifyresourcesneededtocompleteprojects.PromotersVisualizeendresult.Optimistic.Promoteideasandgivemomentum.ManagersCanUseThisChecklisttoDiagnosetheRolesPlayedbyEachTeamMemberTASKORIENTEDMAINTENANCEINDIVIDUALAgendaSetterAnalyzerCoordinatorEvaluatorInformationGiverInformationSeekerIntuitorOtherEncouragerFollowerGatekeeperGroupObserverHarmonizerStandardSetterOtherAvoiderBlockerClownDominatorRecognitionSeekerOtherGroupNormsAcceptablestandardsofbehavior,thataresharedbythegroup’’smembers.FormalNormsexplicitlystatedInformalNormshabitbecomesnormCommonClassesofNormsPerformancerelatedprocessesAppearancefactorsInformalsocialarrangementsAllocationofresourcesBehaviorscanbecomeNormsCriticaleventsingroup’’shistoryPrimacyCarry-overfrompastsituationsExplicitstatementsmadebyagroupsmemberReasonsabehaviormightbecomea““norm””Tofacilitatethegroup’ssurvival.Ifitincreasesthepredictabilityofgroupmembers’’behaviors.Toreduceembarrassinginterpersonalproblemsforgroupmembers.Toallowmemberstoexpresscentralvaluesofthegroup.Toclarifywhatisdistinctiveaboutthegroup’sidentity.StatusSociallydefinedpositionorrankgiventogroupsorgroupmembersbyothers“Inthestatushierarchyoflife,nothingdoesn’tmatter.””Examples:titles,relationships,pay&benefits,workschedules,officeamenitiesGroupSizeGroupswithanoddnumbertendtoperformbetterGroupsof5-7seemtobea““happymedium”SmallergroupsfasterLargergroupsbetterdecisions“socialloafing””EliminatingSocialLoafingMakeeachperformeridentifiable.PublicPostingInterestingWorkRewardsforContributionsPunishmentThreatsSatisfactionisHigherSmallgroupsUniformstatusandnormsamonggroupmembersUsehigherlevelskillsMeaningfulworkSignificanteffectofoutcomesPositivefeedbackWhengroupsexperiencesubstantialautonomyPositiveBehaviorsMaking““I””statementssuchas““Ifeel,”““Ithink,”““Ineed.”Activelylisteningtopromotetwo-waycommunication.Respectingothers’needs,feelings,andrightsbyallowingotherstodisagree.Sharinginformationandexpertiseopenly.NegativeBehaviorsUnwillingnesstosetasidepersonalagendas.Aggressivelyusing““always”or““never”tointimidateothers.Displayinganegativeattitude.Judgingothers.Wantingtobeastarratherthanpartoftheprocess.MatureGroupCharacteristicsPurposeandMissionMaybeassignedormayemergefromthegroupGroupoftenquestions,reexamines,&modifiesmission&purposeMissionconvertedintospecificagenda,cleargoals,&asetofcriticalsuccessfactorsMatureGroupCharacteristicsBehavioralNorms-well-understoodstandardsofbehaviorwithinagroupFormal&writtenGroundrulesformeetingsInformalbutunderstoodIntra-groupsocializingDresscodesMatureGroupCharacteristicsGroupcohesion-interpersonalattractionbindinggroupmemberstogetherEnablesgroupstoexerciseeffectivecontroloverthemembersGroupswithhighcohesivenessdemonstratelowertension&anxietydemonstratelessvariationinproductivitydemonstratebettermembersatisfaction,commitment&communicationCohesiveness&Work-RelatedTensionGroupCohesivenessfromlowtohighNumberofgroups“Doesyourworkevermakeyoujumpyornervous?”FromS.E.Seashore,GroupCohesivenessintheIndustrialWorkForce,1954.ResearchconductedbyStanleyE.SeashoreattheInstituteforSocialResearch,UniversityofMichigan.Reprintedbypermission.MatureGroupCharacteristicsStatusstructure-thesetofauthority&taskrelationsamongagroup’smembersHierarchicaloregalitarianOftenleadershipissharedDiversitystylesContributorCollaboratorCommunicatorChallengerData/InfoMissionFacilitatorDevil’sadvocateGoodwhenperformingcomplicated,complex,inter-relatedand/ormorevoluminousworkthanonepersoncanhandleGoodwhenknowledge,talent,skills,&abilitiesaredispersedacrossorganizationalmembersEmpowerment&collaboration;notpower&competitionWhyTeams?QualityCircles&TeamsQualitycircles(QC)-asmallgroupofemployeeswhoworkvoluntarilyoncompanytime,typicallyonehourperweek,toaddresswork-relatedproblemsQC’sdealwithsubstantiveissuesDonotrequirefinaldecisionauthorityQC’sneedperiodicreenergizingQualityteam-ateamthatispartofanorganization’sstructure&isempoweredtoactonitsdecisionsregardingproduct&qualityserviceSocialBenefitsofTeamsPsychologicalintimacy-emotional&psychologicalclosenesstootherteamorgroupmembersIntegratedintimacy-closenessachievedthroughtasks&activitiesTeamTaskFunctionsTaskfunctions-thoseactivitiesdirectlyrelatedtotheeffectivecompletionoftheteam’sworkInitiateactivitiesDiagnoseproblemsCoordinateactivitiesElaborateconceptsSummarizeideasEvaluateeffectivenessGiveinformationTestideasSeekinformationTeamMaintenanceFunctionsMaintenancefunctions-thoseactivitiesessentialtotheeffective,satisfyinginterpersonalrelationshipswithinateamorgroupSupportothersHarmonizeconflictTestgroupdecisionsTestconsensusExpressmemberfeelingsReducetensionFollowothers’leadSetstandardsGatekeepercommunicationEmpowermentAnattributeofapersonorofanorganization’sculturePreparation&carefulplanningfocusesempoweredemployeesEncouragesparticipationFoundationsforEmpowermentOrganizationalfoundationsTeam-orientedworkdesignParticipative,supportiveorganizationalcultureIndividualPrerequisitesforEmpowermentThecapabilitytobecomepsychologicallyinvolvedinparticipativeactivitiesThemotivationtoactautonomouslyThecapacitytoseetherelevanceofparticipationforone’sownwellbeingEmpowermentSkillsCompetenceskills-masteryandexperienceinone’schosendiscipline&professionProcessskills-includingnegotiatingskillsDevelopmentofcooperativeandhelpingbehaviorsCommunicationskills-skillsinselfexpression&skillsinreflectivelisteningSelf-ManagedTeamsSelfmanagedteams-teamsthatmakedecisionsthatwereoncereservedformanagersHowdoesanorganizationavoidtherisksofselfmanagedteams?moralereductionincreasedconflictgroupthinkUpperEchelons:TeamsattheTopMulticulturalTeamsMulticulturalgroupsrepresentthreeormoreethnicbackgrounds.Diversitymayincreaseuncertainty,complexity,&inherentconfusioningroupprocesses.Culturallydiversegroupsmaygeneratemore&betterideas&limitgroupthink.ExecutiveTenure&OrganizationalPerformanceOrganizationalperformancerelativetotheindustryaverageHighLow1714CEOtenure(years)Source:D.Hambrick,TheSeasonsofanExecutive’’sTenure,keynoteaddress,theSixthAnnualTexasConferenceonOrganizations,LagoVista,Texas,April,1991.TriangleforManaging
intheNewTeamEnvironmentManagerIndividualsTeamL.Hirschhorn,ManagingintheNewTeamEnvironment,(pages13/14).Copyright?1991Addison-WesleyPublishingCompany,Inc.ReprintedbypermissionofAddisonWesleyLongman.9、靜靜夜夜四四無無鄰鄰,,荒荒居居舊舊業(yè)業(yè)貧貧。。。。12月月-2212月月-22Thursday,December22,202210、雨雨中中黃黃葉葉樹樹,,燈燈下下白白頭頭人人。。。。14:55:5514:55:5514:5512/22/20222:55:55P
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 預(yù)埋件委托加工合同模板
- 茶室合作合同模板簡(jiǎn)短
- 餐館鐘點(diǎn)工合同(2篇)
- 培訓(xùn)內(nèi)訓(xùn)合同模板
- 水暖建材合同模板
- 別墅包施工合同模板
- 包運(yùn)費(fèi)供貨合同模板
- 石供貨合同模板
- 裝修自裝合同模板
- 銷售管道裝修合同模板
- joyoj集控站防誤系統(tǒng)介紹課件
- 食安員抽考必備知識(shí)考試題庫(kù)(含答案)
- 貴州省安順市各縣區(qū)鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)行政村村莊村名明細(xì)及行政區(qū)劃劃分代碼居民村民委員會(huì)
- 船舶保安職責(zé)-保安意識(shí)考試題庫(kù)(含答案)
- 維克多英語書寫紙A4
- 電商文案策劃與視覺營(yíng)銷實(shí)戰(zhàn)教案
- 預(yù)防接種人員崗位培訓(xùn)習(xí)題(Ⅰ類培訓(xùn)練習(xí)題庫(kù)共385題)
- 部編人教版四年級(jí)上冊(cè)語文全冊(cè)教學(xué)反思(修訂)
- 書法第一課精品課件
- 體液調(diào)節(jié)與神經(jīng)調(diào)節(jié)的關(guān)系(第2課時(shí))課件 高二生物人教版選擇性必修一
- 畢業(yè)論文-如何寫論文摘要課件
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論